Comparative effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on brain and lung damage in experimental acute ischemic stroke

Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on swallowing function and pneumonia in poststroke dysphagia in rats

BACKGROUND

Post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is a common symptom of stroke. Clinical complications of PSD include malnutrition and pneumonia. Clinical studies have shown that high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) can improve the swallowing function in stroke patients. However, few studies have elucidated the underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

A PSD rat model was established using transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO). Rats were randomly divided into sham-operated groups, PSD groups, PSD + sham-rTMS groups, PSD + 5 Hz-rTMS groups, PSD + 10 Hz-rTMS groups and PSD + 20 Hz-rTMS groups. Rats were weighed and videofluoroscopic swallowing studies were conducted. Pulmonary inflammation, levels of substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the serum, lung, and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) in NTS were evaluated.

RESULTS

Rats in the PSD group experienced weight loss, reduced bolus area and pharyngeal bolus speed, and increased pharyngeal transit time (PTT) and inter-swallow interval (ISI) on day 7 and day 14 after operation. Moreover, PSD rats showed pulmonary inflammation, reduced levels of SP in the lung and serum, increased levels of CGRP in the lung and NTS, reduced levels of BDNF and 5HT in the NTS. There was no significant difference between the PSD group and the PSD + sham-rTMS group in the results of weight and VFSS. Comparing with the PSD group, there significant increases in the bolus area, decreases in PTT of rats following 5 Hz rTMS intervention. HF-rTMS at 10 Hz significantly increased the weight, bolus area, pharyngeal bolus speed and decreased the PTT and ISI of rats. There were also significant increases in the bolus area (p < 0.01) and pharyngeal bolus speed, decreases in PTT and ISI of rats following 20 Hz rTMS intervention. Furthermore, compared with the PSD + 5 Hz-rTMS group, there were significant increases in the bolus area and pharyngeal bolus speed, decreases in ISI in the swallowing function of rats in the PSD + 10 Hz-rTMS group. Besides, compared with the PSD + 5 Hz-rTMS group, there were significant decreases in ISI in the swallowing function of rats in the PSD + 20 Hz-rTMS group. HF-rTMS at 10 Hz alleviated pulmonary inflammation, increased the levels of SP in the lung, serum, and NTS, CGRP in the serum and NTS, 5HT in the NTS of PSD rats.

CONCLUSION

Compared with 5 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS, 10 Hz rTMS more effectively improved the swallowing function of rats with PSD. HF-rTMS at 10 Hz improved the swallowing function and alleviated pneumonia in PSD rats. The mechanism may be related to increased levels of SP in the lung, serum and NTS, levels of CGRP in the serum and NTS, 5HT in the NTS after HF-rTMS treatment.

Pressure-support compared with pressure-controlled ventilation mitigates lung and brain injury in experimental acute ischemic stroke in rats

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the pulmonary and cerebral effects of low-tidal volume ventilation in pressure-support (PSV) and pressure-controlled (PCV) modes at two PEEP levels in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

In this randomized experimental study, AIS was induced by thermocoagulation in 30 healthy male Wistar rats. After 24 h, AIS animals were randomly assigned to PSV or PCV with VT = 6 mL/kg and PEEP = 2 cmH2O (PSV-PEEP2 and PCV-PEEP2) or PEEP = 5 cmH2O (PSV-PEEP5 and PCV-PEEP5) for 2 h. Lung mechanics, arterial blood gases, and echocardiography were evaluated before and after the experiment. Lungs and brain tissue were removed for histologic and molecular biology analysis. The primary endpoint was diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) score; secondary endpoints included brain histology and brain and lung molecular biology markers.

