1
|
Russell H, Smith HS, Bensen JT, Murali P, Ferket BS, Finnila C, Hindorff LA, Sahin-Hodoglugil N. Lessons learned while starting multi-institutional genetics research in diverse populations: A report from the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 125:107063. [PMID: 36567057 PMCID: PMC9918690 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing diversity in clinical trial participation is necessary to improve health outcomes and requires addressing existing social, structural, and geographic barriers. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium (CSER) included six research projects to enroll historically underrepresented/underserved (UR/US) populations in clinical genomics research. Delays and project re-designs emerged shortly after work began. Understanding common experiences of these projects may inform future trial implementation. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with six CSER principal investigators and seven project managers were performed. An interview guide included questions of research/clinical infrastructure, logistics across sites, language, communication, and allocation of grant-related resources. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim; transcripts were analyzed using inductive coding, thematic analysis and consensus building. RESULTS All projects collaborating with new clinical sub-sites to recruit UR/US populations. Refining trial logistics continued long after enrollment for all projects. Themes of challenges included: sub-site customization for workflow and genetics support, conflicting input from participant advisory groups and approval bodies, developing research personnel, complex data management structures, and external changes (e.g. subcontractors ending contracts) that required redesign. Themes of beneficial lessons included: domains with prior experience were easier, develop project champions at each sub-site, structure communication within the research team, and simplify research design when possible. CONCLUSIONS The operational aspects of expanding clinical research into novel sub-sites are significant and require investment of time and resources. The themes arising from these interviews suggest priority areas for more quantitative analyses in the future including multi-institutional approval policies and processes, data management structures, and incremental research complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Russell
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Priyanka Murali
- Department of Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bart S Ferket
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Candice Finnila
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Lucia A Hindorff
- Division of Genomic Medicine, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Amendola LM, Shuster E, Leo MC, Dorschner MO, Rolf BA, Shirts BH, Gilmore MJ, Okuyama S, Zepp JM, Kauffman TL, Mittendorf KF, Bellcross C, Jenkins CL, Joseph G, Riddle L, Syngal S, Ukaegbu C, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Jarvik GP. Laboratory-related outcomes from integrating an accessible delivery model for hereditary cancer risk assessment and genetic testing in populations with barriers to access. Genet Med 2022; 24:1196-1205. [PMID: 35305866 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the laboratory-related outcomes of participants who were offered genomic testing based on cancer family history risk assessment tools. METHODS Patients from clinics that serve populations with access barriers, who are screened at risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome based on adapted family history collection tools (the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool and PREMM5), were offered exome-based panel testing for cancer risk and medically actionable secondary findings. We used descriptive statistics, electronic health record review, and inferential statistics to explore participant characteristics and results, consultations and actions related to pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified, and variables predicting category of findings, respectively. RESULTS Of all the participants, 87% successfully returned a saliva kit. Overall, 5% had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic cancer risk variant and 1% had a secondary finding. Almost all (14/15, 93%) participants completed recommended consultations with nongenetics providers after an average of 17 months. The recommended actions (eg, breast magnetic resonance imaging) were completed by 17 of 25 participants. Participant personal history of cancer and PREMM5 score were each associated with the category of findings (history and colon cancer finding, Fisher's exact P = .02; history and breast cancer finding, Fisher's exact P = .01; PREMM5TM score; and colon cancer finding, Fisher's exact P < .001). CONCLUSION This accessible model of hereditary cancer risk assessment and genetic testing yielded results that were often acted upon by patients and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Michael O Dorschner
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Bradley A Rolf
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Brian H Shirts
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Cecilia Bellcross
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Charisma L Jenkins
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Division of Bioethics and Paliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Daniel JM, Ackerman S, Desrosiers LR, Rego S, Knight SJ, Mollison L, Byfield G, Anderson KP, Danila MI, Horowitz CR, Joseph G, Lamoure G, Lindberg NM, McMullen CK, Mittendorf KF, Ramos MA, Robinson M, Sillari C, Madden EB. Integration of stakeholder engagement from development to dissemination in genomic medicine research: Approaches and outcomes from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med 2022; 24:1108-1119. [PMID: 35227608 PMCID: PMC9081226 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a critical need for genomic medicine research that reflects and benefits socioeconomically and ancestrally diverse populations. However, disparities in research populations persist, highlighting that traditional study designs and materials may be insufficient or inaccessible to all groups. New approaches can be gained through collaborations with patient/community stakeholders. Although some benefits of stakeholder engagement are recognized, routine incorporation into the design and implementation of genomics research