Brain-machine interface cursor position only weakly affects monkey and human motor cortical activity in the absence of arm movements

Invariant neural dynamics drive commands to control different movements

It has been proposed that the nervous system has the capacity to generate a wide variety of movements because it reuses some invariant code. Previous work has identified that dynamics of neural population activity are similar during different movements, where dynamics refer to how the instantaneous spatial pattern of population activity changes in time. Here, we test whether invariant dynamics of neural populations are actually used to issue the commands that direct movement. Using a brain-machine interface (BMI) that transforms rhesus macaques' motor-cortex activity into commands for a neuroprosthetic cursor, we discovered that the same command is issued with different neural-activity patterns in different movements. However, these different patterns were predictable, as we found that the transitions between activity patterns are governed by the same dynamics across movements. These invariant dynamics are low dimensional, and critically, they align with the BMI, so that they predict the specific component of neural activity that actually issues the next command. We introduce a model of optimal feedback control (OFC) that shows that invariant dynamics can help transform movement feedback into commands, reducing the input that the neural population needs to control movement. Altogether our results demonstrate that invariant dynamics drive commands to control a variety of movements and show how feedback can be integrated with invariant dynamics to issue generalizable commands.

Improving the accuracy of decoding monkey brain-machine interface data by estimating the state of unobserved cell assemblies

BACKGROUND

The brain-machine interface is a technology that has been used for improving the quality of life of individuals with physical disabilities and also healthy individuals. It is important to improve the methods used for decoding the brain-machine interface data as the accuracy and speed of movements achieved using the existing technology are not comparable to the normal body.

COMPARISON WITH THE EXISTING METHOD

Decoding of brain-machine interface data using the proposed method resulted in improved decoding accuracy compared to the existing method.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated the usefulness of cell assembly state estimation method for decoding the brain-machine interface data.

NEW METHOD

We incorporated a novel method of estimating cell assembly states using spike trains with the existing decoding method that used only firing rate data. Synaptic connectivity pattern was used as feature values in addition to firing rate. Publicly available monkey brain-machine interface datasets were used in the study.

RESULTS

As long as the decoding was successful, the root mean square error of the proposed method was significantly smaller than the existing method. Artificial neural netowork-based decoding method resulted in more stable decoding, and also improved the decoding accuracy due to incorporation of synaptic connectivity pattern.

The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands

Advances in our understanding of brain function, along with the development of neural interfaces that allow for the monitoring and activation of neurons, have paved the way for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which harness neural signals to reanimate the limbs via electrical activation of the muscles or to control extracorporeal devices, thereby bypassing the muscles and senses altogether. BMIs consist of reading out motor intent from the neuronal responses monitored in motor regions of the brain and executing intended movements with bionic limbs, reanimated limbs, or exoskeletons. BMIs also allow for the restoration of the sense of touch by electrically activating neurons in somatosensory regions of the brain, thereby evoking vivid tactile sensations and conveying feedback about object interactions. In this review, we discuss the neural mechanisms of motor control and somatosensation in able-bodied individuals and describe approaches to use neuronal responses as control signals for movement restoration and to activate residual sensory pathways to restore touch. Although the focus of the review is on intracortical approaches, we also describe alternative signal sources for control and noninvasive strategies for sensory restoration.

Speech-related dorsal motor cortex activity does not interfere with iBCI cursor control

OBJECTIVE

Speech-related neural modulation was recently reported in 'arm/hand' area of human dorsal motor cortex that is used as a signal source for intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs). This raises the concern that speech-related modulation might deleteriously affect the decoding of arm movement intentions, for instance by affecting velocity command outputs. This study sought to clarify whether or not speaking would interfere with ongoing iBCI use.

APPROACH

A participant in the BrainGate2 iBCI clinical trial used an iBCI to control a computer cursor; spoke short words in a stand-alone speech task; and spoke short words during ongoing iBCI use. We examined neural activity in all three behaviors and compared iBCI performance with and without concurrent speech.

MAIN RESULTS

Dorsal motor cortex firing rates modulated strongly during stand-alone speech, but this activity was largely attenuated when speaking occurred during iBCI cursor control using attempted arm movements. 'Decoder-potent' projections of the attenuated speech-related neural activity were small, explaining why cursor task performance was similar between iBCI use with and without concurrent speaking.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings indicate that speaking does not directly interfere with iBCIs that decode attempted arm movements. This suggests that patients who are able to speak will be able to use motor cortical-driven computer interfaces or prostheses without needing to forgo speaking while using these devices.