The Rad51 paralogs facilitate a novel DNA strand specific damage tolerance pathway

The role of human Shu complex in ATP-dependent regulation of RAD51 filaments during homologous recombination-associated DNA damage response

Error-free DNA lesion bypass is an important pathway in DNA damage tolerance. The Shu complex facilitates this process by promoting homologous recombination (HR) to bypass DNA damage. Biochemical analysis of the human Shu complex homolog, hSWS1-SWSAP1, offers valuable insights into the HR-associated DNA damage response. Here, we biochemically characterized the human Shu complex and examined its interactions with RAD51 filaments, which are essential in HR. Using fluorescence polarization assays, we first revealed that hSWS1-SWSAP1 preferentially binds DNA with an exposed 5' end in the presence of adenine nucleotides. We then investigated and validated the DNA-stimulated ATPase activity of hSWS1-SWSAP1 through site-specific mutagenesis, revealing that DNA with an exposed 5' end is the most efficient in enhancing this activity. Furthermore, we showed that hSWS1-SWSAP1 initially interacts with RAD51 filaments at the 5' end and modulates the properties of the nucleoprotein filaments using fluorescence-based assays. Our findings revealed that hSWS1-SWSAP1 induces conformational changes in RAD51 filaments in an ATP-hydrolysis-dependent manner, while its stabilization of the filaments depends on ATP binding. This work provides mechanistic insights into the regulation of RAD51 filaments in HR-associated DNA damage tolerance.

Defining APOBEC-induced mutation signatures and modifying activities in yeast

APOBEC cytidine deaminases guard cells in a variety of organisms from invading viruses and foreign nucleic acids. Recently, several human APOBECs have been implicated in mutating evolving cancer genomes. Expression of APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B in yeast allowed experimental derivation of the substitution patterns they cause in dividing cells, which provided critical links to these enzymes in the etiology of the COSMIC single base substitution (SBS) signatures 2 and 13 in human tumors. Additionally, the ability to scale yeast experiments to high-throughput screens allows use of this system to also investigate cellular pathways impacting the frequency of APOBEC-induced mutation. Here, we present validated methods utilizing yeast to determine APOBEC mutation signatures, genetic interactors, and chromosomal substrate preferences. These methods can be employed to assess the potential of other human APOBECs and APOBEC orthologs in different species to contribute to cancer genome evolution as well as define the pathways that protect the nuclear genome from inadvertent APOBEC activity during viral restriction.

The Shu complex interacts with the replicative helicase to prevent mutations and aberrant recombination

Homologous recombination (HR) is important for DNA damage tolerance during replication. The yeast Shu complex, a conserved homologous recombination factor, prevents replication-associated mutagenesis. Here we examine how yeast cells require the Shu complex for coping with MMS-induced lesions during DNA replication. We find that Csm2, a subunit of the Shu complex, binds to autonomous-replicating sequences (ARS) in yeast. Further evolutionary studies reveal that the yeast and human Shu complexes have co-evolved with specific replication-initiation factors. The connection between the Shu complex and replication is underlined by the finding that the Shu complex interacts with the ORC and MCM complexes. For example, the Shu complex interacts, independent of other HR proteins, with the replication initiation complexes through the N-terminus of Psy3. Lastly, we show interactions between the Shu complex and the replication initiation complexes are essential for resistance to DNA damage, to prevent mutations and aberrant recombination events. In our model, the Shu complex interacts with the replication machinery to enable error-free bypass of DNA damage.

Leading and lagging strand abasic sites differentially affect vertebrate replisome progression but involve analogous bypass mechanisms

Abasic sites are one of the most frequent forms of DNA damage that interfere with DNA replication. However, abasic sites exhibit complex effects because they can be processed into other types of DNA damage. Thus, it remains poorly understood how abasic sites affect replisome progression, which replication-coupled repair pathways they elicit, and whether this is affected by the template strand that is damaged. Using Xenopus egg extracts, we developed an approach to analyze replication of DNA containing a site-specific, stable abasic site on the leading or lagging strand template. We show that abasic sites robustly stall synthesis of nascent DNA strands but exert different effects when encountered on the leading or lagging strand template. At a leading strand AP site, replisomes stall ∼100 bp from the lesion until it is bypassed or a converging fork triggers termination. At a lagging strand abasic site, replisome progression is unaffected and lagging strands are reprimed downstream, generating a post-replicative gap, which is then bypassed. Despite different effects on replisome progression, both leading and lagging strand abasic sites rely on translesion DNA synthesis for bypass. Our results detail similarities and differences between how leading and lagging strand AP sites affect vertebrate DNA replication.

