CA 15-3 prognostic biomarker in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

CA 15 - 3 in screening for systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease associated interstitial lung disease: a single center cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

The natural course of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD) varies significantly and is linked to considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, effective screening is crucial for early detection of SARD-ILD. Biomarkers associated with mucin 1, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), are increased in various ILD. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the serum biomarker CA 15-3 as a potential screening tool for ILD in patients newly diagnosed with SARD.

METHODS

Conducted as a single-center cross-sectional study, the research included newly diagnosed SARD patients consecutively examined for ILD according to the algorithm. All included patients underwent chest high-resolution CT scans (HRCT), and serum levels of CA 15-3, KL-6, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured and correlated with other variables associated with possible ILD presence.

RESULTS

Serum biomarker levels, specifically CA 15-3 and LDH, are significantly higher in ILD-positive patients (P<0.001 for both). An inverse relationship is observed between higher FVC values and lower CA 15-3 levels (Rho=-0.291, P=0.007). Similarly, higher DLCO values are associated with lower CA 15-3 levels (Rho=-0.317, P=0.003). Our findings revealed that elevated CA 15-3 levels are positively correlated with higher levels of KL-6 (Rho=0.268, P=0.01) and LDH (Rho=0.227, P=0.04). With a cut-off value of 24 U/mL, CA 15-3 showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (AUC=0.807, specificity=95.7%, sensitivity=71.1%). CA 15-3 emerged as the most significant predictor of a positive HRCT finding, accurately classifying 83% of cases.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that CA 15-3 shows promise as a valuable serum biomarker for screening SARD patients for ILD in routine clinical practice.

Hypermetabolic Pulmonary and Mediastinal Lesions With Elevated Cancer Antigen (CA) 15-3 and CA 27-29 in a Patient With a History of Ovarian and Breast Cancer

Breast cancer affects around 13% of women. Breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) carriers are prone to lung and lymph node metastasis, while breast cancer gene 2 (BRCA2) carriers tend to have bone metastasis. Findings of pulmonary nodules, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and elevated markers such as cancer antigen (CA) 15-3 and CA 27-29 suggest metastatic disease. Here, we present the case of a patient with BRCA1-positive breast cancer in remission and a history of ovarian cancer with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and pulmonary nodules, with avid fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) scan and elevated CA 15-3 and CA 27-29. A 70-year-old female with a history of bilateral breast and ovarian cancer and a positive BRCA test presented with pulmonary nodules, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and elevated CA 15-3 and CA 27-29. Imaging showed mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. A PET scan revealed increased metabolic activity in the lymph nodes and pulmonary lesions. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound lymph node sampling demonstrated granulomatous inflammation without malignant cells. The patient underwent a therapeutic trial of steroids with clinical improvement of symptoms and decreased hypermetabolic activity in chest lesions, as well as a decrease in tumor markers. The coexistence of sarcoidosis and breast cancer is rare; sarcoidosis can coexist, precede, or appear after breast cancer. In both conditions, tumor markers and PET avidity are seen, which makes diagnosis and management challenging. In case of ambiguity, biopsy is crucial. This case underscores the importance of integrating clinical, pathological, and imaging data to reach an accurate diagnosis and consider a therapeutic trial of steroids. Furthermore, the early PET response to treatment can be pivotal in differentiating between sarcoidosis and malignancy, especially in complex clinical scenarios. Proper differentiation is paramount to avoid therapeutic missteps and ensure appropriate patient management.

Factors influencing blood tumor marker concentrations in the absence of neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Tumor markers (TMs) are a heterogeneous group of molecules used in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of cancer patients. During neoplastic differentiation, cells can either directly synthesize or induce the synthesis of TMs, and the release of these molecules into the bloodstream allows their quantification in biological fluids. Although very small concentrations of TMs are usually present in the serum or plasma of healthy subjects, increased concentrations may also be found in the presence of benign diseases or due to technical interference, producing false positive results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS AND RESULTS

Our review analyses the causes of false positives described between January 1970 to February 2023 for the TMs most frequently used in clinical practice: α-fetoprotein (AFP), β2-microglobulin (β2-M), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), cancer antigen CA 19-9 (CA 19-9), cancer antigen CA 72-4 (CA 72-4), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), chromogranin A (CgA), choriogonadotropin (hCG), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), serum HER2 (sHER2), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II), Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (Pro-GRP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Protein S-100 (S-100) and thyroglobulin (Tg). A total of 247 references were included.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of pathophysiological processes and other conditions that affect the concentration of TMs might improve the interpretation of results and their clinical application.