Age is no barrier for adults undergoing HCT for AML in CR1: contemporary CIBMTR analysis

Relationship between age, conditioning intensity, and outcome after allografting in adults age ≥60 years with AML

Methodological advancements now allow older adults with AML to receive allografts although conflicting data exist regarding relative outcomes across age groups and benefits of different conditioning intensities. We retrospectively analyzed 495 adults aged 60-64 (n = 184), 65-69 (n = 189), or ≥70 (n = 122) allografted for AML in remission at our institution from 2006 to 2023. There were no significant differences in relapse or relapse-free survival (RFS) among the 3 age cohorts after multivariable adjustment. Patients aged ≥70 years had higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) than those aged ≥60-64 (P = 0.022) but their overall survival (OS) was only statistically non-significantly shorter (P = 0.11). There was an important interplay between age, conditioning intensity, and outcomes. Relative to age 60-64, age ≥70 years was associated with a higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.47; P = 0.012) and NRM (HR = 3.88; P = 0.001) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), leading to shorter RFS (HR = 3.79; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.46; P < 0.001), while no such associations were found with nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning. Underlying, patients aged 60-64 and 65-69, but not those aged ≥70, had a significantly lower relapse risk with RIC relative to NMA conditioning, whereas NRM risks increased across all age cohorts. Our findings support allografting for adults ≥70 with AML in remission, especially with NMA conditioning.

Superior outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation over chemotherapy in AML patients 55 years or older

Despite advancements in treatment, the prognosis for elderly AML patients remains poor. We conducted a retrospective study involving 307 consecutive AML patients, including 71 who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo) and 236 who received chemotherapy (Chemo) only. Propensity score matching with 1:1 ratio was performed to balance the groups based on age at treatment initiation, gender, and European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 risk classification. 69 case-controlled pairs in the Haplo and Chemo group were analyzed after matching. The two groups were comparable concerning therapy prior to complete remission and 72.5% of patients in the Haplo group received reduced-intensity conditioning. Haplo was associated with a significant survival advantage over Chemo, with a 1-year OS of 77.9% (95% confidence interval(CI), 65.5-86.3, p = 0.001) versus 62.0% (95% CI, 47.9-73.2, p = 0.009). A significanly higher 1-year LFS of 74.1% (95% CI, 61.5-83.1) was also observed compared with 42.0% (95% CI, 29.3-54.0) in the chemotherapy group (p < 0.0001). The survival advantage was majorly due to a significantly reduced relapse incidence (Haplo: 16.5% (95% CI, 8.7-26.5) vs Chemo: 56.6% (95% CI, 42.9-68.2)). The 1-year non-relapse mortality was 9.4% (95% CI, 3.8-18.2) in the Haplo group. To conclude, haploidentical HCT showed superior outcomes to chemotherapy alone and might be recommended to AML patients 55 years or older eligible for transplant in future practice.

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potential cure for many hematological malignancies. Historically, older adults were not considered eligible for allo-HCT due to increased toxicity and mortality concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to explore the outcomes of allo-HCT in patients aged 70 years or older. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov using MeSH terms and keywords for "Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation" AND "Outcome Assessment" from the date of inception to June 30, 2024. Our search produced 102 articles. After excluding irrelevant and review articles during primary and secondary screening, eight original studies reporting outcomes of allo-HCT in patients aged 70 years or older were included. The survival data were retrieved from Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves using an online plot digitizer tool to calculate the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The pooled KM curves were plotted and analyzed using the "MetaSurvival" package of R software version 4.2.1. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted as well. A total of 2519 patients aged 70 years or older with allo-HCT were included in the analysis. The included patients' age ranged from 70 to 84 years, and 68% were male. Median follow-up was 23.2 (0.4 to 122.5) months. The combined median OS was 14.84 months (95% CI: 11.61 to 19.50), with OS rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of 71.8%, 54.5%, 41.9%, and 34.9%, respectively. The estimated pooled mean OS was 28.62 months (95% CI: 23.41 to 31.44). The pooled median DFS was 10.54 months (95% CI: 7.93 to 14.17), with DFS rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of 61.5%, 47.5%, 37%, and 30.6%, respectively. The estimated pooled mean DFS was 24.45 months (95% CI: 18.30 to 23.74). The relapse rate ranged from 28% to 55.6%, while non-relapsed mortality ranged from 5.6% to 42%. The acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) incidence varied from 9.3% to 32%, while chronic GvHD rates ranged from 10% to 43%. Allo-HCT provides promising outcomes for patients aged 70 or older with transplant-eligible diseases. Disease progression, followed by infections, is the leading cause of mortality, underscoring the need for improved post-transplant care, including optimized GvHD regimens and strategies to reduce infection risk.

