1
|
Zhao M, Wang J, Hao X, Jin J, Tang J, Wang Y, Zhang M, Jing T, Schwab W, Gao T, Wang X, Song C. Natural variation of CsUGT71A60 determines growth and cold tolerance via regulating cytokinin glycosylation in Camellia sinensis. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL 2025. [PMID: 40299792 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.70112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2025] [Accepted: 04/04/2025] [Indexed: 05/01/2025]
Abstract
Cold stress severely limits tea plant (Camellia sinensis) productivity, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying cold adaptation remain elusive. Here, we identified a cold-inducible glycosyltransferase, CsUGT71A60, through integrative genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and proteomic profiling. Natural variation in CsUGT71A60 was strongly associated with cold tolerance, as evidenced by linkage disequilibrium analysis of flanking SNPs. Functional characterization revealed that CsUGT71A60 specifically catalyses the glycosylation of cis-zeatin to form cis-zeatin 9-O-glucoside in vitro and in vivo. Overexpression of CsUGT71A60 in Arabidopsis enhanced cold tolerance and agronomic traits, including germination rate, tiller number and seed weight, while delaying flowering. Transient silencing of CsUGT71A60 in tea plants disrupted cis-zeatin homoeostasis, impairing antioxidant defences and osmotic regulation under cold stress. Mechanistically, the transcription factor ARR (TEA021099) directly binds to CRM elements in the CsUGT71A60 promoter, activating its expression to fine-tune cytokinin signalling. This study unveils a dual-function glycosyltransferase that orchestrates stress tolerance and developmental plasticity, offering a strategic target for breeding climate-tolerance crops without yield penalties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyue Zhao
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Jingming Wang
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Xinyuan Hao
- National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Special Economic Animals and Plants, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jieyang Jin
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Junwei Tang
- National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Special Economic Animals and Plants, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yueyue Wang
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Mengting Zhang
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Tingting Jing
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Wilfried Schwab
- Biotechnology of Natural Products, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany
| | - Ting Gao
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Xinchao Wang
- National Center for Tea Plant Improvement, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Special Economic Animals and Plants, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chuankui Song
- National Key Laboratory for Tea Plant Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vahsen ML, Maxwell TM, Blumenthal DM, Gamba D, Germino MJ, Hooten MB, Lasky JR, Leger EA, Pirtel N, Porensky LM, Romero S, Van Ee JJ, Copeland SM, Ensing DJ, Adler PB. Phenological sensitivity of Bromus tectorum genotypes depends on current and source environments. Ecology 2025; 106:e70025. [PMID: 40095408 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.70025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 11/08/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
Plants respond to their environment with both short-term, within-generation trait plasticity, and long-term, between-generation evolutionary changes. However, the relative magnitude of plant responses to short- and long-term changes in the environment remains poorly understood. Shifts in phenological traits can serve as harbingers for responses to environmental change, and both a plant's current and source (i.e., genotype origin) environment can affect plant phenology via plasticity and local adaptation, respectively. To assess the role of current and source environments in explaining variation in flowering phenology of Bromus tectorum, an invasive annual grass, we conducted a replicated common garden experiment using 92 genotypes collected across western North America. Replicates of each genotype were planted in two densities (low = 100 seeds/1 m2, high = 100 seeds/0.04 m2) under two different temperature treatments (low = white gravel; high = black gravel; 2.1°C average difference) in a factorial design, replicated across four common garden locations in Idaho and Wyoming, USA. We tested for the effect of current environment (i.e., density treatment, temperature treatment, and common garden location), source environment (i.e., genotype source climate), and their interaction on each plant's flowering phenology. Flowering timing was strongly influenced by a plant's current environment, with plants that experienced warmer current climates and higher densities flowering earlier than those that experienced cooler current climates and lower densities. Genotypes from hot and dry source climates flowered consistently earlier than those from cool and wet source climates, even after accounting for genotype relatedness, suggesting that this genetically based climate cline is a product of natural selection. We found minimal evidence of interactions between current and source environments or genotype-by-environment interactions. Phenology was more sensitive to variation in the current climate than to variation in source climate. These results indicate that cheatgrass phenology reflects high levels of plasticity as well as rapid local adaptation. Both processes likely contribute to its current success as a biological invader and its capacity to respond to future environmental change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan L Vahsen
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
| | - Toby M Maxwell
- U.S. Geological Survey, Forest, Rangeland and Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
- Department of Biology, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA
| | - Dana M Blumenthal
- USDA-ARS Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Diana Gamba
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew J Germino
- U.S. Geological Survey, Forest, Rangeland and Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
| | - Mevin B Hooten
- Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Jesse R Lasky
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Leger
- Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Nikki Pirtel
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
| | - Lauren M Porensky
- USDA-ARS Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Seth Romero
- Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Justin J Van Ee
- Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Stella M Copeland
- USDA-ARS Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, Oregon, USA
| | - David J Ensing
- Summerland Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Peter B Adler
