Intra-arterial hepatic beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) with mFOLFOX6 in unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a Phase 2 study

Transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan (irinotecan-TACE) as salvage or post-inductive therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: effectiveness results from the CIREL study

BACKGROUND

A pan-European, prospective, observational study on the use of irinotecan-eluting transarterial chemoembolisation (irinotecan-TACE) was conducted to evaluate effectiveness outcomes in salvage and post-inductive/consolidation therapy settings of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-two patients were consecutively enrolled between February 2018 and August 2020. All patients received irinotecan-TACE for CRLMs. Response data were assessed by a central independent image review panel according to RECIST v1.1. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using multivariable Cox regression. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at the first follow-up was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two (median age 66 years, 61% male) patients were prospectively enrolled. Overall, the median OS was 14.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6-17.0 months]. The median OS (95% CI) of irinotecan-TACE as salvage therapy was 9.9 months (7.4-12.8 months) and the median PFS was 3.8 months (2.9-4.7 months). The median OS for post-inductive/consolidation therapy when used with systemic therapy or thermal ablation was 19.1 months (16.2-24.2 months), the median PFS was 6.0 months (4.5-8.7 months), and the median HPFS was 8.7 months (6.9-10.6 months).Following a multivariable analysis, negative prognostic factors for OS were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 [hazard ratio (HR) 4.3], >50 mm lesion size (HR 2.1), progressive extrahepatic disease (HR 2.0), ≥2 prior systemic therapy lines (HR 2.4), >50% liver involvement (HR 8.5), and treatment plan not completed (HR 2.0). For PFS, progressive disease outside the liver (HR 1.8) and liver involvement of 25%-50% (HR 2.0) or >50% (HR 3.4) were identified as negative prognostic factors. HRQoL was generally stable or improved overall.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the largest, pan-European, real-life study on irinotecan-TACE for CRLMs show a comparably long median OS when used as salvage therapy and promising HPFS when used with systemic therapy or thermal ablation as post-inductive/consolidation therapy. With its potential to maintain HRQoL, irinotecan-TACE could be further integrated into systemic treatment pathways.

Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is affected by two groups of malignant tumours: primary liver cancers and liver metastases. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer, and five-year survival after radical surgical treatment of liver metastases ranges from 28% to 50%, depending on primary cancer site. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in most people; therefore, other treatments have to be considered in the case of non-resectability. One possible option is based on the concept that the blood supply to hepatic tumours originates predominantly from the hepatic artery. Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of the peripheral branches of the hepatic artery can be achieved by administering a chemotherapeutic drug followed by vascular occlusive agents and can lead to selective necrosis of the cancer tissue while leaving normal liver parenchyma virtually unaffected. The entire procedure can be performed without infusion of chemotherapy and is then called bland transarterial embolisation (TAE). These procedures are usually applied over a few sessions. Another possible treatment option is systemic chemotherapy which, in the case of colorectal cancer metastases, is most commonly performed using FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) regimens applied in multiple sessions over a long period of time. These therapies disrupt the cell cycle, leading to death of rapidly dividing malignant cells. Current guidelines determine the role of TAE and TACE as non-curative treatment options applicable in people with liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic disease that is unresectable or non-ablatable, and in people who have failed systemic chemotherapy. Regarding the treatment modalities in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases, we found no systematic reviews comparing the efficacy of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) compared with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver-dominant unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three additional databases up to 4 April 2024. We also searched two trials registers and the European Medicines Agency database and checked reference lists of retrieved publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in adults (aged 18 years or older) with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality; overall survival (time to mortality); and any adverse events or complications. Our secondary outcomes were cancer mortality; health-related quality of life; progression-free survival; proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease; time to progression of liver metastases; recurrence of liver metastases; and tumour response measures (complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease). For the purpose of the review and to perform necessary analyses, whenever possible, we converted survival rates to mortality rates, as this was our primary outcome. For the analysis of dichotomous outcomes, we used the risk ratio (RR); for continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference; and for time to event outcomes, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the standardised mean difference with 95% CIs when the trials used different instruments. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We based our conclusions on outcomes analysed at the longest follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three trials with 118 participants randomised to TACE versus 120 participants to systemic chemotherapy. Four participants were excluded; one due to disease progression prior to treatment and three due to decline in health. The trials reported data on one or more outcomes. Two trials were performed in China and one in Italy. The trials differed in terms of embolisation techniques and chemotherapeutic agents. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 50 months. TACE may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. TACE may have little to no effect on overall survival (time to mortality) (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.01; 1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), any adverse events or complications (3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), health-related quality of life (2 trials, 154 participants; very low-certainty evidence), progression-free survival (1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate) (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.96; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. No trials reported cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases. We found no trials comparing the effects of TAE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence regarding effectiveness of TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases is of very low certainty and is based on three trials. Our confidence in the results is limited due to the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. It is very uncertain whether TACE confers benefits with regard to reduction in mortality, overall survival (time to mortality), reduction in adverse events or complications, improvement in health-related quality of life, improvement in progression-free survival, and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate). Data on cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases are lacking. We found no trials assessing TAE versus systemic chemotherapy. More randomised clinical trials are needed to strengthen the body of evidence and provide insight into the benefits and harms of TACE or TAE in comparison with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with systemic therapy to systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

