ASXL1 alteration cooperates with JAK2V617F to accelerate myelofibrosis

Targeting BIRC5 as a therapeutic approach to overcome ASXL1-associated decitabine resistance

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are widely employed in the treatment of myeloid malignancies. However, unresponsive or resistant to HMAs occurs in approximately 50 % of patients. ASXL1, one of the most commonly mutated genes across the full spectrum of myeloid malignancies, has been reported to predict a lower overall response rate to HMAs, suggesting an essential need to develop effective therapeutic strategies for the patients with HMA failure. Here, we investigated the impact of ASXL1 on cellular responsiveness to decitabine treatment. ASXL1 deficiency increased resistance to decitabine treatment in AML cell lines and mouse bone marrow cells. Transcriptome sequencing revealed significant alterations in genes regulating cell cycle, apoptosis, and histone modification in ASXL1 deficient cells that resistant to decitabine. BIRC5 was identified as a potential target for overcoming decitabine resistance in ASXL1 deficient cells. Furthermore, our experimental evidence demonstrated that the small-molecule inhibitor of BIRC5 (YM-155) synergistically sensitized ASXL1 deficient cells to decitabine treatment. This study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the ASXL1-associated HMA resistance and proposes a promising therapeutic strategy for improving treatment outcomes in affected individuals.

SRSF2 mutation reduces polycythemia and impairs hematopoietic progenitor functions in JAK2V617F-driven myeloproliferative neoplasm

SRSF2 mutations are found in association with JAK2V617F in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), most frequently in myelofibrosis (MF). However, the contribution of SRSF2 mutation in JAK2V617F-driven MPN remains elusive. To investigate the consequences of SRSF2P95H and JAK2V617F mutations in MPN, we generated Cre-inducible Srsf2P95H/+Jak2V617F/+ knock-in mice. We show that co-expression of Srsf2P95H mutant reduced red blood cell, neutrophil, and platelet counts, attenuated splenomegaly but did not induce bone marrow fibrosis in Jak2V617F/+ mice. Furthermore, co-expression of Srsf2P95H diminished the competitiveness of Jak2V617F mutant hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. We found that Srsf2P95H mutant reduced the TGF-β levels but increased the expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in Jak2V617F/+ mice. Furthermore, enforced expression of S100A9 in Jak2V617F/+ mice bone marrow significantly reduced the red blood cell, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels. Overall, these data suggest that concurrent expression of Srsf2P95H and Jak2V617F mutants reduces erythropoiesis but does not promote the development of bone marrow fibrosis in mice.

SRSF2-P95H decreases JAK/STAT signaling in hematopoietic cells and delays myelofibrosis development in mice

Heterozygous mutation targeting proline 95 in Serine/Arginine-rich Splicing Factor 2 (SRSF2) is associated with V617F mutation in Janus Activated Kinase 2 (JAK2) in some myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), most commonly primary myelofibrosis. To explore the interaction of Srsf2^P95H with Jak2^V617F, we generated Cre-inducible knock-in mice expressing these mutants under control of the stem cell leukemia (Scl) gene promoter. In transplantation experiments, Srsf2^P95H unexpectedly delayed myelofibrosis induced by Jak2^V617F and decreased TGFβ1 serum level. Srsf2^P95H reduced the competitiveness of transplanted Jak2^V617F hematopoietic stem cells while preventing their exhaustion. RNA sequencing of sorted megakaryocytes identified an increased number of splicing events when the two mutations were combined. Focusing on JAK/STAT pathway, Jak2 exon 14 skipping was promoted by Srsf2^P95H, an event detected in patients with JAK2^V617F and SRSF2^P95 co-mutation. The skipping event generates a truncated inactive JAK2 protein. Accordingly, Srsf2^P95H delays myelofibrosis induced by the thrombopoietin receptor agonist Romiplostim in Jak2 wild-type animals. These results unveil JAK2 exon 14 skipping promotion as a strategy to reduce JAK/STAT signaling in pathological conditions.

