Masculinizing genital gender-affirming surgery: metoidioplasty and urethral lengthening

Urethral Outcomes of the Labia Minora Ring Flap for Metoidioplasty and Phalloplasty

OBJECTIVE

To determine urethral outcomes of single-stage metoidioplasty and radial forearm free flap (RFFF) phalloplasty using the labia minora ring flap for urethral lengthening (UL).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing single-stage metoidioplasty and RFFF phalloplasty utilizing the labia minora ring flap technique. The ring flap consists of endodermal labia minora tissue ventral to the clitoris and surrounding the vaginal introitus. During metoidioplasty, the ring flap accounts for the entirety of UL. During RFFF phalloplasty, the ring flap becomes the pars fixa (PF) urethra. The primary outcomes measured were rates of fistula, stricture, and surgical revision.

RESULTS

Between November 2017 and August 2023, 311 patients underwent metoidioplasty or RFFF phalloplasty (mean follow-up 37 months). Of the 69 metoidioplasties, urethrocutaneous fistulas developed in 11 patients (16%); strictures occurred in 4 (6%). Of the 242 phalloplasty patients, there were 71 fistulas (29%), 56 of which resolved spontaneously. Strictures developed in 44 patients (18%). Twenty-five patients (10%) developed both a stricture and fistula. Surgical repair was required in 8/69 (12%) metoidioplasty patients and in 46/242 (19%) RFFF phalloplasty patients for an overall revision rate of 17%.

CONCLUSION

UL during metoidioplasty or RFFF phalloplasty can be accomplished in a single stage using the labia minora ring flap with comparable surgical revision rates to previously described techniques. This approach can also be applied to other phalloplasty techniques. Many fistulas of the PF urethra resolve spontaneously. Higher urethral revision rates were seen in phalloplasty compared to metoidioplasty.

Gender-affirming care in urology: emergency care of the gender-affirming surgical patient-what the primary urologist needs to know

OBJECTIVE

To present a narrative review of fundamental information needed to manage postoperative complications in patients who have undergone genital gender-affirming surgery (GAS).

METHODS

A narrative review was performed using the following keywords: 'gender-affirming surgery', 'complications', 'emergency', 'postoperative'. Articles were included after being reviewed by two primary authors for relevance. Four clinicians with significant experience providing both primary and ongoing urological care to patients after GAS were involved in article selection and analysis.

RESULTS

The most common feminising genital GAS performed is a vaginoplasty. The main post-surgical complications seen by urologists include wound healing complications, voiding dysfunction, postoperative bleeding, vaginal stenosis, acute vaginal prolapse and graft loss, rectovaginal fistula, and urethrovaginal fistula. The most common masculinising genital GAS options include metoidioplasty and phalloplasty. Complications for these surgeries include urethral strictures, urethral fistulae, and urethral diverticula. Penile implants may also accompany phalloplasties and their complications include infection, erosion, migration, and mechanical failure.

CONCLUSION

Genital GAS is increasing, yet there are still many barriers that individuals face not only in accessing the surgeries, but in receiving follow-up care critical for optimal outcomes. Improved education and training programmes would be helpful to identify and manage postoperative complications. Broader cultural level changes are also important to ensure a safe, gender-inclusive environment for all patients.

Secondary phallic prosthesis placement in transgender patients postmetoidioplasty: a case report on technique and outcome

Introduction

Gender affirming surgery is common among transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals. Genital gender-affirming surgery is a form of surgery that involves transformation and reconstruction of the genitalia while maintaining urologic and sexual function. Masculinizing genital gender-affirming surgery can involve the removal of the female genital and reproductive organs and the creation of a more masculine appearance by using phalloplasty or metoidioplasty techniques. While metoidioplasty has advantages such as limited scarring and preserved genital sensation and clitoral erection, it may not always guarantee the ability to void while standing or even penetrate a sexual partner.

Aim

To describe our method of secondary phallic enhancement after metoidioplasty with a phallic prosthesis.

Methods

Our case is based on a 39-year-old transgender male who underwent metoidioplasty with vaginectomy, scrotoplasty, and urethral lengthening. However, the original surgery was complicated by extensive hematoma formation in the suprapubic area and neoscrotum, leading to a buried position of the neophallus. Subsequent surgery was performed to reduce the prepubic fat pad and penoscrotal interposition, but it too was complicated by hematoma formation and wound dehiscence. To maximize phallic elongation, the tethering urethra was removed, and perineal urethrostomy was performed but could not sufficiently alleviate the buried phallus. As a further step to improve the outcome, we proposed the implantation of a specific phallic prosthesis designed for metoidioplasty with testicular prosthesis placement. Surgery was performed as a single procedure through a penoscrotal incision and greatly enhanced genital appearance.

Results

Three months after surgery, the patient had good sensation of the phallus and was able to have satisfactory sexual activity with his partner. However, he remained dissatisfied with the amount of prepubic tissue and opted to undergo further liposuction.

