A model to implement genomic medicine in the neonatal intensive care unit

Benefits and barriers to broad implementation of genomic sequencing in the NICU

Genome (GS) and exome (ES) sequencing as first-tier diagnostic tests have the potential to increase rates of genetic diagnoses and acutely change the management of neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, the widespread implementation of genomic sequencing has been limited by several barriers. In this systematic review, we analyze the current literature on the utilization of GS and ES in infants in the NICU to identify the benefits, barriers, and components of successful implementation. Across the 42 studies that discussed GS and ES in the NICU setting, six themes were identified: disease detection, timeliness of results, cost, provider attitudes, parental attitudes, and equitable access. Benefits of GS and ES include high disease detection rates, timely results, and possible reduction in healthcare costs by reducing time spent in the NICU. Additionally, clinicians find GS/ES to be important and useful, and parents and caregivers largely perceive GS/ES to be beneficial. Barriers to widespread GS/ES include availability of personnel to facilitate timely diagnosis and coverage of cost. Additionally, clinicians report worries about a lack of genetics knowledge, informed consent, results return, and potential harm. Parents consistently report low levels of anxiety, decisional conflict, harm, or regret. Finally, the lack of availability of translated consent documents limits the participation of families who do not speak English or Spanish. Continued work is essential to optimize these technologies and ensure equitable access.

Exome and Genome Sequencing to Diagnose the Genetic Basis of Neonatal Hypotonia: An International Consortium Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hypotonia is a relatively common finding among infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Consideration of genetic testing is recommended early in the care of infants with unexplained hypotonia. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and overall impact of exome and genome sequencing (ES and GS).

METHODS

Consecutive infants with hypotonia were identified from research and clinical databases across 5 teaching hospitals in United States, Canada, United Kingdom, and Australia. Inclusion criteria included NICU admission and genetic evaluation. Infants with a known explanation for hypotonia were excluded. Data regarding infant characteristics, genetic testing, and diagnoses were collected. The primary outcome was identification of a molecular diagnosis. Impact on care was a secondary outcome. The Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 147 infants with unexplained hypotonia. The median gestational age was 39 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 36-42 weeks), 77 (52%) were female, and the median age was 8 days at the time of evaluation (IQR 2-19 days). Eighty (54%) had hypotonia as the main clinical feature while 67 (46%) had additional multisystem involvement. Seventy-five (51%) underwent rapid ES, 44 (30%) rapid GS, 2 (1%) both ES and GS, and 26 (18%) were admitted before ES or GS became available. Of the 121 infants who underwent ES and/or GS, 72 (60%) had the primary outcome of a molecular diagnosis. In addition, 2 infants with mitochondrial genome variants were diagnosed by mitochondrial GS after negative ES, and one infant needed targeted testing to identify a short tandem repeat expansion missed by GS. The proportion diagnosed by ES and GS was not different between infants with hypotonia as the primary finding (37/56, 66%) and infants with multisystemic symptoms (35/65, 54%, odds ratio [OR] 1.7, CI 0.8-3.7, p value = 0.20). Testing was more likely to have an impact on care for infants receiving a genetic diagnosis (57/66 vs 14/33, OR 8.4, CI 2.9-26.1, p = 1.0E-05).

DISCUSSION

Rapid ES and GS provided a molecular diagnosis for most of the infants with unexplained hypotonia who underwent testing. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these findings as increased access to genetic testing becomes available.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that in unexplained neonatal hypotonia, rapid ES or GS adds diagnostic specificity.

Pulmonary Hypertension in Developmental Lung Diseases

Diverse genetic developmental lung diseases can present in the neonatal period with hypoxemic respiratory failure, often associated with with pulmonary hypertension. Intractable hypoxemia and lack of sustained response to medical management should increase the suspicion of a developmental lung disorder. Genetic diagnosis and lung biopsy are helpful in establishing the diagnosis. Early diagnosis can result in optimizing management and redirecting care if needed. This article reviews normal lung development, various developmental lung disorders that can result from genetic abnormalities at each stage of lung development, their clinical presentation, management, prognosis, and differential diagnoses.

