1
|
Shi L, Bai H, Li Y, Yuan J, Wang P, Wang Y, Ni A, Jiang L, Ge P, Bian S, Zong Y, Isa AM, Tesfay HH, Yang F, Ma H, Sun Y, Chen J. Analysis of DNA Methylation Profiles in Mandibular Condyle of Chicks With Crossed Beaks Using Whole-Genome Bisulfite Sequencing. Front Genet 2021; 12:680115. [PMID: 34306022 PMCID: PMC8298039 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.680115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Crossed beaks have been observed in at least 12 chicken strains around the world, which severely impairs their growth and welfare. To explore the intrinsic factor causing crossed beaks, this study measured the length of bilateral mandibular ramus of affected birds, and investigated the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of normal and affected sides of mandibular condyle. Results showed that the trait was caused by impaired development of unilateral mandibular ramus, which is extended through calcification of mandibular condyle. The methylation levels in the CG contexts were higher than that of CHG and CHH, with the highest methylation level of gene body region, followed by transcription termination sites and downstream. Subsequently, we identified 1,568 differentially methylated regions and 1,317 differentially methylated genes in CG contexts. Functional annotation analysis of Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes showed that these genes were involved in bone mineralization and bone morphogenesis. Furthermore, by combining the WGBS and previous RNA-Seq data, 11 overlapped genes were regulated by both long non-coding RNA and DNA methylation. Among them, FIGNL1 is an important gene in calcification of mandibular condyle. Generally, because the affected genes play key roles in maintaining mandibular calcification, these changes may be pivotal factors of crossed beaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Shi
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Bai
- Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, The Ministry of Education of China, Institutes of Agricultural Science and Technology Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Yunlei Li
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jingwei Yuan
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Panlin Wang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanmei Wang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Aixin Ni
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Linlin Jiang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Pingzhuang Ge
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shixiong Bian
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yunhe Zong
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Adamu Mani Isa
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hailai Hagos Tesfay
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Fujian Yang
- Guangxi Shenhuang Group Co., Ltd., Yulin, China
| | - Hui Ma
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yanyan Sun
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jilan Chen
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heslop JA, Kia R, Pridgeon CS, Sison-Young RL, Liloglou T, Elmasry M, Fenwick SW, Mills JS, Kitteringham NR, Goldring CE, Park BK. Donor-Dependent and Other Nondefined Factors Have Greater Influence on the Hepatic Phenotype Than the Starting Cell Type in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Hepatocyte-Like Cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 2019; 6:1321-1331. [PMID: 28456008 PMCID: PMC5442714 DOI: 10.1002/sctm.16-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug‐induced liver injury is the greatest cause of post‐marketing drug withdrawal; therefore, substantial resources are directed toward triaging potentially dangerous new compounds at all stages of drug development. One of the major factors preventing effective screening of new compounds is the lack of a predictive in vitro model of hepatotoxicity. Primary human hepatocytes offer a metabolically relevant model for which the molecular initiating events of hepatotoxicity can be examined; however, these cells vary greatly between donors and dedifferentiate rapidly in culture. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)‐derived hepatocyte‐like cells (HLCs) offer a reproducible, physiologically relevant and genotypically normal model cell; however, current differentiation protocols produce HLCs with a relatively immature phenotype. During the reprogramming of somatic cells, the epigenome undergoes dramatic changes; however, this “resetting” is a gradual process, resulting in an altered differentiation propensity, skewed toward the lineage of origin, particularly in early passage cultures. We, therefore, performed a comparison of human hepatocyte‐ and dermal fibroblast‐derived iPSCs, assessing the impact of epigenetic memory at all stages of HLC differentiation. These results provide the first isogenic assessment of the starting cell type in human iPSC‐derived HLCs. Despite a trend toward improvement in hepatic phenotype in albumin secretion and gene expression, few significant differences in hepatic differentiation capacity were found between hepatocyte and fibroblast‐derived iPSCs. We conclude that the donor and inter‐clonal differences have a greater influence on the hepatocyte phenotypic maturity than the starting cell type. Therefore, it is not necessary to use human hepatocytes for generating iPSC‐derived HLCs. Stem Cells Translational Medicine2017;6:1321–1331
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Heslop
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Kia
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher S Pridgeon
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| | - Rowena L Sison-Young
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| | - Triantafillos Liloglou
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Elmasry
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom.,University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen W Fenwick
- University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - John S Mills
- AstraZeneca, Personalised Healthcare and Biomarkers, Alderley Park, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Neil R Kitteringham
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| | - Chris E Goldring
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| | - Bong K Park
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Division of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, the Institute of Translational Medicine, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Li F, Feng X, Yang H, Zhu A, Pang J, Han L, Zhang T, Yao X, Wang F. Genome-wide analysis of DNA Methylation profiles on sheep ovaries associated with prolificacy using whole-genome Bisulfite sequencing. BMC Genomics 2017; 18:759. [PMID: 28969601 PMCID: PMC5625832 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4068-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ovulation rate and litter size are important reproductive traits in sheep with high economic value. Recent work has revealed a potential link between DNA methylation and prolificacy. However, a genome-wide study that sought to identify potential DNA methylation sites involved in sheep prolificacy indicated that it is still unknown. Here, we aimed to investigate the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of Hu sheep ovaries by comparing a high-prolificacy group (HP, litter size of three for at least 2 consecutive lambings) and low prolificacy group (LP, litter size of one for at least 2 consecutive lambings) using deep whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). Results First, our results demonstrated lower expression levels of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) genes in the ovaries of the HP group than that in the ovaries of the LP group. Both groups showed similar proportions of methylation at CpG sites but different proportions at non-CpG sites. Subsequently, we identified 70,899 differential methylated regions (DMRs) of CG, 16 DMRs of CHG, 356 DMRs of CHH and 12,832 DMR-related genes(DMGs). Gene Ontology (GO) analyses revealed that some DMGs were involved in regulating female gonad development and ovarian follicle development. Finally, we found that 10 DMGs, including BMP7, BMPR1B, CTNNB1, FST, FSHR, LHCGR, TGFB2 and TGFB3, are more likely to be involved in prolificacy of Hu sheep, as assessed by correlation analysis and listed in detail. Conclusions This study revealed the global DNA methylation pattern of sheep ovaries associated with high and low prolificacy groups, which may contribute to a better understanding of the epigenetic regulation of sheep reproductive capacity. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4068-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanli Zhang
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Fengzhe Li
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Xu Feng
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Hua Yang
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Aoxiang Zhu
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Jing Pang
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Le Han
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Tingting Zhang
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Xiaolei Yao
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China
| | - Feng Wang
- Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Mutton Sheep and Goat Industry, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, No.1 Weigang, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210095, China.
| |
Collapse
|