Conclusion

Phallic prosthesis implantation can be a procedure to improve the condition of multioperated cases of metoidioplasty with resistant phallic burying. Reconstruction with a phallic prosthesis was performed successfully in this case. However, long-term complications and functional outcomes, such as the ability to void while standing or penetrate a sexual partner, remain uncertain. Further experience is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of using a phallic prosthesis as a secondary procedure in patients undergoing metoidioplasty.

Masculinizing gender-affirming surgery for trans men and non-binary individuals: what you should know

Gender dysphoria, the discordance between one's gender identity and anatomy, affects nearly 25 million people worldwide, and the prevalence of transgender and non-binary identities is increasing because of greater acceptance and awareness. Because of the improved accessibility to gender-affirming surgery (GAS), many providers will care for patients during and after gender transition. For trans men (female-to-male), GAS represents a combination of procedures rather than a single surgery. The particular combination of masculinizing procedures is chosen on the basis of informed patient-provider discussions regarding the patient's goals and anatomy and implemented through a multidisciplinary team approach. In this review, we describe the common procedures comprising masculinizing GAS to improve delivery of specialized care for this patient population.

Urethral Complications After Metoidioplasty for Genital Gender Affirming Surgery

BACKGROUND

Possible options of genital gender affirming surgery in transmasculine are metoidioplasty or phalloplasty. As opposed to phalloplasty, no flapbased neophallic reconstruction is needed in metoidioplasty. Urethral lengthening is needed in metoidioplasty if the patient desires voiding at the tip of the neophallus. This urethral lengthening poses the patient at risk for urethral complications.

AIM

Our primary goal was to describe the morbidity and specific the urethral complications related to metoidioplasty. Second, we sought for predictors of these urethral complications.

METHODS

Our institutional database was retrospectively analyzed to identify transmasculine who underwent metoidioplasty between 2006 and 2020. This cohort was further evaluated for surgical morbidity, urethral complications and potential predictors for urethral complications.

OUTCOMES

The rate of surgical morbidity and urethral complications (temporary/permanent fistula, stricture or fistula and stricture) was calculated. Potential predictors evaluated herein were BMI, concomitant vaginectomy, active smoking and additional urethral lengthening (AUL). They were tested with logistic regression analysis with calculation of Odds Ratio (OR).

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients underwent metoidioplasty with a median follow-up of 44 months. Median age was 26 years. AUL was done in 36 (48.6%) patients and established by a transverse preputial skin island and labium minus flap in respectively 34 and 2 patients. Within 30 days after metoidioplasty, 3 (4.1%) high-grade complications were noted. Urethral complications of any kind were noted in 42 (56.8%) patients. All fistulas, permanent fistulas and strictures were seen in resp. 34 (45.9%), 27 (36.5%) and 14 (18.9%) patients. AUL is a significant predictor for all urethral complications (OR 15.5), strictures (OR 24.5), all fistula's (OR 6.07) and permanent fistulas (OR 3.83). In contrast, smoking is only a predictor for all fistulas (OR 6.54) and permanent fistulas (OR 3.76).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Obtaining information about the risk of complications is important in preoperative patient counselling. Patient who desires AUL are at higher risk to develop urethral complications and patients who continue to smoke at the period of metoidioplasty have a higher risk of fistula formation.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

Sufficient events to calculate predictors for urethral complications. However, this is a retrospective study with still a small number of patients with a relative short follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Urethral complications are frequent after metoidioplasty and approximately 50% needs corrective surgery. AUL is an independent risk factor for fistula and stricture formation, whereas smoking is a risk factor for fistula formation. Waterschoot M, Hoebeke P, Verla W, et al. Urethral Complications After Metoidioplasty for Genital Gender Affirming Surgery. J Sex Med 2021;18:1271-1279.

Surgical outcomes and proposal for a treatment algorithm for urethral strictures in transgender men

OBJECTIVES

To assess our results of surgical treatment for urethral strictures in transgender men, and to provide a surgical treatment algorithm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single centre, retrospective cohort study was conducted of transgender men who underwent surgical correction of their urethral stricture(s) between January 2013 and March 2020. The medical charts of 72 transgender men with 147 urethral strictures were reviewed. The primary outcomes were the success and recurrence rates after surgical treatment for urethral strictures.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 61 (25-202) months. At last follow-up, 50/72 (69%) were able to void while standing (after one [60%], two [20%], three [6%], four [8%], five [4%], or seven [2%] procedures), 10/72 (14%) await further treatment, two of the 72 (3%) sat to void despite good urodynamic function, and 10/72 (14%) had a definitive urethrostomy. Of 104 surgical treatments included in separate success rate analysis, 65 (63%) were successful (43/75 [57%] after phalloplasty, 22/29 [76%] after metoidioplasty). The highest success rates in short urethral strictures were seen after a Heineke-Mikulicz procedure (six of seven cases), and in longer or more complicated urethral strictures after two-stage with graft (four of six), two-stage without graft (10/12), pedicled flap (11/15, 73%), and single-stage graft (seven of seven) urethroplasties. Grafts used were buccal mucosa or full-thickness skin grafts. Success rates improved over time, with success rates of 38% and 36% in 2013 and 2014, to 71% and 73% in 2018 and 2019, respectively. We concluded with a surgical treatment algorithm based on previous literature, stricture characteristics, and our surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The highest success rates were seen after a Heineke-Mikulicz procedure in short urethral strictures; and after graft, pedicled flap, or two-stage urethroplasties in longer or more complicated urethral strictures. Finally, most of the transgender men were able to void while standing, although in some multiple surgical procedures were necessary to accomplish this.