Utilization of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation among patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in California: a population-based linked dataset study

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often requires allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for cure, but historically alloHCT has been strikingly underutilized. Reasons for this remain uncertain at the population level. We examined alloHCT utilization over time and explored associations between demographic / healthcare factors and use of alloHCT by age group (adolescent / young adult [AYA] 15-39 years, adult 40-64 years, older adult 65-79 years) using a linked dataset merging the Center for Internatonal Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, the California Cancer Registry, and the California Patient Discharge Database. Eligibility included patients newly diagnosed with AML in California between 2001-2016 who received induction therapy and had no prior HCT. Multivariable Fine-Gray regression analyses were fitted separately across age groups. Among 7,925 patients with AML, alloHCT utilization increased over time across all age groups; however, in the most recent time period studied (2011-2016), utilization within two years of diagnosis remained lowest in older adults (13%) relative to adults (41%) and AYA (49%). Factors statistically significantly associated with lower alloHCT utilization were: 1) AYA: female sex, lower neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), uninsured or Indian Health Services (IHS) coverage; 2) adults: older age, male sex, non-Hispanic Black or Asian race and ethnicity, unmarried, lower nSES, uninsured or covered by Medicaid, Medicare, or IHS, higher comorbidity, and living 100+ miles from a transplant center; and 3) older adults: older age, Asian race, and unmarried. In conclusion, using a population-based linked dataset, we demonstrate that utilization of alloHCT among older patients newly diagnosed with AML remains low in California, and factors associated with utilization vary by age group.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Considerations and challenges

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and related diseases are highly heterogeneous myeloid stem cell cancers that predominantly affect the elderly. The only curative treatment is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Given the prevalence of age-related comorbidities, HCT in patients aged 65 years or older requires a highly personalized approach. This review summarizes disease risk stratification, treatment modalities, and outcomes for patients with MDS and related disorders, and discusses specific considerations and challenges for elderly patients undergoing HCT, including geriatric assessment, timing, conditioning treatment, donor and graft selection, and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity in China 2022-2023. The proportions of peripheral blood for stem cell source continue to grow: a report from the Chinese Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry Group

Over past two years, a total of 39,918 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) cases were reported, with 18,194 and 21,714 transplants performed in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Autologous HSCT accounted for 6562 cases (31%) in 2022, while allogeneic HSCT comprised 12,632 cases (69%). In 2023, the number of allogeneic HSCTs exceeded 15,000, maintaining a 69% share. Participation in the 2022 and 2023 surveys included 193 and 212 transplantation teams, respectively, from 27 provinces, municipalities, or autonomous regions. The leading indication of HSCT was acute leukemia, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, with a total of 17,421 cases. AML was the most common disease (10,339, 38%) for allogeneic HSCT, which was followed by ALL (5925 cases, 21%). Peripheral blood emerged as the primary source of stem cell grafts, utilized in 54% of matched sibling donor transplants and 77% of haploidentical donor transplants. The BuCy-based conditioning regimen was the most prevalent, used in 53% of allogeneic HSCT cases in the past two years. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of the current HSCT landscape and serves as a valuable resource for clinical practice.