Epigenetic regulation by ASXL1 in myeloid malignancies

Myeloid malignancies are clonal hematopoietic disorders that are comprised of a spectrum of genetically heterogeneous disorders, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Myeloid malignancies are characterized by excessive proliferation, abnormal self-renewal, and/or differentiation defects of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and myeloid progenitor cells hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Myeloid malignancies can be caused by genetic and epigenetic alterations that provoke key cellular functions, such as self-renewal, proliferation, biased lineage commitment, and differentiation. Advances in next-generation sequencing led to the identification of multiple mutations in myeloid neoplasms, and many new gene mutations were identified as key factors in driving the pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies. The polycomb protein ASXL1 was identified to be frequently mutated in all forms of myeloid malignancies, with mutational frequencies of 20%, 43%, 10%, and 20% in MDS, CMML, MPN, and AML, respectively. Significantly, ASXL1 mutations are associated with a poor prognosis in all forms of myeloid malignancies. The fact that ASXL1 mutations are associated with poor prognosis in patients with CMML, MDS, and AML, points to the possibility that ASXL1 mutation is a key factor in the development of myeloid malignancies. This review summarizes the recent advances in understanding myeloid malignancies with a specific focus on ASXL1 mutations.

Combination of ruxolitinib with ABT-737 exhibits synergistic effects in cells carrying concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations

The V617F mutation in Janus kinase 2 is considered one of the driver mutations leading to Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations accelerate the progression of myelofibrosis in patients with MPNs. Few therapies are currently available for patients with these two mutations. In our study, the combination of ruxolitinib with ABT-737 was evaluated in cells carrying JAK2V617F and ASXL1 double mutations. RNA sequencing indicated overactivated oxidative phosphorylation in JAK2V617F;Asxl1+/- cKit+ cells. The cell line model with JAK2V617F and ASXL1 double mutations (HEL-AKO cells) also exhibited dysregulated mitochondrial function with an increase in the reactive oxygen species levels and a decrease in the ATP levels. The colony growth inhibition rates of cells with JAK2V617F and ASXL1 double mutations were significantly lower than those of cells with only the JAK2V617F mutation. Combined treatment with ruxolitinib and ABT-737 promoted apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation of HEL-AKO cells. Cotreatment with the two drugs also inhibited the growth of bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated from patients with concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations. In conclusion, we provide preclinical evidence showing that the combination of ruxolitinib and ABT-737 is a promising therapeutic strategy for MPN patients with concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations.

ASXL1/2 mutations and myeloid malignancies

Myeloid malignancies develop through the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations that dysregulate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal, stimulate HSC proliferation and result in differentiation defects. The polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (TrxG) of epigenetic regulators act antagonistically to regulate the expression of genes key to stem cell functions. The genes encoding these proteins, and the proteins that interact with them or affect their occupancy at chromatin, are frequently mutated in myeloid malignancies. PcG and TrxG proteins are regulated by Enhancers of Trithorax and Polycomb (ETP) proteins. ASXL1 and ASXL2 are ETP proteins that assemble chromatin modification complexes and transcription factors. ASXL1 mutations frequently occur in myeloid malignancies and are associated with a poor prognosis, whereas ASXL2 mutations frequently occur in AML with t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and less frequently in other subtypes of myeloid malignancies. Herein, we review the role of ASXL1 and ASXL2 in normal and malignant hematopoiesis by summarizing the findings of mouse model systems and discussing their underlying molecular mechanisms.

Impact of molecular profiling on the management of patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical course, which can be complicated by severe constitutional symptoms, massive splenomegaly, progressive bone marrow failure, cardiovascular events, and development of acute leukemia. Constitutive signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway plays a fundamental role in its pathogenesis, generally due to activating mutations of JAK2, CALR and MPL genes (i.e., the MPN driver mutations), present in most MF patients. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel testing has shown that additional somatic mutations can already be detected at the time of diagnosis in more than half of patients, and that they accumulate along the disease course. These mutations, mostly affecting epigenetic modifiers or spliceosome components, may cooperate with MPN drivers to favor clonal dominance or influence the clinical phenotype, and some, such as high molecular risk mutations, correlate with a more aggressive clinical course with poor treatment response. The current main role of molecular profiling in clinical practice is prognostication, principally for selecting high-risk patients who may be candidates for transplantation, the only curative treatment for MF to date. To this end, contemporary prognostic models incorporating molecular data are useful tools to discriminate different risk categories. Aside from certain clinical situations, decisions regarding medical treatment are not based on patient molecular profiling, yet this approach may become more relevant in novel treatment strategies, such as the use of vaccines against the mutant forms of JAK2 or CALR, or drugs directed against actionable molecular targets.

