The breast is yet to come: current and future utility of circulating tumour DNA in breast cancer

Beyond traditional biopsies: the emerging role of ctDNA and MRD on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment

Breast cancer management has traditionally relied on tissue biopsies and imaging, which offer limited insights into the disease. However, the discovery of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection has revolutionized our approach to breast cancer. ctDNA, which is fragmented tumor DNA found in the bloodstream, provides a minimally invasive way to understand the tumor's genomic landscape, revealing heterogeneity and critical mutations that biopsies may miss. MRD, which indicates cancer cells that remain after treatment, can now be detected using ctDNA and other advanced methods, improving our ability to predict disease recurrence. This allows for personalized adjuvant therapies based on individual MRD levels, avoiding unnecessary treatments for patients with low MRD. This review discusses how ctDNA and MRD represent a paradigm shift towards personalized, genomically guided cancer care, which has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes in breast cancer.

Circulating tumour DNA as a promising biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis & treatment monitoring

Breast cancer contributes a large fraction to mortality among women diagnosed with cancer. It is important to monitor residual disease and extend the lead time to detect relapse in high-risk patients. Minimally invasive techniques that utilise circulating biomarkers are being explored for their potential in diagnosis, prognosis, and disease monitoring of breast cancer. Circulating biomarkers have been investigated as tools for breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, prediction, and monitoring of therapeutic response and resistance. Among these, circulating tumour cells and cell-free plasma DNA (cfDNA) derived from tumour cells (circulating tumour DNA i.e. ctDNA) have been integrated into clinical trial designs. Among all circulating biomarkers, ctDNA stands out as a promising biomaterial with great potential as it is thought to mirror the tumour's evolution. However, its clinical utilisation is hampered mainly by gaps in knowledge of its biological properties and specific characteristics. The development of robust and standardised methods for assessing circulating biomarkers is essential for realising the potential of personalised medicine. This review aims to summarise the characteristics of ctDNA and its role in breast cancer, drawing from both basic and translational research to provide insights into its clinical application. This review suggests that ctDNA has the potential to be a non-invasive, real-time surrogate for tumour tissue-based biomarkers. In conclusion, circulating biomarkers have the potential to revolutionise breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring, but the development of standardised methods for their assessment is essential. ctDNA, in particular, shows great promise as a liquid biopsy tool, but further research is needed to understand its biology and ensure its clinical utility fully.

Surveillance of Disease Progression in Metastatic Breast Cancer by Molecular Counting of Circulating Tumor DNA Using Plasma-SeqSensei Breast Cancer in Vitro Diagnostics Assay

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) quantification surpasses cancer antigen 15 to 3 for metastatic breast cancer surveillance. Clinical translation, however, is limited because of uncertainties about the optimal method and clinically valid ctDNA decision thresholds. Plasma-SeqSensei Breast Cancer IVD kit (PSS) is a novel assay for ctDNA molecular counting, detecting ≥0.06% variant allele fractions in AKT1, ERBB2, ESR1, KRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53. PSS was validated against droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in 201 samples from 16 subjects with PIK3CA/TP53-mutated cancers, longitudinally sampled for a median of 93 (range, 18 to 113) weeks, three to five weekly. PSS and ddPCR ctDNA levels correlate significantly (Spearman ρ, 0.923; 95% CI, 0.898-0.941) across 0% to 43% variant allele frequency (VAF) range. PSS predicts 12-week progression with high clinical accuracy (area under the curve, 0.848; 95% CI, 0.790-0.894). PSS validates a previously developed ddPCR classifier: <10 copies/mL (0.25% VAF); excludes >100 copies/mL (2.5% VAF); and confirms progression, with negative predictive value (95% CI) of 83% (76%-88%) and positive predictive value (95% CI) of 91% (81%-96%) (weighted κ, 0.856; 95% CI, 0.797-0.915). PSS thus confirms robust clinical thresholds (10 to 100 copies/mL, 0.25% to 2.5% VAF) for metastatic breast cancer surveillance, using absolute molecular counting.