Methods

From December 2017 to December 2022, patients with unresectable CRLM who received systemic therapy with or without DEB-TACE as first-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were tumor response, conversion rate and adverse events.

Results

Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in this study, including 46 patients who received systemic therapy combined with DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group) and 52 patients who received systemic therapy alone (control group). The median PFS was elevated in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (12.1 months vs 8.4 months, p = 0.008). The disease control rate was increased in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (87.0% vs 67.3%, p = 0.022). Overall response rates (39.1% vs 25.0%; p = 0.133) and conversion rate to liver resection (33.8% vs 25.0%; p = 0.290) were no different between the two groups. The multivariate analysis showed that treatment options, size of liver metastasis, number of liver metastasis, synchronous metastases, and extrahepatic metastases were independent prognostic factor of PFS. Further subgroup analyses illustrated that PFS was beneficial with the DEB-TACE group in patients with age ≥ 60, male, left colon, synchronous metastases, bilobar, number of liver metastasis > 5, extrahepatic metastases, non-extrahepatic metastases, CEA level < 5 (ng/ml), and KRAS wild-type. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities related to DEB-TACE procedures were observed.

Conclusion

In patients with unresectable CRLM, systemic chemotherapy with DEB-TACE as first-line treatment may improve progression-free survival and disease control rate outcomes over systemic chemotherapy alone with manageable safety profile.

Chemoembolization Beyond Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Tumors Can We Treat and When?

Liver metastases are the most common malignancy found in the liver and are 20 to 40 times more common than primary hepatic tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with liver metastases often present with advanced disease and are not eligible for curative-intent surgery or ablative techniques. The unique hepatic arterial blood supply of liver metastases allows interventional radiologists to target these tumors with transarterial therapies. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been studied in the treatment of liver metastases originating from a variety of primary malignancies and has demonstrated benefits in terms of hepatic progression-free survival, overall survival, and symptomatic relief, among other benefits. Depending on the primary tumor from which they originate, liver metastases may have different indications for TACE, may utilize different TACE regimens and techniques, and may result in different post-procedural outcomes. This review offers an overview of TACE techniques and specific considerations in the treatment of liver metastases, provides an in-depth review of TACE in the treatment of liver metastases originating from colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and uveal melanoma, which represent some of the many tumors beyond hepatocellular carcinoma that can be treated by TACE, and summarizes data regarding when one should consider TACE in their treatment algorithms.

Efficacy and Safety of Liver Chemoembolization Procedures, Combined with FOLFIRI Chemotherapy, in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Oncogene Mutations

PURPOSE

The usual first- and second-line treatments for inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) involve systemic chemotherapy, often with molecular targeted therapy. Chemoembolization, using microspheres loaded with irinotecan, has also been available as a treatment option for many years, used mainly in later lines of treatment when, due to increasing resistance, other chemotherapy regimens may have been exhausted. However, when there are contraindications to molecular therapies, the use of chemoembolization as first or second lines of treatment, in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy, may provide greater efficacy due to reduced irinotecan resistance.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) procedures for the treatment of metastatic liver lesions from CRC, using irinotecan-loaded microspheres as first-line treatment together with FOLFIRI chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The analysis included 20 patients (12 females; 8 males) with unresectable liver metastases in the course of CRC with KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations, who underwent 73 chemoembolization procedures with microspheres loaded with 100 mg of irinotecan, in combination with interspersed FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Response to treatment was assessed through computed tomography according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Assessment of adverse events utilized the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 5.0).

