1
|
Chhetri KB. DNA compaction and chromatin dynamics: The role of cationic polyamines and proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2025; 756:151538. [PMID: 40058308 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2025] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025]
Abstract
DNA compaction by polyaminic cations and proteins involves reversible condensation mechanisms. Polyamines, metal cations, and histone proteins are utilized to compact lengthy DNA chains. Chromatin organization begins with nucleosomal arrays, further compacted by linker histones. Various factors such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-histone proteins influence chromatin structure. Posttranslational modifications like acetylation and methylation alter nucleosome shape. Polyamines induce significant phase transitions, while cationic surfactants drive conformational changes in DNA. In sperm cells, protamines replace histones, leading to dense DNA packing. Despite advances, unresolved aspects persist in understanding the dynamic regulation of chromatin structure, highlighting avenues for future research. An overview of current knowledge and cutting-edge discoveries in the field of reversible DNA compaction induced by charged polyamines and histone proteins is presented in this work, highlighting emerging mechanisms of chromatin compaction and their relevance to cellular function, disease, and potential therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khadka B Chhetri
- Department of Physics, Prithvinarayan Campus, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reijns MAM, Parry DA, Williams TC, Nadeu F, Hindshaw RL, Rios Szwed DO, Nicholson MD, Carroll P, Boyle S, Royo R, Cornish AJ, Xiang H, Ridout K, Schuh A, Aden K, Palles C, Campo E, Stankovic T, Taylor MS, Jackson AP. Signatures of TOP1 transcription-associated mutagenesis in cancer and germline. Nature 2022; 602:623-631. [PMID: 35140396 PMCID: PMC8866115 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04403-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The mutational landscape is shaped by many processes. Genic regions are vulnerable to mutation but are preferentially protected by transcription-coupled repair1. In microorganisms, transcription has been demonstrated to be mutagenic2,3; however, the impact of transcription-associated mutagenesis remains to be established in higher eukaryotes4. Here we show that ID4-a cancer insertion-deletion (indel) mutation signature of unknown aetiology5 characterized by short (2 to 5 base pair) deletions -is due to a transcription-associated mutagenesis process. We demonstrate that defective ribonucleotide excision repair in mammals is associated with the ID4 signature, with mutations occurring at a TNT sequence motif, implicating topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) activity at sites of genome-embedded ribonucleotides as a mechanistic basis. Such TOP1-mediated deletions occur somatically in cancer, and the ID-TOP1 signature is also found in physiological settings, contributing to genic de novo indel mutations in the germline. Thus, although topoisomerases protect against genome instability by relieving topological stress6, their activity may also be an important source of mutations in the human genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A M Reijns
- Disease Mechanisms, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - David A Parry
- Disease Mechanisms, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas C Williams
- Disease Mechanisms, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Biomedical Genomics, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ferran Nadeu
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebecca L Hindshaw
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Diana O Rios Szwed
- Disease Mechanisms, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael D Nicholson
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paula Carroll
- Disease Mechanisms, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shelagh Boyle
- Genome Regulation, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Romina Royo
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Hang Xiang
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kate Ridout
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anna Schuh
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Konrad Aden
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Claire Palles
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elias Campo
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Fonaments Clínics, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tatjana Stankovic
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin S Taylor
- Biomedical Genomics, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Andrew P Jackson
- Disease Mechanisms, MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu J, Wang Z, Lu W, Jiang H, Lu J, Qiu J, Ye G. EZH2 promotes gastric cancer cells proliferation by repressing p21 expression. Pathol Res Pract 2019; 215:152374. [PMID: 30952377 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
EZH2 is a core component of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which catalyzes trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and promotes carcinogenesis by epigenetically silencing many tumor suppressor genes. Increased EZH2 expression is a marker of advanced and metastatic in many cancers, including lung, prostate and breast cancer, and it has been considered as a potential novel therapeutic target. However, the clinical significance and molecular mechanisms of EZH2 controlling gastric cancer cell proliferation and invasion are not well documented. In this study, immunohistochemical analysis was conducted to investigate the EZH2 expression in gastric cancer. We found that EZH2 levels were increased in gastric cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. Moreover, patients with high levels of EZH2 expression had a relatively poor prognosis. Furthermore, knockdown of EZH2 expression by siRNA could impair cell proliferation and invasion both in vitro and vivo. Finally, we found that EZH2 influences gastric cancer cells proliferation partly through regulating p21 expression. Our findings present that EZH2 over-expression can be identified as a poor prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiewei Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Qiu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, People's Republic of China.