The Shu complex is an ATPase that regulates Rad51 filaments during homologous recombination in the DNA damage response

Rad51 filaments are Rad51-coated single-stranded DNA and essential in homologous recombination (HR). The yeast Shu complex (Shu) is a conserved regulator of homologous recombination, working through its modulation on Rad51 filaments to direct HR-associated DNA damage response. However, the biochemical properties of Shu remain unclear, which hinders molecular insights into Shu's role in HR and the DNA damage response. In this work, we biochemically characterized Shu and analyzed its molecular actions on single-stranded DNA and Rad51 filaments. First, we revealed that Shu preferentially binds fork-shaped DNA with 20nt ssDNA components. Then, we identified and validated, through site-specific mutagenesis, that Shu is an ATPase and hydrolyzes ATP in a DNA-dependent manner. Furthermore, we showed that Shu interacts with ssDNA and Rad51 filaments and alters the properties of ssDNA and the filaments with a 5'-3' polarity. The alterations depend on the ATP hydrolysis of Shu, suggesting that the ATPase activity of Shu is important in regulating its functions. The preference of Shu for acting on the 5' end of Rad51 filaments aligns with the observation that Shu promotes lesion bypass at the lagging strand of a replication fork. Our work on Shu, a prototype modulator of Rad51 filaments in eukaryotes, provides a general molecular mechanism for Rad51-mediated error-free DNA lesion bypass.

The human Shu complex promotes RAD51 activity by modulating RPA dynamics on ssDNA

Templated DNA repair that occurs during homologous recombination and replication stress relies on RAD51. RAD51 activity is positively regulated by BRCA2 and the RAD51 paralogs. The Shu complex is a RAD51 paralog-containing complex consisting of SWSAP1, SWS1, and SPIDR. We demonstrate that SWSAP1-SWS1 binds RAD51, maintains RAD51 filament stability, and enables strand exchange. Using single-molecule confocal fluorescence microscopy combined with optical tweezers, we show that SWSAP1-SWS1 decorates RAD51 filaments proficient for homologous recombination. We also find SWSAP1-SWS1 enhances RPA diffusion on ssDNA. Importantly, we show human sgSWSAP1 and sgSWS1 knockout cells are sensitive to pharmacological inhibition of PARP and APE1. Lastly, we identify cancer variants in SWSAP1 that alter Shu complex formation. Together, we show that SWSAP1-SWS1 stimulates RAD51-dependent high-fidelity repair and may be an important new cancer therapeutic target.

REV1 coordinates a multi-faceted tolerance response to DNA alkylation damage and prevents chromosome shattering in Drosophila melanogaster

When replication forks encounter damaged DNA, cells utilize damage tolerance mechanisms to allow replication to proceed. These include translesion synthesis at the fork, postreplication gap filling, and template switching via fork reversal or homologous recombination. The extent to which these different damage tolerance mechanisms are utilized depends on cell, tissue, and developmental context-specific cues, the last two of which are poorly understood. To address this gap, we have investigated damage tolerance responses in Drosophila melanogaster. We report that tolerance of DNA alkylation damage in rapidly dividing larval tissues depends heavily on translesion synthesis. Furthermore, we show that the REV1 protein plays a multi-faceted role in damage tolerance in Drosophila. Larvae lacking REV1 are hypersensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and have highly elevated levels of γ-H2Av (Drosophila γ-H2AX) foci and chromosome aberrations in MMS-treated tissues. Loss of the REV1 C-terminal domain (CTD), which recruits multiple translesion polymerases to damage sites, sensitizes flies to MMS. In the absence of the REV1 CTD, DNA polymerases eta and zeta become critical for MMS tolerance. In addition, flies lacking REV3, the catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta, require the deoxycytidyl transferase activity of REV1 to tolerate MMS. Together, our results demonstrate that Drosophila prioritize the use of multiple translesion polymerases to tolerate alkylation damage and highlight the critical role of REV1 in the coordination of this response to prevent genome instability.