RESULTS

In lungs, DAD was lower with PSV-PEEP5 than PCV-PEEP5 (p < 0.001); interleukin (IL)-1β was lower with PSV-PEEP2 than PCV-PEEP2 (p = 0.016) and PSV-PEEP5 than PCV-PEEP5 (p = 0.046); zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) was lower in PCV-PEEP5 than PCV-PEEP2 (p = 0.042). In brain, necrosis, hemorrhage, neuropil edema, and CD45 + microglia were lower in PSV than PCV animals at PEEP = 2 cmH2O (p = 0.036, p = 0.025, p = 0.018, p = 0.011, respectively) and PEEP = 5 cmH2O (p = 0.003, p = 0.003, p = 0.007, p = 0.003, respectively); IL-1β was lower while ZO-1 was higher in PSV-PEEP2 than PCV-PEEP2 (p = 0.009, p = 0.007, respectively), suggesting blood-brain barrier integrity. Claudin-5 was higher in PSV-PEEP2 than PSV-PEEP5 (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

In experimental AIS, PSV compared with PCV reduced lung and brain injury. Lung ZO-1 reduced in PCV with PEEP = 2 versus PEEP = 5 cmH2O, while brain claudin-5 increased in PSV with PEEP = 2 versus PEEP = 5 cmH2O.

Dexmedetomidine compared to low-dose ketamine better protected not only the brain but also the lungs in acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) and low-dose ketamine (KET) present neuroprotective effects in acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, to date, no studies have evaluated which has better protective effects not only on the brain but also lungs in AIS.

METHODS

AIS-induced Wistar rats (390 ± 30 g) were randomized after 24-h, receiving dexmedetomidine (STROKE-DEX, n = 10) or low-dose S(+)-ketamine (STROKE-KET, n = 10). After 1-h protective ventilation, perilesional brain tissue and lungs were removed for histologic and molecular biology analysis. STROKE animals (n = 5), receiving sodium thiopental but not ventilated, had brain and lungs removed for molecular biology analysis. Effects of DEX and KET mean plasma concentrations on alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, and lung endothelial cells, extracted primarily 24-h after AIS, were evaluated.

RESULTS

In perilesional brain tissue, apoptosis did not differ between groups. In STROKE-DEX, compared to STROKE-KET, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expressions were reduced, but no changes in nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) and super oxide dismutase (SOD)-1 were observed. In lungs, TNF-α and VCAM-1 were reduced, whereas Nrf2 and SOD-1 were increased in STROKE-DEX. In alveolar macrophages, TNF-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase (M1 macrophage phenotype) were lower and arginase and transforming growth factor-β (M2 macrophage phenotype) higher in STROKE-DEX. In lung neutrophils, CXC chemokine receptors (CXCR2 and CXCR4) were higher in STROKE-DEX. In lung endothelial cells, E-selectin and VCAM-1 were lower in STROKE-DEX.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current AIS model, dexmedetomidine compared to low-dose ketamine reduced inflammation and endothelial cell damage in both brain and lung, suggesting greater protection.

Mild hypothermia combined with dexmedetomidine reduced brain, lung, and kidney damage in experimental acute focal ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Sedatives and mild hypothermia alone may yield neuroprotective effects in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the impact of this combination is still under investigation. We compared the effects of the combination of mild hypothermia or normothermia with propofol or dexmedetomidine on brain, lung, and kidney in experimental AIS. AIS-induced Wistar rats (n = 30) were randomly assigned, after 24 h, to normothermia or mild hypothermia (32-35 °C) with propofol or dexmedetomidine. Histologic injury score and molecular biomarkers were evaluated not only in brain, but also in lung and kidney. Hemodynamics, ventilatory parameters, and carotid Doppler ultrasonography were analyzed for 60 min.

RESULTS

In brain: (1) hypothermia compared to normothermia, regardless of sedative, decreased tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α expression and histologic injury score; (2) normothermia + dexmedetomidine reduced TNF-α and histologic injury score compared to normothermia + propofol; (3) hypothermia + dexmedetomidine increased zonula occludens-1 expression compared to normothermia + dexmedetomidine. In lungs: (1) hypothermia + propofol compared to normothermia + propofol reduced TNF-α and histologic injury score; (2) hypothermia + dexmedetomidine compared to normothermia + dexmedetomidine reduced histologic injury score. In kidneys: (1) hypothermia + dexmedetomidine compared to normothermia + dexmedetomidine decreased syndecan expression and histologic injury score; (2) hypothermia + dexmedetomidine compared to hypothermia + propofol decreased histologic injury score.

