Assessing the role of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome

How I treat higher-risk MDS

ABSTRACT

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are a widely heterogenous group of myeloid malignancies characterized by morphological dysplasia, a defective hematopoiesis, and recurrent genetic abnormalities. The original International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and revised IPSS have been used to risk-stratify patients with MDS to guide treatment strategies. In higher-risk MDS, the therapeutic approach is geared toward delaying leukemic transformation and prolonging survival. For more than a decade, the hypomethylating agents azacitidine and decitabine have been the standard of care and, when feasible, an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation should be considered. However, the IPSS scoring systems solely rely on clinical, morphological, and cytogenetic features and do not account for somatic mutations present in >80% of cases. These genetic abnormalities have been shown to play a crucial role in prognostication, prompting the development of molecular IPSS, and the integration of genomic features into MDS classification systems in recent years. In this review, we delineate our approach to higher-risk MDS in the context of updated classifications and the latest prognostication tools. We use illustrative clinical cases to support our discussion and share insights from recent clinical trials, highlighting lessons learned.

Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax for high-risk MDS and CMML as bridge therapy to transplant: a GESMD study

BACKGROUND

High-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) remain therapeutic challenges with suboptimal outcomes. The only potentially curative treatment is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The most frequent pre-allo-SCT treatment is monotherapy with hypomethylating agents (HMA), but approximately 40% of patients cannot proceed to allo-SCT, mainly due to disease progression. Recent evidence suggests that combining HMA with venetoclax (HMA/VEN) could increase HMA efficacy in HR-MDS but it remains unclear if this combination could bridge more patients to allo-SCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated HMA/VEN as a bridge to allo-SCT in 30 patients with HR-MDS or CMML eligible for transplant. Eighteen patients were treatment-naïve and 12 were refractory or relapsed (R/R).

RESULTS

As defined by the IWG 2023 criteria, the overall response rate (ORR) was 90% and the composite complete response rate was 77%. For the R/R patients, ORR was 83%. The allo-SCT rate was 83%, and the allo-SCT rate of those patients treated exclusively with HMA/VEN without further bridge therapies was 76%. One- and two-year post-allo-SCT survival was 75% and two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 30.5%. Follow-up of measurable residual disease identified some molecular relapses that were controlled with preemptive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that HMA/VEN combination therapy shows promise as a bridging strategy to allo-SCT in HR-MDS and CMML.

Targeted therapies for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): current landscape and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies that are stratified into high-risk (HR-MDS) and low-risk (LR-MDS) categories. Until recently, LR-MDS has been typically managed by supportive measures and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs); whereas management of HR-MDS typically included hypomethylating agents and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. However, the limited rates and durations of response observed with these interventions prompted the search for targeted therapies to improve the outcomes among patients with MDS.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we review the current landscape of targeted therapies in MDS. These include pyruvate kinase and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) activators; TGF-beta, telomerase, BCL2 and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors; as well as novel approaches targeting inflammation, pyroptosis, immune evasion, and RNA splicing machinery.

