Treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from the Connect® MM Registry

Real-Life Management of Patients Aged 80 Years Old and Over With Multiple Myeloma: Results of the EMMY Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma patients aged 80 years and older are a population more prone to comorbidities and frailty. We aim to describe the real-life management and outcomes of this population. EMMY is a descriptive large-scale study.

PATIENTS

Between 2017 and 2021 we included 4383 patients of which 894 (20.3%) were aged ≥ 80 years. Four cohorts of patients aged ≥ 80 years were analysed: line 1 (L1), line 2 (L2), line 3 (L3) or line 4+ (L4+).

RESULTS

The proportion of patients ≥ 80 years old was 20.8% in L1, 21.3% in L2, 20.9% in L3 and 17.8% in L4+. L1 patients received more treatment including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) (42.9%), L2 patients received mainly an immunomodulator (IMID) (65.9%) or an anti-CD38 (31.5%). For L3, IMID was used in 71.4% than an anti-CD38 (33.5%). L4+ patients received a PI (40.6%), IMID (33.2%) or an anti-CD38 (29.1%). Regarding efficacy, the median progression-free survival was 18.4 months in L1, 15.1 months in L2, 10.4 months in L3 and 6.5 months in L4+. The median overall survival was 49 months in L1, 31.3 months in L2, 21.4 months in L3 and 13.6 months in L4+.

CONCLUSION

EMMY cohort confirmed that patients ≥ 80 years of age represent an important proportion of MM patients, in the de novo or relapse setting. This study is an important step in improving our comprehension and management of treatment in elderly patients.

Frailty measures in multiple myeloma: evaluating the impact on outcomes and quality-of-life in clinical trials and real-world practice

Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy that predominantly affects older individuals, in whom frailty is prevalent. Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by decreased reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors, leading to decreased functional capacity. Frailty is prevalent in older individuals and negatively impacts treatment outcomes. In this review, we summarize the tools and strategies used to assess frailty in patients with multiple myeloma, review data describing treatment outcomes in frail adults with multiple myeloma using clinical trial and real-world evidence and evaluate the potential relationship of frailty with quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during therapy for multiple myeloma. Frailty-adapted therapy for MM has the potential to improve treatment outcomes for older adults with myeloma.

Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Long-surviving Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Over 13 Years of Follow-up in the ConnectⓇ MM Registry

BACKGROUND

Over the last 15 years, improvements in patient management and treatments have been associated with longer survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The Connect MM Registry is a long-running, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). We assessed the demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of long-term survivors (LTS) enrolled in this registry.

METHODS

Adults with NDMM (n = 3,011) were enrolled from 250 community, academic, and government sites across the US from 2009-2016. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, quality of life (QoL), and overall survival (OS) were examined among LTS, defined as patients with follow-up of ≥ 8 years after enrollment.

RESULTS

As of February 7, 2023, 518 patients were LTS and 2,493 were non-LTS. LTS were generally younger and had better performance status at enrollment compared with non-LTS. Most (65%) LTS received stem cell transplants and few (2%) experienced disease progression within 6 months of starting first line of therapy. At data cutoff, 63% of LTS were still on treatment at their most recent visit. QoL scores and QoL questionnaire completion rates were consistently higher among LTS than non-LTS. The estimated 8-year OS rate of all patients enrolled in the registry was 40%, comparable to an observed 8-year survival of 39% from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides insights on long-surviving patients with MM using real-world data and therefore presents generalizability beyond data obtained in long-term follow-up of clinical trials, underscoring the need for longitudinal follow-up through registries.