has yet to be realized. METHODS The National Institutes of Health-funded Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium required stakeholder engagement as a dedicated project component. Each CSER project planned and carried out stakeholder engagement activities with differing goals and expected outcomes. Examples were curated from each project to highlight engagement strategies and outcomes throughout the research lifecycle from development through dissemination. RESULTS Projects tailored strategies to individual study needs, logistical constraints, and other challenges. Lessons learned include starting early with engagement efforts across project stakeholder groups and planned flexibility to enable adaptations throughout the project lifecycle. CONCLUSION Each CSER project used more than 1 approach to engage with relevant stakeholders, resulting in numerous adaptations and tremendous value added throughout the full research lifecycle. Incorporation of community stakeholder insight improves the outcomes and relevance of genomic medicine research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julianne M O'Daniel
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Sara Ackerman
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lauren R Desrosiers
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Shannon Rego
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sara J Knight
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Lonna Mollison
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Grace Byfield
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Maria I Danila
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Grace Lamoure
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Center for Health Research Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Carmit K McMullen
- Center for Health Research Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michelle A Ramos
- Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Catherine Sillari
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Ebony B Madden
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rolf BA, Schneider JL, Amendola LM, Davis JV, Mittendorf KF, Schmidt MA, Jarvik GP, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB, Hunter JE. Barriers to family history knowledge and family communication among LGBTQ+ individuals in the context of hereditary cancer risk assessment. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:230-241. [PMID: 34302314 PMCID: PMC8783924 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Openness about identity as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual orientations and gender identities (LGBTQ+) may cause strain on relationships between family members, which could lead to limited knowledge of cancer family history and reduced communication with family members. As a result, members of the LGBTQ+ community may have more difficulty accessing genetic counseling services for inherited cancer risk. We applied a mixed-methods approach to explore potential barriers to knowledge of cancer family history and family communication among participants of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study who self-identified as LGBTQ+. We assessed perceptions of family functioning and communication of genetic test results to family members using survey tools and supplemented these data with 20 in-depth interviews to further assess participant perspectives and experiences. LGBTQ+ participants were more likely to report unhealthy family functioning on the survey tool, and some interviewees endorsed that openness about their LGBTQ+ identity led to strained family relationships and reduced communication about their family history of cancer. Overall, this study identified barriers that may be faced by members of the LGBTQ+ community which could limit their ability to access genetic counseling services for inherited cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A. Rolf
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Laura M. Amendola
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - James V. Davis
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Kathleen F. Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Mark A. Schmidt
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Gail P. Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mercado J, Lawrence JZ, Moore M, Neogi A, Vig H. A call for unity in DEIJ efforts using a proposed framework for education, Recruitment, Retainment, Research, and Active outreach (ERA) for genetic counselors in the United States. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:590-597. [PMID: 35006622 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counselors, like many other healthcare providers, play a vital role in genomic health care. As a profession, we, along with our colleagues and students, have recognized the need to improve and incorporate diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) within our daily ways of practice to help create access to genomic technologies. In order to create systemic change and focus on unity, open communication, and transparency, we introduce a suggested framework called ERA (Education, Recruitment, Retainment, Research, and Active Outreach). This framework would benefit a genetic counselor throughout various stages of their career, from student to practicing genetic counselor, and can be broadly applied to all specialties of genomic medicine. Different iterations of DEIJ efforts have arisen in the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC), from the D&I (Diversity and Inclusion) Task Force to the J.E.D.I (justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion) committee. The lack of recorded history of these previous efforts and the lack of communication between current DEIJ organizations is one of the many reasons the ERA framework demands unity and transparency to achieve sustainable positive change. Genetic counselors must unite and work collaboratively to conduct and promote DEIJ efforts, so the benefits of genomic medicine can be realized by all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Mercado
- Genome Medical, South San Francisco, CA, USA.,Genomic Technologies Special Interest Group
| | - Janette Z Lawrence
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Cultural Representation and Outreach Subcommittee, NSGC
| | - Michelle Moore
- International Special Interest Group.,Sanford Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.,Laboratory/Industry Special Interest Group