The human Shu complex promotes RAD51 activity by modulating RPA dynamics on ssDNA

Templated DNA repair that occurs during homologous recombination and replication stress relies on RAD51. RAD51 activity is positively regulated by BRCA2 and the RAD51 paralogs. The Shu complex is a RAD51 paralog-containing complex consisting of SWSAP1 and SWS1. We demonstrate that SWSAP1-SWS1 binds RAD51, maintains RAD51 filament stability, and enables strand exchange. Using single molecule confocal fluorescence microscopy combined with optical tweezers, we show that SWSAP1-SWS1 decorates RAD51 filaments proficient for homologous recombination. We also find SWSAP1-SWS1 enhances RPA diffusion on ssDNA. Importantly, we show human sgSWSAP1 and sgSWS1 knockout cells are sensitive to pharmacological inhibition of PARP and APE1. Lastly, we identify cancer variants in SWSAP1 that alter SWS1 complex formation. Together, we show that SWSAP1-SWS1 stimulates RAD51-dependent high-fidelity repair and may be an important new cancer therapeutic target.

REV1 Coordinates a Multi-Faceted Tolerance Response to DNA Alkylation Damage and Prevents Chromosome Shattering in Drosophila melanogaster

When replication forks encounter damaged DNA, cells utilize DNA damage tolerance mechanisms to allow replication to proceed. These include translesion synthesis at the fork, postreplication gap filling, and template switching via fork reversal or homologous recombination. The extent to which these different damage tolerance mechanisms are utilized depends on cell, tissue, and developmental context-specific cues, the last two of which are poorly understood. To address this gap, we have investigated damage tolerance responses following alkylation damage in Drosophila melanogaster. We report that translesion synthesis, rather than template switching, is the preferred response to alkylation-induced damage in diploid larval tissues. Furthermore, we show that the REV1 protein plays a multi-faceted role in damage tolerance in Drosophila. Drosophila larvae lacking REV1 are hypersensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and have highly elevated levels of γ-H2Av foci and chromosome aberrations in MMS-treated tissues. Loss of the REV1 C-terminal domain (CTD), which recruits multiple translesion polymerases to damage sites, sensitizes flies to MMS. In the absence of the REV1 CTD, DNA polymerases eta and zeta become critical for MMS tolerance. In addition, flies lacking REV3, the catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta, require the deoxycytidyl transferase activity of REV1 to tolerate MMS. Together, our results demonstrate that Drosophila prioritize the use of multiple translesion polymerases to tolerate alkylation damage and highlight the critical role of REV1 in the coordination of this response to prevent genome instability.

APOBEC3A induces DNA gaps through PRIMPOL and confers gap-associated therapeutic vulnerability

Mutation signatures associated with apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like 3A/B (APOBEC3A/B) cytidine deaminases are prevalent across cancers, implying their roles as mutagenic drivers during tumorigenesis and tumor evolution. APOBEC3A (A3A) expression induces DNA replication stress and increases the cellular dependency on the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase for survival. Nonetheless, how A3A induces DNA replication stress remains unclear. We show that A3A induces replication stress without slowing replication forks. We find that A3A induces single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps through PrimPol-mediated repriming. A3A-induced ssDNA gaps are repaired by multiple pathways involving ATR, RAD51, and translesion synthesis. Both ATR inhibition and trapping of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) on DNA by PARP inhibitor impair the repair of A3A-induced gaps, preferentially killing A3A-expressing cells. When used in combination, PARP and ATR inhibitors selectively kill A3A-expressing cells synergistically in a manner dependent on PrimPol-generated gaps. Thus, A3A-induced replication stress arises from PrimPol-generated ssDNA gaps, which confer a therapeutic vulnerability to gap-targeted DNA repair inhibitors.

