Unbiased discovery of autoantibodies associated with severe COVID-19 via genome-scale self-assembled DNA-barcoded protein libraries

In search of a function for human type III interferons: insights from inherited and acquired deficits

The essential and redundant functions of human type I and II interferons (IFNs) have been delineated over the last three decades by studies of patients with inborn errors of immunity or their autoimmune phenocopies, but much less is known about type III IFNs. Patients with cells that do not respond to type III IFNs due to inherited IL10RB deficiency display no overt viral disease, and their inflammatory disease phenotypes can be explained by defective signaling via other interleukine10RB-dependent pathways. Moreover, patients with inherited deficiencies of interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF-3) (STAT1, STAT2, IRF9) present viral diseases also seen in patients with inherited deficiencies of the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1/2). Finally, patients with autoantibodies neutralizing type III IFNs have no obvious predisposition to viral disease. Current findings thus suggest that type III IFNs are largely redundant in humans. The essential functions of human type III IFNs, particularly in antiviral defenses, remain to be discovered.

Building Representation Learning Models for Antibody Comprehension

Antibodies are versatile proteins with both the capacity to bind a broad range of targets and a proven track record as some of the most successful therapeutics. However, the development of novel antibody therapeutics is a lengthy and costly process. It is challenging to predict the functional and biophysical properties of antibodies from their amino acid sequence alone, requiring numerous experiments for full characterization. Machine learning, specifically deep representation learning, has emerged as a family of methods that can complement wet lab approaches and accelerate the overall discovery and engineering process. Here, we review advances in antibody sequence representation learning, and how this has improved antibody structure prediction and facilitated antibody optimization. We discuss challenges in the development and implementation of such models, such as the lack of publicly available, well-curated antibody function data and highlight opportunities for improvement. These and future advances in machine learning for antibody sequences have the potential to increase the success rate in developing new therapeutics, resulting in broader access to transformative medicines and improved patient outcomes.

Human autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs: From 1981 to 2023

Human autoantibodies (auto-Abs) neutralizing type I IFNs were first discovered in a woman with disseminated shingles and were described by Ion Gresser from 1981 to 1984. They have since been found in patients with diverse conditions and are even used as a diagnostic criterion in patients with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy syndrome type 1 (APS-1). However, their apparent lack of association with viral diseases, including shingles, led to wide acceptance of the conclusion that they had no pathological consequences. This perception began to change in 2020, when they were found to underlie about 15% of cases of critical COVID-19 pneumonia. They have since been shown to underlie other severe viral diseases, including 5%, 20%, and 40% of cases of critical influenza pneumonia, critical MERS pneumonia, and West Nile virus encephalitis, respectively. They also seem to be associated with shingles in various settings. These auto-Abs are present in all age groups of the general population, but their frequency increases with age to reach at least 5% in the elderly. We estimate that at least 100 million people worldwide carry auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs. Here, we briefly review the history of the study of these auto-Abs, focusing particularly on their known causes and consequences.

Higher COVID-19 pneumonia risk associated with anti-IFN-α than with anti-IFN-ω auto-Abs in children

We found that 19 (10.4%) of 183 unvaccinated children hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia had autoantibodies (auto-Abs) neutralizing type I IFNs (IFN-α2 in 10 patients: IFN-α2 only in three, IFN-α2 plus IFN-ω in five, and IFN-α2, IFN-ω plus IFN-β in two; IFN-ω only in nine patients). Seven children (3.8%) had Abs neutralizing at least 10 ng/ml of one IFN, whereas the other 12 (6.6%) had Abs neutralizing only 100 pg/ml. The auto-Abs neutralized both unglycosylated and glycosylated IFNs. We also detected auto-Abs neutralizing 100 pg/ml IFN-α2 in 4 of 2,267 uninfected children (0.2%) and auto-Abs neutralizing IFN-ω in 45 children (2%). The odds ratios (ORs) for life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia were, therefore, higher for auto-Abs neutralizing IFN-α2 only (OR [95% CI] = 67.6 [5.7-9,196.6]) than for auto-Abs neutralizing IFN-ω only (OR [95% CI] = 2.6 [1.2-5.3]). ORs were also higher for auto-Abs neutralizing high concentrations (OR [95% CI] = 12.9 [4.6-35.9]) than for those neutralizing low concentrations (OR [95% CI] = 5.5 [3.1-9.6]) of IFN-ω and/or IFN-α2.

Quantitative assessment of multiple pathogen exposure and immune dynamics at scale

IMPORTANCE

Serology reveals exposure to pathogens, as well as the state of autoimmune and other clinical conditions. It is used to evaluate individuals and their histories and as a public health tool to track epidemics. Employing a variety of formats, studies nearly always perform serology by testing response to only one or a few antigens. However, clinical outcomes of new infections also depend on which previous infections may have occurred. We developed a high-throughput serology method that evaluates responses to hundreds of antigens simultaneously. It can be used to evaluate thousands of samples at a time and provide a quantitative readout. This tool will enable doctors to monitor which pathogens an individual has been exposed to and how that changes in the future. Moreover, public health officials could track populations and look for infectious trends among large populations. Testing many potential antigens at a time may also aid in vaccine development.

