Yeast Rad52 is a homodecamer and possesses BRCA2-like bipartite Rad51 binding modes

Monomers and short oligomers of human RAD52 promote single-strand annealing

Genome maintenance and stability rely on the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Breaks can be repaired via the single-strand-annealing pathway mediated by the protein RAD52. RAD52 oligomerizes to rings that are thought to promote annealing. However, rings have only been observed at micromolar concentrations at which annealing activity is impaired. Thus, it is unclear which oligomeric form is responsible for annealing. We combined single-molecule mass photometry with biochemical assays to determine the in vitro oligomeric states of human RAD52. We found that RAD52 was mostly monomeric at lower nanomolar concentrations. With increasing concentration, RAD52 oligomerized and formed rings with a variable stoichiometry from heptamers to tridecamers consistent with an oligomerization model of noncooperative assembly coupled with preferential cyclization. Under conditions where hardly any rings were present, RAD52 already promoted single-strand annealing in vitro. Our findings indicate that in vitro single-strand annealing can be mediated by monomers and short oligomers of RAD52. The oligomerization model suggests that ring formation is similar to a phase transition whereby rings are a reservoir to replenish the monomer and short oligomer pool. This pool has a nearly constant concentration which may be optimal for annealing and would be independent, for example, of the amount of DNA damage, protein upregulation, or the cell cycle.

Transcriptomics and Proteomics Analysis of the Liver of RAD52 Knockout Mice

RAD52 plays crucial roles in several aspects of mammalian cells, including DNA double-strand breaks repair, viral infection, cancer development, and antibody class switching. To comprehensively elucidate the role of RAD52 in maintaining genome stability and uncover additional functions of RAD52 in mammals, we performed the transcriptomics and proteomics analysis of the liver of RAD52 knockout mice. Transcriptomics analysis reveals overexpression of mitochondrial genes in the liver of RAD52 knockout (RAD52KO) mice. Proteomics analysis of RAD52KO mice shows that damage recognition proteins Cul4b and Rad23a in the process of nucleotide excision repair pathway are overexpressed. Furthermore, gene ontology and KEGG enrichment analysis (accessed on 20 November 2024) from integrated omics shows that differentially expressed genes are significantly enriched in pathways related to mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and nucleotide metabolism in the liver of RAD52KO mice. In addition, mRNA and protein levels of Bhmt1b are elevated in the liver of RAD52KO mice. Taken together, this study provides valuable insights into the function and mechanism of RAD52.

Interrogating the potential of helical aromatic foldamers for protein recognition

A biotinylated helical aromatic oligoamide foldamer equivalent in size to a 24mer peptide was designed without any prejudice other than to display various polar and hydrophobic side chains at its surface. It was synthesized on solid phase, its P- and M-helical conformers were separated by HPLC on a chiral stationary phase, and the solid state structure of a non-biotinylated analogue was elucidated by X-ray crystallography. Pull-down experiments from a yeast cell lysate using the foldamer as a bait followed by proteomic analysis revealed potential protein binding partners. Three of these proteins were recombinantly expressed. Biolayer interferometry showed submicromolar binding demonstrating the potential of a given foldamer to have affinity for certain proteins in the absence of design considerations. Yet, binding selectivity was low in all three cases since both P- and M-conformers bound to the proteins with similar affinities.

Rad52 sorts and stacks Rad51 at the DNA junction to promote homologous recombination

Homologous recombination (HR) repairs double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). The DSBs are resected to yield single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that are coated by Replication Protein A (RPA). Rad51 is a recombinase and catalyzes strand invasion and the search for homology. However, it binds to ssDNA with lower affinity than RPA. Thus, mediator proteins such as Rad52/BRCA2 are required to promote Rad51 binding to RPA-coated ssDNA, but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52 interacts with Rad51 through two distinct binding modes. We here uncover that the Rad51-binding site in the disordered C-terminus of Rad52 (mode-1) sorts polydisperse Rad51 into discrete monomers. The second Rad51 binding site resides in the ordered N-terminal ring of Rad52 (mode-2), but this interaction occurs at only one position on the ring. In single molecule confocal fluorescence microscopy combined with optical tweezer analysis, we directly visualize filament formation using fluorescent-Rad51. Rad52 catalyzes Rad51 loading onto RPA-coated ssDNA, with a distinct preference for junctions, but no filament growth is observed. Deletion of the C-terminus of Rad52 results in loss of Rad51 sorting and abrogates Rad51 binding to RPA-coated DNA. While BRCA2 and Rad52 are structurally unrelated, many of these functional features are conserved. We describe a concerted Sort & Stack mechanism for mediator proteins in promoting HR.