Genetic inhibitors of APOBEC3B-induced mutagenesis

The cytidine deaminases APOBEC3A (A3A) and APOBEC3B (A3B) are prominent mutators of human cancer genomes. However, tumor-specific genetic modulators of APOBEC-induced mutagenesis are poorly defined. Here, we used a screen to identify 61 gene deletions that increase A3B-induced mutations in yeast. We also determined whether each deletion was epistatic with Ung1 loss, which indicated whether the encoded factors participate in the homologous recombination (HR)-dependent bypass of A3B/Ung1-dependent abasic sites or suppress A3B-catalyzed deamination by protecting against aberrant formation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). We found that the mutation spectra of A3B-induced mutations revealed genotype-specific patterns of strand-specific ssDNA formation and nucleotide incorporation across APOBEC-induced lesions. Combining these three metrics, we were able to establish a multifactorial signature of APOBEC-induced mutations specific to (1) failure to remove H3K56 acetylation, (2) defective CTF18-RFC complex function, and (3) defective HR-mediated bypass of APOBEC-induced lesions. We extended these results by analyzing mutation data for human tumors and found BRCA1/2-deficient breast cancers display three- to fourfold more APOBEC-induced mutations. Mirroring our results in yeast, Rev1-mediated C-to-G substitutions are mainly responsible for increased APOBEC-signature mutations in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors, and these mutations associate with lagging strand synthesis during replication. These results identify important factors that influence DNA replication dynamics and likely the abundance of APOBEC-induced mutation during tumor progression. They also highlight a novel role for BRCA1/2 during HR-dependent lesion bypass of APOBEC-induced lesions during cancer cell replication.

Bre1/RNF20 promotes Rad51-mediated strand exchange and antagonizes the Srs2/FBH1 helicases

Central to homologous recombination (HR) is the assembly of Rad51 recombinase on single-strand DNA (ssDNA), forming the Rad51-ssDNA filament. How the Rad51 filament is efficiently established and sustained remains partially understood. Here, we find that the yeast ubiquitin ligase Bre1 and its human homolog RNF20, a tumor suppressor, function as recombination mediators, promoting Rad51 filament formation and subsequent reactions via multiple mechanisms independent of their ligase activities. We show that Bre1/RNF20 interacts with Rad51, directs Rad51 to ssDNA, and facilitates Rad51-ssDNA filament assembly and strand exchange in vitro. In parallel, Bre1/RNF20 interacts with the Srs2 or FBH1 helicase to counteract their disrupting effect on the Rad51 filament. We demonstrate that the above functions of Bre1/RNF20 contribute to HR repair in cells in a manner additive to the mediator protein Rad52 in yeast or BRCA2 in human. Thus, Bre1/RNF20 provides an additional layer of mechanism to directly control Rad51 filament dynamics.

Genetic modifiers of APOBEC-induced mutagenesis

The cytidine deaminases APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B (A3B) are prominent mutators of human cancer genomes. However, tumor-specific genetic modulators of APOBEC-induced mutagenesis are poorly defined. Here, we utilized a screen to identify 61 gene deletions that increase A3B-induced mutations in yeast. Also, we determined whether each deletion was epistatic with UNG1 loss, which indicated whether the encoded factors participate in the error-free bypass of A3B/Ung1-dependent abasic sites or suppress A3B-catalyzed deamination by protecting against aberrant formation of single stranded DNA (ssDNA). Additionally, we determined that the mutation spectra of A3B-induced mutations revealed genotype-specific patterns of strand-specific ssDNA formation and nucleotide incorporation across APOBEC-induced lesions. Combining these three metrics we were able to establish a multifactorial signature of APOBEC-induced mutations specific to (1) failure to remove H3K56 acetylation, which results in extremely high A3B-induced mutagenesis, (2) defective CTF18-RFC complex function, which results in high levels of A3B induced mutations specifically on the leading strand template that synergistically increase with loss of UNG1, and (3) defective HR-mediated bypass of APOBEC-induced lesions, which were epistatic with Ung1 loss and result from increased Rev1-mediated C-to-G substitutions. We extended these results by analyzing mutation data for human tumors and found BRCA1/2-deficient breast cancer tumors display 3- to 4-fold more APOBEC-induced mutations. Mirroring our results in yeast, for BRCA1/2 deficient tumors Rev1-mediated C-to-G substitutions are solely responsible for increased APOBEC-signature mutations and these mutations occur on the lagging strand during DNA replication. Together these results identify important factors that influence the dynamics of DNA replication and likely the abundance of APOBEC-induced mutation during tumor progression as well as a novel mechanistic role for BRCA1/2 during HR-dependent lesion bypass of APOBEC-induced lesions during cancer cell replication.

