|
1
|
Azzalini E, Bonin S. Molecular diagnostics of prostate cancer: impact of molecular tests. Asian J Androl 2024:00129336-990000000-00185. [PMID: 38738960 DOI: 10.4103/aja202411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among men. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is used in screening programs for early detection with a consequent reduction of PCa-specific mortality at the cost of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of the nonaggressive PCa. Recently, several assays have been commercially developed to implement PCa diagnosis, but they have not been included in both screening and diagnosis of PCa. This review aims to describe the actual and novel commercially available molecular biomarkers that can be used in PCa management to implement and tailor the screening and diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eros Azzalini
- DSM, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste 34149, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Liu Y, Hatano K, Nonomura N. Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:42.e45. [PMID: 38772530 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major health concern that necessitates appropriate diagnostic approaches for timely intervention. This review critically evaluates the role of liquid biopsy techniques, focusing on blood- and urine-based biomarkers, in overcoming the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods. The 4Kscore test and Prostate Health Index have demonstrated efficacy in distinguishing PCa from benign conditions. Urinary biomarker tests such as PCa antigen 3, MyProstateScore, SelectMDx, and ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore test have revolutionized risk stratification and minimized unnecessary biopsies. Emerging biomarkers, including non-coding RNAs, circulating tumor DNA, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) glycosylation, offer valuable insights into PCa biology, enabling personalized treatment strategies. Advancements in non-invasive liquid biomarkers for PCa diagnosis may facilitate the stratification of patients and avoid unnecessary biopsies, particularly when PSA is in the gray area of 4 to 10 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutong Liu
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Koji Hatano
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Turchi B, Lombardo R, Franco A, Tema G, Nacchia A, Cicione A, Pastore AL, Carbone A, Fuschi A, Franco G, Tubaro A, De Nunzio C. Residents and Consultants Have Equal Outcomes When Performing Transrectal Fusion Biopsies: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:747-758. [PMID: 38392049 PMCID: PMC10887997 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of our study was to compare the performance of residents vs. consultants in transrectal fusion prostate biopsies (FUS-PBs), as well as patient-reported comfort. Between January 2021 and October 2022, a consecutive series of patients undergoing FUS-PBs were randomized into two groups: (A) FUS-PBs performed by a consultant; (B) FUS-PBs performed by trained residents (>50 procedures). All patients underwent FUS-PBs with 12 systematic cores and 3/6 target cores. The detection rate and number of positive cores in the target lesion were compared between groups, and the patient's discomfort after the procedure was evaluated using the VAS scale. Overall, 140 patients with a median age of 72 years were enrolled. Overall, 69/140 (49.3%) presented prostate cancer and 53/69 (76.8%) presented a clinically significant cancer (Grade Group ≥ 2). Consultants presented a detection rate of 37/70 (52.9%) and residents a detection rate of 32/70 (45.7%) (p > 0.2); the mean number of positive cores in the index lesion was similar in both groups (1.5 vs. 1.1; p > 0.10). In terms of the patients' experiences, the procedure was well tolerated, with a median VAS score of 2 in both groups, with no statistically significant differences. Residents showed satisfactory outcomes in terms of detection rate, procedural time, and patient comfort when performing prostate biopsies. Residents, after adequate training, can safely perform prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; (B.T.); (R.L.); (A.F.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (A.C.); (A.L.P.); (A.C.); (A.F.); (G.F.); (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Lombardo R, Tema G, Nacchia A, Mancini E, Franco S, Zammitti F, Franco A, Cash H, Gravina C, Guidotti A, Gallo G, Ghezzo N, Cicione A, Tubaro A, Autorino R, De Nunzio C. Role of Perilesional Sampling of Patients Undergoing Fusion Prostate Biopsies. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1719. [PMID: 37629576 PMCID: PMC10455324 DOI: 10.3390/life13081719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, researchers have proposed perilesional sampling during prostate biopsies to avoid systematic biopsies of patients at risk of prostate cancer. The aim of our study is to evaluate the role of perilesional sampling to avoid systematic biopsies of patients undergoing fusion biopsies. A prospective cohort of patients undergoing transrectal MRI transrectal fusion biopsies were consecutively enrolled. All the patients underwent systematic biopsies (SB), targeted biopsies (TB) and perilesional biopsies within 10 mm from the lesion (PB). The detection rates of different strategies were determined. A total of 262 patients were enrolled. The median age of those enrolled was 70 years. The mean BMI was 27 kg/m2, and the mean and prostate volume was 52 mL. A PIRADS score ≥ 4 was recorded in 163/262 (40%) patients. Overall, the detection rates of cancer were 43.5% (114/262) and 35% (92/262) for csPCa. The use of the target + peri-target strategy resulted in a detection of 32.8% (86/262) of cancer cases and of 29% (76/262) of csPCa cases (Grade Group > 2). Using the target plus peri-target approach resulted in us missing 18/262 (7%) of the csPCa cases, avoiding the diagnosis of 8/262 (3%) of nsPCa cases. A biopsy strategy including lesional and perilesional sampling could avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. However, the risk of missing significant cancers is present. Future studies should assess the cost-benefit relationship of different strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Lombardo