RESULTS

Partial remission (PR) was observed in 11 (55%) patients while 5 (25%) patients showed stable disease (SD). Progression (PD) was observed in 4 (20%) patients. Median PFS was 9.1 months (95% CI: 7.2-10.1 months) and median OS was 20.7 months (95% CI: 18.2-23.3 months). The most common adverse events (AEs) resulting in treatment delay were hematological disorders, notably neutropenia (CTCAE grades 1-3). No deaths or AEs above grade 3 occurred during TACE. Continued FOLFIRI chemotherapy after TACE treatments resulted in grade 4 neutropenia in two patients, grade 3 in four patients and grade 2 thrombocytopenia in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Combining FOLFIRI chemotherapy with chemoembolization procedures for liver metastatic lesions from colorectal cancer may provide a valuable treatment option for patients not qualified for monoclonal antibody therapy.

Drug-Eluting Bead, Irinotecan (DEBIRI) Therapy for Refractory Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review

Colorectal cancer and related mortality present a profound challenge in its management, even in this modern age. Even today, colorectal cancer-related deaths rank third in the world. Despite having multiple lines of chemotherapy, combined with radiotherapy and chemoembolization techniques, after or before surgical resection, the five-year survival rate is approximately 20%. Drug-eluting bead, irinotecan (DEBIRI) is a new technique that involves embolization of the feeding vessels to the tumour and delivering irinotecan for its chemotherapeutic effects. A significant amount of literature compares DEBIRI as an adjunct to various lines of chemotherapy. However, so far, not much data are available on DEBIRI as a singular treatment for those patients who have had multiple chemotherapies and still progressing and are not fit for liver resection. In this systematic review, we aim to highlight and bring together the results of those studies that focused on this specific patient group. A systematic search of the literature involving three large databases (published between January 2017 and July 2022), excluding languages other than English, was conducted to identify articles documenting patients who had disease progression despite chemotherapy and were not fit for surgical resection. The level of evidence and the quality check were assessed by two independent reviewers, and consensus with the senior author resolved disagreements. Out of seven studies that met the final criteria, we found a pooled cohort of 302 patients. The mean age of the patients was 61.2 years, ranging from 40.7 to 84 years. The most commonly used DEBIRI beads were M1 (70-150 um) and M2 (100-300 um), but two studies reported the use of 40 um as well. The total number of DEBIRI treatments performed in our pooled cohort was 904. The majority of the studies reported only G1/G2 toxicities among the patients, with maximal toxicity of G4 in a few selected patients. The median overall survival in our pooled cohort was 19.52 months. The median progression-free survival in our data was 5.76 months. Our systematic review concludes that DEBIRI is undoubtedly a useful treatment modality with an acceptable toxicity profile. This treatment offers a good overall survival benefit for refractory colorectal liver metastasis.

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads combined with systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Systemic therapy is the standard treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRCLM). Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is considered an effective treatment option for CRCLM. Few studies have investigated the combination of DEB-TACE, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy for CRCLM. In the present study, we evaluated the disease control rate (DCR), adverse events, and survival among patients with CRCLM who underwent the combination of DEB-TACE and chemotherapy/targeted therapy.

MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with CRCLM who were treated between January 2015 and January 2021. Standard systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and 66 DEB-TACE procedures were administered. Data were collected on each DEB-TACE procedure, including chemotherapy agents, tumor burden of liver metastasis, number of DEB-TACE courses, and adverse events. Patients who received DEB-TACE after failure of first-line systemic therapy were categorized into the first-line failure group. Patients who received DEB-TACE after the failure of second-line, third-line, or fourth-line therapy were categorized into the other group. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 35 patients with CRCLM (34 patients with adenocarcinoma and 1 patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma) were enrolled. In total, 13 patients (37.1%) had extrahepatic metastases at initial diagnosis. In this study, 66 DEB-TACE procedures were performed. The DCR was 54.3%. The median OS period was 47.4 months, and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 59.5%. The median PFS period was 6.3 months, and the estimated 1-year PFS rate was 20.6%. The PFS period was longer in the first-line failure group than in the other group (7.2 vs. 6.3 months). No significant difference was observed in OS between the two groups. Four episodes (6.1%) of grade 3 intra-abdominal infection were observed.