Outcomes of older adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide based prophylaxis

This study evaluates the feasibility of using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) prophylaxis in allo-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for adults aged 65 and older. PTCY is increasingly used to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) across all donor types, but concerns remain about potential risks, especially in older patients. Fifty-seven adults aged 65 or older with hematological malignancies, undergoing their first allo-HCT with PTCY prophylaxis between January 2011 and January 2023 were included. Overall, 94.8% of patients achieved primary engraftment. The median durations for neutrophil and platelet engraftments were 19 and 21 days. The day +30 cumulative incidence of bacterial bloodstream infection was 43.9%. No CMV reactivations occurred within the first 100 days after letermovir implementation. The day +180 cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD, and the 2-year cumulative incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD were 26.3%, 10.5%, and 4.8%. Eighteen patients (31.6%) relapsed, and 30 (52.6%) died, with relapse (16.4%) and infection (11.5%) being the main causes of death. The estimated 2-year overall survival, non-relapse mortality, cumulative incidence of relapse, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival rates were 45.5%, 27.1%, 33.9%, and 37.0%. Adults aged 70 or older had similar outcomes to those aged 65-69. This study confirms the safety and feasibility of PTCY-based allo-HCT in older adults.

Relationship Between Age, Conditioning Intensity, and Outcome After Allografting in Adults Age ≥60 Years with AML

Methodological advancements now allow older adults with AML to receive allografts although conflicting data exist regarding relative outcomes across age groups and benefits of different conditioning intensities. We retrospectively analyzed 495 adults aged 60-64 (n = 184), 65-69 (n = 189), or ≥ 70 (n = 122) who underwent allogeneic HCT for AML in remission at our institution from 2006 to 2023. There were no significant differences in relapse or relapse-free survival (RFS) among the 3 age cohorts after multivariable adjustment. Patients aged ≥ 70 years had a higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) than those aged ≥ 60-64 (P = 0.022) but their overall survival (OS) was only statistically non-significantly shorter (P = 0.11). There was an important interplay between age, conditioning intensity, and outcomes. Age ≥ 70 years was associated with a higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.47; P = 0.012) and NRM (HR = 3.88; P = 0.001) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), leading to shorter RFS (HR = 3.79; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 3.46; P < 0.001), while no association was found with nonmyeloablative conditioning. Conversely, patients aged 60-64 and 65-69, not those aged ≥ 70, had a significantly lower risk of relapse with RIC, but NRM risk increased with age. Our findings support allogeneic HCT for adults with AML in remission even if aged beyond 70, especially with nonmyeloablative conditioning.

Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review

Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.

Transplantation and Cellular Therapy for Older Adults-The MSK Approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hematologic malignances more commonly affect older individuals and often present with advanced, higher risk disease than younger patients. Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation is well-established treatment modalities with curative potential following either frontline treatments for these diseases or salvage therapy in the relapsed or refractory setting. More recently, novel cellular immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has been shown to lead to high response rate and durable remission in many patients with advanced blood cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given unique characteristics of older patients, how best to deliver these higher-intensity and time sensitive treatment modalities for them remains challenging. Moreover, their short-term and potential long-term impact on their functional status, cognitive status, and quality of life may be significant considerations for many older patients. All these issues contributed to the lack of access and significant underutilization of these potential curative treatment strategies. In this review, we present up to date evidence to support potential benefits of transplantation and cellular therapy for older adults, their steady improving outcomes, and most importantly, highlight the use of geriatric assessment to help select appropriate older patients and optimize them prior to and following transplantation and cellular therapy. We specifically describe our approach at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and encouraging early results from its implementation.

Validation of the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) index for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The intensity of the conditioning regimen given before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) can vary substantially. To confirm the ability of the recently developed transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score to stratify the preparative regimens of allo-HCT, we used an independent and contemporary patient cohort of 4060 transplant recipients with acute myeloid leukemia meeting inclusion criteria from the discovery study (allo-HCT in first complete remission, matched donor), but who were allografted in a more recent period (2018-2021) and were one decade older (55-75 years, median 63.4 years), we assigned them to a TCI category (low n = 1934, 48%; intermediate n = 1948, 48%, high n = 178, 4%) according to the calculated TCI score ([1-2], [2.5-3.5], [4-6], respectively), and examined the validity of the TCI category in predicting early non-relapse mortality (NRM), 2-year NRM and relapse (REL). In the unadjusted comparison, the TCI index provided a significant risk stratification for d100 and d180 NRM, NRM and REL risk. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for significant variables, there was an independent association of TCI with early NRM, NRM and REL. In summary, we confirm in contemporary treated patients that TCI reflects the conditioning regimen related morbidity and anti-leukemic efficacy satisfactorily and across other established prognostic factors.