EXPERT OPINION

This review highlights the progress and challenges in MDS treatment. Despite some promising results, many therapies remain in early development or have faced setbacks, emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the disease's pathobiology. Continued research into targeted therapies, homogenous clinical trial designs, as well as increased incorporation of molecular prognostic tools and artificial intelligence into trial design are essential for developing effective treatments for MDS and improving patient outcomes.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: An Update on Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are clonal myeloid neoplasms that cause life-limiting complications from severe cytopenias and leukemic transformation. Efforts to better classify, prognosticate, and assess therapeutic responses in HR-MDS have resulted in publication of new clinical tools in the last several years. Given limited current treatment options and suboptimal outcomes, HR-MDS stands to benefit from the study of investigational agents.Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal myeloid-lineage malignancies often characterized by high-risk genetic lesions, increased blood transfusion needs, constitutional symptoms, elevated risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and therapeutic need for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Use of blast percentage and other morphologic features to define myelodysplastic neoplasm subtypes is rapidly shifting to incorporate genetics, resulting in a subset of former HR-MDS patients now being considered as AML in presence of leukemia-defining genetic alterations. A proliferation of prognostic tools has further focused use of genetic features to drive decision making in clinical management. Recently, criteria to assess response of HR-MDS to therapy were revised to incorporate more clinically meaningful endpoints and better match AML response criteria. Basic science investigations have resulted in improved understanding of the relationship between MDS genetic lesions, bone marrow stromal changes, germline predispositions, and disease phenotype. However, therapeutic advances have been more limited. There has been import of the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib, initially approved for AML; the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax and liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351) are under active investigation as well. Unfortunately, effective treatment of TP53-mutated disease remains elusive, though preliminary evidence suggests improved outcomes with oral decitabine/cedazuridine over parenteral hypomethylating agent monotherapy. Investigational agents with novel mechanisms of action may help expand the repertoire of treatment options for HR-MDS and trials continue to offer a hopeful therapeutic avenue for suitable patients.

Frontline treatment options for higher-risk MDS: can we move past azacitidine?

Although remarkable international efforts have been ongoing for over 17 years to improve upon azacitidine, representing the standard of care therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), there still has not been a positive randomized trial in comparison to azacitidine. Real-world data from numerous trials have shown similar results with a median overall survival of 14-18 months, a 40%-50% overall response rate, and a complete remission rate close to 20%. Despite these outcomes, 6 randomized controlled trials have failed to improve outcomes in this patient population, although relevant issues in some of these studies included improper dose adjustments of the hypomethylating agent, lack of placebo- controlled studies, and lack of overall survival (OS) as a primary endpoint, among others. Critical updates in MDS management include the development of molecular prognostication models (eg, the molecular international prognostic scoring system), updates in classification systems highlighting significant overlap in patients with MDS-increased blasts and acute myeloid leukemia (most relevant to TP53 mutations), and refinement of response criteria. Although these paradigm-shifting studies have had great impact in MDS management, the current ongoing randomized phase 3 trials were initiated prior, and prognostic stratification remains via the revised international prognostic scoring system) and with bone marrow blast counts of <20%. Notably, azacitidine + venetoclax, azacitidine + sabatolimab, and azacitidine + magrolimab have shown exciting results in large, single-arm studies and have completed accrual in placebo-controlled, double-blind studies with OS as a primary endpoint. We all eagerly await the results of these studies.

Are We Ready For "Triplet" Therapy in Higher-Risk MDS?

Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) represent an ongoing therapeutic challenge, with few effective therapies, many of which may have limited use in this older patient population often with considerations around comorbidities. Outside of transplant, azacitidine and decitabine remain the only disease-modifying therapies, and are palliative in nature. Recent interest has grown in extending combination chemotherapies used to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to patients with MDS, including novel combination chemotherapy "doublets" and "triplets." In this review, we discuss considerations around combination chemotherapy in MDS, specifically as relates to study design, appropriate endpoints, supportive considerations, and how to integrate these into the current treatment paradigm. New therapies in MDS are desperately needed but also require considerations particular to this unique patient population.

Novel Therapies in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Where Do Venetoclax and Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors Fit in?

ABSTRACT

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders with treatment approaches tailored to the presence of cytopenias, disease risk, and molecular mutation profile. In higher-risk MDSs, the standard of care are DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, otherwise referred to as hypomethylating agents (HMAs), with consideration for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in appropriate candidates. Given modest complete remission rates (15%-20%) with HMA monotherapy and median overall survival of approximately 18 months, there is much interest in the investigation of combination and targeted treatment approaches. Furthermore, there is no standard treatment approach in patients with progression of disease after HMA therapy. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence for the B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, and a variety of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors in the treatment of MDSs along with discussing their potential role in the treatment paradigm of this disease.