Mutational landscape of blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-BP) and antecedent MPN

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have an inherent tendency to evolve to the blast phase (BP), characterized by ≥20% myeloblasts in the blood or bone marrow. MPN-BP portends a dismal prognosis and currently, effective treatment modalities are scarce, except for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in selected patients, particularly those who achieve complete/partial remission. The mutational landscape of MPN-BP differs from de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in several key aspects, such as significantly lower frequencies of FLT3 and DNMT3A mutations, and higher incidence of IDH1/2 and TP53 in MPN-BP. Herein, we comprehensively review the impact of the three signaling driver mutations (JAK2 V617F, CALR exon 9 indels, MPL W515K/L) that constitutively activate the JAK/STAT pathway, and of the other somatic non-driver mutations (epigenetic, mRNA splicing, transcriptional regulators, and mutations in signal transduction genes) that cooperatively or independently promote MPN progression and leukemic transformation. The MPN subtype, harboring two or more high-molecular risk (HMR) mutations (epigenetic regulators and mRNA splicing factors) and "triple-negative" PMF are among the critical factors that increase risk of leukemic transformation and shorten survival. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive MPN; and polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are relatively indolent subtypes. In PV and ET, mutations in splicing factor genes are associated with progression to myelofibrosis (MF), and in ET, TP53 mutations predict risk for leukemic transformation. The advent of targeted next-generation sequencing and improved prognostic scoring systems for PMF inform decisions regarding allo-HSCT. The emergence of treatments targeting mutant enzymes (e.g., IDH1/2 inhibitors) or epigenetic pathways (BET and LSD1 inhibitors) along with new insights into the mechanisms of leukemogenesis will hopefully lead the way to superior management strategies and outcomes of MPN-BP patients.

Rapid progression of myelofibrosis in polycythemia vera patient carrying SRSF2 c.284C>A p.(Pro95His) and unique ASXL1 splice site c.1720-2A>G variant

BACKGROUND

The prognosis in polycythemia vera (PV) is comparatively favorable, but individual myelofibrosis/leukemic progression risk is heterogeneous. About a quarter of patients progress to the fibrotic phase after 20 years.

METHODS

Multiplex PCR, allele-specific qPCR, high-resolution melt analysis, and Sanger sequencing were used to detect BCR-ABL, JAK2, ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1, and IDH1/2 variants.

RESULTS

Herein, we present a PV patient with rapid progression to secondary myelofibrosis probably due to the coexistence of homozygous JAK2 V617F mutation, SRSF2 c.284C>A p.(Pro95His) and splice site variant of ASXL1 c.1720-2A>G. The detected ASXL1 variant was first described in Bohring-Opitz syndrome and has not been reported in hematological malignancies so far. In the presented case, the ASXL1 VAF was stable (50%) during the 4-year follow-up, despite an evident increase in the JAK2 V617F VAF. Family history revealed cerebral palsy in the patient's grandson; however, germline character of the ASXL1 variant was excluded.

CONCLUSION

The biological consequences of the variant acquisition by hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) seem to be similar to other mutations of ASXL1 responsible for the truncation of ASXL1 protein, formation of hyperactive ASXL1-BAP1 (BRCA1-associated protein-1) complexes, and finally, the promotion of aberrant myeloid differentiation of HSC. Our report supports the hypothesis that ASXL1 alteration cooperates with JAK2 V617F leading to biased lineage skewing, favoring erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation, accelerating the progression of PV to the fibrotic phase.

