Proteosomal degradation of NSD2 by BRCA1 promotes leukemia cell differentiation

Uncovering the bookshelves of CRISPR-based libraries: Advances and applications in cancer studies

The advent of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has revolutionized the genome editing field. CRISPR-based libraries have become powerful tools for high-throughput functional genomics and genetic screening. CRISPR-based libraries can represent a powerful approach to uncovering genes related to chemoresistance and therapy efficacy and to studying cancer cells' fitness. In this review, we conducted an extensive literature search and summarized multiple studies that utilized these libraries in both in vitro and in vivo research, emphasizing their key findings. We provide an overview of the design, construction, and applications of CRISPR-based libraries in different cancer-focused studies and discuss the different types of CRISPR-based libraries. We finally point out the challenges associated with library design, including guide RNA selection, off-target effects, and library complexity. This review provides an overview of the work conducted with CRISPR libraries in the search for new targets that could potentially assist in cancer therapy by contributing to functional approaches.

Generation of an NSD2-deficient human embryonic stem cell line using CRISPR/Cas9 technology

NSD2 is a histone methyltransferase (HMT) and is involved in the epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis and hematological cancers. To understand and illustrate the precise roles of NSD2 in hematopoietic development, here we constructed a human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line with knockout of NSD2 using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting. The cell line maintained typical stem cell morphology and normal karyotype. Furthermore, the pluripotency of the cell line was evidenced by high expression level of pluripotency genes and differentiation potential into three germ layers. The cell line provides a good model for studying roles of NSD2 in embryonic development, especially hematopoiesis.

NSD2 as a Promising Target in Hematological Disorders

Alterations of the epigenetic machinery are critically involved in cancer development and maintenance; therefore, the proteins in charge of the generation of epigenetic modifications are being actively studied as potential targets for anticancer therapies. A very important and widespread epigenetic mark is the dimethylation of Histone 3 in Lysine 36 (H3K36me2). Until recently, it was considered as merely an intermediate towards the generation of the trimethylated form, but recent data support a more specific role in many aspects of genome regulation. H3K36 dimethylation is mainly carried out by proteins of the Nuclear SET Domain (NSD) family, among which NSD2 is one of the most relevant members with a key role in normal hematopoietic development. Consequently, NSD2 is frequently altered in several types of tumors—especially in hematological malignancies. Herein, we discuss the role of NSD2 in these pathological processes, and we review the most recent findings in the development of new compounds aimed against the oncogenic forms of this novel anticancer candidate.

Structural and functional specificity of H3K36 methylation

The methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 (H3K36me) is essential for maintaining genomic stability. Indeed, this methylation mark is essential for proper transcription, recombination, and DNA damage response. Loss- and gain-of-function mutations in H3K36 methyltransferases are closely linked to human developmental disorders and various cancers. Structural analyses suggest that nucleosomal components such as the linker DNA and a hydrophobic patch constituted by histone H2A and H3 are likely determinants of H3K36 methylation in addition to the histone H3 tail, which encompasses H3K36 and the catalytic SET domain. Interaction of H3K36 methyltransferases with the nucleosome collaborates with regulation of their auto-inhibitory changes fine-tunes the precision of H3K36me in mediating dimethylation by NSD2 and NSD3 as well as trimethylation by Set2/SETD2. The identification of specific structural features and various cis-acting factors that bind to different forms of H3K36me, particularly the di-(H3K36me2) and tri-(H3K36me3) methylated forms of H3K36, have highlighted the intricacy of H3K36me functional significance. Here, we consolidate these findings and offer structural insight to the regulation of H3K36me2 to H3K36me3 conversion. We also discuss the mechanisms that underlie the cooperation between H3K36me and other chromatin modifications (in particular, H3K27me3, H3 acetylation, DNA methylation and N⁶-methyladenosine in RNAs) in the physiological regulation of the epigenomic functions of chromatin.

Posttranslational modification of Aurora A-NSD2 loop contributes to drug resistance in t(4;14) multiple myeloma

Background

t(4;14)(p16;q32) cytogenetic abnormality renders high level of histone methyltransferase NSD2 in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, and predicts poor clinical prognosis, but mechanisms of NSD2 in promoting chemoresistance have not been well elucidated.

Methods

An epigenetics compound library containing 181 compounds was used to screen inhibitors possessing a prior synergistic effect with bortezomib (BTZ) in vitro. Molecular biology techniques were applied to uncover underlying mechanisms. Transcriptome profile assay was performed by RNA‐seq. NSG mouse‐based xenograft model and intra‐bone model were applied to qualify the synergistic effect in vivo.

Results

We identified an Aurora kinase A inhibitor (MLN8237) possessed a significant synergistic effect with BTZ on t(4;14) positive MM cells. Aurora A protein level positively correlated with NSD2 level, and gain‐ and loss‐of‐functions of Aurora A correspondingly altered NSD2 protein and H3K36me2 levels. Mechanistically, Aurora A phosphorylated NSD2 at S56 residue to protect the protein from cleavage and degradation, thus methylation of Aurora A and phosphorylation of NSD2 bilaterally formed a positive regulating loop. Transcriptome profile assay of MM cells with AURKA depletion identified IL6R, STC2 and TCEA2 as the downstream target genes responsible for BTZ‐resistance (BR). Clinically, higher expressions of these genes correlated with poorer outcomes of MM patients. Combined administration of MLN8237 and BTZ significantly suppressed tumour growth in LP‐1 cells derived xenografts, and remarkably alleviated bone lesion in femurs of NSG mice.

Conclusions

Aurora A phosphorylates NSD2 at S56 residue to enhance NSD2 methyltransferase activity and form a positive regulating loop in promoting MM chemoresistance, thus pharmacologically targeting Aurora A sensitizes t(4;14) positive MM to the proteasome inhibitors treatment. Our study uncovers a previously unknown reason of MM patients with t(4;14) engendering chemoresistance, and provides a theoretical basis for developing new treatment strategy for MM patients with different genomic backgrounds.

Negative Regulation of Erythroid Differentiation via the CBX8-TRIM28 Axis

Although the mechanism of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) initiation through BCR/ABL oncogene has been well characterized, CML cell differentiation into erythroid lineage cells remains poorly understood. Using CRISPR-Cas9 screening, we identify Chromobox 8 (CBX8) as a negative regulator of K562 cell differentiation into erythrocytes. CBX8 is degraded via proteasomal pathway during K562 cell differentiation, which activates the expression of erythroid differentiation-related genes that are repressed by CBX8 in the complex of PRC1. During the differentiation process, the serine/threonine-protein kinase PIM1 phosphorylates serine 196 on CBX8, which contributes to CBX8 reduction. When CD235A expression levels are analyzed, the result reveals that the knockdown of PIM1 inhibits K562 cell differentiation. We also identify TRIM28 as another interaction partner of CBX8 by proteomic analysis. Intriguingly, TRIM28 maintains protein stability of CBX8 and TRIM28 loss significantly induces proteasomal degradation of CBX8, resulting in an acceleration of erythroid differentiation. Here, we demonstrate the involvement of the CBX8-TRIM28 axis during CML cell differentiation, suggesting that CBX8 and TRIM28 are promising novel targets for CML research.