ML216-Induced BLM Helicase Inhibition Sensitizes PCa Cells to the DNA-Crosslinking Agent Cisplatin

Using standard DNA-damaging medicines with DNA repair inhibitors is a promising anticancer tool to achieve better therapeutic responses and reduce therapy-related side effects. Cell viability assay, neutral comet assay, western blotting (WB), and cell cycle and apoptosis analysis were used to determine the synergistic effect and mechanism of ML216, a Bloom syndrome protein (BLM) helicase inhibitor, and cisplatin (CDDP), a DNA-crosslinking agent, in PCa cells. Based on the online database research, our findings revealed that BLM was substantially expressed in PCa, which is associated with a bad prognosis for PCa patients. The combination of ML216 and CDDP improved the antiproliferative properties of three PCa cell lines. As indicated by the increased production of γH2AX and caspase-3 cleavage, ML216 significantly reduced the DNA damage-induced high expression of BLM, making PC3 more susceptible to apoptosis and DNA damage caused by CDDP. Furthermore, the combination of ML216 and CDDP increased p-Chk1 and p-Chk2 expression. The DNA damage may have triggered the ATR-Chk1 and ATM-Chk2 pathways simultaneously. Our results demonstrated that ML216 and CDDP combination therapy exhibited synergistic effects, and combination chemotherapy could be a novel anticancer tactic.

Emergence and adaptation of the cellular machinery directing antigenic variation in the African trypanosome

Survival of the African trypanosome within its mammalian hosts, and hence transmission between hosts, relies upon antigenic variation, where stochastic changes in the composition of their protective variant-surface glycoprotein (VSG) coat thwart effective removal of the pathogen by adaptive immunity. Antigenic variation has evolved remarkable mechanistic complexity in Trypanosoma brucei, with switching of the VSG coat executed by either transcriptional or recombination reactions. In the former, a single T. brucei cell selectively transcribes one telomeric VSG transcription site, termed the expression site (ES), from a pool of around 15. Silencing of the active ES and activation of one previously silent ES can lead to a co-ordinated VSG coat switch. Outside the ESs, the T. brucei genome contains an enormous archive of silent VSG genes and pseudogenes, which can be recombined into the ES to execute a coat switch. Most such recombination involves gene conversion, including copying of a complete VSG and more complex reactions where novel 'mosaic' VSGs are formed as patchworks of sequences from several silent (pseudo)genes. Understanding of the cellular machinery that directs transcriptional and recombination VSG switching is growing rapidly and the emerging picture is of the use of proteins, complexes and pathways that are not limited to trypanosomes, but are shared across the wider grouping of kinetoplastids and beyond, suggesting co-option of widely used, core cellular reactions. We will review what is known about the machinery of antigenic variation and discuss if there remains the possibility of trypanosome adaptations, or even trypanosome-specific machineries, that might offer opportunities to impair this crucial parasite-survival process.

Rad54L promotes bladder cancer progression by regulating cell cycle and cell senescence

Bladder cancer (BCa) is the most prevalent cancer of the urinary system, but its pathogenesis is still poorly understood. Several reports have suggested that gene damage repair is highly correlated with tumor development and drug resistance, in which homologous recombination repair gene Rad54L seems to play an important role, through yet unclear mechanisms. Therefore, this study stratified cancer patients by Rad54L expression in BCa tissue, and high Rad54L expression was associated with a poor prognosis. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that high Rad54L expression promotes abnormal bladder tumor cell proliferation by changing the cell cycle and cell senescence. In addition, this study also suggests that Rad54L may be associated with p53, p21, and pRB in BCa tissue. In summary, this study exposes Rad54L as potential a prognostic biomarker and precision treatment target in BCa.

Gene expression profiling and in vitro functional studies reveal RAD54L as a potential therapeutic target in multiple myeloma

Background

Current advances in the molecular biology of multiple myeloma (MM) are not sufficient to fully delineate the genesis and development of this disease.

Objective

This study aimed to identify molecular targets underlying MM pathogenesis.

Methods

mRNA expression profiling for 29 samples (19 MM samples, 7 MM cell lines and 3 controls) were obtained using microarray. We evaluated the in vitro effects of RAD54L gene silencing on the proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle distribution in KMS-28BM human MM cells using siRNA approach. Cell proliferation was determined by MTS assay while apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were analysed with flow cytometry. Gene and protein expression was evaluated using RT-qPCR and ELISA, respectively.