CONCLUSION

The combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and DEB-TACE can lead to a favorable DCR and survival outcomes in patients with CRCLM. Early intervention with DEB-TACE (i.e., after the failure of first-line therapy) has the potential to extend the PFS period in patients with CRCLM. Severe adverse events were rare and manageable. Further prospective, randomized controlled studies are warranted to obtain more conclusive findings.

The Evolving Role of Intra-arterial Chemotherapy in Adult and Pediatric Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

The development of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) was driven by an ambition to mitigate systemic side effects, enhance the bioavailability of drugs, and optimize the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. While the initial research on IAC primarily examined its effectiveness in treating various liver malignancies, the application of this treatment has undergone significant advancements since its introduction. The primary objective of this article is to examine the current range of utilization of IAC, both with and without radiotherapy, while also evaluating the results of relevant clinical trials. Furthermore, this article explores potential future advancements and opportunities in this field. From the scoping review of available articles, it can be concluded that IAC is an effective treatment alternative and, sometimes, a better first-line option, but there is a need for more evidence to make IAC a regular treatment option available for patients.

Drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan to treat synchronous liver-only metastases of colorectal cancer non-responsive to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with synchronous liver-only metastases non-responsive to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (BBC).

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Treatment response to BBC and DEBIRI were determined by the morphological criteria and Choi's criteria, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. The correlation between pre-DEBIRI CT parameters and treatment response to DEBIRI was analyzed.

RESULTS

CRC patients were divided into the BBC responsive group (R group) (n = 16) and the non-responsive group (n = 42), which was further divided into the NR group (23 patients who did not receive DEBIRI) and the NR+DEBIRI group (19 patients who received DEBIRI after failing BBC). Among the R, NR and NR+DEBIRI groups, the median PFS were 11, 12, and 4 months, respectively (p < 0.01); median OS were 36, 23, and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.01). In the NR+DEBIRI group, 33 metastatic lesions were treated with DEBIRI, of which 18 (54.5%) reached objective response. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) before DEBIRI could predict objective response (AUC = 0.737, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In CRC patients, DEBIRI can achieve acceptable objective response for liver metastases non-responsive to BBC. However, this locoregional control does not prolong survival. The pre-DEBIRI CER can predict OR in these patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

DEBIRI can act as an acceptable locoregional management in CRC patients with liver metastases non-responsive to BBC, and the pre-DEBIRI CER is a potential indicator of locoregional control.

Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) in patients undergoing conversional hepatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatic resection after conversion therapy had a high recurrence rate of nearly 90%. Preoperative DEB-TACE has the potential to prevent postoperative recurrence which has not been elucidated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative DEB-TACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CRLM who underwent liver resection from June 1, 2016, to June 30, 2021, were collected and those who received conversional hepatectomy were included in this study. Patients with preoperative DEB-TACE were propensity-score matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients without preoperative DEB-TACE. Short-term outcomes and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 44 patients were included in each group. The toxicities of DEB-TACE were mild and could be managed by conservative treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) of conversion therapy (75.0% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.437) and postoperative complication of hepatic resection (27.3% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.453) were similar between the two groups. The median RFS of the DEB-TACE group (10.7 months, 95%CI: 6.6-14.8 months) was significantly longer than that of the control group (8.1 months, 95%CI: 3.4-12.8 months) (HR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.37-0.95, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who became resectable after conversion therapy, preoperative DEB-TACE might be a safe option to achieve longer RFS.

KEY POINTS

• This is a propensity-score matching study comparing patients who underwent conversional hepatectomy with or without preoperative DEB-TACE. • The preoperative DEB-TACE was safe and with mild toxicities (without toxicities more than CTCAE grade 3). • The preoperative DEB-TACE significantly prolonged the RFS of those patients who underwent conversional hepatectomy (10.7 vs. 8.1 months, p = 0.027).