An Updated Overview of Gender Dysphoria and Gender Affirmation Surgery: What Every Plastic Surgeon Should Know

Gender dysphoria refers to the medical condition experienced by individuals whose physical anatomy is not consistent with their gender identity. Surgery is a safe and effective treatment for many individuals, yet the current demand for surgery exceeds the number of trained surgeons. This article reviews gender-affirming surgical procedures and emphasizes an individualized approach within the context of a multidisciplinary team. We review pre-, intra-, and postoperative care including the preoperative requirements for surgery.

Surgical Outcomes Following Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Multi-Center, International Survey of 129 Transmasculine Patients

BACKGROUND

Current literature on surgical outcomes after gender affirming genital surgery is limited by small sample sizes from single-center studies.

AIM

To use a community-based participatory research model to survey a large, heterogeneous cohort of transmasculine patients on phalloplasty and metoidioplasty outcomes.

METHODS

A peer-informed survey of transmasculine peoples' experience was constructed and administered between January and April 2020. Data collected included demographics, genital surgery history, pre- and postoperative genital sensation and function, and genital self-image.

OUTCOMES

Of the 1,212 patients completing the survey, 129 patients underwent genital reconstruction surgery. Seventy-nine patients (61 percent) underwent phalloplasty only, 32 patients (25 percent) underwent metoidioplasty only, and 18 patients (14 percent) underwent metoidioplasty followed by phalloplasty.

RESULTS

Patients reported 281 complications requiring 142 revisions. The most common complications were urethrocutaneous fistula (n = 51, 40 percent), urethral stricture (n = 41, 32 percent), and worsened mental health (n = 25, 19 percent). The average erect neophallus after phalloplasty was 14.1 cm long vs 5.5 cm after metoidioplasty (P < .00001). Metoidioplasty patients report 4.8 out of 5 erogenous sensation, compared to 3.4 out of 5 for phalloplasty patients (P < .00001). Patients who underwent clitoris burial in addition to primary phalloplasty did not report change in erogenous sensation relative to primary phalloplasty patients without clitoris burial (P = .105). The average postoperative patient genital self-image score was 20.29 compared with 13.04 for preoperative patients (P < .00001) and 21.97 for a historical control of cisgender men (P = .0004).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These results support anecdotal reports that complication rates following gender affirming genital reconstruction are higher than are commonly reported in the surgical literature. Patients undergoing clitoris burial in addition to primary phalloplasty did not report a change in erogenous sensation relative to those patients not undergoing clitoris burial. Postoperative patients report improved genital self-image relative to their preoperative counterparts, although self-image scores remain lower than cisgender males.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

These results are unique in that they are sourced from a large, heterogeneous group of transgender patients spanning 3 continents and dozens of surgical centers. The design of this study, following a community-based participatory research model, emphasizes patient-reported outcomes with focus on results most important to patients. Limitations include the recall and selection bias inherent to online surveys, and the inability to verify clinical data reported through the web-based questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Complication rates, including urethral compromise and worsened mental health, remain high for gender affirming penile reconstruction. Robinson IS, Blasdel G, Cohen O, et al. Surgical Outcomes Following Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Multi-Center, International Survey of 129 Transmasculine Patients. J Sex Med 2021;18:800-811.

Overview on metoidioplasty: variants of the technique

Number of gender dysphoric people increased over the last few decades with positive social acceptance of transpopulation. Genital gender affirming surgeries are of utmost importance in order to adjust body to the mind of these individuals. Creation of the phallus is usually the last step in transmen transition, which remains demanding and challenging for surgeons, with different options for phalloplasty available. The ideal phallus is esthetically appealing, with preserved tactile and erogenous sensation, enables standing micturition and sexual function with minimal donor-site morbidity. Metoidioplasty, as a variant of phalloplasty, uses the hormonally hypertrophied clitoris to create the neophallus. Metoidioplasty can be considered as a method of choice for thin-built individuals looking for male genitalia with preserved erogeneity, in one-stage genital gender affirming surgery. It can be combined together with removal of reproductive organs and vaginectomy. Preoperative consultation with patients and postoperative follow-up as well as multidisciplinary approach are essential for successful treatment.This literature review aims to assess and discuss different metoidioplasty approaches with a special reference to authors' current metoidioplasty technique.