Ruxolitinib Reduces Oxidative Stress in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis: A Multicenter Study

Introduction

Primary myelofibrosis (PM) has a lower overall survival rate than other myeloproliferative neoplasms, and leukemic transformation is the most common cause of death. Increased oxidative stress has an important role in leukemic transformation in these patients. In this study, we aimed to find an answer to the question, "Could Ruxolitinib, which has been widely used in patients with myelofibrosis in recent years, have a role in reducing oxidative stress in these patients?".

Methods

A total of 106 patients with PM and 111 healthy volunteers were included in this study. We collected the serum samples of healthy volunteers and patients with myelofibrosis at the time of diagnosis and one month after the initiation of Ruxolitinib treatment. Ischemia modified albumin (IMA), native thiol, total thiol, and disulfide levels were studied. The disulfide/native thiol, disulfide/total thiol, and native thiol/total thiol ratios were calculated.

Results

IMA, native thiol, total thiol, disulfide levels, disulfide/native thiol, and disulfide/total thiol ratios at the time of diagnosis were significantly different in patients with myelofibrosis compared to the control group (p=0.001). Ruxolitinib significantly reduced oxidative stress when the measurements in the first month after Ruxolitinib were compared with those at the time of diagnosis (p=0.001). In patients with ASXL1 mutation, intermediate-2 risk, and high-risk according to the Dipps-plus score, the decrease in oxidative stress in the first month of treatment was more significant than at the time of diagnosis.

Conclusion

Ruxolitinib may be an effective treatment for reducing oxidative stress in patients with PM. The reduction in oxidative stress parameters with treatment in patients with ASXL1 mutation, intermediate-2, and high-risk patients was observed to be higher.

Insufficiency of non-canonical PRC1 synergizes with JAK2V617F in the development of myelofibrosis

Insufficiency of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which trimethylates histone H3 at lysine 27, is frequently found in primary myelofibrosis and promotes the development of JAK2V617F-induced myelofibrosis in mice by enhancing the production of dysplastic megakaryocytes. Polycomb group ring finger protein 1 (Pcgf1) is a component of PRC1.1, a non-canonical PRC1 that monoubiquitylates H2A at lysine 119 (H2AK119ub1). We herein investigated the impact of PRC1.1 insufficiency on myelofibrosis. The deletion of Pcgf1 in JAK2V617F mice strongly promoted the development of lethal myelofibrosis accompanied by a block in erythroid differentiation. Transcriptome and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequence analyses showed the de-repression of PRC1.1 target genes in Pcgf1-deficient JAK2V617F hematopoietic progenitors and revealed Hoxa cluster genes as direct targets. The deletion of Pcgf1 in JAK2V617F hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), as well as the overexpression of Hoxa9, restored the attenuated proliferation of JAK2V617F progenitors. The overexpression of Hoxa9 also enhanced JAK2V617F-mediated myelofibrosis. The expression of PRC2 target genes identified in PRC2-insufficient JAK2V617F HSPCs was not largely altered in Pcgf1-deleted JAK2V617F HSPCs. The present results revealed a tumor suppressor function for PRC1.1 in myelofibrosis and suggest that PRC1.1 insufficiency has a different impact from that of PRC2 insufficiency on the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis.

Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) can transform into blast phase MPN (leukemic transformation; MPN-BP), typically via accelerated phase MPN (MPN-AP), in ∼20-25% of the cases. MPN-AP and MPN-BP are characterized by 10-19% and ≥20% blasts, respectively. MPN-AP/BP portend a dismal prognosis with no established conventional treatment. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the sole modality associated with long-term survival.