Patient-centric thresholding of Cobas® EGFR mutation Test v2 for surveillance of EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Cobas EGFR mutation Test v2 was FDA-approved as qualitative liquid biopsy for actionable EGFR variants in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It generates semiquantitative index (SQI) values that correlate with mutant allele levels, but decision thresholds for clinical use in NSCLC surveillance are lacking. We conducted long-term ctDNA monitoring in 20 subjects with EGFR-mutated NSCLC; resulting in a 155 on-treatment samples. We defined optimal SQI intervals to predict/rule-out progression within 12 weeks from sampling and performed orthogonal calibration versus deep-sequencing and digital PCR. SQI showed significant diagnostic power (AUC 0.848, 95% CI 0.782-0.901). SQI below 5 (63% of samples) had 93% (95% CI 87-96%) NPV, while SQI above 10 (25% of samples) had 69% (95% CI 56-80%) PPV. Cobas EGFR showed perfect agreement with sequencing (Kappa 0.860; 95% CI 0.674-1.00) and digital PCR. SQI values strongly (r: 0.910, 95% 0.821-0.956) correlated to mutant allele concentrations with SQI of 5 and 10 corresponding to 6-9 (0.2-0.3%) and 64-105 (1.1-1.6%) mutant allele copies/mL (VAF) respectively. Our dual-threshold classifier of SQI 0/5/10 yielded informative results in 88% of blood draws with high NPV and good overall clinical utility for patient-centric surveillance of metastatic NSCLC.

Use of ctDNA in early breast cancer: analytical validity and clinical potential

Circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is gaining popularity in precision oncology, particularly in metastatic breast cancer, as it provides non-invasive, real-time tumor information to complement tissue biopsies, allowing for tailored treatment strategies and improved patient selection in clinical trials. Its use in early breast cancer has been limited so far, due to the relatively low sensitivity of available techniques in a setting characterized by lower levels of ctDNA shedding. However, advances in sequencing and bioinformatics, as well as the use of methylome profiles, have led to an increasing interest in the application of ctDNA analysis in early breast cancer, from screening to curative treatment evaluation and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection. With multiple prospective clinical trials in this setting, ctDNA evaluation may become useful in clinical practice. This article reviews the data regarding the analytical validity of the currently available tests for ctDNA detection and the clinical potential of ctDNA analysis in early breast cancer.

Status of breast cancer detection in young women and potential of liquid biopsy

Young onset breast cancer (YOBC) is an increasing demographic with unique biology, limited screening, and poor outcomes. Further, women with postpartum breast cancers (PPBCs), cancers occurring up to 10 years after childbirth, have worse outcomes than other young breast cancer patients matched for tumor stage and subtype. Early-stage detection of YOBC is critical for improving outcomes. However, most young women (under 45) do not meet current age guidelines for routine mammographic screening and are thus an underserved population. Other challenges to early detection in this population include reduced performance of standard of care mammography and reduced awareness. Women often face significant barriers in accessing health care during the postpartum period and disadvantaged communities face compounding barriers due to systemic health care inequities. Blood tests and liquid biopsies targeting early detection may provide an attractive option to help address these challenges. Test development in this area includes understanding of the unique biology involved in YOBC and in particular PPBCs that tend to be more aggressive and deadly. In this review, we will present the status of breast cancer screening and detection in young women, provide a summary of some unique biological features of YOBC, and discuss the potential for blood tests and liquid biopsy platforms to address current shortcomings in timely, equitable detection.

Rational thresholding of circulating tumor DNA concentration for improved surveillance of metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) concentration for metastatic cancer surveillance is promising, but uncertainty remains about cut-offs with clinical validity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational study recruited 136 subjects with advanced metastatic breast cancer (irrespective of ERBB2/hormone receptor status) for sequencing of their primary tumor in search for PIK3CA hotspot variants amenable for monitoring by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). The study analyzed 341 on-treatment samples from 19 patients with PIK3CA variants H1047R or E545K enrolled for long-term (median 85 weeks, range 13-125 weeks), frequent (every 3-5 weeks, median of 14 time points per subject, range 2-29) blood sampling for ctDNA quantification by ddPCR, orthogonally validated by deep sequencing. The diagnostic accuracy of ctDNA versus cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) concentrations to predict disease progression within 12 weeks was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Likelihood ratios were used for rational selection of ctDNA result intervals.

