Gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma analysis identifies promoter methylation-based cancer subtypes and signatures

Discovery of novel DNA methylation biomarker panels for the diagnosis and differentiation between common adenocarcinomas and their liver metastases

Differentiation between adenocarcinomas is sometimes challenging. The promising avenue for discovering new biomarkers lies in bioinformatics using DNA methylation analysis. Utilizing a 2853-sample identification dataset and a 782-sample independent verification dataset, we have identified diagnostic DNA methylation biomarkers that are hypermethylated in cancer and differentiate between breast invasive carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarcinoma. The best panels for cancer type exhibit sensitivity of 77.8-95.9%, a specificity of 92.7-97.5% for tumors, a specificity of 91.5-97.7% for tumors and normal tissues and a diagnostic accuracy of 85.3-96.4%. We have shown that the results can be extended from the primary cancers to their liver metastases, as the best panels diagnose and differentiate between pancreatic adenocarcinoma liver metastases and breast invasive carcinoma liver metastases with a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3-100% and a diagnostic accuracy of 86.8-91.9%. Moreover, the panels could detect hypermethylation of selected regions in the cell-free DNA of patients with liver metastases. At the same time, these were unmethylated in the cell-free DNA of healthy donors, confirming their applicability for liquid biopsies.

CpG-biomarkers in tumor tissue and prediction models for the survival of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and external validation study

The research aimed to identify previously published CpG-methylation-based prognostic biomarkers and prediction models for colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis and validate them in a large external cohort. A systematic search was conducted, analyzing 298 unique CpGs and 12 CpG-based prognostic models from 28 studies. After adjustment for clinical variables, 48 CpGs and five prognostic models were confirmed to be associated with survival. However, the discrimination ability of the models was insufficient, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.53 to 0.62. Calibration accuracy was mostly poor, and no significant added prognostic value beyond traditional clinical variables was observed. All prognostic models were rated at high risk of bias. While a fraction of CpGs showed potential clinical utility and generalizability, the CpG-based prognostic models performed poorly and lacked clinical relevance.

Machine learning in the identification of prognostic DNA methylation biomarkers among patients with cancer: A systematic review of epigenome-wide studies

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation biomarkers have great potential in improving prognostic classification systems for patients with cancer. Machine learning (ML)-based analytic techniques might help overcome the challenges of analyzing high-dimensional data in relatively small sample sizes. This systematic review summarizes the current use of ML-based methods in epigenome-wide studies for the identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with cancer prognosis.

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for articles published until 2 January 2023. ML-based methods and workflows used to identify DNA methylation signatures associated with cancer prognosis were extracted and summarized. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of included studies by a seven-item checklist adapted from 'A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (PROBAST)' and from the 'Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK). Different ML methods and workflows used in included studies were summarized and visualized by a sunburst chart, a bubble chart, and Sankey diagrams, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-three studies were included in this review. Three major types of ML-based workflows were identified. 1) unsupervised clustering, 2) supervised feature selection, and 3) deep learning-based feature transformation. For the three workflows, the most frequently used ML techniques were consensus clustering, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and autoencoder, respectively. The systematic review revealed that the performance of these approaches has not been adequately evaluated yet and that methodological and reporting flaws were common in the identified studies using ML techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

There is great heterogeneity in ML-based methodological strategies used by epigenome-wide studies to identify DNA methylation markers associated with cancer prognosis. In theory, most existing workflows could not handle the high multi-collinearity and potentially non-linearity interactions in epigenome-wide DNA methylation data. Benchmarking studies are needed to compare the relative performance of various approaches for specific cancer types. Adherence to relevant methodological and reporting guidelines are urgently needed.

Integration of DNA Microarray with Clinical and Genomic Data

DNA microarrays have been widely employed to understand cancer development. This technology is able to measure expression levels of a large numbers of genes or to genotype multiple regions of a genome in a massively parallel experiment. In addition, the detection of methylation patterns and gene copy number variations are also performed. Clinicians began to apply these findings in personalized medicine for the selection of cancer therapy according to the individual's cancer genomic profile. Because cancer is a complex disease it is of great value to integrate microarray data with genomic and clinical data. Here, we presented an overview of DNA microarray technology and discuss about benefits and challenging of microarray data integration.

Transcriptional and Epigenetic Bioinformatic Analysis of Claudin-9 Regulation in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease that represents 5% to 10% of all new cancer cases worldwide. Advances in histological diagnosis and the discovery of new genes have admitted new genomic classifications. Nevertheless, the bioinformatic analysis of gastric cancer databases has favored the detection of specific differentially expressed genes with biological significance. Claudins, a family of proteins involved in tight junction physiology, have emerged as the key regulators of cellular processes, such as growth, proliferation, and migration, associated with cancer progression. The expression of Claudin-9 in the gastric cancer tissue has been linked to poor prognosis, however, its transcriptional and epigenetic regulations demand a more comprehensive analysis. Using the neural network promoter prediction, TransFact, Uniprot-KB, Expasy-SOPMA, protein data bank, proteomics DB, Interpro, BioGRID, String, and the FASTA protein sequence databases and software, we found the following: (1) the promoter sequence has an unconventional structure, including different transcriptional regulation elements distributed throughout it, (2) GATA 4, GATA 6, and KLF5 are the key regulators of Claudin-9 expression, (3) Oct1, NF-κB, AP-1, c-Ets-1, and HNF-3β have the higher binding affinity to the CLDN9 promoter, (4) Claudin-9 interacts with cell differentiation and development proteins, (5) CLDN9 is highly methylated, and (6) Claudin-9 expression is associated with poor survival. In conclusion, Claudin-9 is a protein that should be considered a diagnostic marker as its gene promoter region binds to the transcription factors associated with the deregulation of cell control, enhanced cell proliferation, and metastasis.

Identification of stem cell-related subtypes and risk scoring for gastric cancer based on stem genomic profiling

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies demonstrate the role of cancer stem cells in occurrence, recurrence, and distant metastases in gastric cancer (GC), little is known about the evolving genetic and epigenetic changes in the stem and progenitor cells. The purpose of this study was to identify the stem cell subtypes in GC and examine their clinical relevance.

METHODS

Two publicly available datasets were used to identify GC stem cell subtypes, and consensus clustering was performed by unsupervised machine learning methods. The cancer stem cell (CSC) typing-related risk scoring (RS) model was established through multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Cross-platform dataset-based two stable GC stem cell subtypes, namely low stem cell enrichment (SCE_L) and high stem cell enrichment (SCE_H), were prudently identified. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the classical oncogenic pathways, immune-related pathways, and regulation of stem cell division were active in SCE_H; ferroptosis, NK cell activation, and post-mutation repair pathways were active in SCE_L. GC stem cell subtypes could accurately predict clinical outcomes in patients, tumor microenvironment cell-infiltration characteristics, somatic mutation landscape, and potential responses to immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy. Additionally, a CSC typing-related RS model was established; it was strongly independent and could accurately predict the patient's overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the complex oncogenic mechanisms underlying GC. The findings provide a basis and reference for the diagnosis and treatment of GC.