Results

Microarray results revealed a total of 5124 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), in which 2696 and 2428 genes were up-regulated and down-regulated in MM compared to the normal controls, respectively (fold change ≥ 2.0; P < 0.05). Up-regulated genes (RAD54L, DIAPH3, SHCBP1, SKA3 and ANLN) and down-regulated genes (HKDC1, RASGRF2, CYSLTR2) have never been reported in association with MM. Up-regulation of RAD54L was further verified by RT-qPCR (P < 0.001). In vitro functional studies revealed that RAD54L gene silencing significantly induced growth inhibition, apoptosis (small changes) and cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase in KMS-28BM (P < 0.05). Silencing of RAD54L also decreased its protein level (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study has identified possible molecular targets underlying the pathogenesis of MM. For the first time, we reveal RAD54L as a potential therapeutic target in MM, possibly functioning in the cell cycle and checkpoint control.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13258-022-01272-7.

The HMCES DNA-protein cross-link functions as an intermediate in DNA interstrand cross-link repair

The 5-hydroxymethylcytosine binding, embryonic stem-cell-specific (HMCES) protein forms a covalent DNA-protein cross-link (DPC) with abasic (AP) sites in single-stranded DNA, and the resulting HMCES-DPC is thought to suppress double-strand break formation in S phase. However, the dynamics of HMCES cross-linking and whether any DNA repair pathways normally include an HMCES-DPC intermediate remain unknown. Here, we use Xenopus egg extracts to show that an HMCES-DPC forms on the AP site generated during replication-coupled DNA interstrand cross-link repair. We show that HMCES cross-links form on DNA after the replicative CDC45-MCM2-7-GINS (CMG) helicase has passed over the AP site, and that HMCES is subsequently removed by the SPRTN protease. The HMCES-DPC suppresses double-strand break formation, slows translesion synthesis past the AP site and introduces a bias for insertion of deoxyguanosine opposite the AP site. These data demonstrate that HMCES-DPCs form as intermediates in replication-coupled repair, and they suggest a general model of how HMCES protects AP sites during DNA replication.

The Shu complex prevents mutagenesis and cytotoxicity of single-strand specific alkylation lesions

Three-methyl cytosine (3meC) are toxic DNA lesions, blocking base pairing. Bacteria and humans express members of the AlkB enzymes family, which directly remove 3meC. However, other organisms, including budding yeast, lack this class of enzymes. It remains an unanswered evolutionary question as to how yeast repairs 3meC, particularly in single-stranded DNA. The yeast Shu complex, a conserved homologous recombination factor, aids in preventing replication-associated mutagenesis from DNA base damaging agents such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). We found that MMS-treated Shu complex-deficient cells exhibit a genome-wide increase in A:T and G:C substitutions mutations. The G:C substitutions displayed transcriptional and replicational asymmetries consistent with mutations resulting from 3meC. Ectopic expression of a human AlkB homolog in Shu-deficient yeast rescues MMS-induced growth defects and increased mutagenesis. Thus, our work identifies a novel homologous recombination-based mechanism mediated by the Shu complex for coping with alkylation adducts.

REV1-Polζ maintains the viability of homologous recombination-deficient cancer cells through mutagenic repair of PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps

BRCA1/2 mutant tumor cells display an elevated mutation burden, the etiology of which remains unclear. Here, we report that these cells accumulate ssDNA gaps and spontaneous mutations during unperturbed DNA replication due to repriming by the DNA primase-polymerase PRIMPOL. Gap accumulation requires the DNA glycosylase SMUG1 and is exacerbated by depletion of the translesion synthesis (TLS) factor RAD18 or inhibition of the error-prone TLS polymerase complex REV1-Polζ by the small molecule JH-RE-06. JH-RE-06 treatment of BRCA1/2-deficient cells results in reduced mutation rates and PRIMPOL- and SMUG1-dependent loss of viability. Through cellular and animal studies, we demonstrate that JH-RE-06 is preferentially toxic toward HR-deficient cancer cells. Furthermore, JH-RE-06 remains effective toward PARP inhibitor (PARPi)-resistant BRCA1 mutant cells and displays additive toxicity with crosslinking agents or PARPi. Collectively, these studies identify a protective and mutagenic role for REV1-Polζ in BRCA1/2 mutant cells and provide the rationale for using REV1-Polζ inhibitors to treat BRCA1/2 mutant tumors.

