Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism

Comparative analysis of aldosterone and renin assays for primary aldosteronism screening

The transition from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) assays has raised concerns over its impact on primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis. This study investigated the correlation between PAC and renin values using RIA, CLEIA, and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), established cutoff values for PA diagnosis using the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) with PAC_CLEIA, and assessed the differences in PAC values by measuring weak mineralocorticoids (WMs). This retrospective study evaluated 312 serum PAC samples using RIA, CLEIA, and LC-MS/MS, and analyzed 315 plasma renin samples. Method correlations were assessed through Passing-Bablok regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined ARR cutoffs for PA diagnosis. WMs were quantified to evaluate their impact on ΔPAC (RIA-LC-MS/MS) through multiple regression analysis. PAC_CLEIA and PAC_LC-MS/MS values were highly correlated. ARRs derived from PAC_RIAs demonstrated more false positives and lower specificity than ARRs using PAC_CLEIA or PAC_LC-MS/MS. WMs significantly influenced ΔPAC in both the PA and non-PA groups. ARRs using PAC_CLEIA are valuable for determining PA cutoffs in clinical practice. The transition to PAC using CLEIA may enhance PA detection rates. WMs were found to interfere with PAC measurements in the RIA method, affecting outcomes.

Intraprocedural Cortisol Measurement Increases Adrenal Vein Cannulation Success Rate in Primary Aldosteronism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of intraprocedural cortisol measurement (IPCM) for the technical success rates of bilateral adrenal vein, right adrenal vein (RAV), and left adrenal vein (LAV) cannulation during adrenal vein sampling (AVS).

METHODS

Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed from database inception to May 10, 2023, without any restrictions. We estimated the overall effect estimates of outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. We conducted subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis to explore the possible sources of between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In total, 3,485 patients from 11 studies (three prospective and eight retrospective) were enrolled. Bilateral selectivity in patients who underwent IPCM during AVS was significantly higher than that in patients who underwent a routine AVS procedure (84% vs. 64%, RR 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.59, P < 0.01), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 68%). A 42% relative risk reduction in the failure rate of bilateral adrenal vein cannulation was found in the IPCM group. Moreover, pooled analysis showed a significant increase in the success rates of RAV cannulation (84% vs. 72%, RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.31, P < 0.01, I2 = 33%) and LAV cannulation (89% vs. 84%, RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, P < 0.01, I2 = 4%) when IPCM was implemented during the AVS procedure compared to the routine AVS procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

An IPCM-based strategy during AVS appears to have a significant beneficial effect on improving the success rate of bilateral cannulation, RAV cannulation and LAV cannulation.