RESULTS

ctDNA [area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.848, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.791-0.895] showed superior diagnostic performance than CA15-3 (AUC 0.670, 95% CI 0.601-0.735, P < 0.001) to predict clinical progression within 12 weeks. ctDNA levels below 10 mutant allele copies/ml had high negative predictive value (88%), while levels above 100 copies/ml detected 64% of progressions 10 weeks earlier versus standard of care. Logistic regression analysis indicated complementary value of ctDNA and the presence of two consecutive CA15-3 rises, resulting in a model with 86% (95% CI 74% to 93%) positive predictive value and a clinically meaningful result in 89% of blood draws.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive ctDNA quantification improves metastatic breast cancer surveillance and enables individualized risk-based scheduling of clinical care.

Routine molecular applications and recent advances in breast cancer diagnostics

Cancer stands as one of the most common and lethal diseases, imposing a substantial burden on global mortality rates. Breast cancer is distinct from other forms of cancer in which it is the primary cause of death for women. Early detection of breast cancer can significantly lower the risk of mortality, improving the prognosis for those who are affected. The death rate of breast cancer has been steadily rising, according to epidemiological data, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. This emphasizes the necessity of sensitive and precise technologies that can be utilized in early breast cancer diagnosis. In this process, biomarkers play a pivotal role by facilitating the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Currently, a wide variety of cancer biomarkers have been identified, improving the accuracy of cancer diagnosis. These biomarkers can be applied in liquid biopsies as well as on solid tissues. In the context of breast cancer, biomarkers are particularly valuable for determining who is predisposed to the disease, predicting prognosis at the time of diagnosis, and selecting the best course of therapy. This review comprehensively explores the recently developed gene-based biomarkers from biofluids that are used in the context of breast cancer, as well as the conventional and cutting-edge techniques that have been employed for breast cancer diagnosis.

ESR1 mutations in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer: Enhancing the accuracy of ctDNA testing

Activating mutations of the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) are common mechanisms of endocrine therapy (ET) resistance in hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Recent clinical findings emphasize that both old and new generations of selective ER degraders (SERDs) demonstrate enhanced clinical effectiveness in patients with MBC who have detectable ESR1 mutations via liquid biopsy. This stands in contrast to individuals with MBC carrying these mutations and undergoing conventional endocrine monotherapies like aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive alternative to conventional tissue-based testing for identifying ESR1 mutations. Within the context of the PADA-1 and EMERALD trials, distinct molecular methodologies and assays, specifically digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have been employed to evaluate the mutational status of ESR1 within ctDNA. This manuscript critically examines the advantages and indications of various ctDNA testing methods on liquid biopsy for HR+/HER2-negative MBC. Specifically, we delve into the capabilities of ddPCR and NGS in identifying ESR1 mutations. Each methodology boasts unique strengths and limitations: ddPCR excels in its analytical sensitivity for pinpointing hotspot mutations, while NGS offers comprehensive coverage of the spectrum of ESR1 mutations. The significance of meticulous sample handling and timely analysis is emphasized, acknowledging the transient nature of cfDNA. Furthermore, we underscore the importance of detecting sub-clonal ESR1 mutations, as these variants can exert a pivotal influence on predicting both endocrine therapy resistance and responsiveness to SERDs. In essence, this work discusses the role of ctDNA analysis for detecting ESR1 mutations and their implications in tailoring effective therapeutic strategies for HR+/HER2- MBC.

