A database of calculated solution parameters for the AlphaFold predicted protein structures

Color-coded galectin fusion proteins as novel tools in biomaterial science

The inherent carbohydrate-binding specificities of human galectins can serve as recognition elements in both biotechnological and biomedical applications. The combination of the carbohydrate-recognition domain (CRD) of galectins fused to peptides or proteins for purification, immobilization, and imaging enables multifunctional utilization within a single protein. We present here a library of color-coded galectin fusion proteins that incorporate a His6-tag, a fluorescent protein, and a SpyCatcher or SpyTag unit to enable immobilization procedures. These galectin fusion proteins exhibit similar binding properties to the non-fused galectins with micromolar apparent binding affinities. N- and C-terminal fusion partners do not interfere with the SpyCatcher/SpyTag immobilization. By applying SpyCatcher/SpyTag-mediated SC-ST-Gal-3 conjugates, we show the stepwise formation of a three-layer ECM-like structure in vitro. Additionally, we demonstrate the SpyCatcher/SpyTag-mediated immobilization of galectins in microgels, which can serve as a transport platform for localized targeting applications. The proof of concept is provided by the galectin-mediated binding of microgels to colorectal cancer cells.

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

Artificial intelligence-driven advances in protein structure prediction in recent years have raised the question: has the protein structure-prediction problem been solved? Here, with a focus on nonglobular proteins, we highlight the many strengths and potential weaknesses of DeepMind's AlphaFold2 in the context of its biological and therapeutic applications. We summarize the subtleties associated with evaluation of AlphaFold2 model quality and reliability using the predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) and predicted aligned error (PAE) values. We highlight various classes of proteins that AlphaFold2 can be applied to and the caveats involved. Concrete examples of how AlphaFold2 models can be integrated with experimental data in the form of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), solution NMR, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray diffraction are discussed. Finally, we highlight the need to move beyond structure prediction of rigid, static structural snapshots toward conformational ensembles and alternate biologically relevant states. The overarching theme is that careful consideration is due when using AlphaFold2-generated models to generate testable hypotheses and structural models, rather than treating predicted models as de facto ground truth structures.

AlphaFold-predicted protein structures and small-angle X-ray scattering: insights from an extended examination of selected data in the Small-Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank

By providing predicted protein structures from nearly all known protein sequences, the artificial intelligence program AlphaFold (AF) is having a major impact on structural biology. While a stunning accuracy has been achieved for many folding units, predicted unstructured regions and the arrangement of potentially flexible linkers connecting structured domains present challenges. Focusing on single-chain structures without prosthetic groups, an earlier comparison of features derived from small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data taken from the Small-Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank (SASBDB) is extended to those calculated using the corresponding AF-predicted structures. Selected SASBDB entries were carefully examined to ensure that they represented data from monodisperse protein solutions and had sufficient statistical precision and q resolution for reliable structural evaluation. Three examples were identified where there is clear evidence that the single AF-predicted structure cannot account for the experimental SAXS data. Instead, excellent agreement is found with ensemble models generated by allowing for flexible linkers between high-confidence predicted structured domains. A pool of representative structures was generated using a Monte Carlo method that adjusts backbone dihedral allowed angles along potentially flexible regions. A fast ensemble modelling method was employed that optimizes the fit of pair distance distribution functions [P(r) versus r] and intensity profiles [I(q) versus q] computed from the pool to their experimental counterparts. These results highlight the complementarity between AF prediction, solution SAXS and molecular dynamics/conformational sampling for structural modelling of proteins having both structured and flexible regions.

Beyond the US-SOMO-AF database: a new website for hydrodynamic, structural, and circular dichroism calculations on user-supplied structures

At the 25th International Analytical Ultracentrifugation Workshop and Symposium, we described the recent implementation of the UltraScan SOlution MOdeler AlphaFold (US-SOMO-AF) database, containing hydrodynamic, structural, CD calculations, and other ancillary information, performed on the entire AF v2 database of predicted protein structures, containing more than 1,000,000 entries. The scope of the US-SOMO-AF database was that of providing direct access to pre-calculated physicochemical parameters for rapid assessment against their experimentally determined counterparts to test the compatibility in solution of predicted AlphaFold structures. In the meantime, the AlphaFold consortium has extended its database of predicted structures to an astonishing > 200 million entries, making it quite impractical for their coverage in the US-SOMO-AF database. Therefore, we have created the US-SOMO-Web site, allowing the rapid calculations of all the properties, as present in the US-SOMO-AF database, on user-supplied PDB and mmCIF structures, as well as allowing direct processing of the latest AlphaFold models. Major features on the website are described, along with current limitations and potential future developments.