RAD51 paralog function in replicative DNA damage and tolerance

RAD51 paralog gene mutations are observed in both hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Classically, defects in RAD51 paralog function are associated with homologous recombination (HR) deficiency and increased genomic instability. Several recent investigative advances have enabled characterization of non-canonical RAD51 paralog function during DNA replication. Here we discuss the role of the RAD51 paralogs and their associated complexes in integrating a robust response to DNA replication stress. We highlight recent discoveries suggesting that the RAD51 paralogs complexes mediate lesion-specific tolerance of replicative stress following exposure to alkylating agents and the requirement for the Shu complex in fork restart upon fork stalling by dNTP depletion. In addition, we describe the role of the BCDX2 complex in restraining and promoting fork remodeling in response to fluctuating dNTP pools. Finally, we highlight recent work demonstrating a requirement for RAD51C in recognizing and tolerating methyl-adducts. In each scenario, RAD51 paralog complexes play a central role in lesion recognition and bypass in a replicative context. Future studies will determine how these critical functions for RAD51 paralog complexes contribute to tumorigenesis.

HMCES Maintains Replication Fork Progression and Prevents Double-Strand Breaks in Response to APOBEC Deamination and Abasic Site Formation

5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) binding, ES-cell-specific (HMCES) crosslinks to apurinic or apyrimidinic (AP, abasic) sites in single-strand DNA (ssDNA). To determine whether HMCES responds to the ssDNA abasic site in cells, we exploited the activity of apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 3A (APOBEC3A). APOBEC3A preferentially deaminates cytosines to uracils in ssDNA, which are then converted to abasic sites by uracil DNA glycosylase. We find that HMCES-deficient cells are hypersensitive to nuclear APOBEC3A localization. HMCES relocalizes to chromatin in response to nuclear APOBEC3A and protects abasic sites from processing into double-strand breaks (DSBs). Abasic sites induced by APOBEC3A slow both leading and lagging strand synthesis, and HMCES prevents further slowing of the replication fork by translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases zeta (Polζ) and kappa (Polκ). Thus, our study provides direct evidence that HMCES responds to ssDNA abasic sites in cells to prevent DNA cleavage and balance the engagement of TLS polymerases.

Mehta et al. use APOBEC3A to demonstrate that HMCES responds to ssDNA abasic sites in cells and prevents replication fork collapse. APOBEC3A-induced abasic sites slow both leading and lagging strand polymerization, and HMCES engagement prevents further fork slowing because of the action of TLS polymerases zeta (Polζ) and kappa (Polκ).

E2F1 Promotes Progression of Bladder Cancer by Modulating RAD54L Involved in Homologous Recombination Repair

DNA repair defects are important factors in cancer development. High DNA repair activity can affect cancer progression and chemoresistance. DNA double-strand breaks in cancer cells caused by anticancer agents can be restored by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). Our previous study has identified E2F1 as a key gene in bladder cancer progression. In this study, DNA repair genes related to E2F1 were analyzed, and RAD54L involved in HRR was identified. In gene expression analysis of bladder cancer patients, the survival of patients with high RAD54L expression was shorter with cancer progression than in patients with low RAD54L expression. This study also revealed that E2F1 directly binds to the promoter region of RAD54L and regulates the transcription of RAD54L related to the HRR pathway. This study also confirmed that DNA breaks are repaired by RAD54L induced by E2F1 in bladder cancer cells treated with MMC. In summary, RAD54L was identified as a new target directly regulated by E2F1. Our results suggest that, E2F1 and RAD54L could be used as diagnostic markers for bladder cancer progression and represent potential therapeutic targets.

PrimPol-dependent single-stranded gap formation mediates homologous recombination at bulky DNA adducts

Stalled replication forks can be restarted and repaired by RAD51-mediated homologous recombination (HR), but HR can also perform post-replicative repair after bypass of the obstacle. Bulky DNA adducts are important replication-blocking lesions, but it is unknown whether they activate HR at stalled forks or behind ongoing forks. Using mainly BPDE-DNA adducts as model lesions, we show that HR induced by bulky adducts in mammalian cells predominantly occurs at post-replicative gaps formed by the DNA/RNA primase PrimPol. RAD51 recruitment under these conditions does not result from fork stalling, but rather occurs at gaps formed by PrimPol re-priming and resection by MRE11 and EXO1. In contrast, RAD51 loading at double-strand breaks does not require PrimPol. At bulky adducts, PrimPol promotes sister chromatid exchange and genetic recombination. Our data support that HR at bulky adducts in mammalian cells involves post-replicative gap repair and define a role for PrimPol in HR-mediated DNA damage tolerance.

