Civilian spinal cord injuries due to terror explosions

Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Predicting neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a complex task considering the heterogeneous nature of injury and the inconsistency of individual studies. This study aims to summarize the current evidence on neurological recovery following TSCI by use of a meta-analytical approach, and to identify injury, treatment, and study variables with prognostic significance.

METHODS

A literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed, and studies reporting follow-up changes in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) or Frankel or ASIA motor score (AMS) scales were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients with at least 1 grade of AIS/Frankel improvement, and point changes in AMS were calculated using random pooled effect analysis. The potential effect of severity, level and mechanism of injury, type of treatment, time and country of study, and follow-up duration were evaluated using meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 114 studies were included, reporting AIS/Frankel changes in 19,913 patients and AMS changes in 6920 patients. Overall, the quality of evidence was poor. The AIS/Frankel conversion rate was 19.3% (95% CI 16.2-22.6) for patients with grade A, 73.8% (95% CI 69.0-78.4) for those with grade B, 87.3% (95% CI 77.9-94.8) for those with grade C, and 46.5% (95% CI 38.2-54.9) for those with grade D. Neurological recovery was significantly different between all grades of SCI severity in the following order: C > B > D > A. Level of injury was a significant predictor of recovery; recovery rates followed this pattern: lumbar > cervical and thoracolumbar > thoracic. Thoracic SCI and penetrating SCI were significantly more likely to result in complete injury. Penetrating TSCI had a significantly lower recovery rate compared to blunt injury (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.92; p = 0.006). Recovery rate was positively correlated with longer follow-up duration (p = 0.001). Studies with follow-up durations of approximately 6 months or less reported significantly lower recovery rates for incomplete SCI compared to studies with long-term (3-5 years) follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' meta-analysis provides an overall quantitative description of neurological outcomes associated with TSCI. Moreover, they demonstrated how neurological recovery after TSCI is significantly dependent on injury factors (i.e., severity, level, and mechanism of injury), but is not associated with type of treatment or country of origin. Based on these results, a minimum follow-up of 12 months is recommended for TSCI studies that include patients with neurologically incomplete injury.

Surgical management of penetrating spinal cord injury primarily due to shrapnel and its effect on neurological outcome: a literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to determine whether decompression of penetrating spinal cord injury (SCI) due to explosive shrapnel leads to greater neurological recovery than conservative management.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Defense Technical Information Center public site was conducted on May 2, 2016. Studies that described penetrating SCI with shrapnel as an etiology, included surgical and/or conservative management, and demonstrated admission and follow-up neurological status were eligible for inclusion in this study. Odds ratios were calculated for the overall effect of surgical treatment on neurological recovery. Funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS

Five case series (Level IV evidence) met the study criteria, and 2 of them had estimable odds ratios for use in the Forest plot analysis. Among the patients from all 5 studies, 65% were injured by shrapnel, 25% by high-velocity bullet, 8% by low-velocity bullet, and 2% by an unknown cause. A total of 288 patients were included in the overall odds ratio calculations. Patients were stratified by complete and incomplete SCI. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes between surgical and conservative management in the complete SCI cohort or the incomplete SCI cohort. Overall rates of improvement for complete SCI were 25% with surgery and 27% with conservative treatment (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.44–2.61, p = 0.88); for incomplete SCI, 70% with surgery and 81% with conservative treatment (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.68–4.05, p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates no clear benefit to surgical decompression of penetrating SCI due predominantly to shrapnel. There is a considerable need for nonrandomized prospective cohort studies examining decompression and stabilization surgery for secondary and tertiary blast injuries.

Rehabilitation impact indices and their independent predictors: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To (1) identify all available rehabilitation impact indices (RIIs) based on their mathematical formula, (2) assess the evidence for independent predictors of each RII and (3) propose a nomenclature system to harmonise the names of RIIs.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and references in primary articles.

STUDY SELECTION

First, we identified all available RII through preliminary literature review. Then, various names of the same formula were used to identify studies, limited to articles in English and up to 31 December 2011, including case-control and cohort studies, and controlled interventional trials where RIIs were outcome variable and matching or multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The five RIIs identified were (1) absolute functional gain (AFG)/absolute efficacy/total gain, (2) rehabilitation effectiveness (REs)/Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS)/relative functional gain (RFG), (3) rehabilitation efficiency (REy)/length of stay-efficiency (LOS-EFF)/efficiency, (4) relative functional efficiency (RFE)/MRFS efficiency and (5) revised MRFS (MRFS-R). REy/LOS-EFF/efficiency had the most number of supporting studies, followed by REs and AFG. Although evidence for different predictors of RIIs varied according to the RII and study population, there is good evidence that older age, lower prerehabilitation functional status and cognitive impairment are predictive of poorer AFG, REs and REy.

CONCLUSIONS

5 RIIs have been developed in the past two decades as composite rehabilitation outcome measures controlling premorbid and prerehabilitation functional status, rate of functional improvement, each with varying levels of evidence for its predictors. To address the issue of multiple names for the same RII, a new nomenclature system is proposed to harmonise the names based on common mathematical formula and a first-named basis.