CONCLUSIONS

In experimental AIS, the combination of mild hypothermia with dexmedetomidine reduced brain, lung, and kidney damage.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of dexmedetomidine for postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine (DEX) for postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Measurements: Two investigators independently searched Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and CBM for randomized controlled trials of DEX for PCIA. Main results: Thirty-seven studies with a total of 5,409 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with analgesics alone, DEX for PCIA reduced pain score at 24 h [mean difference (MD) = -0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.85, -0.54; p < 0.00001, I ² = 90%] and 48 h postoperatively (MD = -0.43; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.34; p < 0.00001, I ² = 96%). Moreover, DEX reduced analgesics consumption during the first 24 h [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.16; p < 0.00001, I ² = 91%] and the number of resuscitation analgesics administered [odds ratio (OR) = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.66; p < 0.00001, I ² = 72%]. Furthermore, DEX improved patient satisfaction (OR = 3.55; 95% CI: 2.36, 5.35; p < 0.00001, I ² = 60%), and reduced incidence of side effects, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.57; p < 0.00001, I ² = 59%) and pruritus after surgery (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.68; p = 0.0001, I ² = 0%). Besides, DEX attenuates inflammatory cytokine levels, such as IL-6 (MD = -5.73; 95% CI: -8.34, -3.12; p < 0.00001, I ² = 91%) and TNF-α (MD = -0.63; 95% CI: -0.76, -0.50; p < 0.00001, I ² = 89%). Finally, DEX increased the risk of bradycardia (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.12, 2.45; p = 0.01, I ² = 15%), but the complication of hypotension did not differ between the two groups (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.84, 2.04; p = 0.25, I ² = 0%). Conclusion: DEX is used for postoperative PCIA analgesia, which can significantly improve the analgesic effect, effectively control postoperative inflammatory response, reduce the dosage and adverse reactions of analgesics, and improve postoperative patient satisfaction. Of course, the impact of the immunosuppressive effect of DEX on the prognosis of patients needs further study. Systematic review registration: CRD42022340933, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Could dexmedetomidine be repurposed as a glymphatic enhancer?

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flows through the central nervous system (CNS) via the glymphatic pathway to clear the interstitium of metabolic waste. In preclinical studies, glymphatic fluid flow rate increases with low central noradrenergic tone and slow-wave activity during natural sleep and general anesthesia. By contrast, sleep deprivation reduces glymphatic clearance and leads to intracerebral accumulation of metabolic waste, suggesting an underlying mechanism linking sleep disturbances with neurodegenerative diseases. The selective α₂-adrenergic agonist dexmedetomidine is a sedative drug that induces slow waves in the electroencephalogram, suppresses central noradrenergic tone, and preserves glymphatic outflow. As recently developed dexmedetomidine formulations enable self-administration, we suggest that dexmedetomidine could serve as a sedative-hypnotic drug to enhance clearance of harmful waste from the brain of those vulnerable to neurodegeneration.

Effects of propofol on macrophage activation and function in diseases

Macrophages work with monocytes and dendritic cells to form a monocyte immune system, which constitutes a powerful cornerstone of the immune system with their powerful antigen presentation and phagocytosis. Macrophages play an essential role in infection, inflammation, tumors and other pathological conditions, but these cells also have non-immune functions, such as regulating lipid metabolism and maintaining homeostasis. Propofol is a commonly used intravenous anesthetic in the clinic. Propofol has sedative, hypnotic, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidation effects, and it participates in the body’s immunity. The regulation of propofol on immune cells, especially macrophages, has a profound effect on the occurrence and development of human diseases. We summarized the effects of propofol on macrophage migration, recruitment, differentiation, polarization, and pyroptosis, and the regulation of these propofol-regulated macrophage functions in inflammation, infection, tumor, and organ reperfusion injury. The influence of propofol on pathology and prognosis via macrophage regulation is also discussed. A better understanding of the effects of propofol on macrophage activation and function in human diseases will provide a new strategy for the application of clinical narcotic drugs and the treatment of diseases.