Oral diseases after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of Oral Infection on Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Posttransplant infections may lead to dire consequences in immunocompromised organ recipients. Oral foci of infection are therefore often eliminated prior to solid organ transplantation to reduce posttransplant morbidity. However, despite increasing numbers of organ transplantations the necessity of pretransplant dental treatment and its effect on transplant outcome remains uncertain. The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the impact of oral foci of infection and pretransplant dental treatment on adverse events following solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

Studies on adult patients undergoing solid organ transplantation with/without oral infection or with/without pretransplant dental treatment were eligible. An electronic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Cochrane was conducted up to June 11, 2024. Screening of eligibility, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment of the included studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were done independently by two reviewers. Data were synthesized with a narrative approach.

RESULTS

In total, 4035 unique publications were identified. After full text assessment of 75 studies nine cohort studies on liver, kidney, heart and/or lung transplantation based on 727 patients were included. Two studies based on 161 patients found a significant increase of infectious complications after liver transplantation when no dental treatment was performed. Presence of oral foci increased the risk of hospitalization after kidney transplantation in one study but was associated with lower infection rate after lung transplantation in another study. No studies found significant impact on mortality or on organ rejection. Overall, the quality of the included studies was good with low or medium risk-of-bias.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the impact of oral infection on organ transplantation. The results suggest a possible link between persisting oral infection and posttransplant infectious complications, thus lending support to the elimination of oral infectious foci before solid organ transplantation.

The sensitivity outcome index system for home care of elderly liver transplant patients was developed based on the Omaha problem classification system

OBJECTIVE

Based on the Omaha problem classification system, a sensitivity outcome index system for home nursing of elderly liver transplant patients was established.

METHODS

Through a comprehensive literature review and rigorous application of the Delphi method, a panel of 20 experts completed two rounds of effective letter consultation to obtain expert consensus opinions. The contents of indicators were determined based on this process, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to confirm the weightage assigned to each indicator. Consequently, we established a sensitivity outcome index system for home care in elderly liver transplant patients.

RESULTS

The effective recovery rate of the questionnaire in two rounds of expert consultation was 100%, and the proportion of experts who gave opinions was 55% and 15%, respectively, indicating that the experts were highly active. The expert authority coefficients were calculated as 0.904 and 0.905, respectively, indicating a high degree of expert authority. In the second round, Kendall's coordination coefficients for primary, secondary, and tertiary indicators were determined to be 0.419, 0.418, and 0.394 (P < 0.001), indicating that expert opinions tended to be consistent. Finally, we established a comprehensive sensitivity outcome index system comprising 4 first-level indexes, 20 s-level indexes, and 72 third-level indexes specifically designed for elderly liver transplantation patients.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity outcome index system of home nursing for elderly liver transplant patients can provide theoretical basis for nursing staff to build accurate individualized continuous nursing model.

Salivary Assessments in Post-Liver Transplantation Patients

Saliva is in the first line of the body's defense mechanism. In order to better understand how liver transplantation impacts salivary biochemistry, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore variations of salivary markers for oral health in post-liver transplantation patients, as compared with systemically healthy dental outpatients (controls). In this case, 26 patients were enrolled in each group, with similar socio-demographic characteristics. Unstimulated whole saliva was collected; total protease activity and total protein content were measured. The oral health in both groups was assessed using a self-report oral health questionnaire. Data were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric tests. Comparable results were recorded in terms of salivary protein and protease activity assessments. In post-liver transplantation group, positive correlation was found between the salivary pH level and the salivary secretion rate (r = 0.39; p = 0.04). With respect to self-reported oral health, there were no significant differences between the two groups, except for dental and oral care habits, the controls reporting more frequently use of dental floss and mouthwash (p = 0.02, and p = 0.003, respectively). Considering the high risk for developing systemic complications after liver transplantation, oral health care is an important issue to be addressed, salivary investigations representing powerful tool for disease changes monitoring.