DENSS-multiple: A structure reconstruction method using contrast variation of small-angle neutron scattering based on the DENSS algorithm

The 3D structure of biomacromolecules, such as protein and DNA/RNA, provide keys to understanding their biological functions. Among many structural biology techniques, small-angle scattering techniques with ab initio methods have been widely used to reveal biomolecular structures in relevant solution conditions. Recently, a method called DENsity from Solution Scattering (DENSS) was developed to reconstruct the scattering density directly from biological small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering data instead of using a dummy atom modeling approach. Here, a method named DENSS-Multiple was developed to work simultaneously on multiple datasets from small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) contrast variation data. The easily manipulable neutron contrast has been widely exploited to study the structure and function of biological macromolecules and their complexes in solution. This new method provides a single structural result that includes all the information represented by different contrasts from SANS. The results from DENSS-Multiple generally have better resolution than those from DENSS, and more subtle features are represented by density variations from different phases of a structure. DENSS-Multiple was tested on various examples, including simulated and experimental data. These results, along with DENSS-Multiple's applications and limitations, are discussed herein.

A round-robin approach provides a detailed assessment of biomolecular small-angle scattering data reproducibility and yields consensus curves for benchmarking

Through an expansive international effort that involved data collection on 12 small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and four small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) instruments, 171 SAXS and 76 SANS measurements for five proteins (ribonuclease A, lysozyme, xylanase, urate oxidase and xylose isomerase) were acquired. From these data, the solvent-subtracted protein scattering profiles were shown to be reproducible, with the caveat that an additive constant adjustment was required to account for small errors in solvent subtraction. Further, the major features of the obtained consensus SAXS data over the q measurement range 0-1 Å-1 are consistent with theoretical prediction. The inherently lower statistical precision for SANS limited the reliably measured q-range to <0.5 Å-1, but within the limits of experimental uncertainties the major features of the consensus SANS data were also consistent with prediction for all five proteins measured in H2O and in D2O. Thus, a foundation set of consensus SAS profiles has been obtained for benchmarking scattering-profile prediction from atomic coordinates. Additionally, two sets of SAXS data measured at different facilities to q > 2.2 Å-1 showed good mutual agreement, affirming that this region has interpretable features for structural modelling. SAS measurements with inline size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) proved to be generally superior for eliminating sample heterogeneity, but with unavoidable sample dilution during column elution, while batch SAS data collected at higher concentrations and for longer times provided superior statistical precision. Careful merging of data measured using inline SEC and batch modes, or low- and high-concentration data from batch measurements, was successful in eliminating small amounts of aggregate or interparticle interference from the scattering while providing improved statistical precision overall for the benchmarking data set.

AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery

AlphaFold has burst into our lives. A powerful algorithm that underscores the strength of biological sequence data and artificial intelligence (AI). AlphaFold has appended projects and research directions. The database it has been creating promises an untold number of applications with vast potential impacts that are still difficult to surmise. AI approaches can revolutionize personalized treatments and usher in better-informed clinical trials. They promise to make giant leaps toward reshaping and revamping drug discovery strategies, selecting and prioritizing combinations of drug targets. Here, we briefly overview AI in structural biology, including in molecular dynamics simulations and prediction of microbiota-human protein-protein interactions. We highlight the advancements accomplished by the deep-learning-powered AlphaFold in protein structure prediction and their powerful impact on the life sciences. At the same time, AlphaFold does not resolve the decades-long protein folding challenge, nor does it identify the folding pathways. The models that AlphaFold provides do not capture conformational mechanisms like frustration and allostery, which are rooted in ensembles, and controlled by their dynamic distributions. Allostery and signaling are properties of populations. AlphaFold also does not generate ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions, instead describing them by their low structural probabilities. Since AlphaFold generates single ranked structures, rather than conformational ensembles, it cannot elucidate the mechanisms of allosteric activating driver hotspot mutations nor of allosteric drug resistance. However, by capturing key features, deep learning techniques can use the single predicted conformation as the basis for generating a diverse ensemble.