Cellular Therapies for Multiple Myeloma: Engineering Hope

Multiple myeloma (MM) treatment remains challenging due to its relapsed/refractory disease course as well as intra- and inter-patient heterogeneity. Cellular immunotherapies, especially chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), mark a major breakthrough, achieving long-lasting remissions and instilling hope for a potential cure. While ongoing clinical trials are increasingly driving approved cellular products towards earlier lines of therapy, novel targets as well as advanced approaches employing natural killer (NK) cells or dendritic cell (DC) vaccines are currently under investigation. Treatment resistance, driven by tumor-intrinsic factors such as antigen escape and the intricate dynamics of the tumor microenvironment (TME), along with emerging side effects such as movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs), are the major limitations of approved cellular therapies. To improve efficacy and overcome resistance, cutting-edge research is exploring strategies to target the microenvironment as well as synergistic combinatorial approaches. Recent advances in CAR-T cell production involve shortened manufacturing protocols and "off-the-shelf" CAR-T cells, aiming at decreasing socioeconomic barriers and thereby increasing patient access to this potential lifesaving therapy. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the evolving field of cellular therapies for MM, underlining the potential to achieve long-lasting responses.

Impact of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone induction on patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and renal impairment: Results from the Connect® MM Registry

Limited data exist on the effects of induction treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and renal impairment (RI), who may also be ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant. This analysis investigated the impact of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVd) induction on renal function in patients from the Connect® MM Registry based on transplant status. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with symptomatic MM diagnosed ≤2 months before enrollment. Patients in this analysis received front-line RVd for ≥3 cycles and were grouped by transplant status and baseline renal function. As of August 4, 2021, 344 transplanted and 289 non-transplanted patients had received RVd for ≥3 cycles at induction. Improved renal function was observed at 3, 6, and 12 months in patients with all severities of RI at baseline. In patients with >60 and ≤60 creatinine clearance mL/min at baseline, median progression-free survival was 49.4 months and 47.6 months in transplanted patients and 35.7 months and 29.1 months in non-transplanted patients, respectively. These results provide real-world evidence that patients with NDMM and RI who receive front-line RVd for ≥3 cycles may have improved renal function regardless of transplant status, with renal function no longer affecting the long-term outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT01081028.

The Effect of Age and Other Patient Characteristics on Outcomes Among Nontransplanted Patients Who Were Treated With First-Line Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone: Results From the ConnectⓇ MM Registry

BACKGROUND

Lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (d) is a standard-of-care regimen in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, characteristics and outcomes for nontransplanted patients receiving frontline RVd are not well understood.

PATIENTS

The ConnectⓇ MM Registry is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of NDMM patients.

METHODS

This analysis investigated characteristics and outcomes of patients who received RVd alone or followed by Rd or R (RVd ± Rd/R) who did not undergo frontline autologous stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

As of August 2021, 314 of 1979 nontransplanted patients received RVd ± Rd/R as initial therapy. Of these, 135 were aged ≤ 65 years and 179 were > 65 years. 108 patients had time to relapse (TTR) of ≤ 12 months and 182 had TTR > 12 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable regardless of TTR and age group except renal function, which was more commonly impaired in older patients. Among patients aged ≤ 65 and > 65 years, median duration of first-line treatment was 6.3 and 9.0 months, median time to next line for those who received second-line therapy was 15.5 and 15.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.3 and 23.0 months, and median overall survival was 60.0 and 59.1 months, respectively. High-risk disease (per IMWG criteria) and high serum calcium were associated with higher hazard of progression or death; the adjusted PFS hazard ratio with respect to age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 years) based on multivariable analysis was 1.18 (0.89-1.57; P = .25).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate RVd is active across age groups and provide a better understanding of outcomes with RVd in NDMM.

Personalized Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in Frail Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to expand at a rapid pace, management of older adults and frail patients becomes increasingly challenging. As these patients have traditionally been underrepresented on clinical trials, there is limited guidance on the optimal approach to frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

RECENT FINDINGS

Frailty is an independent predictor of tolerability and response to antineoplastic treatment. Stringent eligibility criteria have often excluded these patients, but recently some large trials have included frailty sub-analyses to help guide management. In general, triplet regimens are preferred to doublet regimens in this population and enrollment on a clinical trial should be prioritized when possible. In this review, we summarize the MM frailty scoring tools that have been developed to identify and assess this vulnerable population. We present the clinical trials over the past decade that have enrolled frail patients and/or have included subgroup analyses to help elucidate the response and tolerability of different regimens in this underrepresented group. We provide practical advice regarding assessment and management of frail patients NDMM and RRMM.

