Chemotherapy for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer

Network meta-analysis of combination strategies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

ABSTRACT

This study compared different doublet and triplet therapies for efficacy and safety in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to October 2023. Interventions included abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide, docetaxel, darolutamide, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), either as doublet or triplet therapies. The outcomes examined were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival, time to symptomatic skeletal event (SSE), and toxicity. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was determined to identify the preferred treatments. Ten RCTs were included. The combination of darolutamide, docetaxel, and ADT had the highest SUCRA of 84.3 for OS, followed by combined abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT (SUCRA = 71.6). The highest SUCRAs for PFS were observed for triplet therapies (abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT [SUCRA = 74.9], followed by enzalutamide, docetaxel, and ADT [SUCRA = 74.3]) and other androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy-based doublet therapies (SUCRAs: 26.5-59.3). Darolutamide, docetaxel, and ADT had the highest SUCRAs, i.e., 80.8 and 84.0 regarding CRPC-free survival and time to SSE, respectively. Regarding Grade >3 adverse events (AEs), the SUCRAs of triplet therapies (SUCRAs: 14.8-31.5) were similar to that of docetaxel and ADT (SUCRA = 39.5). Three studies had a low risk of bias in all categories; the remaining studies had at least an unclear risk of bias in at least one category. Triplet therapy demonstrated potentially enhanced effectiveness than doublet therapy in mHSPC, with acceptable safety concerns. Darolutamide might be the optimal option for triplet therapy in combination with docetaxel and ADT.

Addition of Docetaxel to Androgen Receptor Axis-targeted Therapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that addition of docetaxel or androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy (ARAT) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or addition of ARAT to ADT and docetaxel improves overall survival (OS) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, it is unknown whether docetaxel, when given as part of triplet therapy, has an independent OS benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ADT plus ARAT with the triplet of ADT, ARAT, and docetaxel through a network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs in mHSPC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Bibliographic databases and conference proceedings were searched in March 2022 for RCTs that evaluated the addition of docetaxel, ARAT, or both to ADT in mHSPC. The primary endpoint was OS. Standard random-effect NMA and Bayesian analyses were performed to compare ADT plus ARAT with triplet therapy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eleven RCTs (n = 11 546) were eligible. Compared with ADT plus ARAT, the triplet had a nonsignificant OS benefit (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.16), while ADT plus docetaxel (HR 1.16 [0.94-1.43]) and ADT alone (HR 1.46 [1.30-1.64]) had an increased risk of death. By P-score ordering, the triplet was the most effective treatment strategy (P score = 0.936) followed by ADT plus ARAT (P score = 0.704). The triplet had a 77% likelihood of being the best treatment strategy compared with a 23% likelihood for ADT plus ARAT.

CONCLUSIONS

The triplet of ADT, ARAT, and docetaxel was the highest ranked treatment strategy, but it did not confer a statistically significant OS benefit over ADT plus ARAT. This NMA provides the highest-level comparative evidence for these treatment approaches in the initial management of mHSPC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We synthesized the available evidence from clinical trials conducted in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer to compare the survival of patients receiving triplet therapy (androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy [ARAT], androgen deprivation therapy [ADT], and docetaxel) with those receiving only ARAT and ADT. We conclude that the triplet is a somewhat more effective treatment approach.

Clinical proteomics for prostate cancer: understanding prostate cancer pathology and protein biomarkers for improved disease management

Following the introduction of routine Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening in the early 1990′s, Prostate Cancer (PCa) is often detected at an early stage. There are also a growing number of treatment options available and so the associated mortality rate is generally low. However, PCa is an extremely complex and heterogenous disease and many patients suffer disease recurrence following initial therapy. Disease recurrence commonly results in metastasis and metastatic PCa has an average survival rate of just 3–5 years. A significant problem in the clinical management of PCa is being able to differentiate between patients who will respond to standard therapies and those who may benefit from more aggressive intervention at an earlier stage. It is also acknowledged that for many men the disease is not life threatenting. Hence, there is a growing desire to identify patients who can be spared the significant side effects associated with PCa treatment until such time (if ever) their disease progresses to the point where treatment is required. To these important clinical needs, current biomarkers and clinical methods for patient stratification and personlised treatment are insufficient. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the complexities of PCa pathology and disease management. In this context it is possible to review current biomarkers and proteomic technologies that will support development of biomarker-driven decision tools to meet current important clinical needs. With such an in-depth understanding of disease pathology, the development of novel clinical biomarkers can proceed in an efficient and effective manner, such that they have a better chance of improving patient outcomes.

