Streamlined and quantitative detection of chimerism using digital PCR

Chimeric Livers: Interspecies Blastocyst Complementation and Xenotransplantation for End-Stage Liver Disease

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) currently serves as the sole definitive treatment for thousands of patients suffering from end-stage liver disease; and the existing supply of donor livers for OLT is drastically outpaced by the increasing demand. To alleviate this significant gap in treatment, several experimental approaches have been devised with the aim of either offering interim support to patients waiting on the transplant list or bioengineering complete livers for OLT by infusing them with fresh hepatic cells. Recently, interspecies blastocyst complementation has emerged as a promising method for generating complete organs in utero over a short timeframe. When coupled with gene editing technology, it has brought about a potentially revolutionary transformation in regenerative medicine. Blastocyst complementation harbors notable potential for generating complete human livers in large animals, which could be used for xenotransplantation in humans, addressing the scarcity of livers for OLT. Nevertheless, substantial experimental and ethical challenges still need to be overcome to produce human livers in larger domestic animals like pigs. This review compiles the current understanding of interspecies blastocyst complementation and outlines future possibilities for liver xenotransplantation in humans.

Generation of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockin mutant models in mice and MEFs for studies of polymorphism in clock genes

The creation of mutant mice has been invaluable for advancing biomedical science, but is too time- and resource-intensive for investigating the full range of mutations and polymorphisms. Cell culture models are therefore an invaluable complement to mouse models, especially for cell-autonomous pathways like the circadian clock. In this study, we quantitatively assessed the use of CRISPR to create cell models in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) as compared to mouse models. We generated two point mutations in the clock genes Per1 and Per2 in mice and in MEFs using the same sgRNAs and repair templates for HDR and quantified the frequency of the mutations by digital PCR. The frequency was about an order of magnitude higher in mouse zygotes compared to that in MEFs. However, the mutation frequency in MEFs was still high enough for clonal isolation by simple screening of a few dozen individual cells. The Per mutant cells that we generated provide important new insights into the role of the PAS domain in regulating PER phosphorylation, a key aspect of the circadian clock mechanism. Quantification of the mutation frequency in bulk MEF populations provides a valuable basis for optimizing CRISPR protocols and time/resource planning for generating cell models for further studies.

New methods for the quantification of mixed chimerism in transplantation

Background

Quantification of chimerism showing the proportion of the donor in a recipient is essential for the follow-up of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but can also be useful to document an immune tolerance situation after solid organ transplantation. Historically, chimerism has been quantified from genomic DNA, but with technological advances, chimerism from donor-derived cell-free DNA seems particularly relevant in solid organ transplantation.

Methods

The reference method was until recently the short tandem repeat technique, but new innovative techniques as digital PCR (dPCR) and NGS, have revolutionized the quantification of chimerism, such as the so-called microchimerism analysis. After a short review of chimerism methods, a comparison of chimerism quantification data for two new digital PCR systems (QIAcuity™ dPCR (Qiagen^®) and QuantStudio Absolute Q (ThermoFisher^®) and two NGS-based chimerism quantification methods (AlloSeq HCT™ (CareDx^®) and NGStrack™ (GenDX^®)) was performed.

Results

These new methods were correlated and concordant to routinely methods (r²=0.9978 and r²=0.9974 for dPCR methods, r²=0.9978 and r²=0.9988 for NGS methods), and had similar high performance (sensitivity, reproductibility, linearity).

Conclusion

Finally, the choice of the innovative method of chimerism within the laboratory does not depend on the analytical performances because they are similar but mainly on the amount of activity and the access to instruments and computer services.