Individualized dynamic frailty-tailored therapy (DynaFiT) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a prospective study

It remains a substantial challenge to balance treatment efficacy and toxicity in geriatric patients with multiple myeloma (MM), primarily due to the dynamic nature of frailty. Here, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of dynamic frailty-tailored therapy (DynaFiT) in elderly patients. Patients with newly diagnosed MM (aged ≥ 65 years) received eight induction cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (daratumumab was recommended for frail patients), with treatment intensity adjusted according to longitudinal changes in the frailty category (IMWG-FI) at each cycle. Of 90 patients, 33 (37%), 16 (18%), and 41 (45%) were fit, intermediate fit, and frail at baseline, respectively. Of 75 patients who had geriatric assessment at least twice, 28 (37%) experienced frailty category changes at least once. At analysis, 15/26 (58%) frail patients improved (27% became fit and 31% became intermediate fit), 4/15 (27%) intermediate fit patients either improved or deteriorated (two for each), and 6/30 (20%) fit patients deteriorated. During induction, 34/90 (38%) patients discontinued treatment, including 10/33 (30%) fit, 4/16 (25%) intermediate fit, and 20/41 (49%) frail; 14/40 (35%) frail patients discontinued treatment within the first two cycles, mainly because of non-hematologic toxicity (mostly infections). For fit, intermediate-fit, and frail patients, the overall response rate was 100%, 93%, and 73%, respectively; one-year overall survival was 90%, 75%, and 54%, respectively. Therefore, the individualized DynaFiT is feasible and promising for heterogeneous elderly patients.

Navigating High-Risk and Ultrahigh-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Challenges and Emerging Strategies

Despite significant improvement in the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with novel therapies, there is still an underserved high-risk (HR) population that experiences early disease progression and death. With the median survival crossing 10 years, we defined ultrahigh-risk (uHR)MM as MM leading to death within 24-36 months of diagnosis and HRMM as MM leading to death within 36-60 months. Several features have emerged as markers of uHRMM: the co-occurrence of two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary disease, plasma cell leukemia and a high-risk gene expression profiling signature. The heterogeneous risk definition across trials, the few trials available designed for HR patients, and the small HR subgroups in all-comers trials make it difficult to generate recommendations with high levels of evidence. Nevertheless, regardless of treatment administered, several studies consistently showed that achieving and maintaining measurable residual disease negativity is now considered the main factor able to mitigate the adverse prognosis related to baseline features. For fit patients with HR transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM, quadruplet induction/consolidation treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors and dexamethasone, and autologous stem-cell transplant and maintenance with, if available, at least a doublet combination could be considered the option of choice. For non-TE NDMM, considering the recent data generated and carefully reviewing those upcoming, quadruplet treatment consisting of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and dexamethasone should also be considered. Future trials integrating BCMA-directed novel generation immunotherapies hold great potential for further advancing the treatment landscape in all NDMM patients with HR disease.

Analysis of baseline circulating tumor cells integrated with PET/CT findings in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

We aimed to improve prognostic predictors in patients with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma (TIE-MM) by combining baseline circulating clonal tumor cells (CTCs) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings. The factors associated with prognosis were retrospectively investigated in 126 patients with TIE-MM who underwent CTC quantification by multiparameter flow cytometry and PET/CT at the initial presentation. The total lesion glycolysis (TLG) level was calculated using the Metavol software. The median percentage of CTC was 0.06% (range, 0%-4.82%), and 54 patients (42.9%) demonstrated high CTC levels. High CTC levels were associated with significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS, 2-year 43.4% vs 68.1%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS, 5-year 39.0% vs 68.3%; P < .001). Similarly, high TLG levels significantly worsened the PFS (2-year, 41.2% vs 67.6%; P = .038) and OS (5-year, 37.7% vs 63.1%; P = .019). The multivariate analyses showed that Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) III, high CTC and TLG levels, and complete response were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS. A novel predictive model was constructed using CTCs, TLG, and R-ISS III. The patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the number of risk factors, revealing an extremely high-risk group with a 2-year PFS of 0% and a 5-year OS of 20%. Patients without any high-risk features had better prognosis, with a 2-year PFS of 78.6% and a 5-year OS of 79.5%. The combination of CTCs and volumetric assessment of PET/CT at diagnosis augments the existing stratification systems and may pave the way for a risk-adapted treatment approach.