Increased ABCC4 Expression Induced by ERRα Leads to Docetaxel Resistance via Efflux of Docetaxel in Prostate Cancer

Docetaxel is a major treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa); however, its resistance compromises clinical effectiveness. Estrogen receptor-related receptor alpha (ERRα) belongs to an orphan nuclear receptor superfamily and was recently found to be closely involved in cancer. In the present study, we found that ERRα was involved in docetaxel resistance in PCa. Overexpression of ERRα conferred docetaxel resistance in PCa cell lines, and cells with ERRα downregulation were more sensitive to docetaxel. Among the drug resistance-related genes, ABCC4 demonstrated synchronous expression after ERRα manipulation in cells. Moreover, both ERRα and ABCC4 were overexpressed in the docetaxel-resistant cell, which could be reversed by ERRα knockdown. The knockdown of ERRα also reversed the reduced drug accumulation in the docetaxel-resistant cell. We also demonstrated for the first time that ABCC4 was a direct target of ERRα as determined by the CHIP and luciferase assays. Bioinformatics analysis revealed high expression of ERRα and ABCC4 in PCa patients, and a number of potential ERRα/ABCC4 targets were predicted. In conclusion, our study demonstrated a critical role for ERRα in docetaxel resistance by directly targeting ABCC4 and stressed the importance of ERRα as a potential therapeutic target for drug-resistant PCa.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advance prostate patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Ovid, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library will be searched for studies related to the topic. The identification, inclusion and exclusion flow charts will be conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The identified reports will be critically appraised using GRADE approach. Bias and heterogeneity of included studies will be assessed, and outcome measurements from individual studies will be combined with 95% confidence interval using a fixed- or random-effects model if qualified.

RESULTS

This study will provide evidence and data on the tolerance and efficacy of NAC followed by radical prostatectomy (RP).

CONCLUSION

The application of taxanes-based chemotherapy has been widened to metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer in recent years. To be more vigorous, whether neoadjuvant administration of these cytotoxic agents can improve the outcome of RP in locally advance prostate cancer patients has been explored. This study aims to synthesis data regarding the adverse effect, response rate, recurrence, and survival from multiple trials, and to guide the healthcare practitioners using an evidence-based approach.

Burden of illness of chemotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients in Japan: a retrospective database analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the burden of chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in Japan.

METHODS

Utilizing a large administrative hospital database we compared a set of outcome measures 12 months before and after initiation of chemotherapy, namely total medical costs, number of outpatient visits, number of hospital admissions and number of days spent in hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 598 CRPC patients were identified in the database. Total healthcare costs increased from 143,578 Japanese Yen (JPY) per patient per month (PPPM), before chemotherapy, to 333,628 JPY after start of chemotherapy. The number of hospital admissions increased by 280%, and the number of days spent in hospital by 380%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall costs of chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan are high. Our findings can serve as a basis for health economic evaluations.

Abiraterone acetate and its use in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer: a review

Abiraterone acetate, which targets enzymatic complexes playing a central role in steroidogenesis, demonstrated to increase survival significantly in both chemo-naive and docetaxel pretreated, becoming one of the drugs of choice for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. More recently, this agent in combination to androgen deprivation therapy demonstrated to be efficacious also in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. The present review is aimed to outline the clinical development of abiraterone acetate, the pivotal trials which led to its approval for the clinical practice, new evidence about its efficacy in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, its place in the therapeutic landscape of prostate cancer and future directions of development.