Implementation of rapid genomic sequencing in safety-net neonatal intensive care units: protocol for the VIrtual GenOme CenteR (VIGOR) proof-of-concept study

INTRODUCTION

Rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) in critically ill infants with suspected genetic disorders has high diagnostic and clinical utility. However, rGS has primarily been available at large referral centres with the resources and expertise to offer state-of-the-art genomic care. Critically ill infants from racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations disproportionately receive care in safety-net and/or community settings lacking access to state-of-the-art genomic care, contributing to unacceptable health equity gaps. VIrtual GenOme CenteR is a 'proof-of-concept' implementation science study of an innovative delivery model for genomic care in safety-net neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We developed a virtual genome centre at a referral centre to remotely support safety-net NICU sites predominantly serving racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations and have limited to no access to rGS. Neonatal providers at each site receive basic education about genomic medicine from the study team and identify eligible infants. The study team enrols eligible infants (goal n of 250) and their parents and follows families for 12 months. Enrolled infants receive rGS, the study team creates clinical interpretive reports to guide neonatal providers on interpreting results, and neonatal providers return results to families. Data is collected via (1) medical record abstraction, (2) surveys, interviews and focus groups with neonatal providers and (3) surveys and interviews with families. We aim to examine comprehensive implementation outcomes based on the Proctor Implementation Framework using a mixed methods approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the institutional review board of Boston Children's Hospital (IRB-P00040496) and participating sites. Participating families are required to provide electronic written informed consent and neonatal provider consent is implied through the completion of surveys. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and data will be made accessible per National Institutes of Health (NIH) policies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05205356/clinicaltrials.gov.

Genomic medicine in neonatal care: progress and challenges

During the neonatal period, many genetic disorders present and contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Genomic medicine-the use of genomic information in clinical care- has the potential to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period and improve outcomes for this population. Diagnostic genomic testing for symptomatic newborns, especially rapid testing, has been shown to be feasible and have diagnostic and clinical utility, particularly in the short-term. Ongoing studies are assessing the feasibility and utility, including personal utility, of implementation in diverse populations. Genomic screening for asymptomatic newborns has also been studied, and the acceptability and feasibility of such an approach remains an active area of investigation. Emerging precision therapies, with examples even at the "n-of-1" level, highlight the promise of precision diagnostics to lead to early intervention and improve outcomes. To sustainably implement genomic medicine in neonatal care in an ethical, effective, and equitable manner, we need to ensure access to genetics and genomics knowledge, access to genomic tests, which is currently limited by payors, feasible processes for ordering these tests, and access to follow up in the clinical and research realms. Future studies will provide further insight into enablers and barriers to optimize implementation strategies.

Provision and availability of genomic medicine services in Level IV neonatal intensive care units

PURPOSE

To describe variation in genomic medicine services across level IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United States and Canada.

METHODS

We developed and distributed a novel survey to the 43 level IV NICUs belonging to the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium, requesting a single response per site from a clinician with knowledge of the provision of genomic medicine services.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 74% (32/43). Although chromosomal microarray and exome or genome sequencing (ES or GS) were universally available, access was restricted for 22% (7/32) and 81% (26/32) of centers, respectively. The most common restriction on ES or GS was requiring approval by a specialist (41%, 13/32). Rapid ES/GS was available in 69% of NICUs (22/32). Availability of same-day genetics consultative services was limited (41%, 13/32 sites), and pre- and post-test counseling practices varied widely.

CONCLUSION

We observed large inter-center variation in genomic medicine services across level IV NICUs: most notably, access to rapid, comprehensive genetic testing in time frames relevant to critical care decision making was limited at many level IV Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium NICUs despite a significant burden of genetic disease. Further efforts are needed to improve access to neonatal genomic medicine services.

Role of genomic medicine and implementing equitable access for critically ill infants in neonatal intensive care units

Genetic disorders are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. This population has immense potential to benefit from genomic medicine, as early precision diagnosis is critical to early personalized management. However, the implementation of genomic medicine in neonatology thus far has arguably worsened health inequities, and strategies are urgently needed to achieve equitable access to genomics in neonatal care. In this perspective, we demonstrate the utility of genomic sequencing in critically ill infants and highlight three key recommendations to advance equitable access: recruitment of underrepresented populations, education of non-genetics providers to empower practice of genomic medicine, and development of innovative infrastructure to implement genomic medicine across diverse settings.