1
|
Stumpo S, Carlini A, Mantuano F, Di Federico A, Melotti B, Sperandi F, Favorito V, De Giglio A. Efficacy and Safety of TROP-2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Treatment in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Reconstructed Patient Data. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:1750. [PMID: 40507234 PMCID: PMC12153610 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17111750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2025] [Revised: 05/20/2025] [Accepted: 05/21/2025] [Indexed: 06/16/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Docetaxel is the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy but is associated with modest clinical outcomes and considerable toxicity. Sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan are trophoblast cell surface antigen (TROP)-2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that showed encouraging activity in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. This systematic review and pooled analysis aims to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of anti-TROP-2 ADCs compared to docetaxel in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS A systematic search through PubMed and EMBASE before 31 January 2025 was performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized controlled phase III trials comparing an anti-TROP-2 regimen to docetaxel in patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were extracted from the identified trials. A pooled analysis of reconstructed patient data and meta-analysis employing the random-effect model were used to summarize the efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS Across the two trials included, 1207 patients were enrolled, 598 in the TROP-2 ADC arm and 609 in the docetaxel arm. Anti-TROP-2 treatment did not produce significant improvements in OS (HR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78-1.03; P = 0.13) and PFS (HR: 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.02; P = 0.08), compared to docetaxel, even in patients with a nonsquamous histology (OS HR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01; P = 0.06; PFS HR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-1.12; P = 0.17). Across the subgroup analyses, a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed in patients with actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) (HR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; P = 0.03). Compared to docetaxel, the anti-TROP-2 regimen demonstrated a lower risk of developing grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (RR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.05; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS The anti-TROP-2 regimen showed a better safety profile but failed to demonstrate a relevant clinical improvement over docetaxel. Anti-TROP-2 ADCs could find a role in the management of patients with AGAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Stumpo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (A.C.); (F.M.); (A.D.F.); (V.F.); (A.D.G.)
| | - Andrea Carlini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (A.C.); (F.M.); (A.D.F.); (V.F.); (A.D.G.)
| | - Francesco Mantuano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (A.C.); (F.M.); (A.D.F.); (V.F.); (A.D.G.)
| | - Alessandro Di Federico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (A.C.); (F.M.); (A.D.F.); (V.F.); (A.D.G.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.M.); (F.S.)
| | - Barbara Melotti
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.M.); (F.S.)
| | - Francesca Sperandi
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.M.); (F.S.)
| | - Valentina Favorito
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (A.C.); (F.M.); (A.D.F.); (V.F.); (A.D.G.)
| | - Andrea De Giglio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (A.C.); (F.M.); (A.D.F.); (V.F.); (A.D.G.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (B.M.); (F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gallina M, Carollo A, Gallina A, Cutaia S, Rizzo S, Provenzani A. Efficacy and Safety of Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Lung Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-Randomized Clinical Trials. Pharmaceutics 2025; 17:608. [PMID: 40430899 PMCID: PMC12114828 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17050608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2025] [Revised: 04/28/2025] [Accepted: 04/29/2025] [Indexed: 05/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-90% of all lung cancers. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) represent an expanding targeted therapy option for the treatment of NSCLC. The aim is to perform a systematic literature review to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of ADCs currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of NSCLC. Methods: The study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, ClinicalTrial.gov and Web of Science databases, covering the period from 2014 to 2024. Only randomized and non-randomized phase II-IV clinical trials focusing on ADC-based therapies for adult patients affected by NSCLC were selected. The Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2.0) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to evaluate the overall risk of bias in the included randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively. While GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Efficacy endpoints were categorized based on primary outcomes while safety was assessed through the frequency and severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and a qualitative summary of the findings was conducted. Results: A total of seven studies, including three randomized, three non-randomized, and one without specific allocation, were included, comprising 1287 patients, with 693 (54%) men, and an average age of 63 years old. Two studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias, while six had a moderate risk or some concerns. Five ADCs were evaluated: trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), telisotuzumab vedotin, patritumab deruxtecan, and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd). T-DXd demonstrated superior efficacy in HER2-overexpressing and HER2-mutant NSCLC, with an ORR of 52.9% and 49.0%, respectively. However, HER2-mutant patients exhibited a longer median DOR (16.8 vs. 6.2 months) but a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 TEAEs (38.6% vs. 22%). T-DM1 showed modest efficacy, with an ORR of 20% in HER2-overexpressing NSCLC and 6.7% in HER2-mutant patients. Dato-DXd demonstrated improved ORR (26.4% vs. 12.8%) and PFS (4.4 vs. 3.7 months) compared to docetaxel. Patritumab deruxtecan achieved an ORR of 39% in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, while telisotuzumab vedotin exhibited limited activity in c-MET-positive NSCLC (ORR 9%, median DOR 7.5 months). Frequency and severity of TEAEs varied across ADCs, with ILD being a major concern, highlighting the need for strict patient monitoring and early intervention to mitigate severe adverse events. Conclusions: ADCs represent a promising advancement in NSCLC treatment, offering targeted therapeutic options beyond conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy. T-DXd has emerged as the most effective ADC for HER2-mutant NSCLC with manageable safety profile, whereas Dato-DXd provides a viable alternative for TROP2-expressing tumors. While ADCs offer significant clinical benefits, careful patient selection and proactive management of adverse events remain crucial. Ongoing and future trials will further refine the role of ADCs in personalized NSCLC treatment, potentially expanding their tumor-agnostic use to broader patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Gallina
- Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), School of Specialization in Hospital Pharmacy, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed.16-17, 90128 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Anna Carollo
- Clinical Pharmacy Service, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS ISMETT), Via Ernesto Tricomi, 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Anna Gallina
- Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical, and Environmental Sciences, School of Specialization in Hospital Pharmacy, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno d’Alcontres, 31, 98166 Messina, Italy;
| | - Sofia Cutaia
- Medical Oncology Service, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS ISMETT), Via Ernesto Tricomi, 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (S.C.); (S.R.)
| | - Sergio Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Service, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS ISMETT), Via Ernesto Tricomi, 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (S.C.); (S.R.)
| | - Alessio Provenzani
- Clinical Pharmacy Service, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS ISMETT), Via Ernesto Tricomi, 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|