Using eye movements to detect visual field loss: a pragmatic assessment using simulated scotoma

Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics

Purpose

Previous studies show that some visual field (VF) defects are detectable from visual search behavior; for example, when watching video. Here, we developed and tested a VF testing approach that measures the number of fixations to find targets on a background with spatial frequency content similar to natural scenes.

Methods

Twenty-one older controls and 20 people with glaucoma participated. Participants searched for a Gabor (6 c/°) that appeared in one of 25 possible locations within a 15° (visual angle) 1/f noise background (RMS contrast: 0.20). Procedure performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity for different combinations of control performance limits (p = 95%, 98%, 99%), number of target locations with fixations outside control performance limits (k = 0 to 25) and number of repeated target presentations (n = 1 to 20).

Results

Controls made a median of two to three fixations (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile: two to four) to locate the target depending on location. A VF was flagged “abnormal” when the number of fixations was greater than the p = 99% for k = 3 or more locations with n = 2 repeated presentations, giving 85% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity. The median test time for controls was 85.71 (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile: 66.49–113.53) seconds.

Conclusion

Our prototype test demonstrated effective and efficient screening of abnormal areas in central vision.

Translational Relevance

Visual search behavior can be used to detect central vision loss and may produce results that relate well to performance in natural visual environments.

How Free-Viewing Eye Movements Can Be Used to Detect the Presence of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma Patients

Purpose: There is a need for more intuitive perimetric screening methods, which can also be performed by elderly people and children currently unable to perform standard automated perimetry (SAP). Ideally, these methods should also be easier to administer, such that they may be used outside of a regular clinical environment. We evaluated the suitability of various methodological and analytical approaches for detecting and localizing VFD in glaucoma patients, based on eye movement recordings. Methods: The present study consisted of two experiments. In experiment 1, we collected data from 20 glaucoma patients and 20 age-matched controls, who monocularly viewed 28 1-min video clips while their eyes were being tracked. In experiment 2, we re-analyzed a published dataset, that contained data of 44 glaucoma patients and 32 age-matched controls who had binocularly viewed three longer-duration (3, 5, and 7 min) video clips. For both experiments, we first examined if the two groups differed in the basic properties of their fixations and saccades. In addition, we computed the viewing priority (VP) of each participant. Following a previously reported approach, for each participant, we mapped their fixation locations and used kernel Principal Component Analysis (kPCA) to distinguish patients from controls. Finally, we attempted to reconstruct the location of a patient's VFD by mapping the relative fixation frequency and the VP across their visual field. Results: We found direction dependent saccade amplitudes in glaucoma patients that often differed from those of the controls. Moreover, the kPCA indicated that the fixation maps of the two groups separated into two clusters based on the first two principal components. On average, glaucoma patients had a significantly lower VP than the controls, with this decrease depending on the specific video viewed. Conclusions: It is possible to detect the presence of VFD in glaucoma patients based on their gaze behavior made during video viewing. While this corroborates earlier conclusions, we show that it requires participants to view the videos monocularly. Nevertheless, we could not reconstruct the VFD with any of the evaluated methods, possibly due to compensatory eye movements made by the glaucoma patients.

Cortical oscillations can differentiate the gradient of the simulated central visual field defect

PURPOSE

Covert spatial attention directs the attentional spotlight to a particular part of the visual field and modulates the retinotopic organized oscillatory brain activity. This study aimed to investigate the electrophysiological characteristics of oscillatory brain activity when simulating different defect degrees of the central visual field.

METHODS

The power of theta and alpha activity was extracted using time-frequency analysis in forty healthy participants enrolled in the three-stimulus oddball paradigm. Standard stimuli were black-and-white checkerboards. Target stimuli simulated different degrees of the central visual field defect by superimposing black discs with different radii (5, 10, 20, and 30 degrees of visual angle) on the center of the peripheral checkerboard stimulation, and distractor stimuli presented in the reverse form with a constant radius.

RESULTS

By simulating central visual field defects, the increased theta power and decreased alpha power was observed when detecting target stimuli. Besides, the magnitude of increased theta power and decreased alpha power peaked at the 10-degree defect conditions, and gradually decayed to the 5 and 30-degree defect conditions, which separately indicated two key points in the visual field through the spatial attentional modulations.

CONCLUSION

Using cortical oscillatory dynamics in the time-frequency platform, the defect category of the central visual field could be quantified by alpha and theta oscillations in power differences. These findings suggest that cortical oscillations are sensitive markers for the discrimination of gradient effects of the central visual field defects and further demonstrate the phenomenon of functional dissociation in the visual field in covert spatial attention status.