Circulating tumour DNA testing in metastatic breast cancer: Integration with tissue testing

Breast cancer biomarker profiling predominantly relies on tissue testing (surgical and/or biopsy samples). However, the field of liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), has witnessed remarkable progress and continues to evolve rapidly. The incorporation of ctDNA-based testing into clinical practice is creating new opportunities for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). ctDNA offers advantages over conventional tissue analyses, as it reflects tumour heterogeneity and enables multiple serial biopsies in a minimally invasive manner. Thus, it serves as a valuable complement to standard tumour tissues and, in certain instances, may even present a potential alternative approach. In the context of MBC, ctDNA testing proves highly informative in the detection of disease progression, monitoring treatment response, assessing actionable biomarkers, and identifying mechanisms of resistance. Nevertheless, ctDNA does exhibit inherent limitations, including its generally low abundance, necessitating timely blood samplings and rigorous management of the pre-analytical phase. The development of highly sensitive assays and robust bioinformatic tools has paved the way for reliable ctDNA analyses. The time has now come to establish how ctDNA and tissue analyses can be effectively integrated into the diagnostic workflow of MBC to provide patients with the most comprehensive and accurate profiling. In this manuscript, we comprehensively analyse the current methodologies employed in ctDNA analysis and explore the potential benefits arising from the integration of tissue and ctDNA testing for patients diagnosed with MBC.

Assessing Mode of Recurrence in Breast Cancer to Identify an Optimised Follow-Up Pathway: 10-Year Institutional Review

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer surveillance programmes ensure early identification of recurrence which maximises overall survival. Programmes include annual clinical examination and radiological assessment. There remains debate around the value of annual clinical exam in diagnosing recurrent disease/second primaries. The aim was to assess diagnostic modalities for recurrent breast cancer with a focus on evaluating the role of annual clinical examination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospectively maintained database from a symptomatic breast cancer service between 2010-2020 was reviewed. Patients with biopsy-proven recurrence/second breast primary were included. The primary outcome was the diagnostic modality by which recurrences/secondary breast cancers were observed. Diagnostic modalities included (i) self-detection by the patient, (ii) clinical examination by a breast surgeon or (iii) radiological assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were identified and, following application of exclusion criteria, a total of 140 patients were included. A total of 65/140 (46%) patients were diagnosed clinically, either by self-detection or clinical examination, while 75/140 (54%) were diagnosed radiologically. A total of 59/65 (91%) of patients clinically diagnosed with recurrence presented to the breast clinic after self-detection of an abnormality. Four (6%) patients had cognitive impairment and recurrence was diagnosed by a carer. Two (3%) patients were diagnosed with recurrence by a breast surgeon at clinical examination. The median time to recurrence in all patients was 48 months (range 2-263 months).

CONCLUSION

Clinical examination provides little value in diagnosing recurrence (< 5%) and surveillance programmes may benefit from reduced focus on such a modality. Regular radiological assessment and ensuring patients have urgent/easy access to a breast clinic if they develop new symptoms/signs should be the focus of surveillance programmes.

Liquid biopsy: Cell-free DNA based analysis in breast cancer

Breast cancer management has witnessed significant advancements, especially in the diagnosis and treatment response monitoring through the implementation of imaging techniques and tissue biopsy procedures. Nevertheless, there is potential for further improvement by integrating less invasive approaches that offer timely and precise information. Liquid biopsy, which involves isolating tumor-derived components such as circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and its subset known as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), can greatly enhance the prognosis, identification of specific genomic alterations, and selection of targeted therapies for breast cancer patients. While the incorporation of ctDNA-based testing into clinical practice has been primarily focused on metastatic breast cancer (MBC), there is growing interest in its applicability in early-stage breast cancer given the ability to capture tumor heterogeneity. Additionally, the minimally invasive nature of ctDNA testing allows for multiple serial samplings, providing a dynamic assessment of tumor characteristics and monitoring treatment response over time. However, the analysis of ctDNA in breast cancer encounters a significant challenge related to its abundance and the temporal aspect of the disease. The quantity of ctDNA in relation to the disease stage poses an important obstacle that often hinders its accurate analysis. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure timely sample collection, employ sensitive detection methods, and carefully manage the pre-analytical phase to overcome these challenges and facilitate successful ctDNA analysis in breast cancer. This article aims to summarize the methodologies employed in the detection of ctDNA, provide a comprehensive review of the current applications of ctDNA analysis in breast cancer, and elucidate the underlying rationale for its potential extension into broader clinical contexts. Furthermore, models that could facilitate the widespread adoption of ctDNA testing in various healthcare institutions are discussed.