Phage Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (PhIP-Seq) for Analyzing Antibody Epitope Repertoires Against Food Antigens

While thousands of food and environmental allergens have been reported, conventional methods for allergy testing typically rely on measuring immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding against panels of dozens to hundreds of antigens. Beyond IgE, also the specificity of other Ig (sub-)classes such as IgG4, has gained interest because of a potential protective role toward allergy.Phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) allows to study hundreds of thousands of rationally selected peptide antigens and to resolve binding specificities of different Ig classes. This technology combines synthetic DNA libraries encoding antigens, with the display on the surface of T7 bacteriophages and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for quantitative readouts. Thereby binding of entire Ig repertoires can be measured to detect the exact epitopes of food allergens and to study potential cross-reactivity.In this chapter, we provide a summary of both the key experimental steps and various strategies for analyzing PhIP-Seq datasets, as well as comparing the advantages and disadvantages of this methodology for measuring antibody responses against food antigens.

Autoantibodies Neutralizing Type III Interferons Are Uncommon in Patients with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia

Autoantibodies (AABs) neutralizing type I interferons (IFN) underlie about 15% of cases of critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The impact of autoimmunity toward type III IFNs remains unexplored. We included samples from 1,002 patients with COVID-19 (50% with severe disease) and 1,489 SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals. We studied the prevalence and neutralizing capacity of AABs toward IFNλ and IFNα. Luciferase-based immunoprecipitation method was applied using pooled IFNα (subtypes 1, 2, 8, and 21) or pooled IFNλ1-IFNλ3 as antigens, followed by reporter cell-based neutralization assay. In the SARS-CoV-2-naive cohort, IFNλ AABs were more common (8.5%) than those targeting IFNα2 (2.9%) and were related with older age. In the COVID-19 cohort the presence of autoreactivity to IFNλ did not associate with severe disease [odds ratio (OR) 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-1.73], unlike to IFNα (OR 4.88; 95% CI 2.40-11.06; P < 0.001). Most IFNλ AAB-positive COVID-19 samples (67%) did not neutralize any of the 3 IFNλ subtypes. Pan-IFNλ neutralization occurred in 5 patients (0.50%), who all suffered from severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and 4 of them neutralized IFNα2 in addition to IFNλ. Overall, AABs to type III IFNs are rarely neutralizing, and do not seem to predispose to severe COVID-19 pneumonia on their own.

Human antibody profiling technologies for autoimmune disease

Autoimmune diseases are caused by the break-down in self-tolerance mechanisms and can result in the generation of autoantibodies specific to human antigens. Human autoantigen profiling technologies such as solid surface arrays and display technologies are powerful high-throughput technologies utilised to discover and map novel autoantigens associated with disease. This review compares human autoantigen profiling technologies including the application of these approaches in chronic and post-infectious autoimmune disease. Each technology has advantages and limitations that should be considered when designing new projects to profile autoantibodies. Recent studies that have utilised these technologies across a range of diseases have highlighted marked heterogeneity in autoantibody specificity between individuals as a frequent feature. This individual heterogeneity suggests that epitope spreading maybe an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease in general and likely contributes to inflammatory tissue damage and symptoms. Studies focused on identifying autoantibody biomarkers for diagnosis should use targeted data analysis to identify the rarer public epitopes and antigens, common between individuals. Thus, utilisation of human autoantigen profiling technology, combined with different analysis approaches, can illuminate both pathogenesis and biomarker discovery.

Autoantibodies Neutralizing Type I IFNs in the Bronchoalveolar Lavage of at Least 10% of Patients During Life-Threatening COVID-19 Pneumonia

Autoantibodies (auto-Abs) neutralizing type I interferons (IFNs) are found in the blood of at least 15% of unvaccinated patients with life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia. We report here the presence of auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of 54 of the 415 unvaccinated patients (13%) with life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia tested. The 54 individuals with neutralizing auto-Abs in the BAL included 45 (11%) with auto-Abs against IFN-α2, 37 (9%) with auto-Abs against IFN-ω, 54 (13%) with auto-Abs against IFN-α2 and/or ω, and five (1%) with auto-Abs against IFN-β, including three (0.7%) with auto-Abs neutralizing IFN-α2, IFN-ω, and IFN-β, and two (0.5%) with auto-Abs neutralizing IFN-α2 and IFN-β. Auto-Abs against IFN-α2 also neutralize the other 12 subtypes of IFN-α. Paired plasma samples were available for 95 patients. All seven patients with paired samples who had detectable auto-Abs in BAL also had detectable auto-Abs in plasma, and one patient had auto-Abs detectable only in blood. Auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs are, therefore, present in the alveolar space of at least 10% of patients with life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia. These findings suggest that these auto-Abs impair type I IFN immunity in the lower respiratory tract, thereby contributing to hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia.