Mei5-Sae3 stabilizes Dmc1 nucleating clusters for efficient Dmc1 assembly on RPA-coated single-stranded DNA

Interhomolog recombination in meiosis requires a meiosis-specific recombinase, Dmc1. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Mei5-Sae3 complex facilitates the loading of Dmc1 onto the replication protein A (RPA)-coated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to form nucleoprotein filaments. In vivo, Dmc1 and Mei5-Sae3 are interdependent in their colocalization on the chromosomes. However, the mechanistic role of Mei5-Sae3 in mediating Dmc1 activity remains unclear. We used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer and colocalization single-molecule spectroscopy experiments to elucidate how Mei5-Sae3 stimulates Dmc1 assembly on ssDNA and RPA-coated ssDNA. We showed that Mei5-Sae3 stabilized Dmc1 nucleating clusters with two to three molecules on naked DNA by preferentially reducing Dmc1 dissociation rates. Mei5-Sae3 also stimulated Dmc1 assembly on RPA-coated DNA. Using green fluorescent protein-labeled RPA, we showed the coexistence of an intermediate with Dmc1 and RPA on ssDNA before RPA dissociation. Moreover, the displacement efficiency of RPA depended on Dmc1 concentration, and its dependence was positively correlated with the stability of Dmc1 clusters on short ssDNA. These findings suggest a molecular model that Mei5-Sae3 mediates Dmc1 binding on RPA-coated ssDNA by stabilizing Dmc1 nucleating clusters, thus altering RPA dynamics on DNA to promote RPA dissociation.

Structure-based approaches in synthetic lethality strategies

Evolution has fostered robust DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms to combat DNA lesions. However, disruptions in this intricate machinery can render cells overly reliant on the remaining functional but often less accurate DNA repair pathways. This increased dependence on error-prone pathways may result in improper repair and the accumulation of mutations, fostering genomic instability and facilitating the uncontrolled cell proliferation characteristic of cancer initiation and progression. Strategies based on the concept of synthetic lethality (SL) leverage the inherent genomic instability of cancer cells by targeting alternative pathways, thereby inducing selective death of cancer cells. This review emphasizes recent advancements in structural investigations of pivotal SL targets. The significant contribution of structure-based methodologies to SL research underscores their potential impact in characterizing the growing number of SL targets, largely due to advances in next-generation sequencing. Harnessing these approaches is essential for advancing the development of precise and personalized SL therapeutic strategies.

A glimpse into the hidden world of the flexible C-terminal protein binding domains of human RAD52

Human RAD52 protein binds DNA and is involved in genomic stability maintenance and several forms of DNA repair, including homologous recombination and single-strand annealing. Despite its importance, there are very few structural details about the variability of the RAD52 ring size and the RAD52 C-terminal protein-protein interaction domains. Even recent attempts to employ cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) methods on full-length yeast and human RAD52 do not reveal interpretable structures for the C-terminal half that contains the replication protein A (RPA) and RAD51 binding domains. In this study, we employed the monodisperse purification of two RAD52 deletion constructs and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to construct a structural model that includes RAD52's RPA binding domain. This model is of interest to DNA repair specialists as well as for drug development against HR-deficient cancers.

Rtt105 stimulates Rad51-ssDNA assembly and orchestrates Rad51 and RPA actions to promote homologous recombination repair

Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for the maintenance of genome stability. During HR, Replication Protein A (RPA) rapidly coats the 3'-tailed single-strand DNA (ssDNA) generated by end resection. Then, the ssDNA-bound RPA must be timely replaced by Rad51 recombinase to form Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments that drive homology search and HR repair. How cells regulate Rad51 assembly dynamics and coordinate RPA and Rad51 actions to ensure proper HR remains poorly understood. Here, we identified that Rtt105, a Ty1 transposon regulator, acts to stimulate Rad51 assembly and orchestrate RPA and Rad51 actions during HR. We found that Rtt105 interacts with Rad51 in vitro and in vivo and restrains the adenosine 5' triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis activity of Rad51. We showed that Rtt105 directly stimulates dynamic Rad51-ssDNA assembly, strand exchange, and D-loop formation in vitro. Notably, we found that Rtt105 physically regulates the binding of Rad51 and RPA to ssDNA via different motifs and that both regulations are necessary and epistatic in promoting Rad51 nucleation, strand exchange, and HR repair. Consequently, disrupting either of the interactions impaired HR and conferred DNA damage sensitivity, underscoring the importance of Rtt105 in orchestrating the actions of Rad51 and RPA. Our work reveals additional layers of mechanisms regulating Rad51 filament dynamics and the coordination of HR.