Development and Validation of a Concise Objectifiable Risk Evaluation Score for Non-Relapse Mortality after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

We aimed to develop a concise objectifiable risk evaluation (CORE) tool for predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). A total of 1120 adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT at our center between 2013 and 2020 were divided into training, first, and second validation cohorts. Objectifiable, patient-related factors impacting NRM in univariate and multivariate analyses were: serum albumin, serum creatinine, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), heart function (LVEF), lung function (VC, FEV1), and patient age. Hazard ratios were assigned points (0-3) based on their impact on NRM and summed to the individual CORE HCT score. The CORE HCT score stratified patients into three distinct low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with two-year NRM rates of 9%, 22%, and 46%, respectively, and OS rates of 73%, 55%, and 35%, respectively (p < 0.001). These findings were confirmed in a first and a second recently treated validation cohort. Importantly, the CORE HCT score remained informative across various conditioning intensities, disease-specific subgroups, and donor types, but did not impact relapse incidence. A comparison of CORE HCT vs. HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) in the second validation cohort revealed better performance of the CORE HCT score with c-statistics for NRM and OS of 0.666 (SE 0.05, p = 0.001) and 0.675 (SE 0.039, p < 0.001) vs. 0.431 (SE 0.057, p = 0.223) and 0.535 (SE 0.042, p = 0.411), respectively. The CORE HCT score is a concise and objectifiable risk evaluation tool for adult patients undergoing allo-HCT for malignant disease. External multicenter validation is underway.

Acute myeloid leukemia: challenges for diagnosis and treatment in Latin America

OBJECTIVE

to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of AML in Latin America as a reflection of other low- and middle-income countries and regions of the world. Encompassing both acute promyelocytic and non-promyelocytic disease types.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature and study registries concerning epidemiological features of patients with AML/APL treated in Latin America, as well as evaluated diagnostic and genetic stratification and patient fitness assessment challenges, the importance of early mortality and supportive care capacity, intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy alternatives, consolidation, and maintenance strategies including novel agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Although most of the current technologies and treatment options are available in the region, a significant fraction of patients have only limited access to them. In addition, mortality in the first weeks from diagnosis is higher in the region compared to developed countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in access to technologies, supportive care capacity, and availability of novel agents and HSCT hinder results in our region, reflecting barriers common to other LMICs. Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease must be implemented through education, collaborative clinical research, and advocacy to improve outcomes.

Novel risk assessment for the intensity of conditioning regimen in older patients

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have long-term outcomes that are generally comparable with those of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) because of a lower risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but a higher risk of relapse. However, it is unclear how we should select the conditioning intensity in individual cases. We propose the risk assessment for the intensity of conditioning regimen in elderly patients (RICE) score. We retrospectively analyzed 6147 recipients aged 50 to 69 years using a Japanese registry database. Based on the interaction analyses, advanced age (≥60 years), hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (≥2), and umbilical cord blood were used to design a scoring system to predict the difference in an individual patient's risk of NRM between MAC and RIC: the RICE score, which is the sum of the 3 factors. Zero or 1 implies low RICE score and 2 or 3, high RICE score. In multivariate analyses, RIC was significantly associated with a decreased risk of NRM in patients with a high RICE score (training cohort: hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90; P = .003; validation cohort: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77; P < .001). In contrast, we found no significant differences in NRM between MAC and RIC in patients with a low RICE score (training cohort: HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15; P = .860; validation cohort: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.01; P = .061). In summary, a new and simple scoring system, the RICE score, appears to be useful for personalizing the conditioning intensity and could improve transplant outcomes in older patients.