A systematic review of the barcoding strategy that contributes to COVID-19 diagnostics at a population level

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 has made us more alert to the importance of viral diagnostics at a population level to rapidly control the spread of the disease. The critical question would be how to scale up testing capacity and perform a diagnostic test in a high-throughput manner with robust results and affordable costs. Here, the latest 26 articles using barcoding technology for COVID-19 diagnostics and biologically-relevant studies are reviewed. Barcodes are molecular tags, that allow proceeding an array of samples at once. To date, barcoding technology followed by high-throughput sequencing has been made for molecular diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections because it can synchronously analyze up to tens of thousands of clinical samples within a short diagnostic time. Essentially, this technology can also be used together with different biotechnologies, allowing for investigation with resolution of single molecules. In this Mini-Review, I first explain the general principle of the barcoding strategy and then put forward recent studies using this technology to accomplish COVID-19 diagnostics and basic research. In the meantime, I provide the viewpoint to improve the current COVID-19 diagnostic strategy with potential solutions. Finally, and importantly, two practical ideas about how barcodes can be further applied in studying SARS-CoV-2 to accelerate our understanding of this virus are proposed.

Autoantibodies to Interferons in Infectious Diseases

Anti-cytokine autoantibodies and, in particular, anti-type I interferons are increasingly described in association with immunodeficient, autoimmune, and immune-dysregulated conditions. Their presence in otherwise healthy individuals may result in a phenotype characterized by a predisposition to infections with several agents. For instance, anti-type I interferon autoantibodies are implicated in Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) pathogenesis and found preferentially in patients with critical disease. However, autoantibodies were also described in the serum of patients with viral, bacterial, and fungal infections not associated with COVID-19. In this review, we provide an overview of anti-cytokine autoantibodies identified to date and their clinical associations; we also discuss whether they can act as enemies or friends, i.e., are capable of acting in a beneficial or harmful way, and if they may be linked to gender or immunosenescence. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the production of autoantibodies could improve the approach to treating some infections, focusing not only on pathogens, but also on the possibility of a low degree of autoimmunity in patients.

Integration of DNA barcoding and nanotechnology in drug delivery

In recent years' development in nanotechnology utilization of DNA barcodes with potential benefit of nanoparticulate system is a hallmark for novel advancement in healthcare, biomedical and research sector. Interplay of biological barcoding with nanodimensional system encompasses innovative technologies to offer unique advantages of ultra-sensitivity, error-free, accuracy with minimal label reagents, and less time consumption in comparison to conventional techniques like ELISA, PCR, culture media, electrophoresis. DNA barcoding systems used as universal novel tool for identification and multiplex structural detection of proteins, DNAs, toxins, allergens, and nucleic acids of humans, viruses, animals, bacteria, plants as well as personalized treatment in ovarian cancer, AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma, breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Barcoding tools offer substantial attention in drug delivery, in-vivo screening, gene transport for theranostics, bioimaging, and nano-biosensors applications. This review article outlines the recent advances in nano-mediated DNA barcodes to explore various applications in detection of cancer markers, tumor cells, pathogens, allergens, as theranostics, biological sensors, and plant authentication. Furthermore, it summarizes the diverse newer technologies such as bio-barcode amplification (BBA), Profiling Relative Inhibition Simultaneously in Mixtures (PRISM) and CRISPR-Cas9 gene knockout and their applications as sensors for detections of antigens, allergens, and other specimens.

Unlocking life-threatening COVID-19 through two types of inborn errors of type I IFNs

Since 2003, rare inborn errors of human type I IFN immunity have been discovered, each underlying a few severe viral illnesses. Autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs due to rare inborn errors of autoimmune regulator (AIRE)-driven T cell tolerance were discovered in 2006, but not initially linked to any viral disease. These two lines of clinical investigation converged in 2020, with the discovery that inherited and/or autoimmune deficiencies of type I IFN immunity accounted for approximately 15%-20% of cases of critical COVID-19 pneumonia in unvaccinated individuals. Thus, insufficient type I IFN immunity at the onset of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a general determinant of life-threatening COVID-19. These findings illustrate the unpredictable, but considerable, contribution of the study of rare human genetic diseases to basic biology and public health.

Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with critical influenza pneumonia

Autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons (IFNs) can underlie critical COVID-19 pneumonia and yellow fever vaccine disease. We report here on 13 patients harboring autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α2 alone (five patients) or with IFN-ω (eight patients) from a cohort of 279 patients (4.7%) aged 6-73 yr with critical influenza pneumonia. Nine and four patients had antibodies neutralizing high and low concentrations, respectively, of IFN-α2, and six and two patients had antibodies neutralizing high and low concentrations, respectively, of IFN-ω. The patients' autoantibodies increased influenza A virus replication in both A549 cells and reconstituted human airway epithelia. The prevalence of these antibodies was significantly higher than that in the general population for patients <70 yr of age (5.7 vs. 1.1%, P = 2.2 × 10-5), but not >70 yr of age (3.1 vs. 4.4%, P = 0.68). The risk of critical influenza was highest in patients with antibodies neutralizing high concentrations of both IFN-α2 and IFN-ω (OR = 11.7, P = 1.3 × 10-5), especially those <70 yr old (OR = 139.9, P = 3.1 × 10-10). We also identified 10 patients in additional influenza patient cohorts. Autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs account for ∼5% of cases of life-threatening influenza pneumonia in patients <70 yr old.