Mechanism of single-stranded DNA annealing by RAD52-RPA complex

RAD52 is important for the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks1,2, mitotic DNA synthesis3-5 and alternative telomere length maintenance6,7. Central to these functions, RAD52 promotes the annealing of complementary single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)8,9 and provides an alternative to BRCA2/RAD51-dependent homologous recombination repair10. Inactivation of RAD52 in homologous-recombination-deficient BRCA1- or BRCA2-defective cells is synthetically lethal11,12, and aberrant expression of RAD52 is associated with poor cancer prognosis13,14. As a consequence, RAD52 is an attractive therapeutic target against homologous-recombination-deficient breast, ovarian and prostate cancers15-17. Here we describe the structure of RAD52 and define the mechanism of annealing. As reported previously18-20, RAD52 forms undecameric (11-subunit) ring structures, but these rings do not represent the active form of the enzyme. Instead, cryo-electron microscopy and biochemical analyses revealed that ssDNA annealing is driven by RAD52 open rings in association with replication protein-A (RPA). Atomic models of the RAD52-ssDNA complex show that ssDNA sits in a positively charged channel around the ring. Annealing is driven by the RAD52 N-terminal domains, whereas the C-terminal regions modulate the open-ring conformation and RPA interaction. RPA associates with RAD52 at the site of ring opening with critical interactions occurring between the RPA-interacting domain of RAD52 and the winged helix domain of RPA2. Our studies provide structural snapshots throughout the annealing process and define the molecular mechanism of ssDNA annealing by the RAD52-RPA complex.

RPA interacts with Rad52 to promote meiotic crossover and noncrossover recombination

Meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown that, following rapid resection to generate 3' single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tails, one DSB end engages a homolog partner chromatid and is extended by DNA synthesis, whereas the other end remains associated with its sister. Then, after regulated differentiation into crossover- and noncrossover-fated types, the second DSB end participates in the reaction by strand annealing with the extended first end, along both pathways. This second-end capture is dependent on Rad52, presumably via its known capacity to anneal two ssDNAs. Here, using physical analysis of DNA recombination, we demonstrate that this process is dependent on direct interaction of Rad52 with the ssDNA binding protein, replication protein A (RPA). Furthermore, the absence of this Rad52-RPA joint activity results in a cytologically-prominent RPA spike, which emerges from the homolog axes at sites of crossovers during the pachytene stage of the meiotic prophase. Our findings suggest that this spike represents the DSB end of a broken chromatid caused by either the displaced leading DSB end or the second DSB end, which has been unable to engage with the partner homolog-associated ssDNA. These and other results imply a close correspondence between Rad52-RPA roles in meiotic recombination and mitotic DSB repair.

The Role of hBRCA2 in the Repair of Spontaneous and UV DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Women with mutations in the human BRCA2 gene ( hBRCA2 ) have an increased risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer throughout their lifetime. hBRCA2 transcribes proteins necessary for gene repair through homologous recombination (HR). In order to better understand the role of hBRCA2 in response to specific types of DNA damage, the present study evaluated HR in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae , using wildtype (WT) and rad52Δ mutant cells subject to spontaneous and UV damage in the presence or absence of hBRCA2. As expected, rad52Δ genotypes yielded lower recombination frequencies compared to WT in both spontaneous and UV exposure experiments. However, there was no significant difference between rad52Δ mutants with or without hBRCA2. Interestingly, higher UV exposure resulted in a relative increase in HR for only the rad52Δ mutant genotypes. The results demonstrate that hBRCA2 complementation may not be as substantial in spontaneous or UV DNA damage compared to double-strand break DNA damage, as previous work has shown.

Positive and negative regulators of RAD51/DMC1 in homologous recombination and DNA replication

RAD51 recombinase plays a central role in homologous recombination (HR) by forming a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to catalyze homology search and strand exchange between the ssDNA and a homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The catalytic activity of RAD51 assembled on ssDNA is critical for the DNA-homology-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks in somatic and meiotic cells and restarting stalled replication forks during DNA replication. The RAD51-ssDNA complex also plays a structural role in protecting the regressed/reversed replication fork. Two types of regulators control RAD51 filament formation, stability, and dynamics, namely positive regulators, including mediators, and negative regulators, so-called remodelers. The appropriate balance of action by the two regulators assures genome stability. This review describes the roles of positive and negative RAD51 regulators in HR and DNA replication and its meiosis-specific homolog DMC1 in meiotic recombination. We also provide future study directions for a comprehensive understanding of RAD51/DMC1-mediated regulation in maintaining and inheriting genome integrity.