Oxycodone/naloxone versus tapentadol in real-world chronic non-cancer pain management: an observational and pharmacogenetic study

Using a Two-Steps Clustering and PCA Analysis for Stratified Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Care: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

Given the number of people who suffer from chronic pain and the impact on healthcare resources, it is imperative that the people with pain receive an appropriate matched treatment due and stratified care. The aim of this study was to characterize chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients' states, through an unsupervised cluster analysis, to implement clinical recommendations in pain care.

Patients and Methods

Real-world ambulatory CNCP cohort of patients (n = 418) completed a multidimensional patient-reported registry, as part of a routine initial evaluation, in a multidisciplinary academic pain unit. A clustering analysis was performed according to: 1) pain intensity and relief; 2) quality of life; 3) number of adverse events; and 4) emergency department visits. A retrospective study was developed (n = 120) following the stratified analysis.

Results

From a principal component analysis, cut-off points were defined to discriminate between the six clusters and three groups of different pain intervention requirements. Those patients showed a significantly different monitoring and basal clinical status. Being older than 65 years old, retired or on medical leave, under opioids and anxiolytic prescription, had a severe impact on daily quality of life without any sex-difference.

Conclusion

These clusters based on real-world clinical information might be useful for screening even more where the access to physical exploration is limited. Follow-up analyses will support the replicability of this stratified care.

Tapentadol: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role in Pain Management

Pain is a prevalent issue among patients, requiring effective management to prevent the transition of acute pain into chronic pain and to mitigate significant clinical and socioeconomic impacts, such as increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged recovery, unplanned readmissions, and diminished quality of life. Despite advancements in pain management guidelines, achieving consistent pain relief remains challenging due to individual differences in pain thresholds, the nature of surgical procedures, patient age, and existing comorbidities. Tapentadol, an opioid that acts as both a μ-opioid receptor agonist and a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, presents a promising option for pain management. Approved by the FDA in 2008 for immediate release and in 2011 for extended release, tapentadol effectively addresses both nociceptive and neuropathic pain, offering a more favorable efficacy-safety profile compared to traditional opioids such as tramadol. Additionally, tapentadol is gaining recognition as a preferred option for managing significant pain in cancer patients due to its effectiveness and reduced side effects. This review evaluates tapentadol's clinical and pharmacological attributes, systematically analyzing literature on its efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and comparative effectiveness, suggesting that tapentadol is a viable option for effective pain management with potential for broader clinical applications.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Pain Treated With Tapentadol Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone and Its Determinants: A Real-World, Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Spain

OBJECTIVES

A substantial proportion of patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) are treated with tapentadol (TAP) or oxycodone/naloxone (OXN) to improve their perceived physical and mental health over time.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 135 CNCP outpatients with usual prescribing (TAP: n = 58, OXN: n = 77) at a tertiary-care Spanish Hospital to compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) records. Health utility was derived from the EQ-5D-3L. Regression models were performed to search for other HRQoL determinants. Pain intensity, relief, analgesic prescription, adverse events, inpatient stays, emergency department visits, and change to painkiller prescriptions were registered from electronic records.

RESULTS

Health utility (0.43 ± 0.24 scores, from -0.654 to 1) was similar for both opioids, although TAP showed a significantly low daily opioid dose requirement, neuromodulators use, and constipation side effect compared with OXN. After multivariable adjustment, the significant predictors of impaired HRQoL were pain intensity (β = -0.227, 95% CI -0-035 to -0.005), number of adverse events (β = -0.201, 95% CI -0.024 to -0.004), and opioid daily dose (β = -0.175, 95% CI -0.097 to -0.012). Male sex (β = -0.044) and pain relief (β = 0.158) should be taken into account for future studies.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL was similar for TAP and OXN in real-world patients with CNCP, albeit with a TAP opioid-sparing effect. More work is needed to explore HRQoL determinants in relation to long-term opioid use in CNCP.