| | - Arpita Neogi
- International Special Interest Group.,Internal Medicine-Cardiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hetal Vig
- Genomic Technologies Special Interest Group.,Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Examining access to care in clinical genomic research and medicine: Experiences from the CSER Consortium. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e193. [PMID: 34888063 PMCID: PMC8634302 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Ensuring equitable access to health care is a widely agreed-upon goal in medicine, yet access to care is a multidimensional concept that is difficult to measure. Although frameworks exist to evaluate access to care generally, the concept of “access to genomic medicine” is largely unexplored and a clear framework for studying and addressing major dimensions is lacking. Methods: Comprised of seven clinical genomic research projects, the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium (CSER) presented opportunities to examine access to genomic medicine across diverse contexts. CSER emphasized engaging historically underrepresented and/or underserved populations. We used descriptive analysis of CSER participant survey data and qualitative case studies to explore anticipated and encountered access barriers and interventions to address them. Results: CSER’s enrolled population was largely lower income and racially and ethnically diverse, with many Spanish-preferring individuals. In surveys, less than a fifth (18.7%) of participants reported experiencing barriers to care. However, CSER project case studies revealed a more nuanced picture that highlighted the blurred boundary between access to genomic research and clinical care. Drawing on insights from CSER, we build on an existing framework to characterize the concept and dimensions of access to genomic medicine along with associated measures and improvement strategies. Conclusions: Our findings support adopting a broad conceptualization of access to care encompassing multiple dimensions, using mixed methods to study access issues, and investing in innovative improvement strategies. This conceptualization may inform clinical translation of other cutting-edge technologies and contribute to the promotion of equitable, effective, and efficient access to genomic medicine.
Collapse
|
7
|
Riddle L, Amendola LM, Gilmore MJ, Guerra C, Biesecker B, Kauffman TL, Anderson K, Rope AF, Leo MC, Caruncho M, Jarvik GP, Wilfond B, Goddard KAB, Joseph G. Development and early implementation of an Accessible, Relational, Inclusive and Actionable approach to genetic counseling: The ARIA model. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:969-978. [PMID: 33549385 PMCID: PMC8881934 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the training and early implementation of the ARIA model of genetic counseling (Accessible, Relational, Inclusive, Actionable). METHODS As part of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study, an interdisciplinary workgroup developed the ARIA curriculum and trained genetic counselors to return exome sequencing results using the ARIA model. CURRICULUM The ARIA curriculum includes didactic elements, discussion, readings, role plays, and observations of usual care genetic counseling sessions. The ARIA model provides the skills and strategies needed for genetic counseling to be accessible to all patients, regardless of prior knowledge or literacy level; involves appropriate psychological and social counseling without overwhelming the patient with information; and leaves the patient with clear and actionable next steps. CONCLUSION With sufficient training and practice, the ARIA model appears to be feasible, with promise for ensuring that genetic counselors' communication is accessible, relational, inclusive and actionable for the diverse patients participating in genomic medicine. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS ARIA offers a coherent set of principles and strategies for effective communication with patients of all literacy levels and outlines specific techniques to practice and incorporate these skills into routine practice. The ARIA model could be integrated into genetic counseling training programs and practice, making genetic counseling more accessible and meaningful for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St., San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St. Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St. Box 0128, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | | | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Katherine Anderson
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, MC 3150, 777 Bannock, Denver, CO 80204, USA
| | - Alan F Rope
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Mikaella Caruncho
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St., San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St. Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Benjamin Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, M/S JMB-6, 1900 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St., San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mittendorf KF, Ukaegbu C, Gilmore MJ, Lindberg NM, Kauffman TL, Eubanks DJ, Shuster E, Allen J, McMullen C, Feigelson HS, Anderson KP, Leo MC, Hunter JE, Sasaki SO, Zepp JM, Syngal S, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Adaptation and early implementation of the PREdiction model for gene mutations (PREMM 5™) for lynch syndrome risk assessment in a diverse population. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:167-180. [PMID: 33754278 PMCID: PMC8458476 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00243-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common inherited cause of colorectal and endometrial cancers. Identifying individuals at risk for LS without personal cancer history requires detailed collection and assessment of family health history. However, barriers exist to family health history collection, especially in historically underserved populations. To improve LS risk assessment in historically underserved populations, we adapted the provider-facing PREdiction Model for gene Mutations (PREMM5™ model), a validated LS risk assessment model, into a patient-facing electronic application through an iterative development process involving expert and patient stakeholders. We report on preliminary findings based on the first 500 individuals exposed to the adapted application in a primary care population enriched for