Evolving trends and outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia including allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have historically been poor. Given advances in low-intensity therapy (LIT) and stem cell transplantation (SCT), we performed a retrospective single-center study to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of this population. We reviewed all patients ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML between 2012 and 2021 and analyzed treatment and SCT-related trends and outcomes. We identified 1073 patients with a median age of 71 years. Adverse clinical and cytomolecular findings were frequent within this cohort. In total, 16% of patients were treated with intensive chemotherapy, 51% with LIT alone, and 32% with LIT plus venetoclax. The composite complete remission rate with LIT plus venetoclax was 72%, which was higher than with LIT alone (48%, p < .0001) and comparable to intensive chemotherapy (74%, p = .6). The median overall survival (OS) with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax was 20.1, 8.9, and 12.1 months, respectively. 18% of patients received SCT. SCT rates were 37%, 10%, and 22% in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax, respectively. The 2-year OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse, and CI of treatment-related mortality with frontline SCT (n = 139) were 59%, 52%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. By landmark analysis, patients undergoing frontline SCT had superior OS (median 39.6 vs. 21.4 months, p < .0001) and RFS (30.9 vs. 12.1 months, p < .0001) compared with responding patients who did not. Outcomes in older patients with AML are improving with more effective LIT. Measures should be pursued to increase access to SCT in older patients.

Transplantation Referral Patterns for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia at Academic and Community Sites in the Connect® Myeloid Disease Registry: Potential Barriers to Care

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is indicated for patients with higher-risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Age, performance status, patient frailty, comorbidities, and nonclinical factors (eg, cost, distance to site) are all recognized as important clinical factors that can influence HCT referral patterns and patient outcomes; however, the proportion of eligible patients referred for HCT in routine clinical practice is largely unknown. This study aimed to assess patterns of consideration for HCT among patients with HR-MDS and AML enrolled in the Connect® Myeloid Disease Registry at community/government (CO/GOV)- or academic (AC)-based sites, as well as to identify factors associated with rates of transplantation referral. We assessed patterns of consideration for and completion of HCT in patients with HR-MDS and AML enrolled between December 12, 2013, and March 6, 2020, in the Connect Myeloid Disease Registry at 164 CO/GOV and AC sites. Registry sites recorded whether patients were considered for transplantation at baseline and at each follow-up visit. The following answers were possible: "considered potentially eligible," "not considered potentially eligible," or "not assessed." Sites also recorded whether patients subsequently underwent HCT at each follow-up visit. Rates of consideration for HCT between CO/GOV and AC sites were compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis with covariates for age and comorbidity. Among the 778 patients with HR-MDS or AML enrolled in the Connect Myeloid Disease Registry, patients at CO/GOV sites were less likely to be considered potentially eligible for HCT than patients at AC sites (27.9% versus 43.9%; P < .0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with factors for age (<65 versus ≥65 years) and ACE-27 comorbidity grade (<2 versus ≥2) showed that patients at CO/GOV sites were significantly less likely than those at AC sites to be considered potentially eligible for HCT (odds ratio, 1.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.4; P = .0155). Among patients considered eligible for HCT, 45.1% (65 of 144) of those at CO/GOV sites and 35.7% (41 of 115) of those at AC sites underwent transplantation (P = .12). Approximately one-half of all patients at CO/GOV (50.1%) and AC (45.4%) sites were not considered potentially eligible for HCT; the most common reasons were age at CO/GOV sites (71.5%) and comorbidities at AC sites (52.1%). Across all sites, 17.4% of patients were reported as not assessed (and thus not considered) for HCT by their treating physician (20.7% at CO/GOV sites and 10.7% at AC sites; P = .0005). These findings suggest that many patients with HR-MDS and AML who may be candidates for HCT are not receiving assessment or consideration for transplantation in clinical practice. In addition, treatment at CO/GOV sites and age remain significant barriers to ensuring that all potentially eligible patients are assessed for HCT.

