Association of maternal fertility status and receipt of fertility treatment with healthcare utilization in infants up to age four

Long-term healthcare utilization and costs of babies born after assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a record linkage study with 10-years' follow-up in England

STUDY QUESTION

Is the long-term health care utilization of children born after ART more costly to the healthcare system in England than children born to mothers with no fertility problems?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Children born after ART had significantly more general practitioner (GP) consultations and higher primary care costs up to 10 years after birth, and significantly higher hospital admission costs in the first year after birth, compared to children born to mothers with no fertility problems.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

There is evidence that children born after ART are at an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes and a small increased risk of rare adverse outcomes in childhood.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We conducted a longitudinal study of 368 088 mother and baby pairs in England using a bespoke linked dataset. Singleton babies born 1997-2018, and their mothers, who were registered at GP practices in England contributing data to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), were identified through the CPRD GOLD mother-baby dataset; this data was augmented with further linkage to the mothers' Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) Register data. Four groups of babies were identified through the mothers' records: a 'fertile' comparison group, an 'untreated sub-fertile' group, an 'ovulation induction' group, and an ART group. Babies were followed-up from birth to 28 February 2021, unless censored due to loss to follow-up (e.g. leaving GP practice, emigration) or death.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The CPRD collects anonymized coded patient electronic health records from a network of GPs in the UK. We estimated primary care costs and hospital admission costs for babies in the four fertility groups using the CPRD GOLD data and the linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) data. Linear regression was used to compare the care costs in the different groups. Inverse probability weights were generated and applied to adjust for potential bias caused by attrition due to loss to follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Children born to mothers with no fertility problems had significantly fewer consultations and lower primary care costs compared to the other groups throughout the 10-years' follow up. Regarding hospital costs, children born after ART had significantly higher hospital admission costs in the first year after birth compared to those born to mothers with no fertility problems (difference = £307 (95% CI: 153, 477)). The same pattern was observed in children born after untreated subfertility and ovulation induction.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

HFEA linkage uses non-donor data cycles only, and the introduction of consent for data use reduced the availability of HFEA records after 2009. The fertility groups were derived by augmenting HFEA data with evidence from primary care records; however, there remains some potential misclassification of exposure groups. The cost of neonatal critical care is not captured in the HES APC data, which may cause underestimation of the cost differences between the comparison group and the infertility groups.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The findings can help anticipate the financial impact on the healthcare system associated with subfertility and ART, particularly as the demand for these treatments grows.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

C.C. and this work were funded by a UK Medical Research Council Career Development Award [MR/L019671/1] and a UK MRC Transition Support Award [MR/W029286/1]. X.H. is an Australia National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Emerging Leadership Fellow [grant number 2009253]. The authors declare no competing interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Assisted Reproductive Technology or Infertility: What underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology

Numerous studies have demonstrated that assisted reproductive technology (ART: defined here as including only in vitro fertilization and related technologies) is associated with increased adverse pregnancy, neonatal, and childhood developmental outcomes, even in singletons. The comparison group for many had often been a fertile population that conceived without assistance. The Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART) was initiated to define a subfertile population with which to compare ART outcomes. Over more than 10 years, we have used the MOSART database to study pregnancy abnormalities and delivery complications but also to evaluate ongoing health of women, infants, and children. This article will review studies from MOSART in the context of how they compare with those of other investigations. We will present MOSART studies that identified the influence of ART and subfertility/infertility on adverse pregnancy (pregnancy hypertensive disorder, gestational diabetes, placental abnormality) and delivery (preterm birth, low birthweight) outcomes as well as on maternal and child hospitalizations. We will provide evidence that although subfertility/infertility increases the risk of adverse outcomes, there is additional risk associated with the use of ART. Studies exploring the contribution of placental abnormalities as one factor adding to this increased ART-associated risk will be described.

