1
|
Arabpour E, Azarboo A, Pouladi A, Mozafari Komesh-Tape P, Eshlaghi FM, Golmoradi H, Ghaseminejad-Raeini A, Sadeghi A, Zali MR. A network meta-analysis of optimal strategies for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Sci Rep 2025; 15:13702. [PMID: 40258999 PMCID: PMC12012026 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-98969-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2025] [Indexed: 04/23/2025] Open
Abstract
Numerous interventions have been proposed to reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), but it remains uncertain which approach is the most effective. The objective of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare different preventive strategies for overall, mild, and moderate-to-severe PEP in both average- and high-risk patients. A systematic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials across the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies that featured at least two of the following interventions: pre-procedural administration of 100 mg of rectal diclofenac (D) or indomethacin (I), aggressive hydration utilizing normal saline (NS) or lactated Ringer's solution (LR), 5-french pancreatic duct stent (S), and either a placebo or an active control (C). The interventions were ranked according to their surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values. The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024538533). Of the total 42 (n = 11,493) identified studies, 23 studies (n = 5,410) were categorized into the average-risk group and 19 studies (n = 6,083) were categorized into high-risk group. Based on SUCRA, I + NS was ranked as the best preventive method for overall and mild PEP in average-risk group. However, I + LR was the most effective method of prevention of moderate-to-severe PEP in this group. In high-risk group, I + S was the best preventive method of overall and mild PEP. However, D was the most effective method of prevention of moderate-to-severe PEP in this group. The findings of this network meta-analysis indicate that endoscopists should consider all available prophylactic options when performing ERCP, rather than favoring one over the others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erfan Arabpour
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, RIGLD, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Alireza Azarboo
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirreza Pouladi
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, RIGLD, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parya Mozafari Komesh-Tape
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, RIGLD, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Hadi Golmoradi
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, RIGLD, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Amir Sadeghi
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, RIGLD, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Zali
- Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, RIGLD, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yousaf MN, Ehsan H, Wahab A, Muneeb A, Chaudhary FS, Williams R, Haas CJ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided interventions in the management of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12:323-340. [PMID: 33133370 PMCID: PMC7579529 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i10.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality with an overall five-year survival of less than 9% in the United States. At presentation, the majority of patients have painless jaundice, pruritis, and malaise, a triad that develops secondary to obstruction, which often occurs late in the course of the disease process. The technical advancements in radiological imaging and endoscopic interventions have played a crucial role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of patients with pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided diagnosis (with brush cytology, serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination technique, or biliary biopsy) and therapeutic interventions such as pancreatobiliary decompression, intraductal and relief of gastric outlet obstruction play a pivotal role in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer and are increasingly used due to improved morbidity and complication rates compared to surgical management. In this review, we highlight various ERCP-guided diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for the management of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Nadeem Yousaf
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21239, United States
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Harbor Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States
| | - Hamid Ehsan
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
| | - Ahsan Wahab
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Baptist Medical Center South, Montgomery, AL 36116, United States
| | - Ahmad Muneeb
- Department of Medicine, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabald 38000, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Fizah S Chaudhary
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21239, United States
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Harbor Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States
| | - Richard Williams
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21239, United States
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Harbor Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States
| | - Christopher J Haas
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21239, United States
- Department of Medicine, Medstar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, United States
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Harbor Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21225, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Microbial Profiles and Risk Factors of Preexisting Biliary Infection in Patients with Therapeutic Endoscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2019; 2019:1527328. [PMID: 31191641 PMCID: PMC6525931 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1527328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The bile infection may already exist before the administration of an interventional procedure, despite no clinical manifestations of cholangitis detected. Blood cultures remained negative even in more than half of the febrile cases with cholangitis. Risk factors associated with bacterial growth in bile before the intervention are not well defined. To establish the bacterial profiles isolated from the bile samples and to identify risk factors for bacterial colonization in the bile system. Methods Individuals who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) interventions were enrolled. Bile samples were aspirated and were immediately transferred into a sterile tube for storage. Results Positive bile cultures were detected in 363 (38.0%) of 956 patients, including 322 benign diseases and 41 malignances. Of 363 positive cases, 351 (96.7%) were monoinfection and 12 (3.3%) multi-infection. Escherichia coli were the most common Gram-negative bacteria (210, 56.0%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (45, 12.0%). Enterococcus faecalis represented the most common Gram-positive microorganism (19, 5.07%), while Candida albicans (11, 2.93%) were the dominant fungi. Klebsiella pneumoniae were more frequently detected in malignant diseases (P = 0.046). Age, previous ERCP history or OLT history, and CBD diameter were independent risk factors for positive cultures (P < 0.05) while preoperative jaundice drug therapy was the protective factor for bile infection (P < 0.05). Conclusion Monomicrobial infection was dominant among all infections, and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were more frequently isolated from patients with malignant diseases. To effectively manage patients who are at a high risk for bile infection, a detailed diagnosis and treatment plan for each case should be prepared.
Collapse
|