1
|
Sarsam RD, Xu J, Lahiri I, Gong W, Li Q, Oh J, Zhou Z, Hou P, Chong J, Hao N, Li S, Wang D, Leschziner AE. Elf1 promotes Rad26's interaction with lesion-arrested Pol II for transcription-coupled repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2314245121. [PMID: 38194460 PMCID: PMC10801861 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2314245121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER) is a highly conserved DNA repair pathway that removes bulky lesions in the transcribed genome. Cockayne syndrome B protein (CSB), or its yeast ortholog Rad26, has been known for decades to play important roles in the lesion-recognition steps of TC-NER. Another conserved protein ELOF1, or its yeast ortholog Elf1, was recently identified as a core transcription-coupled repair factor. How Rad26 distinguishes between RNA polymerase II (Pol II) stalled at a DNA lesion or other obstacles and what role Elf1 plays in this process remains unknown. Here, we present cryo-EM structures of Pol II-Rad26 complexes stalled at different obstacles that show that Rad26 uses a common mechanism to recognize a stalled Pol II, with additional interactions when Pol II is arrested at a lesion. A cryo-EM structure of lesion-arrested Pol II-Rad26 bound to Elf1 revealed that Elf1 induces further interactions between Rad26 and a lesion-arrested Pol II. Biochemical and genetic data support the importance of the interplay between Elf1 and Rad26 in TC-NER initiation. Together, our results provide important mechanistic insights into how two conserved transcription-coupled repair factors, Rad26/CSB and Elf1/ELOF1, work together at the initial lesion recognition steps of transcription-coupled repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reta D. Sarsam
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Jun Xu
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Indrajit Lahiri
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Wenzhi Gong
- Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA70803
| | - Qingrong Li
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Juntaek Oh
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Zhen Zhou
- Department of Molecular Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Peini Hou
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Jenny Chong
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Nan Hao
- Department of Molecular Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Shisheng Li
- Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA70803
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Andres E. Leschziner
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
- Department of Molecular Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reese JC. New roles for elongation factors in RNA polymerase II ubiquitylation and degradation. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA. GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2023; 1866:194956. [PMID: 37331651 PMCID: PMC10527621 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2023.194956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) encounters numerous impediments on its way to completing mRNA synthesis across a gene. Paused and arrested RNAPII are reactivated or rescued by elongation factors that travel with polymerase as it transcribes DNA. However, when RNAPII fails to resume transcription, such as when it encounters an unrepairable bulky DNA lesion, it is removed by the targeting of its largest subunit, Rpb1, for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). We are starting to understand this process better and how the UPS marks Rbp1 for degradation. This review will focus on the latest developments and describe new functions for elongation factors that were once thought to only promote elongation in unstressed conditions in the removal and degradation of RNAPII. I propose that in addition to changes in RNAPII structure, the composition and modification of elongation factors in the elongation complex determine whether to rescue or degrade RNAPII.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Reese
- Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu J, Yan C, Dodd T, Tsai CL, Tainer JA, Tsutakawa SE, Ivanov I. Dynamic conformational switching underlies TFIIH function in transcription and DNA repair and impacts genetic diseases. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2758. [PMID: 37179334 PMCID: PMC10183003 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38416-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcription factor IIH (TFIIH) is a protein assembly essential for transcription initiation and nucleotide excision repair (NER). Yet, understanding of the conformational switching underpinning these diverse TFIIH functions remains fragmentary. TFIIH mechanisms critically depend on two translocase subunits, XPB and XPD. To unravel their functions and regulation, we build cryo-EM based TFIIH models in transcription- and NER-competent states. Using simulations and graph-theoretical analysis methods, we reveal TFIIH's global motions, define TFIIH partitioning into dynamic communities and show how TFIIH reshapes itself and self-regulates depending on functional context. Our study uncovers an internal regulatory mechanism that switches XPB and XPD activities making them mutually exclusive between NER and transcription initiation. By sequentially coordinating the XPB and XPD DNA-unwinding activities, the switch ensures precise DNA incision in NER. Mapping TFIIH disease mutations onto network models reveals clustering into distinct mechanistic classes, affecting translocase functions, protein interactions and interface dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jina Yu
- Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Chunli Yan
- Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Thomas Dodd
- Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Chi-Lin Tsai
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John A Tainer
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Susan E Tsutakawa
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Ivaylo Ivanov
- Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Woike S, Eustermann S, Jung J, Wenzl SJ, Hagemann G, Bartho J, Lammens K, Butryn A, Herzog F, Hopfner KP. Structural basis for TBP displacement from TATA box DNA by the Swi2/Snf2 ATPase Mot1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2023; 30:640-649. [PMID: 37106137 PMCID: PMC7615866 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-00966-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
The Swi2/Snf2 family transcription regulator Modifier of Transcription 1 (Mot1) uses adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to dissociate and reallocate the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) from and between promoters. To reveal how Mot1 removes TBP from TATA box DNA, we determined cryogenic electron microscopy structures that capture different states of the remodeling reaction. The resulting molecular video reveals how Mot1 dissociates TBP in a process that, intriguingly, does not require DNA groove tracking. Instead, the motor grips DNA in the presence of ATP and swings back after ATP hydrolysis, moving TBP to a thermodynamically less stable position on DNA. Dislodged TBP is trapped by a chaperone element that blocks TBP's DNA binding site. Our results show how Swi2/Snf2 proteins can remodel protein-DNA complexes through DNA bending without processive DNA tracking and reveal mechanistic similarities to RNA gripping DEAD box helicases and RIG-I-like immune sensors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Woike
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Eustermann
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Structural and Computational Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - James Jung
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Simon Josef Wenzl
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Götz Hagemann
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Joseph Bartho
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Katja Lammens
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Agata Butryn
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Macromolecular Machines Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Franz Herzog
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Institute Krems Bioanalytics, IMC University of Applied Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Karl-Peter Hopfner
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
- Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lu H, Yang M, Zhou Q. Reprogramming transcription after DNA damage: recognition, response, repair, and restart. Trends Cell Biol 2022:S0962-8924(22)00261-6. [PMID: 36513571 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Genome integrity is constantly challenged by endogenous and exogenous insults that cause DNA damage. To cope with these threats, cells have a surveillance mechanism, known as the DNA damage response (DDR), to repair any lesions. Although transcription has long been implicated in DNA repair, how transcriptional reprogramming is coordinated with the DDR is just beginning to be understood. In this review, we highlight recent advances in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying major transcriptional events, including RNA polymerase (Pol) II stalling and transcriptional silencing and recovery, which occur in response to DNA damage. Furthermore, we discuss how such transcriptional adaptation contributes to sensing and eliminating damaged DNA and how it can jeopardize genome integrity when it goes awry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huasong Lu
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China.
