Prion protein gene mutation detection using long-read Nanopore sequencing

Detection of Biological Molecules Using Nanopore Sensing Techniques

Modern biomedical sensing techniques have significantly increased in precision and accuracy due to new technologies that enable speed and that can be tailored to be highly specific for markers of a particular disease. Diagnosing early-stage conditions is paramount to treating serious diseases. Usually, in the early stages of the disease, the number of specific biomarkers is very low and sometimes difficult to detect using classical diagnostic methods. Among detection methods, biosensors are currently attracting significant interest in medicine, for advantages such as easy operation, speed, and portability, with additional benefits of low costs and repeated reliable results. Single-molecule sensors such as nanopores that can detect biomolecules at low concentrations have the potential to become clinically relevant. As such, several applications have been introduced in this field for the detection of blood markers, nucleic acids, or proteins. The use of nanopores has yet to reach maturity for standardization as diagnostic techniques, however, they promise enormous potential, as progress is made into stabilizing nanopore structures, enhancing chemistries, and improving data collection and bioinformatic analysis. This review offers a new perspective on current biomolecule sensing techniques, based on various types of nanopores, challenges, and approaches toward implementation in clinical settings.

Exome Sequencing and Multigene Panel Testing in 1,411 Patients With Adult-Onset Neurologic Disorders

Background and Objectives

Owing to their extensive clinical and molecular heterogeneity, hereditary neurologic diseases in adults are difficult to diagnose. The current knowledge about the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of exome sequencing (ES) for neurologic diseases in adults is limited. This observational study assesses the diagnostic value of ES and multigene panel analysis in adult-onset neurologic disorders.

Methods

From January 2019 through April 2022, ES-based multigene panel testing was conducted in 1,411 patients with molecularly unexplained neurologic phenotypes at the Ghent University Hospital. Gene panels were developed for ataxia and spasticity, leukoencephalopathy, movement disorders, paroxysmal episodic disorders, neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation, progressive myoclonic epilepsy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Single nucleotide variants, small indels, and copy number variants were analyzed. Across all panels, our analysis covered a total of 725 genes associated with Mendelian inheritance.

Results

A molecular diagnosis was established in 10% of the cases (144 of 1,411) representing 71 different monogenic disorders. The diagnostic yield depended significantly on the presenting phenotype with the highest yield seen in patients with ataxia or spastic paraparesis (19%). Most of the established diagnoses comprised disorders with an autosomal dominant inheritance (62%), and the most frequently mutated genes were NOTCH3 (13 patients), SPG7 (11 patients), and RFC1 (8 patients). 34% of the disease-causing variants were novel, including a unique likely pathogenic variant in APP (Ghent mutation, p.[Asn698Asp]) in a family presenting with stroke and severe cerebral white matter disease. 7% of the pathogenic variants comprised copy number variants detected in the ES data and confirmed by an independent technique.

Discussion

ES and multigene panel testing is a powerful and efficient tool to diagnose patients with unexplained, adult-onset neurologic disorders.

High-Depth PRNP Sequencing in Brains With Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

Background and Objectives

Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) has established genetic risk factors, but, in contrast to genetic and acquired CJD, the initial trigger for misfolded prion aggregation and spread is not known. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that pathologic somatic variants in the prion gene PRNP are increased in sCJD, potentially leading to the seeding of misfolded prion protein.

Methods

High-depth amplicon-based short read sequencing of the PRNP coding region was performed on postmortem brain tissue from patients with a clinical and neuropathologic diagnosis of sCJD (n = 142), Alzheimer disease (AD) (n = 51) and controls with no clinical or neuropathologic diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease (n = 71). Each DNA sample was sequenced twice, including independent PCR amplification, library preparation, and sequencing. We used RePlow to call somatic variants with high sensitivity and specificity and optimal sequence kernel association test to compare variant burden between groups.

Results

Two sCJD cases had somatic (variant allele frequency 0.5-1%) PRNP variants not previously identified, but with high in silico predicated pathogenicity. However, the pathogenicity of these variants is uncertain, as both located in the octapeptide repeat region where no point variations have previously been associated with sCJD. There was no overall difference in burden somatic PRNP in sCJD compared with controls and a lower burden compared with Alzheimer disease.

Discussion

Somatic variants in PRNP are unlikely to play a major role in sCJD but may contribute to the disease mechanism in a minority of cases.

Genetic counseling for prion disease: Updates and best practices

Prion disease is a rare, fatal, and often rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease. Ten to fifteen percent of cases are caused by autosomal dominant gain-of-function variants in the prion protein gene, PRNP. Rarity and phenotypic variability complicate diagnosis, often obscuring family history and leaving families unprepared for the genetic implications of an index case. Several recent developments inspire this update in best practices for prion disease genetic counseling. A new prion-detection assay has transformed symptomatic diagnosis. Meanwhile, penetrance, age of onset, and duration of illness have been systematically characterized across PRNP variants in a global cohort. Clinically, the traditional genotype-phenotype correlation has weakened over time, and the term genetic prion disease may now better serve providers than the historical subtypes Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, fatal familial insomnia, and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease. Finally, in the age of genetically targeted therapies, clinical trials for prion disease are being envisaged, and healthy at-risk individuals may be best positioned to benefit. Such individuals need to be able to access clinical services for genetic counseling and testing. Thus, this update on the genetics of prion disease and best practices for genetic counseling for this disease aims to provide the information needed to expand genetic counseling services.