Transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation-a novel therapy for premature ejaculation: results of a proof of concept study

Low frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation applied to the bulbospongiosus muscle prolongs the ejaculation latency in a rat model

Premature ejaculation (PE) is common, but its true pathophysiology is not clear, and treatments are limited. We aimed to investigate the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation applied in different modes and frequencies to the bulbospongiosus muscle on ejaculation parameters. In this study, 24 male Wistar albino rats were used. The rats were equally divided into three groups: control, high-frequency burst (HFB) and low-frequency (LF) (n = 8 each). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation was applied to the rats for 30 min. In the HFB group, this stimulation was applied in the burst mode at 80 Hz frequency using 200 microseconds (µs) transition time. In the LF group, manual stimulation was applied using a 2 Hz frequency and 200 µs transition time. Following the intraperitoneal administration of para-chloroamphetamine at a dose of 5 mg/kg, ejaculation time, increase in basal seminal vesicle pressure, seminal vesicle maximum pressure, number and interval time of seminal vesicle contractions and bulbospongiosus muscle electromyography activities were evaluated over 30 min. There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of ejaculation time (p = 0.002). The ejaculation times of the LF, HFB and control groups were 1344.71 ± 105.9, 908 ± 62 and 672 ± 149.7 s, respectively. The post hoc analysis revealed that the ejaculation time of the LF group was significantly longer than that of the HFB and control groups (p = 0.033 and p = 0.001, respectively). The remaining parameters did not differ significantly between the groups. The results showed that low-frequency (2 Hz) electrical stimulation applied to the male rats significantly prolonged the ejaculation time. It is thus considered that applying neuromuscular electrical stimulation before planned sexual activity can prevent the rhythmic contractions necessary for completing the ejaculatory process by maintaining subtetanic continuous contraction and prolonging the ejaculation time in patients with premature ejaculation complaints.

Regular penis-root masturbation: A promising behavioral treatment method for lifelong premature ejaculation

AIM

We aimed to determine the effectiveness of penis-root masturbation (PRM), a newly defined behavioral therapy (BT) technique, in patients with unsuccessful medical treatment due to premature ejaculation (PE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 35 patients aged 25-43 years, who were diagnosed with lifelong PE. Patients and their partners were informed about the PRM technique and asked to practice PRM three times a week for three months, with or without sexual intercourse. The patients' Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) scores and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) were recorded and compared before PRM training (T0) and at the third (T3) month after the start of PRM training.

RESULTS

The mean±SD PEDT scores were 16.26±1.94 at T0, 10.63±1.14 at T3. When compared to T0, the PEDT values at T3 were significantly lower (P=0.021). In terms of IELT, the mean T3 values (192.43±56.71) were significantly longer (P=0.035) than at T0 (50.43±13.84seconds).

CONCLUSION

PRM BT shows promise for lifelong PE patients who do not benefit from or discontinue to pharmacotherapy. Larger prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

Surgical treatment of premature ejaculation: a narrative review

Recurrence after drug cessation is the biggest drawback of medical premature ejaculation (PE) treatments. Although these treatments are demonstrated to be safe and effective, most of the PE patients are interested in a more permanent solution. Despite the fact that currently available guidelines do not recommend surgical treatment for PE, some surgical interventions have been commonly performed for many years, especially in the Asian countries. The main purpose of these surgical treatments is to decrease the sensitivity of the glans penis. However, they are associated with irreversible complications such as penile deformity, sensory loss and erectile dysfunction. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical interventions introduced for the treatment of PE. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science have been utilized to search articles about glans penis augmentation and penile dorsal nerve interventions. A total of 11 articles were included, three articles excluded because they were in non-English languages. Glans penis augmentation offered a less invasive treatment that avoids severe side effects but requires retreatment in time. Selective dorsal neurectomy provided a more invasive but curative treatment alternative. However, more clinical data are necessary before surgical treatment options can be recommended to patients with PE.

A novel on-demand therapy for lifelong premature ejaculation using a miniature transperineal electrical stimulator-the vPatch: an as-treated analysis

BACKGROUND

While premature ejaculation (PE) is a common and disturbing sexual dysfunction in men, current available treatment modalities have limited efficacy and low treatment adherence.

AIM

To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the vPatch, a miniaturized on-demand perineal transcutaneous electrical stimulation device for treating PE.

METHODS

This prospective bicenter international first-in-human clinical study consisted of 2 arms, was sham controlled, and had a randomized double-blind design. In terms of statistical power calculation, 59 patients aged 21 to 56 years (mean ± SD, 39.8 ± 9.28) with lifelong PE were included. During the initial visit, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was measured over a 2-week run-in period. Eligibility was confirmed in visit 2, based on IELT values, medical and sexual history, and patients' individualized sensory and motor activation thresholds during perineal stimulation with the vPatch. Patients were randomized to the active (vPatch) and sham device groups in a 2:1 ratio, respectively. The vPatch device's safety profile was determined by comparing the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. During visit 3, IELTs, Clinical Global Impression of Change scores, and Premature Ejaculation Profile questionnaire outcomes were recorded. Primary end points assessed vPatch device efficacy as mean change in geometric mean IELT; each person was compared with himself, with and without the device, and the sham group was compared with the active group.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes included changes in IELT and Premature Ejaculation Profile before and after treatment, last visit Clinical Global Impression of Change scores, and vPatch safety profile.

RESULTS

Of 59 patients, 51 completed the study: 34 in the active group and 17 in the sham group. The baseline geometric mean IELT significantly increased from 67 to 123 seconds (P < .01) in the active group, as compared with an insignificant increase from 63 to 81 seconds (P = .17) in the sham group. The increase in mean IELT in the active group was significantly higher than in the sham group (56 vs 18 seconds, P = .01). IELT significantly increased by 3.1 times in the active vs sham group. The mean ratio of fold change (active:sham) was 1.4, significantly different from 1.0 (P = .02). No serious adverse events were reported.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Therapeutic use of the vPatch during coitus may become an on-demand, noninvasive, and drug-free treatment for PE.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first rigorous study investigating whether transcutaneous electrical stimulation during coitus could improve the symptoms of men with lifelong PE. The study is limited by the small number of patients, the exclusion of patients with acquired PE, the short-term follow up, and the use of a device based on a theoretic mechanism of action.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the possibility to treat lifelong PE by prolonging coitus on demand, using electric stimulation of ejaculation muscles with the vPatch.Clinical trial registration: NCT03942367 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Current and emerging treatment options for premature ejaculation

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a prevalent male sexual dysfunction. Current standard treatment regimens include behavioural therapies, topical anaesthetics, dapoxetine and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Most of the pharmacotherapeutic options target neurotransmitters (such as serotonin and oxytocin) that have a role in the ejaculation mechanism. However, these treatments are mildly effective and only provide a temporary delay in the ejaculation latency time, and PE recurs when the treatment is stopped. Thus, a treatment for PE is urgently needed and research is ongoing to find the ideal PE therapy. The efficacy and safety of topical anaesthetics and SSRIs in delaying ejaculation have been confirmed in many well-designed controlled trials. Both preclinical and clinical studies on new-generation SSRIs are ongoing. Moreover, promising results came from clinical trials in which the efficacy of on-demand PE therapies targeting neurotransmitters other than serotonin, such as α1-adrenoceptor antagonists and oxytocin antagonists, was assessed. Surgical intervention and neuromodulation have been proposed as potential treatment options for PE; however, current PE guidelines do not recommend these treatments owing to safety concerns.