SUMMARY

MPN-AP/BP has a markedly different mutational profile from de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In MPN-AP/BP, TP53 and IDH1/2 are more frequent, whereas FLT3 and DNMT3A are rare. Higher incidence of leukemic transformation has been associated with the most aggressive MPN subtype, myelofibrosis (MF); other risk factors for leukemic transformation include rising blast counts above 3-5%, advanced age, severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, increasing bone marrow fibrosis, type 1 CALR-unmutated status, lack of driver mutations (negative for JAK2, CALR, or MPL genes), adverse cytogenetics, and acquisition of ≥2 high-molecular risk mutations (ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, SRSF2, and U2AF1Q157). The aforementioned factors have been incorporated in several novel prognostic scoring systems for MF. Currently, elderly/unfit patients with MPN-AP/BP are treated with hypomethylating agents with/without ruxolitinib; these regimens appear to confer comparable benefit to intensive chemotherapy but with lower toxicity. Retrospective studies in patients who acquired actionable mutations during MPN-AP/BP showed positive outcomes with targeted AML treatments, such as IDH1/2 inhibitors, and require further evaluation in clinical trials. Key Messages: Therapy for MPN-AP patients represents an unmet medical need. MF patients, in particular, should be appropriately stratified regarding their prognosis and the risk for transformation. Higher-risk patients should be monitored regularly and treated prior to progression to MPN-BP. MPN-AP patients may be treated with hypomethylating agents alone or in combination with ruxolitinib; also, patients can be provided with the option to enroll in rationally designed clinical trials exploring combination regimens, including novel targeted drugs, with an ultimate goal to transition to transplant.

Lessons from mouse models of MPN

Over the past decades, a variety of MPN mouse models have been developed to express in HSC the main mutations identified in patients: JAK2^V617F, CALRdel52 or ins5 and MPL^W515L. These models mimic quite faithfully human PV or ET with their natural evolutions into MF and their hemostasis complications, demonstrating the driver function of these mutations in MPN. Here, we review these models and show how they have improved our general understanding of MPN regarding (1) the mechanisms of fibrosis, thrombosis/hemorrhages and disease initiation, (2) the roles of additional mutations and signaling pathways in disease progression and (3) the preclinical development of novel therapies. We also address controversial results between these models and remind how these models may differ from human MPN onset and also how basically mice are not humans, encouraging caution when one draw lessons from mice to humans. Furthermore, the contribution of germline genetic predisposition, HSC and niche aging, metabolic, oxidative, replicative or genotoxic stress, inflammation, immune escape and additional mutations need to be considered in further investigations to encompass the full complexity of human MPN in mice.

Epigenetic Dysregulation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

This article reviews the genetic data on epigenetic modifying mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms and their clinical implications, preclinical studies exploring our current understanding of how mutations in epigenetic modifying proteins cooperate with myeloproliferative neoplasms drivers to promote disease progression, and recent advances in novel therapeutics supporting the role of targeting epigenetic pathways to treat fibrotic progression.

Murine Modeling of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms, such as polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis, are bone marrow disorders that result in the overproduction of mature clonal myeloid elements. Identification of recurrent genetic mutations has been described and aid in diagnosis and prognostic determination. Mouse models of these mutations have confirmed the biologic significance of these mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasm disease biology and provided greater insights on the pathways that are dysregulated with each mutation. The models are useful tools that have led to preclinical testing and provided data as validation for future myeloproliferative neoplasm clinical trials.

Mouse models of myeloproliferative neoplasms for pre-clinical testing of novel therapeutic agents

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), are clonal hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) disorders driven by gain-of-function mutations in JAK2 (JAK2-V617F), CALR or MPL genes. MPN treatment options currently mainly consist of cytoreductive therapy with hydroxyurea and JAK2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib. Pegylated interferon-alpha can induce complete molecular remission (CMR) in some MPN patients when applied at early stages of disease. The ultimate goal of modern MPN treatment is to develop novel therapies that specifically target mutant HSCs in MPN and consistently induce CMR. Basic research has identified a growing number of candidate drugs with promising effects in vitro. A first step on the way to developing these compounds into drugs approved for treatment of MPN patients often consists of examining the effects in vivo using pre-clinical mouse models of MPN. Here we review the current state of MPN mouse models and the experimental setup for their optimal use in drug testing. In addition to novel compounds, combinatorial therapeutic approaches are often considered for the treatment of MPN. Optimized and validated mouse models can provide an efficient way to rapidly assess and select the most promising combinations and thereby contribute to accelerating the development of novel therapies of MPN.