Safety, Feasibility and Technical Considerations from a Prospective, Observational Study-CIREL: Irinotecan-TACE for CRLM in 152 Patients

CIREL, a prospective, Europe-wide, observational study aimed to assess the real-world feasibility and tolerability of irinotecan-based transarterial chemoembolization (LP-irinotecan TACE) for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with regard to the treatment plan and adverse events (AEs). CIREL enrolled 152 eligible patients (≥18 years) with liver-only or dominant metastases treated with LP-irinotecan TACE following a multidisciplinary tumor board decision. Data were prospectively collected for baseline, the number of planned and performed sessions, and technical information and safety according to CTCAE 4.03/5.0. Results from 351 analyzed treatment sessions showed technical success for 99% of sessions, and 121 patients (79%) completed all planned sessions. Further, 60% of sessions were performed using opioids, 4% intra-arterial anesthetics, and 25% both. Additionally, 60% of patients experienced at least one peri-interventional AE of any grade; 8% of grade 3−4. Occurrence of AEs was related to larger liver-involvement (p < 0.001), bi-lobar disease (p = 0.002), and larger beads (p < 0.001). Using corticosteroids together with antiemetics showed reduced and lower grade vomiting (p = 0.01). LP-irinotecan TACE was tolerated well and had a high proportion of completed treatment plans. This minimally invasive locoregional treatment can be used together with concomitant systemic therapy or ablation.

Regional Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Which Modality and When?

For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM), regional therapies leverage the unique, dual blood supply to the liver; the hepatic artery is the main blood supply for liver tumors, whereas the portal vein supplies most normal hepatic parenchyma. Infusion of cancer therapies via the hepatic artery allows selective delivery to the tumors with relative sparing of normal liver tissue and little extrahepatic exposure, thus limiting systemic side effects. There is a paucity of randomized controlled trial evidence to inform the optimal integration of regional therapies into the management of CRLM. Hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy has a potential survival benefit when used in the adjuvant setting after resection of CRLM. HAIP chemotherapy can be safely given with contemporary systemic therapies and is associated with a high objective response and rate of conversion to resectability in patients with uCRLM. Drug-eluting beads coated with irinotecan transarterial chemoembolization is associated with high objective response rates within the liver and has a well-established safety profile in patients with uCRLM. Transarterial radioembolization achieves high rates of response within the liver but is not associated with improvements in overall survival or quality of life in the first- or second-line setting for uCRLM. The best treatment approach is the one that most aligns with a given patients' values, preferences, and philosophy of care. In the first-line setting, HAIP could be offered to motivated patients who hope to achieve conversion to resectability. After progression on chemotherapy, HAIP, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization are valuable treatment options to consider for patients with liver-limited or liver-predominant CRLM who seek to optimize response rates and regional control.

The Role of Conventional TACE (cTACE) and DEBIRI-TACE in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumor entities worldwide and a common cause of cancer-associated death. Colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) thereby constitute a severe life-limiting factor. The therapy of CRLM presents a major challenge and surgical resection as well as systemic chemotherapy remain the first-line treatment options. Over the years several locoregional, vascular- and image-based treatments offered by interventional radiologists have emerged when conventional therapies fail, or metastases recurrence occurs. Among such options is the conventional/traditional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) by local injection of a combination of chemotherapeutic- and embolic-agents. A similar treatment is the more recent irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads TACE (DEBIRI-TACE), which are administered using the same approach. Numerous studies have shown that these different types of chemoembolization can be applied in different clinical settings safely. Furthermore, such treatments can also be combined with other local or systemic therapies. Unfortunately, due to the incoherent patient populations of studies investigating TACE in CRLM, critics state that the definite evidence supporting positive patient outcomes is still lacking. In the following article we review studies on conventional and DEBIRI-TACE. Although highly dependent on the clinical setting, prior therapies and generally the study population, cTACE and DEBIRI-TACE show comparable results. We present the most representative studies on the different chemoembolization procedures and compare the results. Although there is compelling evidence for both approaches, further studies are necessary to determine which patients profit most from these therapies. In conclusion, we determine TACE to be a viable option in CRLM in different clinical settings. Nevertheless, a multidisciplinary approach is desired to offer patients the best possible care.