RAD51 Gene Family Structure and Function

Accurate DNA repair and replication are critical for genomic stability and cancer prevention. RAD51 and its gene family are key regulators of DNA fidelity through diverse roles in double-strand break repair, replication stress, and meiosis. RAD51 is an ATPase that forms a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA. RAD51 has the function of finding and invading homologous DNA sequences to enable accurate and timely DNA repair. Its paralogs, which arose from ancient gene duplications of RAD51, have evolved to regulate and promote RAD51 function. Underscoring its importance, misregulation of RAD51, and its paralogs, is associated with diseases such as cancer and Fanconi anemia. In this review, we focus on the mammalian RAD51 structure and function and highlight the use of model systems to enable mechanistic understanding of RAD51 cellular roles. We also discuss how misregulation of the RAD51 gene family members contributes to disease and consider new approaches to pharmacologically inhibit RAD51.

Conditional knockout of RAD51-related genes in Leishmania major reveals a critical role for homologous recombination during genome replication

Homologous recombination (HR) has an intimate relationship with genome replication, both during repair of DNA lesions that might prevent DNA synthesis and in tackling stalls to the replication fork. Recent studies led us to ask if HR might have a more central role in replicating the genome of Leishmania, a eukaryotic parasite. Conflicting evidence has emerged regarding whether or not HR genes are essential, and genome-wide mapping has provided evidence for an unorthodox organisation of DNA replication initiation sites, termed origins. To answer this question, we have employed a combined CRISPR/Cas9 and DiCre approach to rapidly generate and assess the effect of conditional ablation of RAD51 and three RAD51-related proteins in Leishmania major. Using this approach, we demonstrate that loss of any of these HR factors is not immediately lethal but in each case growth slows with time and leads to DNA damage and accumulation of cells with aberrant DNA content. Despite these similarities, we show that only loss of RAD51 or RAD51-3 impairs DNA synthesis and causes elevated levels of genome-wide mutation. Furthermore, we show that these two HR factors act in distinct ways, since ablation of RAD51, but not RAD51-3, has a profound effect on DNA replication, causing loss of initiation at the major origins and increased DNA synthesis at subtelomeres. Our work clarifies questions regarding the importance of HR to survival of Leishmania and reveals an unanticipated, central role for RAD51 in the programme of genome replication in a microbial eukaryote.

New insights into abasic site repair and tolerance

Thousands of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP or abasic) sites form in each cell, each day. This simple DNA lesion can have profound consequences to cellular function, genome stability, and disease. As potent blocks to polymerases, they interfere with the reading and copying of the genome. Since they provide no coding information, they are potent sources of mutation. Due to their reactive chemistry, they are intermediates in the formation of lesions that are more challenging to repair including double-strand breaks, interstrand crosslinks, and DNA protein crosslinks. Given their prevalence and deleterious consequences, cells have multiple mechanisms of repairing and tolerating these lesions. While base excision repair of abasic sites in double-strand DNA has been studied for decades, new interest in abasic site processing has come from more recent insights into how they are processed in single-strand DNA. In this review, we discuss the source of abasic sites, their biological consequences, tolerance mechanisms, and how they are repaired in double and single-stranded DNA.

Role of Rad51 and DNA repair in cancer: A molecular perspective

The maintenance of genome integrity is essential for any organism survival and for the inheritance of traits to offspring. To the purpose, cells have developed a complex DNA repair system to defend the genetic information against both endogenous and exogenous sources of damage. Accordingly, multiple repair pathways can be aroused from the diverse forms of DNA lesions, which can be effective per se or via crosstalk with others to complete the whole DNA repair process. Deficiencies in DNA healing resulting in faulty repair and/or prolonged DNA damage can lead to genes mutations, chromosome rearrangements, genomic instability, and finally carcinogenesis and/or cancer progression. Although it might seem paradoxical, at the same time such defects in DNA repair pathways may have therapeutic implications for potential clinical practice. Here we provide an overview of the main DNA repair pathways, with special focus on the role played by homologous repair and the RAD51 recombinase protein in the cellular DNA damage response. We next discuss the recombinase structure and function per se and in combination with all its principal mediators and regulators. Finally, we conclude with an analysis of the manifold roles that RAD51 plays in carcinogenesis, cancer progression and anticancer drug resistance, and conclude this work with a survey of the most promising therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting RAD51 in experimental oncology.