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gamba D, Vahsen ML, Maxwell TM, Pirtel N, Romero S, Ee JJV, Penn A, Das A, Ben-Zeev R, Baughman O, Blaney CS, Bodkins R, Budha-Magar S, Copeland SM, Davis-Foust SL, Diamond A, Donnelly RC, Dunwiddie PW, Ensing DJ, Everest TA, Hoitink H, Holdrege MC, Hufbauer RA, Juzėnas S, Kalwij JM, Kashirina E, Kim S, Klisz M, Klyueva A, Langeveld M, Lutfy S, Martin D, Merkord CL, Morgan JW, Nagy DU, Ott JP, Puchalka R, Pyle LA, Rasran L, Rector BG, Rosche C, Sadykova M, Shriver RK, Stanislavschi A, Starzomski BM, Stone RL, Turner KG, Urza AK, VanWallendael A, Wegenschimmel CA, Zweck J, Brown CS, Leger EA, Blumenthal DM, Germino MJ, Porensky LM, Hooten MB, Adler PB, Lasky JR. Local adaptation to climate facilitates a global invasion. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.09.12.612725. [PMID: 39345363 PMCID: PMC11429938 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.12.612725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
Local adaptation may facilitate range expansion during invasions, but the mechanisms promoting destructive invasions remain unclear. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), native to Eurasia and Africa, has invaded globally, with particularly severe impacts in western North America. We sequenced 307 genotypes and conducted controlled experiments. We found that diverse lineages invaded North America, where long-distance gene flow is common. Ancestry and phenotypic clines in the native range predicted those in the invaded range, indicating pre-adapted genotypes colonized different regions. Common gardens showed directional selection on flowering time that reversed between warm and cold sites, potentially maintaining clines. In the Great Basin, genomic predictions of strong local adaptation identified sites where cheatgrass is most dominant. Preventing new introductions that may fuel adaptation is critical for managing ongoing invasions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Gamba
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University; University Park, PA, USA
| | - Megan L. Vahsen
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University; Logan, UT, USA
| | - Toby M. Maxwell
- Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University; Boise, ID, USA
| | - Nikki Pirtel
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University; Logan, UT, USA
| | - Seth Romero
- US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit; Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Justin J. Van Ee
- Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Amanda Penn
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University; University Park, PA, USA
| | - Aayudh Das
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University; University Park, PA, USA
| | - Rotem Ben-Zeev
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University; University Park, PA, USA
| | | | - C. Sean Blaney
- Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre; Sackville, NB, Canada
| | | | | | - Stella M. Copeland
- US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center; Burns, OR, USA
| | | | - Alvin Diamond
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Troy University; Troy, Alabama, USA
| | - Ryan C. Donnelly
- Division of Biology, Kansas State University; Manhattan, KS, USA
| | | | - David J. Ensing
- Summerland Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Summerland, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Martin C. Holdrege
- Northern Arizona University, Center for Adaptable Western Landscapes; Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | - Ruth A. Hufbauer
- Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Sigitas Juzėnas
- Department of Botany and Genetics, Institute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University; Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Jesse M. Kalwij
- Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Sangtae Kim
- Department of Biology, Sungshin Women’s University; Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Marcin Klisz
- Department of Silviculture and Genetics of Forest Trees, Forest Research Institute; Raszyn, Poland
| | - Alina Klyueva
- Bryansk State University named after Academician I. G. Petrovsky; Bryansk, Russia
| | | | - Samuel Lutfy
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Kingsville, TX, USA
| | | | | | - John W. Morgan
- Department of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University; Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dávid U. Nagy
- Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg; Halle, Saale, Germany
| | - Jacqueline P. Ott
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Rapid City, SD, USA
| | - Radoslaw Puchalka
- Department of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University; Torun, Poland
| | | | - Leonid Rasran
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna; Vienna, Austria
| | - Brian G. Rector
- US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit; Albany, CA, USA
| | - Christoph Rosche
- Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg; Halle, Saale, Germany
| | | | - Robert K. Shriver
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada; Reno, NV, USA
| | - Alexandr Stanislavschi
- Department of Organic, Biochemical, and Food Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi; Iasi, Romania
| | - Brian M. Starzomski
- School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria; Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Rachel L. Stone
- Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kathryn G. Turner
- Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University; Pocatello, ID, USA
| | | | - Acer VanWallendael
- Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University; Raleigh, NC, USA
| | | | - Justin Zweck
- Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University; University Park, PA, USA
| | - Cynthia S. Brown
- Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | | | - Dana M. Blumenthal
- US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit; Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Matthew J. Germino
- US Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center; Boise, Idaho, USA
| | - Lauren M. Porensky
- US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Rangeland Resources and Systems Research Unit; Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Mevin B. Hooten
- Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin; Austin, TX, USA
| | - Peter B. Adler
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University; Logan, UT, USA
| | - Jesse R. Lasky
- Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University; University Park, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Montgomery J, Morran S, MacGregor DR, McElroy JS, Neve P, Neto C, Vila-Aiub MM, Sandoval MV, Menéndez AI, Kreiner JM, Fan L, Caicedo AL, Maughan PJ, Martins BAB, Mika J, Collavo A, Merotto A, Subramanian NK, Bagavathiannan MV, Cutti L, Islam MM, Gill BS, Cicchillo R, Gast R, Soni N, Wright TR, Zastrow-Hayes G, May G, Malone JM, Sehgal D, Kaundun SS, Dale RP, Vorster BJ, Peters B, Lerchl J, Tranel PJ, Beffa R, Fournier-Level A, Jugulam M, Fengler K, Llaca V, Patterson EL, Gaines TA. Current status of community resources and priorities for weed genomics research. Genome Biol 2024; 25:139. [PMID: 38802856 PMCID: PMC11129445 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03274-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Weeds are attractive models for basic and applied research due to their impacts on agricultural systems and capacity to swiftly adapt in response to anthropogenic selection pressures. Currently, a lack of genomic information precludes research to elucidate the genetic basis of rapid adaptation for important traits like herbicide resistance and stress tolerance and the effect of evolutionary mechanisms on wild populations. The International Weed Genomics Consortium is a collaborative group of scientists focused on developing genomic resources to impact research into sustainable, effective weed control methods and to provide insights about stress tolerance and adaptation to assist crop breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Montgomery
- Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, 1177 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Sarah Morran
- Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, 1177 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Dana R MacGregor
- Protecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - J Scott McElroy
- Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Paul Neve
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark
| | - Célia Neto
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark
| | - Martin M Vila-Aiub
- IFEVA-Conicet-Department of Ecology, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Analia I Menéndez
- Department of Ecology, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Julia M Kreiner
- Department of Botany, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Longjiang Fan
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ana L Caicedo
- Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Maughan
- Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | | | - Jagoda Mika
- Bayer AG, Weed Control Research, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Aldo Merotto
- Department of Crop Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
| | - Nithya K Subramanian
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | | | - Luan Cutti
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | | | - Bikram S Gill
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
| | - Robert Cicchillo
- Crop Protection Discovery and Development, Corteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Roger Gast
- Crop Protection Discovery and Development, Corteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Neeta Soni
- Crop Protection Discovery and Development, Corteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Terry R Wright
- Genome Center of Excellence, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, USA
| | | | - Gregory May
- Genome Center of Excellence, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, USA
| | - Jenna M Malone
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia
| | - Deepmala Sehgal
- Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Syngenta Ltd, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
| | - Shiv Shankhar Kaundun
- Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Syngenta Ltd, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
| | - Richard P Dale
- Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Syngenta Ltd, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
| | - Barend Juan Vorster
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Bodo Peters
- Bayer AG, Weed Control Research, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Patrick J Tranel
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Roland Beffa
- Senior Scientist Consultant, Herbicide Resistance Action Committee / CropLife International, Liederbach, Germany
| | | | - Mithila Jugulam
- Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
| | - Kevin Fengler
- Genome Center of Excellence, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, USA
| | - Victor Llaca
- Genome Center of Excellence, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, USA
| | - Eric L Patterson
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Todd A Gaines
- Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, 1177 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen K, Yang H, Wu D, Peng Y, Lian L, Bai L, Wang L. Weed biology and management in the multi-omics era: Progress and perspectives. PLANT COMMUNICATIONS 2024; 5:100816. [PMID: 38219012 PMCID: PMC11009161 DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
Weeds pose a significant threat to crop production, resulting in substantial yield reduction. In addition, they possess robust weedy traits that enable them to survive in extreme environments and evade human control. In recent years, the application of multi-omics biotechnologies has helped to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying these weedy traits. In this review, we systematically describe diverse applications of multi-omics platforms for characterizing key aspects of weed biology, including the origins of weed species, weed classification, and the underlying genetic and molecular bases of important weedy traits such as crop-weed interactions, adaptability to different environments, photoperiodic flowering responses, and herbicide resistance. In addition, we discuss limitations to the application of multi-omics techniques in weed science, particularly compared with their extensive use in model plants and crops. In this regard, we provide a forward-looking perspective on the future application of multi-omics technologies to weed science research. These powerful tools hold great promise for comprehensively and efficiently unraveling the intricate molecular genetic mechanisms that underlie weedy traits. The resulting advances will facilitate the development of sustainable and highly effective weed management strategies, promoting greener practices in agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Chen
- Key Laboratory of Indica Rice Genetics and Breeding in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hunan Rice Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; Longping Branch, College of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha 410125, China; Hunan Weed Science Key Laboratory, Hunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
| | - Haona Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; Hunan Weed Science Key Laboratory, Hunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
| | - Di Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
| | - Yajun Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; Hunan Weed Science Key Laboratory, Hunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
| | - Lei Lian
- Qingdao Kingagroot Compounds Co. Ltd, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Lianyang Bai
- Key Laboratory of Indica Rice Genetics and Breeding in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hunan Rice Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; Longping Branch, College of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha 410125, China; Huangpu Research Institute of Longping Agricultural Science and Technology, Guangzhou 510715, China; Hunan Weed Science Key Laboratory, Hunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
| | - Lifeng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Indica Rice Genetics and Breeding in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hunan Rice Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; Longping Branch, College of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha 410125, China; Huangpu Research Institute of Longping Agricultural Science and Technology, Guangzhou 510715, China; Hunan Weed Science Key Laboratory, Hunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
| |
Collapse
|