Silicone oil tamponade for persistent macular holes

Closure rates and patterns after light silicone oil tamponade for persistent full-thickness macular holes

PURPOSE

To report outcomes of re-vitrectomy using light silicone oil (SO) tamponade for persistent macular holes (MHs).

METHODS

We reviewed cases of patients with full-thickness MHs that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with air/gas and were re-vitrectomized using light SO tamponade after primary non-closure (persistent MHs). Outcome measures included anatomic closure rates and patterns confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

A total of 42 eyes of 41 patients with unsuccessful primary PPV with air/gas were included. After re-vitrectomy with light SO (1000-centistoke), 29 (69%) eyes demonstrated type 1 closure without neurosensory defects in OCT scans, whereas 9 eyes (21%) showed type 2 closure with persisting neurosensory defects. Available data (n = 21) showed a significant mean improvement of BCVA from 0.99 logMAR (SD 0.25, range 0.7-1.3) preoperatively to 0.74 logMAR (SD 0.42, range 0.2-1.5) postoperatively (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of persistent MHs with PPV and light SO tamponade resulted in high closure rates.

Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes

BACKGROUND

Aim of the study was to compare success rate and functional outcome following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus ILM flap technique for full-thickness idiopathic macular holes (FTMH).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive eyes with FTMH having undergone vitrectomy with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) endotamponade 25% at the University Medical Center Rostock, Germany (2009-2020). Eyes were divided according to applied surgical technique (ILM peeling [group P] versus ILM flap [group F]). Inclusion criteria were macular hole base diameters (MH-BD) ≥ 400 μm plus axial length ≤ 26.0 mm. Each group was divided into two subgroups based on macular hole minimum linear diameter (MH-MLD): ≤ 400 μm and > 400 μm. Exclusion criteria were FTMH with MH-BD < 400 μm, trauma, myopia with axial length > 26.0 mm or macular schisis. Demographic, functional, and anatomical data were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Preoperative MH-BD and MH-MLD were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT; Spectralis®, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Main outcome parameter were: primary closure rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and re-surgery rate.

RESULTS

Overall 117 eyes of 117 patients with FTMH could be included, thereof 52 eyes underwent conventional ILM peeling (group P) and 65 additional ILM flap (group F) technique. Macular hole closure was achieved in 31 eyes (59.6%) in group P and in 59 eyes (90.8%) in group F (p < 0.001). Secondary PPV was required in 21 eyes (40.4%) in group P and in 6 eyes (9.2%) in group F. Postoperative BCVA at first follow-up in eyes with surgical closure showed no significant difference for both groups (MH-MLD ≤ 400 μm: p = 0.740); MH-MLD > 400 μm: p = 0.241).

CONCLUSION

Anatomical results and surgical closure rate following ILM flap technique seems to be superior to conventional ILM peeling for treatment of FTMH.

Outcomes of revision surgery for idiopathic macular hole after failed primary vitrectomy

Persistent idiopathic macular hole (PIMH), the occurrence of idiopathic macular holes that have failed to close after standard pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, has become a global health threat to the aging population. Because postoperative anatomic closure or restoration of visual acuity is more difficult to achieve in PIMH, surgical approaches that would yield the best outcomes remain to be elucidated. On paper, extended ILM peeling combined with silicone oil (SiO) tamponade is believed to be a feasible option for excellent macular hole closure. However, no studies on this combined treatment for PIMH is compared with simple air tamponade have been conducted. Thus, in this retrospective case series, we used spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and other technologies to investigate real-world evidence for the anatomical and functional outcomes of revisional PPV with either SiO or air tamponade for failed primary idiopathic macular hole surgery. We included the records of 76 patients with PIMH who had SD-OCT examinations and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Regression analysis was performed to find factors affecting PIMH fracture closure. Seventy-six participants were allocated to a SiO group (n = 21, with an extended ILM peeling and SiO tamponade) or an air group (n = 55, with extended ILM peeling and air tamponade). Anatomical success was achieved in 18 (85.7%) and 40 (72.7%) eyes in the SiO and air groups, respectively (p = 0.37). BCVA was significantly improved in both subgroups of closed PIMH (SiO group: p = 0.041; air group: p < 0.001). Minimum linear diameter (MLD) was closely related to the closure rate (OR, 1.0; 95% CI (0.985-0.999); p = 0.03). MLD = 650 μm seemed like a cut-off point for closure rate (MLD ≤ 650 μm vs. MLD > 650 μm; 88.4% vs. 52%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, we demonstrated that extended ILM peeling combined with SiO or air tamponade is effective in PIMH treatment. Moreover, though not statistically significant herein, the anatomic closure rate was better for silicone-operated eyes than for air-operated eyes. MLD is the best predictor of PIMH closure; MLD ≤ 650 μm could achieve a significantly higher closure rate.

Autologous Retinal Transplant Repeat Surgery after Initial Graft Failure: A Case Report

Autologous retinal transplant (ART) has become an increasingly explored surgical option for managing large chronic holes refractory to standard surgical treatments. However, management strategies for patients who already failed a previous ART are less well-understood. Here, we report on a case of a successful repeat retinal transplant for a refractory macular hole after a previously dislocated ART graft. Subretinal injection of balanced salt solution was used to partially elevate the macular hole and secure the edge of the harvested retinal graft under the edge of the macular hole in the second operation. Postoperatively, the patient developed intraretinal fluid within the retinal graft with an appearance similar to cystoid macular edema, which was controlled with topical steroids. In addition, two separate choroidal neovascular membranes along the subretinal injection sites were seen and treated with vascular endothelial growth factor downregulation. This case illustrates successful repeat ART surgery, but further optimization of ART surgical techniques is necessary to minimize ART's complication rate.