| | - Min Yang
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
| | - Qiang Zhou
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tan Y, You C, Park J, Kim HS, Guo S, Schärer OD, Wang Y. Transcriptional Perturbations of 2,6-Diaminopurine and 2-Aminopurine. ACS Chem Biol 2022; 17:1672-1676. [PMID: 35700389 DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.2c00369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
2,6-Diaminopurine (Z) is a naturally occurring adenine (A) analog that bacteriophages employ in place of A in their genetic alphabet. Recent discoveries of biogenesis pathways of Z in bacteriophages have stimulated substantial research interest in this DNA modification. Here, we systematically examined the effects of Z on the efficiency and fidelity of DNA transcription. Our results showed that Z exhibited no mutagenic yet substantial inhibitory effects on transcription mediated by purified T7 RNA polymerase and by human RNA polymerase II in HeLa nuclear extracts and in human cells. A structurally related adenine analog, 2-aminopurine (2AP), strongly blocked T7 RNA polymerase but did not impede human RNA polymerase II in vitro or in human cells, where no mutant transcript could be detected. The lack of mutagenic consequence and the presence of a strong blockage effect of Z on transcription suggest a role of Z in transcriptional regulation. Z is also subjected to removal by transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair (TC-NER), but not global-genome NER in human cells. Our findings provide new insight into the effects of Z on transcription and its potential biological functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jiyeong Park
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Suk Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Orlando D Schärer
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, 44919, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li W, Jones K, Burke TJ, Hossain MA, Lariscy L. Epigenetic Regulation of Nucleotide Excision Repair. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:847051. [PMID: 35465333 PMCID: PMC9023881 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.847051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic DNA is constantly attacked by a plethora of DNA damaging agents both from endogenous and exogenous sources. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most versatile repair pathway that recognizes and removes a wide range of bulky and/or helix-distorting DNA lesions. Even though the molecular mechanism of NER is well studied through in vitro system, the NER process inside the cell is more complicated because the genomic DNA in eukaryotes is tightly packaged into chromosomes and compacted into a nucleus. Epigenetic modifications regulate gene activity and expression without changing the DNA sequence. The dynamics of epigenetic regulation play a crucial role during the in vivo NER process. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the epigenetic regulation of NER.
Collapse
|
8
|
Agapov A, Olina A, Kulbachinskiy A. OUP accepted manuscript. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:3018-3041. [PMID: 35323981 PMCID: PMC8989532 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cellular DNA is continuously transcribed into RNA by multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs). The continuity of transcription can be disrupted by DNA lesions that arise from the activities of cellular enzymes, reactions with endogenous and exogenous chemicals or irradiation. Here, we review available data on translesion RNA synthesis by multisubunit RNAPs from various domains of life, define common principles and variations in DNA damage sensing by RNAP, and consider existing controversies in the field of translesion transcription. Depending on the type of DNA lesion, it may be correctly bypassed by RNAP, or lead to transcriptional mutagenesis, or result in transcription stalling. Various lesions can affect the loading of the templating base into the active site of RNAP, or interfere with nucleotide binding and incorporation into RNA, or impair RNAP translocation. Stalled RNAP acts as a sensor of DNA damage during transcription-coupled repair. The outcome of DNA lesion recognition by RNAP depends on the interplay between multiple transcription and repair factors, which can stimulate RNAP bypass or increase RNAP stalling, and plays the central role in maintaining the DNA integrity. Unveiling the mechanisms of translesion transcription in various systems is thus instrumental for understanding molecular pathways underlying gene regulation and genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksei Agapov
- Correspondence may also be addressed to Aleksei Agapov. Tel: +7 499 196 0015; Fax: +7 499 196 0015;
| | - Anna Olina
- Institute of Molecular Genetics, National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute” Moscow 123182, Russia
| | - Andrey Kulbachinskiy
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +7 499 196 0015; Fax: +7 499 196 0015;
| |
Collapse
|