Clonal hematopoiesis: Molecular basis and clinical relevance

Recent genomics studies have revealed that clonal hematopoietic expansion due to recurrent somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells are common in older people without evidence of hematological malignancies. This phenomenon, termed clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), is associated with greater risk for hematological malignancy and cardiovascular diseases, leading to decreased overall survival of the affected individuals. The most frequently mutated genes in CHIP cases include genes associated with epigenetic modification, cell signaling, DNA damage response and RNA splicing, which are all recurrently mutated in myeloid malignancies. Recent findings suggest that these genetic alleles exert pleiotropic effects on hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) functions, transcriptional regulations, DNA damage responses and resistance to cellular stresses. Recent studies have uncovered the clinical relevance of CHIP in various settings during the management of hematological malignancies. Elucidating overall picture of clonal evolution based on CHIP will help developing preventive measures and novel treatments for hematological malignancies.

Murine Models of Myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by a relatively poor prognosis in patients. Understanding the factors that drive MF pathogenesis is crucial to identifying novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to improve patient care. Driver mutations in three main genes (janus kinase 2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), and myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene (MPL)) are recurrently mutated in MPN and are sufficient to engender MPN using animal models. Interestingly, animal studies have shown that the underlying molecular mutation and the acquisition of additional genetic lesions is associated with MF outcome and transition from early stage MPN such as essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) to secondary MF. In this issue, we review murine models that have contributed to a better characterization of MF pathobiology and identification of new therapeutic opportunities in MPN.

Myelofibrosis biology and contemporary management

Myelofibrosis is an enigmatic myeloproliferative neoplasm, despite noteworthy strides in understanding its genetic underpinnings. Driver mutations involving JAK2, CALR or MPL in 90% of patients mediate constitutive JAK-STAT signaling which, in concert with epigenetic alterations (ASXL1, DNMT3A, SRSF2, EZH2, IDH1/2 mutations), play a fundamental role in disease pathogenesis. Aberrant immature megakaryocytes are a quintessential feature, exhibiting reduced GATA1 protein expression and secreting a plethora of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 ß, TGF-ß), growth factors (b-FGF, PDGF, VEGF) in addition to extra cellular matrix components (fibronectin, laminin, collagens). The ensuing disrupted interactions amongst the megakaryocytes, osteoblasts, endothelium, stromal cells and myofibroblasts within the bone marrow culminate in the development of fibrosis and osteosclerosis. Presently, prognostic assessment tools for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are centered on genetics, with incorporation of cytogenetic and molecular information into the mutation-enhanced (MIPSS 70-plus version 2.0) and genetically-inspired (GIPSS) prognostic scoring systems. Both models illustrate substantial clinical heterogeneity in PMF and serve as the crux for risk-adapted therapeutic decisions. A major challenge remains the dearth of disease-modifying drugs, whereas allogeneic transplant offers the chance of long-term remission for some patients. Our review serves to synopsise current appreciation of the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis together with emerging management strategies.

The Molecular Genetics of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Activated JAK-STAT signaling is central to the pathogenesis of BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and occurs as a result of MPN phenotypic driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL The spectrum of concomitant somatic mutations in other genes has now largely been defined in MPNs. With the integration of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels into clinical practice, the clinical significance of concomitant mutations in MPNs has become clearer. In this review, we describe the consequences of concomitant mutations in the most frequently mutated classes of genes in MPNs: (1) DNA methylation pathways, (2) chromatin modification, (3) RNA splicing, (4) signaling pathways, (5) transcription factors, and (6) DNA damage response/stress signaling. The increased use of molecular genetics for early risk stratification of patients brings the possibility of earlier intervention to prevent disease progression in MPNs. However, additional studies are required to decipher underlying molecular mechanisms and effectively target them.

The role of driver mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms: insights from mouse models

High frequency of JAK2V617F or CALR exon 9 mutations is a main molecular feature of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Analysis of mouse models driven by these mutations suggests that they are a direct cause of MPNs and that the expression levels of the mutated genes define the disease phenotype. The function of MPN-initiating cells has also been elucidated by these mouse models. Such mouse models also play an important role in modeling disease to investigate the effects and action mechanisms of therapeutic drugs, such as JAK2 inhibitors and interferon α, against MPNs. The mutation landscape of hematological tumors has already been clarified by next-generation sequencing technology, and the importance of functional analysis of mutant genes in vivo should increase further in the future.