Evaluating fine changes in visual function of diabetic eyes using spatial-sweep steady-state pattern electroretinography

Functional diabetic retinopathy: A new concept to improve management of diabetic retinal diseases

Multifocal functional tests are not routinely performed in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) management. We emphasise their importance and coin the term functional diabetic retinopathy (FDR). We reviewed current guidelines on management of DR/DME, and literature on diabetic retinal neurodegeneration (DRN) and functional deficits in DR/DME. Functional visual loss due to DRN precedes vasculopathy and clinical DR; however, currently the diagnosis and management of DR/DME are based on classical signs of retinal vasculopathy and structural changes shown by funduscopy, fundus photographs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Furthermore, DME can mask DRN-based retinal layer thinning by OCT and is focussed on the macular region. The only functional test recommended in national and international guidelines on DR/DME is best-corrected visual acuity, a test of foveal function (<1 % of retina). Multifocal functional tests can objectively characterize both foveal and extrafoveal, localized and global, function. Current recommendations for DR/DME screening are inadequate to detect FDR affecting the greater retina. Early detection of FDR using multifocal functional tests could bring DR/DME management strategies forward enabling prevention of the later stage vision-threatening complications. After all, the end point of patient care is functional outcomes.

Diabetic choriocapillaris flow deficits affect the outer retina and are related to hemoglobin A1c and systolic blood pressure levels

Patient systemic and ocular data based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography images were analyzed (n = 45; control and diabetic eyes with or without diabetic retinopathy [DR]; mean age, 49.6 ± 8.1 years). All participants had best-corrected visual acuity < 0.05 in logMAR. The choriocapillaris flow area (CCFA) ratio was lower and the coefficient of variation (CV) of CCFA ratio was higher in diabetic eyes with or without DR than in control eyes. CCFA ratio of DR eyes was lower than that of diabetic eyes without DR. Superficial retinal vessel length density (VLD) was reduced only in DR eyes. CCFA ratio correlated with retinal VLD, photoreceptor outer segment (PROS) length, and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) volume in the study population; mean PROS decreased in diabetic eyes with or without DR, and RPE volume increased in DR eyes. CCFA ratio < 65.9% and CV of CCFA ratio ≥ 0.140 were more frequently found in diabetic eyes (odds ratio [OR], 13.333; P = 0.001), and related to HbA1c ≥ 7.0% (OR, 4.992; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.164-21.412; P = 0.030) or systolic blood pressure ≥ 135 mmHg (OR, 5.572; 95% CI 1.156-26.863; P = 0.032). These findings could help understand diabetic pathogenesis in the choriocapillaris and outer retina, and remind clinicians to manage both diabetes and hypertension.