Comorbidities in transplant recipients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving low-intensity conditioning regimens: an ALWP EBMT study

Older age and a high burden of comorbidities often drive the selection of low-intensity conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. However, the impact of comorbidities in the low-intensity conditioning setting is unclear. We sought to determine the contribution of individual comorbidities and their cumulative burden on the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among patients receiving low-intensity regimens. In a retrospective analysis of adults (≥18 years) who underwent transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in the first complete remission between 2008 and 2018, we studied recipients of low-intensity regimens as defined by the transplantation conditioning intensity (TCI) scale. Multivariable Cox models were constructed to study associations of comorbidities with NRM. Comorbidities identified as putative risk factors in the low-TCI setting were included in combined multivariable regression models assessed for overall survival, NRM, and relapse. A total of 1663 patients with a median age of 61 years received low-TCI regimens. Cardiac comorbidity (including arrhythmia/valvular disease) and psychiatric disease were associated with increased NRM risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.09 and HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.02-2.82, respectively). Moderate pulmonary dysfunction, though prevalent, was not associated with increased NRM. In a combined model, cardiac, psychiatric, renal, and inflammatory bowel diseases were independently associated with adverse transplantation outcomes. These findings may inform patient and regimen selection and reinforce the need for further investigation of cardioprotective transplantation approaches.

Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed AML: Hot Topics for the Practicing Clinician

Over the past decade, our understanding of AML pathogenesis and pathophysiology has improved significantly with mutational profiling. This has led to translational advances in therapeutic options, as there have been 10 new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for AML therapies since 2017, half of which target specific driver mutations in FLT3, IDH1, or IDH2. These new agents have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium for AML, particularly for patients who are considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy with anthracycline- and cytarabine-containing regimens. These new treatment options are relevant because the median age at diagnosis is 68 years, and outcomes for patients older than 60 years have historically been dismal. However, the optimal approach to incorporating novel agents into frontline regimens remains a clinical challenge, particularly with regard to sequencing of therapies, considering the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and managing toxicities.

Determinants of refined GvHD-free, relapse-free survival after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with myeloid malignancies

BACKGROUND

Older patients with AML/MDS have a poor prognosis with alloHCT as the only curative option. However alloHCT is challenging given its high TRM. Recently, a composite endpoint of GRFS was proposed to define transplant success. A single centre retrospective analysis was performed to determine the main variables influencing GRFS.

PATIENTS AND METHODSMETHODS

91 consecutive patients≥ 60 years (median 64 years, range 60-74) with AML/MDS who received reduced-intensity alloHCT during 2001-2017 analysed. Disease risk index (DRI) at HCT was low/intermediate in 47pts (52%) and high in 44 pts (48%).

RESULTS

After median follow-up for survivors of 56 months (range 7-144), 37 (40.6%) patients were alive. The OS, LFS and GRFS were 61.4%, 58.1%, 49.1% at 1 year and 35.5%, 32.3% and 23.1% at 5 years, respectively. The 1-year and 5-year incidences of NRM and relapse were 26.9%, 21.3% and 47.9% and 35.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, high DRI was the strongest factor for worse OS (HR 2.121; p = 0.049), LFS (HR 1.924; p = 0.0123) and GRFS (HR 2.319; p = 0.0005). The donor age ≥ 62 years had a negative impact on OS (HR 2.110; p = 0.0345) and GRFS (HR 2.014; p = 0.0341). High DRI (HR 2.652; p = 0.0003) and donor age (HR 2.304; p = 0.0257) retained its significance in multivariate analysis for GRFS.

CONCLUSION

A significant portion of older patients with myeloid malignancies survive alloHCT without experiencing GRFS event with DRI as the main determinant of outcome. Negative impact of donor age≥ 62 years suggests preference of a young donor, regardless of being related or unrelated.