Pharmacotherapeutic advances in fibromyalgia: what's new on the horizon?

INTRODUCTION

This review delves into Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS), a chronic pain condition demanding thorough understanding for precise diagnosis and treatment. Yet, a definitive pharmacological solution for FMS remains elusive.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we systematically analyze various pharmacotherapeutic prospects for FMS treatment, organized into sections based on the stage of drug development and approval. We begin with an overview of FDA-approved drugs, discussing their efficacy in FMS treatment. Next, we delve into other medications currently used for FMS but still undergoing further study, including opioids and muscle relaxants. Further, we evaluate the evidence behind medications that are currently under study, such as cannabinoids and naltrexone. Lastly, we explore new drugs that are in phase II trials. Our research involved a thorough search on PUBMED, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov. We also discuss the action mechanisms of these drugs and their potential use in specific patient groups.

EXPERT OPINION

A focus on symptom-driven, combination therapy is crucial in managing FMS. There is also a need for ongoing research into drugs that target neuroinflammation, immunomodulation, and the endocannabinoid system. Bridging the gap between benchside research and clinical application is challenging, but it holds potential for more targeted and effective treatment strategies.

Opioid Monitoring in Clinical Settings: Strategies and Implications of Tailored Approaches for Therapy

This review emphasises the importance of opioid monitoring in clinical practice and advocates for a personalised approach based on pharmacogenetics. Beyond effectively managing pain, meticulous oversight is required to address concerns about side effects, specially due to opioid-crisis-related abuse and dependence. Various monitoring techniques, along with pharmacogenetic considerations, are critical for personalising treatment and optimising pain relief while reducing misuse and addiction risks. Future perspectives reveal both opportunities and challenges, with advances in analytical technologies holding promise for increasing monitoring efficiency. The integration of pharmacogenetics has the potential to transform pain management by allowing for a precise prediction of drug responses. Nevertheless, challenges such as prominent pharmacogenetic testing and guideline standardisation persist. Collaborative efforts are critical for transforming scientific advances into tangible improvements in patient care. Standardised protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration are required to ensure consistent and evidence-based opioid monitoring. Future research should look into the long-term effects of opioid therapy, as well as the impact of genetic factors on individual responses, to help guide personalised treatment plans and reduce adverse events. Lastly, embracing innovation and collaboration can improve the standard of care in chronic pain management by striking a balance between pain relief and patient safety.

Clinical prediction of opioid use disorder in chronic pain patients: a cohort-retrospective study with a pharmacogenetic approach

BACKGROUND

Opioids are widely used in chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) management. However, they remain controversial due to serious risk of causing opioid use disorder (OUD). Our main aim was to develop a predictive model for future clinical translation that include pharmacogenetic markers.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted in 806 pre-screened Spanish CNCP patients, under long-term use of opioids, to compare cases (with OUD, N.=137) with controls (without OUD, N.=669). Mu-opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1, A118G, rs1799971) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT, G472A, rs4680) genetic variants plus cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) liver enzyme phenotypes were analyzed. Socio-demographic, clinical and pharmacological outcomes were also registered. A logistic regression model was performed. The model performance and diagnostic accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

OPRM1-AA genotype and CYP2D6 poor and ultrarapid metabolizers together with three other potential predictors: 1) age; 2) work disability; 3) oral morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), were selected with a satisfactory diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity: 0.82 and specificity: 0.85), goodness of fit (P=0.87) and discrimination (0.89). Cases were ten-year younger with lower incomes, more sleep disturbances, benzodiazepines use, and history of substance use disorder in front of controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional polymorphisms related to OPRM1 variant and CYP2D6 phenotypes may predict a higher OUD risk. Established risk factors such as young age, elevated MEDD and lower incomes were identified. A predictive model is expected to be implemented in clinical setting among CNCP patients under long-term opioids use.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2022

This paper is the forty-fifth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2022 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

