1
|
Braun D, Kaempf JW, Ho NJ, Nguyen MH, Passi R, Burgos AE, Volodarskiy M, Villosis MFB, Gupta M, Habeshian TS, Tam HK, Litam KB, Hong QL, Dong CC, Getahun D. Discontinuation of Car Seat Tolerance Screening and Postdischarge Adverse Outcomes in Infants Born Preterm. J Pediatr 2023; 261:113577. [PMID: 37353144 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the association between discontinuing predischarge car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) with 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes in infants born preterm. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study involving all infants born preterm from 2010 through 2021 who survived to discharge to home in a 14-hospital integrated health care system. The exposure was discontinuation of CSTS. The primary outcome was a composite rate of death, 911 call-triggered transports, or readmissions associated with diagnostic codes of respiratory disorders, apnea, apparent life-threatening event, or brief resolved unexplained events within 30 days of discharge. Outcomes of infants born in the periods of CSTS and after discontinuation were compared. RESULTS Twelve of 14 hospitals initially utilized CSTS and contributed patients to the CSTS period; 71.4% of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients and 26.9% of non-NICU infants were screened. All hospitals participated in the discontinuation period; 0.1% was screened. Rates of the unadjusted primary outcome were 1.02% in infants in the CSTS period (n = 21 122) and 1.06% after discontinuation (n = 20 142) (P = .76). The aOR (95% CI) was 0.95 (0.75, 1.19). Statistically insignificant differences between periods were observed in components of the primary outcome, gestational age strata, NICU admission status groups, and other secondary analyses. CONCLUSIONS Discontinuation of CSTS in a large integrated health care network was not associated with a change in 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes. CSTS's value as a standard predischarge assessment deserves further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Braun
- Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA; Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA.
| | - Joseph W Kaempf
- Women and Children's Services Institute, Providence Health System, Portland, OR
| | - Ngoc J Ho
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA
| | - Marielle H Nguyen
- Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA
| | - Rohit Passi
- Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA; Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA
| | - Anthony E Burgos
- Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA; Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA
| | - Marianna Volodarskiy
- Department of Patient Care Services, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Maria Fe B Villosis
- Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA; Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA
| | - Mandhir Gupta
- Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA
| | - Talar S Habeshian
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA
| | - Henry K Tam
- Department of Clinical Analysis, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA
| | - Kevin B Litam
- Department of Clinical Analysis, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA
| | - Quinn L Hong
- Department of Clinical Analysis, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA
| | - Calvin C Dong
- Department of Regional Ambulance Operations, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Downey, CA
| | - Darios Getahun
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA; Department of Health Care Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrison WN, Ritter VS, Flower KB, Seashore CJ, McLaurin-Jiang S. The Association Between Routine Car Seat Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:913-922. [PMID: 36189493 PMCID: PMC9647635 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends preterm newborns undergo car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) before discharge despite limited evidence supporting the practice. We examined subsequent health care utilization in screened and unscreened late preterm and low birth weight newborns. METHODS This observational study included late preterm (34-36 weeks) and term low birth weight (<2268 g) newborns born between 2014 and 2018 at 4 hospitals with policies recommending CSTS for these infants. Birth hospitalization length of stay (LOS) in addition to 30-day hospital revisits and brief resolving unexplained events were examined. Unadjusted and adjusted rates were compared among 3 groups: not screened, pass, and fail. RESULTS Of 5222 newborns, 3163 (61%) were discharged from the nursery and 2059 (39%) from the NICU or floor. Screening adherence was 91%, and 379 of 4728 (8%) screened newborns failed the initial screen. Compared with unscreened newborns, adjusted LOS was similar for newborns who passed the CSTS (+5.1 hours; -2.2-12.3) but significantly longer for those who failed (+16.1; 5.6-26.7). This differed by screening location: nursery = +12.6 (9.1-16.2) versus NICU/floor = +71.2 (28.3-114.1) hours. Hospital revisits did not significantly differ by group: not screened = 7.3% (reference), pass = 5.2% (aOR 0.79; 0.44-1.42), fail = 4.4% (aOR 0.65; 0.28-1.51). CONCLUSIONS Hospital adherence to CSTS recommendations was high, and failed screens were relatively common. Routine CSTS was not associated with reduced health care utilization and may prolong hospital LOS, particularly in the NICU/floor. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate this routine practice for otherwise low-risk infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wade N. Harrison
- Division of Hospital Medicine
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research
| | - Victor S. Ritter
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kori B. Flower
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Carl J. Seashore
- Division of Hospital Medicine
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Skyler McLaurin-Jiang
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Amarillo, Texas
| |
Collapse
|