Evaluation of RAS Mutational Status in Liquid Biopsy to Monitor Disease Progression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

In this study we evaluated both~ K- and N-RAS mutations in plasma samples from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by means of the BEAMing technology, and we assessed their diagnostic performance compared to RAS analyses performed on tissue. The sensitivity of BEAMing in identifying KRAS mutations was of 89.5%, with a fair specificity. The agreement with tissue analysis was moderate. The sensitivity for NRAS was high with a good specificity, and the agreement between tissue analysis and BEAMing was fair. Interestingly, significantly higher mutant allele fraction (MAF) levels were detected in patients with G2 tumors, liver metastases, and in those who did not receive surgery. NRAS MAF level was significantly higher in patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma and for those with lung metastases. A sharp increase in the MAF values was observed in patients who moved towards disease progression. More strikingly, molecular progression always anticipated the radiological one in these patients. These observations pave the way to the possibility of using liquid biopsy to monitor patients during treatment, and to enable oncologists to anticipate interventions compared to radiological analyses. This will allow time to be saved and ensure a better management of metastatic patients in the near future.

Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Analysis of Urine Cell-Free mtDNA Reveals Aberrant Fragmentation and Mutation Profile in Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Many studies have demonstrated the high efficacy of cell-free nuclear DNA in cancer diagnostics. Compared to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) exhibits distinct characteristics, including multiple copies per cell and higher mutation frequency. However, the potential applicability of cell-free mtDNA (cf-mtDNA) in plasma and urine remains poorly investigated.

METHODS

Here, we comprehensively analyzed the fragmentomic and mutational characteristics of cf-mtDNA in urine and plasma samples from controls and cancer patients using next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

Compared to plasma cf-mtDNA, urine cf-mtDNA exhibited increased copy numbers and wider spread in fragment size distributions. Based on 2 independent animal models, urine cf-mtDNA originated predominantly from local shedding and transrenal excretion. Further analysis indicated an enhanced fragmentation of urine cf-mtDNA in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Using the mtDNA sequence of peripheral blood mononuclear cells for reference, the mutant fragments were shorter than wild-type fragments in urine cf-mtDNA. Size selection of short urine cf-mtDNA fragments (<150 bp) significantly enhanced the somatic mutation detection. Our data revealed remarkably different base proportions of fragment ends between urine and plasma cf-mtDNA that also were associated with fragment size. Moreover, both RCC and CRC patients exhibited significantly higher T-end and lower A-end proportions in urine cf-mtDNA than controls. By integrating the fragmentomic and mutational features of urine cf-mtDNA, our nomogram model exhibited a robust efficacy for cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proof-of-concept findings revealed aberrant fragmentation and mutation profiles of urine cf-mtDNA in cancer patients that have diagnostic potential.

Recurrence monitoring for ovarian cancer using a cell phone-integrated paper device to measure the ovarian cancer biomarker HE4/CRE ratio in urine

Ovarian cancer has a poor cure rate and rates of relapse are high. Current recurrence detection is limited by non-specific methods such as blood testing and ultrasound. Based on reports that human epididymis four (HE4) / creatinine (CRE) ratios found in urine are elevated in ovarian cancers, we have developed a paper-based device that combines lateral flow technology and cell phone analysis to quantitatively measure HE4/CRE. Surrogate samples were used to test the performance over clinically expected HE4/CRE ratios. For HE4/CRE ratios of 2 to 47, the percent error was found to be 16.0% on average whether measured by a flatbed scanner or cell phone. There was not a significant difference between the results from the cell phone or scanner. Based on published studies, error in this method was less than the difference required to detect recurrence. This promising new tool, with further development, could be used at home or in low-resource settings to provide timely detection of ovarian cancer recurrence.