The evolving landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a critical review of the evidence for adding docetaxel or abiraterone to androgen deprivation

BACKGROUND

Until 2015, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone was the standard-of-care for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). In 2015, the CHAARTED and STAMPEDE-Docetaxel studies demonstrated marked survival benefit with the addition of docetaxel to ADT in the mHSPC setting, leading to a change in the standard-of-care for mHSPC. The recent LATITUDE and STAMPEDE-Abiraterone trials showed similar substantial improvement in survival with the addition of abiraterone plus prednisone to ADT in this space.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the randomized phase III studies that have investigated either the addition of docetaxel or abiraterone to ADT in patients with mHSPC.

RESULTS

We describe the study designs, key eligibility criteria, and key results for the CHAARTED, STAMPEDE-Docetaxel, GETUG-AFU 15, LATITUDE, and STAMPEDE-Abiraterone clinical trials. We compare the data for abiraterone/prednisone plus ADT in mHSPC with the evidence for docetaxel plus ADT in these patients. Finally, we discuss several factors that should be considered when choosing between docetaxel/ADT or abiraterone/prednisone/ADT in mHSPC.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of mHSPC is evolving. Abiraterone plus prednisone in addition to ADT has emerged as an alternative standard-of-care to docetaxel plus ADT, and ongoing trials should clarify whether combination vs. sequential approaches with AR-targeting agents and taxane chemotherapy are preferred for initial management in the hormone-sensitive setting.

Cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a single centre analysis of toxicity and clinical outcome

Objectives

The current standard of care for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) at diagnosis is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without anti-androgen and chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to define the role of a local radiotherapy (RT) treatment in the mPCa setting.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with PCa and bone oligometastases at diagnosis treated in our institution with ADT followed by cytoreductive prostate-RT with or without RT on metastases. Biochemical and clinical failure (BF, CF), overall survival (OS) and RT-toxicity were assessed.

Results

We identified 22 patients treated with ADT and external-beam RT on primary between June 2008 and March 2016. All of them but four were also treated for bone metastases. RT on primary with moderately and extremely hypofractionated regimes started after 10.3 months (3.9–51.7) from ADT. After a median follow-up of 26.4 months (10.3–55.5), 20 patients are alive. Twelve patients showed BF after a median time of 23 months (14.5–104) and CF after a median of 23.6 months (15.3–106.1) from the start of ADT. Three patients became castration resistant, starting a new therapy; median time to castration resistance was 31.03 months (range: 29.9–31.5 months). According to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC), only one patient developed acute grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. No late grade >2 adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

Prostate RT in oligometastatic patients is safe and offers long-lasting local control. When compared to ADT alone, RT on primary seems to improve biochemical control and long-term survival; however, this hypothesis should be investigated in prospective studies. Further research is warranted.

Prognosis of prostate cancer with initial prostate-specific antigen >1,000 ng/mL at diagnosis

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer patients with surprisingly high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are encountered clinically. However, descriptions of this group of patients are extremely rare in the published literature. This study reports treatment outcome and long-term prognosis for this group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2012, 2,064 patients with PCa diagnosed at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 90 PCa cases were identified with initial PSA (iPSA) >1,000 ng/mL at diagnosis. A retrospective study was conducted in this cohort, with comparison among stratified patient age groups, PSA, treatment options, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The mean PSA at PCa diagnosis in this cohort was 3,323 ng/mL (1,003-23,126, median: 2,050 ng/mL). Most patients were in the age group 65-79 years (55/90, 61%). Males older than 80 years had a poor prognosis (P<0.001). Forty-six patients (51%) underwent orchiectomy with a median follow-up period of 16.2 (1.3-72.7) months, compared to 44 patients treated with medical castration and a median follow-up of 9.1 (0.3-70.5) months. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed survival benefit from treatment with orchiectomy (P<0.001). PSA reduction >90% of iPSA following primary androgen deprivation therapy (reaching true nadir) could be a predictor of longer survival (P<0.001). Cox regression revealed the hazard ratio (HR) of variables were age (HR: 4.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-14.37, P=0.009), reaching true nadir (HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03-0.58, P=0.008), and the treatment option with orchiectomy (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.65-0.76, P=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Age ≥80 years indicated poor overall survival in PCa patients with iPSA >1,000 ng/mL. Reaching a true nadir of PSA following primary androgen deprivation therapy could be a predictor of longer survival. Bilateral orchiectomy is recommended for this group of patients.