Comparison of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with chemotherapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) outcomes are very poor in older patients. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) helps to achieve long-term survival. However, the benefit of haplo-SCT versus chemotherapy is unclear in older adults with AML. Outcomes were retrospectively compared among patients aged 55‒65 years for chemotherapy consolidation or haplo-SCT for AML in the first complete remission with intermediate to high-risk disease. Forty-six patients who underwent chemotherapy and 38 patients who underwent haplo-SCT were evaluated in the final analysis. Compared with the chemotherapy group, patients in the haplo-SCT group had significantly better overall survival (OS) (74.0% versus 23.9% at 36 months, p = 0.005) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (74.0% versus 21.6%, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in the haplo-SCT group (17.3% versus 75.4%, p < 0.001). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was similar in the haplo-SCT and chemotherapy groups (7.9% versus 4.8%, p = 0.587). In the multivariate analysis, haplo-SCT was associated with improved OS, LFS, and decreased CIR. Haplo-SCT did not affect TRM. In conclusion, our data suggest that haploidentical transplant may be an alternative to consolidation chemotherapy as post-remission therapy in patients with intermediate or high-risk AML aged 55‒65 years. Further well-designed studies are needed to validate this result.

Pathogenesis and management of accelerated and blast phases of chronic myeloid leukemia

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been a model for cancer therapy development. Though most patients with CML have a normal quality and duration of life with TKI therapy, some patients progress to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP), both of which have a relatively poor prognosis. The rates of progression have reduced significantly from over >20% in the pre-TKI era to <5% now, largely due to refinements in CML therapy and response monitoring. Significant insights have been gained into the mechanisms of disease transformation including the role of additional cytogenetic abnormalities, somatic mutations, and other genomic alterations present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This knowledge is helping to optimize TKI therapy, improve prognostication and inform the development of novel combination regimens in these patients. While patients with de novo CML-AP have outcomes almost similar to CML in chronic phase (CP), those transformed from previously treated CML-CP should receive second- or third- generation TKIs and be strongly considered for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Similarly, patients with transformed CML-BP have particularly dismal outcomes with a median survival usually less than one year. Combination regimens with a potent TKI such as ponatinib followed by allo-SCT can achieve long-term survival in some transformed BP patients. Regimens including venetoclax in myeloid BP or inotuzumab ozogamicin or blinatumomab in lymphoid BP might lead to deeper and longer responses, facilitating potentially curative allo-SCT for patients with CML-BP once CP is achieved. Newer agents and novel combination therapies are further expanding the therapeutic arsenal in advanced phase CML.

How to improve the outcomes of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients through allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In recent years, with the gradual advancement of haploidentical transplantation technology, the availability of donors has increased significantly, along with the widespread use of reduced-intensity conditioning and the improvement of nursing techniques, giving more elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients the chance to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We have summarized the classic and recently proposed pre-transplant assessment methods and assessed the various sources of donors, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complication management based on the outcomes of large-scale clinical studies for elderly AML patients.

Survival, response rates, and post-transplant outcomes in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia aged 60-75 treated with high intensity chemotherapy vs. lower intensity targeted therapy

The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved several oral, targeted therapies for the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in recent years. These agents are approved in patients with relapsed/refractory disease or as frontline therapy in patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on age, performance status, or comorbidities. They are also being increasingly utilized frontline in patients of all ages and fitness levels through clinical trials and off label prescribing, but comparative treatment outcomes associated with intensive versus targeted therapy have not been extensively studied. We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis to address the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients with AML aged 60-75 at diagnosis. This study included 127 patients, 73 of whom received high intensity chemotherapy at any point during treatment (any HiC) and 54 of whom received only low intensity targeted therapy (LITT only). Overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation did not differ significantly between the any HiC and LITT only groups (hazard ratio (HR) for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.09; P=0.11). The only three variables that were independently associated with superior OS were lower European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk classification, TP53 unmutated status, and receipt of transplant. Our data suggest that baseline genomic features and receipt of transplant are more important than treatment intensity in predicting survival in this patient population. They also highlight the vital role of transplant in older patients with AML regardless of treatment intensity utilized for remission induction. Larger studies are needed to further address this question, including prospective randomized trials.