Treatment for liver cancer: From sorafenib to natural products

Liver cancer most commonly develops in patients with chronic liver disease, the etiology of which includes viral hepatitis (B and C), alcohol, obesity, dietary carcinogens, and so forth. The current treatment modalities, including surgical resection and liver transplantation, have been found far from effective. Hence, there is an obvious critical need to develop alternative strategies for the treatment of it. In this review, we discuss the formation process and therapeutic targets of liver cancer. Currently, targeted therapy is limited to sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, ramucirumab and cabozantinib which leads to a survival benefit in patients, but on the other hand is hampered by the occurrence of drug resistance. Pleasingly and importantly, there are multiple natural products undergoing clinical evaluation in liver cancer, such as polyphenols like icaritin, resveratrol, and silybin, saponins including ginsenoside Rg3 and glycyrrhizinate, alkaloid containing irinotecan and berberine and inorganic compound arsenic trioxide at present. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that these compounds inhibit liver cancer formation owing to the influence on the anti-viral, anti-inflammation, anti-oxidant, anti-angiogenesis and anti-metastasis activity. Furthermore, a series of small molecule derivatives inspired by the aforementioned compounds are designed and synthesized according to structure-activity relationship studies. Drug combination and novel type of drug-targeted delivery system thereof have been well developed. This article is ended by a perspective remark of futuristic development of natural product-based therapeutic regimen for liver cancer treatment. We expect that this review is an account for current status of natural products as promising anti-liver cancer treatments and should contribute to its understanding.

Intra-arterial therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug-eluting embolic trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A search was conducted on EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for prospective non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 20^th June 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SR), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), while two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RR) and conversion-to-resection rates (CRR).

RESULTS

71 prospective non-randomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond first line, DEE-TACE+SCT (n=152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95%-CI: 22.5-29.1) months and 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95%-CI: 21.8-25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE+SCT appears to consistently have the highest pooled survival rates at 1-year (81.9%) and 2-years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015-2020). DEE-TACE+SCT and HAI+SCT had the highest pooled-RRs of 56.7% (I²=0.90) and 62.6% (I²=0.87) respectively and pooled-CRRs of 35.5% (I²=0.00) and 30.3% (I²=0.80) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Albeit significant heterogeneity, paucity of high-quality evidence and the non-comparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE+SCT may have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.

Review of Intra-Arterial Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis occurs in more than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer and is thought to be the most common cause of death from this cancer. The mainstay of treatment for inoperable liver metastasis has been combination systemic chemotherapy with or without the addition of biological targeted therapy with a goal for disease downstaging, for potential curative resection, or more frequently, for disease control. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies including hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are alternative treatment strategies that have shown promising results, most commonly in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. In recent years, their role in the first-line setting in conjunction with concurrent systemic chemotherapy has also been explored. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.

Abstract

The liver is frequently the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, occurring in more than 50% of patients. While surgical resection remains the only potential curative option, it is only eligible in 15–20% of patients at presentation. In the past two decades, major advances in modern chemotherapy and personalized biological agents have improved overall survival in patients with unresectable liver metastasis. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies such as hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are treatment strategies which are increasingly being considered to improve local tumor response and to reduce systemic side effects. Currently, these therapies are mostly used in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. However, their use in the first-line setting in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy as well as to a lesser degree, in a neoadjuvant setting, for downstaging to resection have also been investigated. Furthermore, some clinicians have considered these therapies as a temporizing tool for local disease control in patients undergoing a chemotherapy ‘holiday’ or acting as a bridge in patients between different lines of systemic treatment. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.

The CIREL Cohort: A Prospective Controlled Registry Studying the Real-Life Use of Irinotecan-Loaded Chemoembolisation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Interim Analysis

PURPOSE

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) using irinotecan-eluting beads is an additional treatment option for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients that are not eligible for curative treatment approaches. This interim analysis focuses on feasibility of the planned statistical analysis regarding data distribution and completeness, treatment intention, safety and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of the first 50 patients prospectively enrolled in the CIrse REgistry for LifePearl™ microspheres (CIREL), an observational multicentre study conducted across Europe.

METHODS

In total, 50 patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with CRLM and decided to be treated with irinotecan-eluting LifePearl™ microspheres TACE (LP-irinotecan TACE) by a multidisciplinary tumour board. There were no further inclusion or exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint is the categorisation of treatment intention, and secondary endpoints presented in this interim analysis are safety, treatment considerations and HRQOL.

RESULTS

LP-irinotecan TACE was conducted in 42% of patients as salvage therapy, 20% as an intensification treatment, 16% as a first-line treatment, 14% a consolidation treatment and 8% combination treatment with ablation with curative intent. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were reported by 4% of patients during procedure and by 10% within 30 days. While 38% reported a worse, 62% reported a stable or better global health score, and 54% of patients with worse global health score were treated as salvage therapy patients.

CONCLUSION

This interim analysis confirms in a prospective analysis the feasibility of the study, with an acceptable toxicity profile. More patients reported a stable or improved HRQOL than deterioration. Deterioration of HRQOL was seen especially in salvage therapy patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03086096.