The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113

Comparison of monotherapy and combination therapy for older patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The current standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a combination chemotherapy regimen. However, whether the efficacy of combination therapy is superior to that of monotherapy in older patients with BTC remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with those of combination therapy in such patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 157 patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC aged ≥ 75 years who received systemic chemotherapy between August 2011 and November 2020. We compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy (gemcitabine [GEM] + cisplatin and GEM + S-1) with those of monotherapy (GEM or S-1 alone). We assessed patients' characteristics, survival, adverse events, and dose intensity. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients who received monotherapy were older and had worse performance status (PS), lower albumin levels, and higher carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels than those who received combination therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 and 12.8 months in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-1.01), with a trend towards longer OS observed with combination therapy. However, multivariable analysis did not show superior OS with combination therapy (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.66-1.68). Multivariable analysis also revealed gallbladder cancer, CEA, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as prognostic factors for OS. Regarding safety, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly higher in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (79% vs. 53%, p = 0.001); however, the rate of treatment discontinuation was approximately 10% in both groups, with no treatment-related deaths, suggesting that toxicities are manageable even in older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy is not necessarily recommended for older patients with BTC. Selecting an appropriate chemotherapy regimen based on an individual's condition is important.

Systemic approaches in biliary tract cancers: a review in the era of multidirectional precision medicine

INTRODUCTION

Despite a rising incidence, biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are still considered a rare tumor entity. The disease's subtle clinical presentation and lack of effective early detection strategies often lead to a diagnosis at an advanced or unresectable stage, where curative options are limited.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of current systemic therapies and emerging novel approaches for BTC. For decades, the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GemCis) has been the standard of care for palliative treatment. However, since 2020, the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape for BTC has evolved considerably, not only in the first-line setting but also beyond, driven by the development of clinical trials exploring immunotherapy and molecularly targeted agents. Due to the high frequency of targetable genetic alterations in BTC patients, there is a growing emphasis on obtaining tissue or liquid biopsy samples to identify markers like microsatellite instability and other actionable oncogenic driver genes.

EXPERT OPINION

Early initiation of systemic therapies in combination with multimodal approaches is essential for maximizing survival outcomes in patients with BTC.

An age-group analysis on the efficacy of chemotherapy in older adult patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer: a Japanese cancer registry cohort study

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of chemotherapy in older adult patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains to be established, despite the fact that the majority of patients diagnosed with BTC tend to be aged ≥ 70 years. In this study, we used three databases to examine the effectiveness of chemotherapy in a large patient population aged ≥ 70 years with metastatic BTC.

METHODS

Using a large Japanese database that combined three data sources (Osaka Cancer Registry, Japan's Diagnosis Procedure Combination, the hospital-based cancer registry database), we extracted the data from patients pathologically diagnosed with metastatic BTC, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, in 30 designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs). A cohort of patients with comparable backgrounds was identified using propensity score matching. The log-rank test was used to examine how chemotherapy affected overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 2,622 registered patients with BTC in 30 DCCHs, 207 older adult patients aged > 70 years with metastatic BTC were selected. Chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of older adult patients, according to propensity score matching (chemotherapy, 6.4 months vs. best supportive care, 1.8 months, P value < 0.001). The number of patients receiving chemotherapy tends to decrease with age. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (oral fluoropyrimidine) (GS) combination therapy were frequently performed in the chemotherapy group for patients under 80 years of age (70-74 years, 61.7%; 75-79 years, 62.8%). In contrast, monotherapy including GEM and S-1 was more frequently performed in age groups over 80 years (80-84 years, 56.2%; 85-89 years, 77.7%; ≥90 years, 100%). In the chemotherapy group among older adult patients aged < 85 years, the median OS was significantly longer according to age-group analysis of the 5-year age range following propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adult patients with metastatic BTC who received chemotherapy, prolonged survival was observed. Chemotherapy may be a viable option for patients with metastatic BTC who are aged < 85 years.

Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients

The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent chemotherapy for locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent BTC at our institution from January 2016 to December 2021. Of the 283 included patients, 91 (32.5%) were aged 75 years or older when initiating chemotherapy. Elderly patients were more likely than non-elderly patients to receive monotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 (58.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to experience grade 3-4 toxicities (55.4% vs. 70.2%, p = 0.015). The rates of termination due to intolerance (6.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.800) and transition to second-line chemotherapy (39.1% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.849) were similar between groups. In the overall cohort, age was not an independent predictor of overall survival (OS). Within the elderly cohort, there were no differences in severe adverse events between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy (50.0% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.211). Median OS was longer in the combination therapy group (10.4 vs. 14.1 months; p = 0.010); however, choice of monotherapy was not an independent predictor of overall survival. Monotherapy appears to be a viable alternative in selected elderly BTC patients.

Semiconductor quantum dots for photodynamic therapy: Recent advances

Photodynamic therapy is a promising cancer treatment that induces apoptosis as a result of the interactions between light and a photosensitizing drug. Lately, the emergence of biocompatible nanoparticles has revolutionized the prospects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in clinical trials. Consequently, a lot of research is now being focused on developing non-toxic, biocompatible nanoparticle-based photosensitizers for effective cancer treatments using PDT. In this regard, semiconducting quantum dots have shown encouraging results. Quantum dots are artificial semiconducting nanocrystals with distinct chemical and physical properties. Their optical properties can be fine-tuned by varying their size, which usually ranges from 1 to 10 nm. They present many advantages over conventional photosensitizers, mainly their emission properties can be manipulated within the near IR region as opposed to the visible region by the former. Consequently, low intensity light can be used to penetrate deeper tissues owing to low scattering in the near IR region. Recently, successful reports on imaging and PDT of cancer using carbon (carbon, graphene based) and metallic (Cd based) based quantum dots are promising. This review aims to summarize the development and the status quo of quantum dots for cancer treatment.