The Real-World Evidence on the Fragility and Its Impact on the Choice of Treatment Regimen in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma over 75 Years of Age

Fragility scales are intended to help in therapeutic decisions. Here, we asked if the fragility assessment in MM patients ≥ 75 years old qualified for treatment by the local physician correlates with the choice of treatment: a two- or three-drug regimens. Between 7/2018 and 12/2019, we prospectively enrolled 197 MM patients at the start of treatment from the 13 Polish Myeloma Group centers. The data to assess fragility were prospectively collected, but centrally assessed fragility was not disclosed to the local center. The activity of daily living (ADL) could be assessed in 192 (97.5%) and was independent in 158 (80.2%), moderately impaired in 23 (11.7%), and 11 (5.6%) in completely dependent. Patients with more than three comorbidities made up 26.9% (53 patients). Thus, according to the Palumbo calculator, 43 patients were in the intermediate fitness group (21.8%), and the rest belonged to the frailty group (153, 77.7%). Overall, 79.7% of patients (157) received three-drug regimens and 20.3% (40) received two-drug regimens. In each ECOG group, more than three out of four patients received three-drug regimens. According to the ADL scale, 82.3% of the independent 65.2% of moderately impaired, and 81.8% of the dependent received three-drug regimens. Out of 53 patients with at least four comorbidities, 71.7% received three-drug regimens, and the rest received two-drug regimens. Thirty-four patients from the intermediate fit group (79.0%), and 123 (79.9%) from the frail group received three-drug regimens. Early mortality occurred in 25 patients (12.7%). No one discontinued treatment due to toxicity. To conclude, MM patients over 75 are mainly treated with triple-drug regimens, not only in reduced doses, regardless of their frailty scores. However, the absence of prospective fragility assessment did not negatively affect early mortality and the number of treatment discontinuations, which brings into question the clinical utility of current fragility scales in everyday practice.

Clinical significance of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the era of novel agents in patients older than 65 years with multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) in patients under 65 years of age. However, the performing of ASCT in older patients > 65 years without comorbidities or complications is controversial. Introduction of novel drugs, such as daratumumab, has improved the long-term survival of patients with MM who are ineligible for ASCT. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of ASCT in older patients, even in the era of novel drugs. A total of 55 patients aged 65-74 years (15 ASCT recipients and 40 ASCT-ineligible patients) newly diagnosed with MM between March 2013 and October 2021 at our institution were analyzed in this study. There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival (84.6% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.72) and progression-free survival (PFS) (61.2% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.40) between ASCT recipients and ASCT-ineligible patients. There was also no significant difference in complete response (CR) with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rate between the two groups (27% vs. 33%, p = 1.0). Multivariate analysis showed that CR was an independent predictor of PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.76; p = 0.01). In this retrospective study, despite patients who were determined to be intolerant to ASCT, the non-ASCT group was non-inferior to the ASCT group in PFS and overall response rate. The results of this study confirm that the significance of ASCT is diminishing in patients 65 years of age and older because newer agents can achieve good responses without ASCT.

Treatment of older adult or frail patients with multiple myeloma

Older adults with multiple myeloma (MM) are a growing population, and personalizing treatment based on disease and health status is imperative. Similar to MM staging systems that provide disease-related prognostic information, myeloma-specific frailty tools can better identify subgroups at greatest risk for treatment-related toxicity and early treatment discontinuation, as well as predict overall survival. Several myeloma-specific validated tools are well studied. Although these fitness/frailty scores have shaped our understanding of the heterogeneity among older adults with myeloma, the application of such scores in treatment decision making (ie, transplant considerations, relapse) is an unmet need. Here we outline how to incorporate frailty assessments in the evaluation of older adults with MM in the clinical setting with consideration of other factors such as patient preferences, treatment risks/benefits, life expectancy, and disease biology.