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Giorgia Tema
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Antonio Nacchia
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Elisa Mancini
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Sara Franco
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Filippo Zammitti
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Antonio Franco
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Hannes Cash
- Department of Urology, University of Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany;
| | - Carmen Gravina
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Alessio Guidotti
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Giacomo Gallo
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Nicola Ghezzo
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Antonio Cicione
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Andrea Tubaro
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA;
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.L.); (G.T.); (A.N.); (E.M.); (S.F.); (F.Z.); (A.F.); (C.G.); (A.G.); (G.G.); (N.G.); (A.C.); (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Ferro M, Rocco B, Maggi M, Lucarelli G, Falagario UG, Del Giudice F, Crocetto F, Barone B, La Civita E, Lasorsa F, Brescia A, Catellani M, Busetto GM, Tataru OS, Terracciano D. Beyond blood biomarkers: the role of SelectMDX in clinically significant prostate cancer identification. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2023; 23:1061-1070. [PMID: 37897252 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2277366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New potential biomarkers to pre-intervention identification of a clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) will prevent overdiagnosis and overtreatment and limit quality of life impairment of PCa patients. AREAS COVERED We have developed a comprehensive review focusing our research on the increasing knowledge of the role of SelectMDX® in csPCa detection. Areas identified as clinically relevant are the ability of SelectMDX® to predict csPCa in active surveillance setting, its predictive ability when combined with multiparametric MRI and the role of SelectMDX® in the landscape of urinary biomarkers. EXPERT OPINION Several PCa biomarkers have been developed either alone or in combination with clinical variables to improve csPCa detection. SelectMDX® score includes genomic markers, age, PSA, prostate volume, and digital rectal examination. Several studies have shown consistency in the ability to improve detection of csPCa, avoidance of unnecessary prostate biopsies, helpful in decision-making for clinical benefit of PCa patients with future well designed, and impactful studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science, University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via A. Di Rudini 8, Milan 20142, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Umberto I - 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Via A.Gramsci 89/91, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5 - 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology Unit, AORN Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Via Ferdinando Palasciano, 81100 Caserta , Italy
| | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I 40 - 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Umberto I - 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Brescia
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Michele Catellani
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Via A.Gramsci 89/91, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mures, Gh Marinescu 35, 540142 Târgu Mures, Romania
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I 40 - 80138 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
De Nunzio C, Lombardo R. Best of 2022 in prostate cancer and prostatic diseases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:5-7. [PMID: 36739329 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00652-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Cosimo De Nunzio
- Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Urology, Rome, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Lombardo
- Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Urology, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Samora NL, Tallman JE, Tosoian JJ. The evolving clinical use of prostate cancer biomarkers. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022; 25:386-387. [PMID: 35798854 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00567-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan L Samora
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jacob E Tallman
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Tosoian
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. .,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|