The influence of regulation of medically assisted reproduction on the risk of hospitalization in the first 2 years of life

STUDY QUESTION

Do publicly funded fertility treatment and single embryo transfer (SET) result in lower hospitalization rates of children of parents with infertility?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Following the 2010 Quebec law introducing free fertility treatment and SET, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions decreased among all children born to parents with infertility, but not among singletons, whose risk remained slightly higher than that of children of parents without infertility, even accounting for treatment and maternal age.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Previous studies reported lower NICU admission rates among children conceived with ART after the 2010 law; however, children conceived without ART by parents with infertility were not considered.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Cohort study of children born in 1997-2017 to patients evaluated for infertility ('exposed') at an academic fertility center in Montreal (Canada) in 1996-2015. A random sample of births to Montreal residents served as comparison. Outcomes were identified from Quebec administrative databases.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We compared children's healthcare utilization before and after the 2010 law in 6273 exposed and 12 583 randomly sampled births (6846 and 12 775 children, respectively). We repeated the analysis among children conceived in the 63 months before and after the law ('restricted period'), and examined whether differences in twinning, fertility treatment, and maternal age explained the higher risk of NICU admission among children of parents with infertility.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the exposed cohort, the proportion of twin births and of several adverse outcomes declined after the law. NICU admission and duration of NICU stay decreased overall, but not in singletons. Both measures remained higher in exposed children. Except for NICU admission, hospitalization rates were similar in exposed and random sample children. After accounting for fertility treatment and maternal age, exposed singletons were 17% more likely to be admitted to the NICU than children of parents with no medical history of infertility.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Sample size was relatively small; infertile patients were from a single center and the random sample from one city. Despite some limitations, administrative databases are likely to accurately reflect healthcare utilization.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Universal access to treatment and, particularly, SET results in an overall reduction of adverse outcomes among children conceived with treatment; however, children of parents with infertility are at a slightly higher risk, regardless of treatment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR, grant no. 123362). No competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Assisted reproductive technology and childhood morbidity: a longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and offspring morbidity in the first decade of life.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Provincial health registry in Quebec, Canada.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 797,654 singleton children born between 2008 and 2019, followed up to 2020.

INTERVENTION(S)

Retrospective, noninterventional study of any ART procedure vs. no ART.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Childhood morbidity, including hospitalization for infectious, allergic, malignant, and other diseases, assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association with ART. We controlled for unmeasured family-level confounders that were shared among siblings through stratified Cox regression. To do so, we restricted the analysis to 10,097 siblings with discordant exposure to ART and compared the risk of outcomes in exposed vs. unexposed siblings.

RESULT(S)

Compared with no ART, ART was associated with 1.23 times the risk of any hospitalization (95% CI 1.19-1.27), 1.25 times the risk of infectious disease hospitalization (95% CI 1.21-1.29), and 1.25 times the risk of allergy hospitalization (95% CI 1.14-1.38). When we used a sibling design to control for shared genetic and environmental confounders, ART was not associated with a greater risk of childhood hospitalization (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.08).

CONCLUSION(S)

ART is associated with an elevated risk of hospitalization up to 11 years of age, but discordant sibling analysis suggests that the association may be due to genetic, environmental, or other shared familial confounders.

Assisted reproductive technology and multiple pregnancy in Malta - A population based study

INTRODUCTION

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is increasingly used to overcome growing rates of infertility and subfertility. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality are elevated in ART conceptions even in vaginally delivered singletons. Malta is a small archipelago with comprehensive national data. This study was carried out in order to investigate ART rates in Maltese deliveries for 2000-2019 inclusive.

METHODS

Anonymous data was obtained from the Malta National Obstetric Information System (NOIS). For this study all ART methods were aggregated into one group. Deliveries refer to single pregnancies. A p value ≤0.05 was taken to represent statistically significance.

RESULTS

This study analysed 82,356 deliveries over the period with overall 2% ART. There was a significant rising trend in all deliveries (ART plus non-ART) with time (p = 0.012). Of these, 1262 were twin deliveries (18% ART) and 56 were triplet deliveries (66% ART). Multiple deliveries (ART plus non-ART) also rose significantly (p = 0. 00035). The proportion of ART deliveries rose significantly overall and individually, for singletons (3.4-4.6%) since 2018, and over a quarter of such deliveries since 2013 for twin and further multiples.

DISCUSSION

The Maltese rate of twins and triplets plateaued before reaching the peaks experienced by other countries and it may be that more infertile couples were and are only having one embryo transferred. In smaller countries with only one neonatal unit, ART services should strive to produce a smooth throughput so as to minimize surges and strains on downstream neonatal services which may have deleterious effects on outcomes, especially neonatal.