| | - Guochao Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asaka MN, Kawaguchi A, Sakai Y, Mori K, Nagata K. Polycomb repressive complex 2 facilitates the nuclear export of the influenza viral genome through the interaction with M1. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33608. [PMID: 27646999 PMCID: PMC5028886 DOI: 10.1038/srep33608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The organization of nuclear domains is crucial for biological events including virus infection. Newly synthesized influenza viral genome forms viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complexes and is exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm through a CRM1-dependent pathway mediated by viral proteins M1 and NS2. However, the spatio-temporal regulation of the progeny vRNP in the nucleus is still unclear. Here we found that polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which contains a methyltransferase subunit EZH2 and catalyzes histone H3K27me3 for the formation of facultative heterochromatin, is a positive factor for the virus production. Depletion of PRC2 complex showed the nuclear accumulation of vRNP and the reduction of M1-vRNP complex formation. We also found that PRC2 complex directly binds to M1, and facilitates the interaction of M1 with vRNP. In conclusion, we propose that the progeny vRNP could be recruited to facultative heterochromatin and assembled into the export complex mediated by PRC2 complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masamitsu N Asaka
- Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kawaguchi
- Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Ph.D. Program in Human Biology, School of Integrative and Global Majors, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yuri Sakai
- Ph.D. Program in Human Biology, School of Integrative and Global Majors, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kotaro Mori
- Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kyosuke Nagata
- Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Altered primary chromatin structures and their implications in cancer development. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2016; 39:195-210. [PMID: 27007278 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-016-0276-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer development is a complex process involving both genetic and epigenetic changes. Genetic changes in oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes are generally considered as primary causes, since these genes may directly regulate cellular growth. In addition, it has been found that changes in epigenetic factors, through mutation or altered gene expression, may contribute to cancer development. In the nucleus of eukaryotic cells DNA and histone proteins form a structure called chromatin which consists of nucleosomes that, like beads on a string, are aligned along the DNA strand. Modifications in chromatin structure are essential for cell type-specific activation or repression of gene transcription, as well as other processes such as DNA repair, DNA replication and chromosome segregation. Alterations in epigenetic factors involved in chromatin dynamics may accelerate cell cycle progression and, ultimately, result in malignant transformation. Abnormal expression of remodeler and modifier enzymes, as well as histone variants, may confer to cancer cells the ability to reprogram their genomes and to yield, maintain or exacerbate malignant hallmarks. At the end, genetic and epigenetic alterations that are encountered in cancer cells may culminate in chromatin changes that may, by altering the quantity and quality of gene expression, promote cancer development. METHODS During the last decade a vast number of studies has uncovered epigenetic abnormalities that are associated with the (anomalous) packaging and remodeling of chromatin in cancer genomes. In this review I will focus on recently published work dealing with alterations in the primary structure of chromatin resulting from imprecise arrangements of nucleosomes along DNA, and its functional implications for cancer development. CONCLUSIONS The primary chromatin structure is regulated by a variety of epigenetic mechanisms that may be deregulated through gene mutations and/or gene expression alterations. In recent years, it has become evident that changes in chromatin structure may coincide with the occurrence of cancer hallmarks. The functional interrelationships between such epigenetic alterations and cancer development are just becoming manifest and, therefore, the oncology community should continue to explore the molecular mechanisms governing the primary chromatin structure, both in normal and in cancer cells, in order to improve future approaches for cancer detection, prevention and therapy, as also for circumventing drug resistance.
Collapse
|
6
|
Feinberg AP, Koldobskiy MA, Göndör A. Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression. Nat Rev Genet 2016; 17:284-99. [PMID: 26972587 DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 624] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This year is the tenth anniversary of the publication in this journal of a model suggesting the existence of 'tumour progenitor genes'. These genes are epigenetically disrupted at the earliest stages of malignancies, even before mutations, and thus cause altered differentiation throughout tumour evolution. The past decade of discovery in cancer epigenetics has revealed a number of similarities between cancer genes and stem cell reprogramming genes, widespread mutations in epigenetic regulators, and the part played by chromatin structure in cellular plasticity in both development and cancer. In the light of these discoveries, we suggest here a framework for cancer epigenetics involving three types of genes: 'epigenetic mediators', corresponding to the tumour progenitor genes suggested earlier; 'epigenetic modifiers' of the mediators, which are frequently mutated in cancer; and 'epigenetic modulators' upstream of the modifiers, which are responsive to changes in the cellular environment and often linked to the nuclear architecture. We suggest that this classification is helpful in framing new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P Feinberg
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 855 N. Wolfe Street, Rangos 570, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - Michael A Koldobskiy
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 855 N. Wolfe Street, Rangos 570, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - Anita Göndör
- Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Nobels väg 16, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rafique S, Thomas JS, Sproul D, Bickmore WA. Estrogen-induced chromatin decondensation and nuclear re-organization linked to regional epigenetic regulation in breast cancer. Genome Biol 2015; 16:145. [PMID: 26235388 PMCID: PMC4536608 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0719-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epigenetic changes are being increasingly recognized as a prominent feature of cancer. This occurs not only at individual genes, but also over larger chromosomal domains. To investigate this, we set out to identify large chromosomal domains of epigenetic dysregulation in breast cancers. RESULTS We identify large regions of coordinate down-regulation of gene expression, and other regions of coordinate activation, in breast cancers and show that these regions are linked to tumor subtype. In particular we show that a group of coordinately regulated regions are expressed in luminal, estrogen-receptor positive breast tumors and cell lines. For one of these regions of coordinate gene activation, we show that regional epigenetic regulation is accompanied by visible unfolding of large-scale chromatin structure and a repositioning of the region within the nucleus. In MCF7 cells, we show that this depends on the presence of estrogen. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the liganded estrogen receptor is linked to long-range changes in higher-order chromatin organization and epigenetic dysregulation in cancer. This may suggest that as well as drugs targeting histone modifications, it will be valuable to investigate the inhibition of protein complexes involved in chromatin folding in cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sehrish Rafique
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. .,Edinburgh Breakthrough Research Unit and Edinburgh Cancer Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | - Jeremy S Thomas
- Edinburgh Breakthrough Research Unit and Edinburgh Cancer Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | - Duncan Sproul
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. .,Edinburgh Breakthrough Research Unit and Edinburgh Cancer Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | - Wendy A Bickmore
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|