1
|
Cui K, Guan S, Liang J, Fang L, Ding R, Wang J, Li T, Dong Z, Wu X, Zheng Y. Dissipation, metabolism, accumulation, processing and risk assessment of fluxapyroxad in cucumber and cowpea vegetables from field to table. Food Chem 2023; 423:136384. [PMID: 37201257 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the residue fate of fluxapyroxad is critical for food safety and human health. The present study profiled the dissipation, metabolism, accumulation, removal and risk assessment of fluxapyroxad in cucumbers and cowpeas from field to table. Greenhouse-field trials suggested that fluxapyroxad dissipated faster in cucumbers than in cowpeas, and M700F008 was the only detected metabolite at <LOQ-37.92 μg/kg. Fluxapyroxad accumulated in cucumbers (average residue accumulation value, 1: 2.21: 1.16) and cowpeas (1: 1.33: 1.05) after repeated spraying. Peeling, washing and parboiling could remove fluxapyroxad from cucumbers and cowpeas (PF range, 0.16-0.85); however, fluxapyroxad was partly concentrated by stir-frying (PF range, 0.36-1.41). Moreover, fluxapyroxad residues increased with increasing pickling time. Chronic and acute risk assessments revealed that dietary exposure to fluxapyroxad was within the acceptable levels from cucumber and cowpea consumption. Given high residue levels and their potential accumulation, fluxapyroxad should be continuously monitored and assessed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Cui
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuai Guan
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingyun Liang
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China
| | - Liping Fang
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruiyan Ding
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Wang
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China
| | - Teng Li
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhan Dong
- Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan, Shandong 250100, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xiaohu Wu
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongquan Zheng
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The processing factors of canning and pasteurization for the most frequently occurring fungicides and insecticides in apples and their application into dietary risk assessment. Food Chem 2022; 371:131179. [PMID: 34808762 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The challenge of the present comprehensive work was to study, from apple orchards to consumer's plate, the influence of high- and low-temperature thermal treatments on the most frequently occurring fungicides (boscalid, captan, pyraclostrobin) and insecticides (acetamiprid, methoxyfenozide) in apples and processing factor (PF) application for more realistic dietary risk assessment in the new EFSA methodology. Dry pasteurization and canning combined with previous preliminary treatment gave PFs = 0.25-1.8 of the five active substances. Acute exposure (expressed as %ARfD) in the raw commodity was demonstrated to be 168.1% for acetamiprid in the worst case (input - highest residue) and 307.9% for boscalid in the most critical case (input - MRL), and after re-calculation for PF, decreased to 139.5% for acetamiprid in canned product and 203.2% for boscalid in pasteurized apples. These novel data may be helpful in estimating new threshold residue levels significant in food safety especially intended for children.
Collapse
|