Hepcidin is a relevant iron status indicator in infancy: results from a randomized trial of early vs. delayed cord clamping

Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction in Perinatal Iron Deficiency

Iron deficiency in the fetal and neonatal period (perinatal iron deficiency) bodes poorly for neurodevelopment. Given its common occurrence and the negative impact on brain development, a screening and treatment strategy that is focused on optimizing brain development in perinatal iron deficiency is necessary. Pediatric societies currently recommend a universal iron supplementation strategy for full-term and preterm infants that does not consider individual variation in body iron status and thus could lead to undertreatment or overtreatment. Moreover, the focus is on hematological normalcy and not optimal brain development. Several serum iron indices and hematological parameters in the perinatal period are associated with a risk of abnormal neurodevelopment, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers for screening and monitoring treatment in infants at risk for perinatal iron deficiency. A biomarker-based screening and treatment strategy that is focused on optimizing brain development will likely improve outcomes in perinatal iron deficiency.

Anemia, Iron Supplementation, and the Brain

The developing brain is particularly vulnerable to extrinsic environmental events such as anemia and iron deficiency during periods of rapid development. Studies of infants with postnatal iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia clearly demonstrated negative effects on short-term and long-term brain development and function. Randomized interventional trials studied erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and hemoglobin-based red blood cell transfusion thresholds to determine how they affect preterm infant neurodevelopment. Studies of red blood cell transfusion components are limited in preterm neonates. A biomarker strategy measuring brain iron status and health in the preanemic period is desirable to evaluate treatment options and brain response.

Regulation of iron absorption in infants

BACKGROUND

Iron programs in low- and middle-income countries often target infants and young children. Limited data from human infants and mouse models suggest that homeostatic control of iron absorption is incomplete in early infancy. Excess iron absorption during infancy may have detrimental effects.

OBJECTIVES

Our aims were to 1) investigate determinants of iron absorption in infants aged 3-15 mo and assess whether regulation of iron absorption is fully mature during this period and 2) define the threshold ferritin and hepcidin concentrations in infancy that trigger upregulation of iron absorption.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis of standardized, stable iron isotope absorption studies performed by our laboratory in infants and toddlers. We used generalized additive mixed modeling (GAMM) to examine relationships between ferritin, hepcidin, and fractional iron absorption (FIA).

RESULTS

Kenyan and Thai infants aged 2.9-15.1 mo (n = 269) were included; 66.8% were iron deficient and 50.4% were anemic. In regression models, hepcidin, ferritin, and serum transferrin receptor were significant predictors of FIA, whereas C-reactive protein was not. In the model including hepcidin, hepcidin was the strongest predictor of FIA (β = -0.435). In all models, interaction terms, including age, were not significant predictors of FIA or hepcidin. The fitted GAMM trend of ferritin versus FIA showed a significant negative slope until ferritin of 46.3 μg/L (95% CI: 42.1, 50.5 μg/L), which corresponded to an FIA decrease from 26.5% to 8.3%; above this ferritin value, FIA remained stable. The fitted GAMM trend of hepcidin versus FIA showed a significant negative slope until hepcidin of 3.15 nmol/L (95% CI: 2.67, 3.63 nmol/L), above which FIA remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the regulatory pathways of iron absorption are intact in infancy. In infants, iron absorption begins to increase at threshold ferritin and hepcidin values of ∼46 μg/L and ∼3 nmol/L, respectively, similar to adult values.

Iron disorders and hepcidin

Iron is an essential element due to its role in a wide variety of physiological processes. Iron homeostasis is crucial to prevent iron overload disorders as well as iron deficiency anemia. The liver synthesized peptide hormone hepcidin is a master regulator of systemic iron metabolism. Given its role in overall health, measurement of hepcidin can be used as a predictive marker in disease states. In addition, hepcidin-targeting drugs appear beneficial as therapeutic agents. This review emphasizes recent development on analytical techniques (immunochemical, mass spectrometry and biosensors) and therapeutic approaches (hepcidin agonists, stimulators and antagonists). These insights highlight hepcidin as a potential biomarker as well as an aid in the development of new drugs for iron disorders.

Timing of umbilical cord clamping among infants with congenital heart disease

The optimal timing of clamping and cutting the umbilical cord at birth among infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) remains a subject of controversy and debate. The benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) among term infants without CHD are well described, but the evidence base for DCC among infants with CHD has not been characterized adequately. The goals of the present review are to: 1) compare outcomes of DCC versus early cord clamping (ECC) in term (≥37 weeks of gestation) infants; 2) discuss potential risk/benefit profiles in applying DCC among term infants with CHD; 3) use rigorous systematic review methodology to assess the quality and quantity of published reports on cord clamping practices among term infants with CHD; 4) identify needs and opportunities for future research and interdisciplinary collaboration. Our systematic review shows that previous trials have largely excluded infants with CHD. Therefore, the supposition that DCC is advantageous because it is associated with improved neurologic and hematologic outcome is untested in the CHD population. Given that CHD is markedly heterogeneous, to minimize unnecessary and potentially harmful cord clamping practices, identification of subgroups (single-ventricle, cyanotic lesions) most likely to benefit from optimal cord clamping practices is necessary to optimize risk/benefit profiles. The available evidence base suggests that contemporary, pragmatic, randomized controlled trials comparing DCC with ECC among infants with CHD are needed.