low-literacy and low-resource patients. Major adaptations to the PREMM5™ provider module included reduction in reading level, addition of interactive literacy aids, incorporation of family history assessment for both maternal and paternal sides of the family, and inclusion of questions about individual relatives or small groups of relatives to reduce cognitive burden. In the first 500 individuals, 90% completed the PREMM5™ independently; of those, 94% did so in 5 min or less (ranged from 0.2 to 48.8 min). The patient-facing application was able to accurately classify 84% of patients as having clinically significant or not clinically significant LS risk. Our preliminary results suggest that in this diverse study population, most participants were able to rapidly, accurately, and independently complete an interactive application collecting family health history assessment that accurately assessed for Lynch syndrome risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Donna J Eubanks
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jake Allen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kraft SA, Porter KM, Duenas DM, Guerra C, Joseph G, Lee SSJ, Shipman KJ, Allen J, Eubanks D, Kauffman TL, Lindberg NM, Anderson K, Zepp JM, Gilmore MJ, Mittendorf KF, Shuster E, Muessig KR, Arnold B, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 12:1-11. [PMID: 32981477 PMCID: PMC7785634 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical genomic implementation studies pose challenges for informed consent. Consent forms often include complex language and concepts, which can be a barrier to diverse enrollment, and these studies often blur traditional research-clinical boundaries. There is a move toward self-directed, web-based research enrollment, but more evidence is needed about how these enrollment approaches work in practice. In this study, we developed and evaluated a literacy-focused, web-based consent approach to support enrollment of diverse participants in an ongoing clinical genomic implementation study. Methods: As part of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study, we developed a web-based consent approach that featured plain language, multimedia, and separate descriptions of clinical care and research activities. CHARM offered clinical exome sequencing to individuals at high risk of hereditary cancer. We interviewed CHARM participants about their reactions to the consent approach. We audio recorded, transcribed, and coded interviews using a deductively and inductively derived codebook. We reviewed coded excerpts as a team to identify overarching themes. Results: We conducted 32 interviews, including 12 (38%) in Spanish. Most (69%) enrolled without assistance from study staff, usually on a mobile phone. Those who completed enrollment in one day spent an average of 12 minutes on the consent portion. Interviewees found the information simple to read but comprehensive, were neutral to positive about the multimedia support, and identified increased access to testing in the study as the key difference from clinical care. Conclusions: This study showed that interviewees found our literacy-focused, web-based consent approach acceptable; did not distinguish the consent materials from other online study processes; and valued getting access to testing in the study. Overall, conducting empirical bioethics research in an ongoing clinical trial was useful to demonstrate the acceptability of our novel consent approach but posed practical challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kelly J Shipman
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jake Allen
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Donna Eubanks
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Research Data and Analysis Center, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Briana Arnold
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kraft SA, Rothwell E, Shah SK, Duenas DM, Lewis H, Muessig K, Opel DJ, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Demonstrating 'respect for persons' in clinical research: findings from qualitative interviews with diverse genomics research participants. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 47:medethics-2020-106440. [PMID: 33023975 PMCID: PMC8021602 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The ethical principle of 'respect for persons' in clinical research has traditionally focused on protecting individuals' autonomy rights, but respect for participants also includes broader, although less well understood, ethical obligations to regard individuals' rights, needs, interests and feelings. However, there is little empirical evidence about how to effectively convey respect to potential and current participants. To fill this gap, we conducted exploratory, qualitative interviews with participants in a clinical genomics implementation study. We interviewed 40 participants in English (n=30) or Spanish (n=10) about their experiences with respect in the study and perceptions of how researchers in a hypothetical observational study could convey respect or a lack thereof. Most interviewees were female (93%), identified as Hispanic/Latino(a) (43%) or non-Hispanic white (38%), reported annual household income under US$60 000 (70%) and did not have a Bachelor's degree (65%); 30% had limited health literacy. We identified four key domains for demonstrating respect: (1) personal study team interactions, with an emphasis on empathy, appreciation and non-judgment; (2) study communication processes, including following up and sharing results with participants; (3) inclusion, particularly ensuring materials are understandable and procedures are accessible; and (4) consent and authorisation, including providing a neutral informed consent and keeping promises regarding privacy protections. While the experience of respect is inherently subjective, these findings highlight four key domains that may meaningfully demonstrate respect to potential and current research participants. Further empirical and normative work is needed to substantiate these domains and evaluate how best to incorporate them into the practice of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erin Rothwell
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Seema K Shah
- Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Hannah Lewis
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kristin Muessig
- Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Douglas J Opel
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|