The Role of Gender Pharmacogenetics in the Personalization of Drug Treatment

The use of pharmacogenetic guidelines in personalizing treatments has shown the potential to reduce interindividual variability in drug response by enabling genotype-matched dosing and drug selection. However, other important factors, such as patient gender, may interact strongly with pharmacogenetics in determining the individual profile of toxicity and efficacy but are still rarely considered when planning pharmacological treatment. The literature indicates that males and females respond differently to drugs, with women being at higher risk for toxicity and having different plasma exposure to drugs at standard doses. Recent studies have shown that pharmacogenetic variants may have different predictive value in different sexes, as in the case of treatment with opioids, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or proton pump inhibitors. Of particular interest is the case of treatment with fluoropyrimidines for cancer. A significant increase in toxicity has been described in female patients, with a more pronounced effect of specific DPYD and TYMS polymorphisms also noted. This manuscript reviews the major findings in the field of sex-specific pharmacogenomics. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Interindividual variability in drug response is an emerging issue in pharmacology. The genetic profile of patients, as well as their gender, may play a role in the identification of patients more exposed to the risk of adverse drug reactions or poor efficacy. This article reviews the current state of research on the interaction between gender and pharmacogenetics in addressing interindividual variability.

Tapentadol for the management of cancer pain in adults: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tapentadol is the first of a new class of analgesics, having synergistic µ-opioid receptor agonist and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitory actions. It has been widely researched in many areas of pain, often in noninferiority studies against potent opioids. This review describes all randomized and recent nonrandomized studies of tapentadol in adults with cancer pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tapentadol has been shown to be at least as effective as morphine and oxycodone in five randomized (two of which were multicenter and double-blind) and a range of nonrandomized trials, although caution is needed when interpreting these results. It is effective in both opioid-naive patients and those already taking opioids. By having a lower µ-opioid receptor binding affinity, it has fewer opioid-related toxicities such as constipation and nausea. A recent randomized trial comparing tapentadol to tapentadol plus duloxetine in patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy shows similar improvement in both groups in a range of pain relieving and quality of life measures, with similar adverse effects.

SUMMARY

Tapentadol has been shown in a range of studies to be an effective analgesic and thus should be considered as an alternative to morphine and oxycodone, especially when opioid toxicities are an issue.

Sex Differences in Oxycodone/Naloxone vs. Tapentadol in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: An Observational Real-World Study

Despite the large body of research on sex differences in pain, there is a lack of translation to real-world pain management. Our aim was to analyse the sex differences in the analgesic response to oxycodone/naloxone (OXN) and tapentadol (TAP), in comparison with other opioids (OPO) commonly prescribed for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). An observational and cross-sectional study was conducted on ambulatory CNCP patients (n = 571). Sociodemographic, clinical (pain intensity, relief, and quality of life), safety (adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions), hospital frequentations and pharmacological (morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD)) variables were collected. Multiple linear regressions were carried out to assess the association between sex and outcomes. Sex differences were observed, with lower female tolerability and higher hospital frequentation, especially in the OXN group (OR AEs report = 2.8 [1.8−4.4], p < 0.001). Here, females showed higher hospital use (23% hospital admission, 30% prescription change, p < 0.05), requiring a higher MEDD (127 ± 103 mg/day, p < 0.05), compared to OXN men. Regardless of the opioid group, CNCP women were significantly older than men (three years), with significantly higher benzodiazepine use (OR = 1.6 [1.1−2.3]), more constipation (OR = 1.34 [0.93−1.90]) and headache (OR = 1.45 [0.99−2.13]) AEs, than men who were more likely to refer sexual dysfunction (OR = 2.77 [1.53−5.01]), and loss of libido (OR = 1.93 [1.22−3.04]). Sex-differences were found related to poorer female drug tolerability and higher hospital resources, even worst in OXN female users. Other differences related to older female ages and benzodiazepine prescription, need to be further analysed from a gender perspective.