Ibuprofen and/or paracetamol (acetaminophen) for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth, a Cochrane systematic review

Perioperative Pain Management in Patients Being Treated for Opioid Use Disorder: The Orthopaedic Surgeon's Role and Strategies for Comprehensive Care

Approximately 280,000 deaths in this country were attributed to opioid overdose between 1999 and 2021, increasing fivefold within this period. Orthopaedic surgeons have had a large contribution to this epidemic; they have been found to be the third highest prescribers of opioid medications. Multiple pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options for opioid use disorder (OUD) have been developed. The three most commonly used medications are methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. In part owing to the use of these medications, states such as Oregon have seen a 20% decrease in opioid abuse and a 30% decrease in fatal overdoses. Historically, orthopaedic surgeons receive minimal formal training on managing postoperative pain in patients with OUD. Patients with OUD may experience neuroplastic changes from long-term exposure to opioids, which, in turn, diminish the analgesic effect of opioid medications in the acute postoperative period. Patients become more sensitive to painful stimuli, ultimately leading to loss of opioid efficacy. Undertreating pain may contribute to unnecessary patient suffering and can lead to mistrust within the patient-physician relationship. Overtreating pain may have catastrophic consequences such as disruption of sobriety, respiratory compromise, and death. It is recommended to include a pain management specialist or service during the perioperative period, if possible. This article clarifies the orthopaedic surgeon's role in the perioperative care of this patient population by providing an overview of medications used to treat OUD, pain control strategies, psychosocial concerns, and legal considerations, with the goal of streamlining care to improve patient safety and outcomes.

Evaluating and comparing the effects of paracetamol and ibuprofen on wound healing, MMP-9, and TGF-β1 levels in patients following upper third molar tooth extraction

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol and ibuprofen are commonly prescribed pain relievers used in dental treatments, but their use can delay wound healing and lead to malunion and weaken the strength of newly formed bones. This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the wound healing (WH) and anti-inflammatory effects of paracetamol and ibuprofen on tooth extraction wounds in patients.

METHODS

This study involved a total of 20 patients who required removal of their fully erupted upper third molar under local anaesthesia at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University. The study subjects were divided into two groups of 10 patients each who were prescribed 400 mg of ibuprofen or 500 mg of paracetamol for seven days. Subsequently, WH was evaluated and the resulting proportions were compared using Landry Turnbull and Howley Index (LTHI) scores. Salivary matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1) concentrations were used as proinflammatory indicators. Accordingly, the WH values and the resulting proportions were compared using Fisher's exact test with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% (P < 0.05). The concentrations of MMP-9 and TGF-β1 were measured using ELISA and compared using the Mann‒Whitney U test at 95% CI (P < 0.05). The obtained statistical values were then analysed and interpreted accordingly.

RESULTS

LTHI values on days 3 and 7 after tooth extraction were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. Salivary MMP-9 levels were lower in the paracetamol-treated group than in the ibuprofen-treated group (P < 0.01) on day 3 only. The LTHI concentration was also negatively correlated (r = -0.433) with the MMP-9 concentration (P < 0.05) but was positively correlated (r = 0.369) with the salivary TGF-β1 concentration (P < 0.05). Interestingly, MMP-9 was negatively correlated with TGF-β1 in the ibuprofen treatment group (r2 = -0.351).

CONCLUSION

Ibuprofen can inhibit the inflammatory process and delay healing in the extraction socket. After discontinuation of medication, no differences were observed in the healing effects between the paracetamol and ibuprofen groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The clinical trial was retrospectively registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, Australia (Registry URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au ) (Registration number: ACTRN12624000595516 Date: 9/5/2024).

Efficacy and safety of parenteral and local application of tramadol in mandibular third molar extraction: a qualitative systematic review of current evidence

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative parenteral administration or submucosal infiltration of tramadol for perioperative pain control on the basis of pain intensity or analgesics consumption and perioperative outcomes in mandibular third molar surgery.

MATERIAL-METHODS

An electronic database search was conducted up to 10 November 2022 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessing the analgesic efficacy of parenteral use of tramadol implemented as an adjunct to local anesthesia or intraoperative sedation/general anesthesia, in surgical extraction of mandibular third molars. Modified Jadad scale and Cochrane bias tool were used for the qualitative appraisal.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs were selected for qualitative analysis. Nine studies involved intravenous, and 5 intramuscular administration of tramadol, while 5 evaluated submucosal infiltration with tramadol. Intravenous or intramuscular tramadol provided a weaker analgesic effect compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), while intravenous tramadol induced an enhanced analgesic effect than oral tramadol. Parenteral administration of tramadol improved the quality of postoperative analgesia versus placebo. No notable adverse effects were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Parenteral or submucosal infiltration of tramadol constitutes an effective and safe alternative analgesic approach in surgical extraction of mandibular third molars, yet the nociceptive effect of this analgesic modality could not supersede that of NSAIDs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO No CRD42021227574.

Efficacy of auriculotherapy in the control of pain, edema, and trismus following surgical extraction of the lower third molars: a split-mouth, randomized, placebo-controlled, and triple-blind study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this split-mouth, randomized, placebo-controlled, and triple-blind study was to evaluate whether auriculotherapy had any effect on the post-operative course after the extraction of third molars in terms of the control of pain, edema, and trismus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 42 patients (84 teeth) who had undergone a surgical extraction of the lower third molars. In each patient, the two extractions were randomly assigned to two study groups. In the therapy group, the patients underwent auriculotherapy with vaccaria seeds applied with patches in 6 ear points. In the control group, the patches were applied, without seeds, to the same ear points. After the extraction, the patients were asked to stimulate the ear points three times a day and whenever they felt pain. The patients were asked to keep a diary in which they assessed their pain by means of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for 8 days. Edema and trismus were assessed 1, 2, 3, and 8 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The differences between the two groups were statistically significant at the 12-h control (auriculotherapy group (AG) VAS 5.5 [IQR 4.25-6.75], placebo group (PG) VAS 6 [IQR 5-8], p = 0.040), after 24 h (AG VAS 5 [IQR 4-6], PG VAS 6 [IQR 4.25-7], p = 0.024), after 2 days (AG VAS 4 [IQR 3-5], PG VAS 4.5 [IQR 4-6], p = 0.044), and after 3 days (AG VAS 3 [IQR 0-5], PG VAS 4 [IQR 3-5], p = 0.024). Throughout the observation period, the AG took a significantly lower number of painkillers than the PG (AG 6 [IQR 4.25-7]; PG 8 [IQR 8-9], p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the levels of edema and trismus between the two groups throughout the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the results of the present study, auriculotherapy can be considered as a cost-effective adjuvant pain reliever treatment in patients undergoing an extraction of the lower third molars.

Comparing the efficacy of intravenous morphine versus ibuprofen or the combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in patients with closed limb fractures: a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of intravenous ibuprofen or intravenous ibuprofen plus acetaminophen compared to intravenous morphine in patients with closed extremity fractures.

METHODS

A triple-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary trauma center in Iran. Adult patients between 15 and 60 years old with closed, isolated limb fractures and a pain intensity of at least 6/10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) were eligible. Patients with specific conditions or contraindications were not included. Participants were randomly assigned to receive intravenous ibuprofen, intravenous ibuprofen plus acetaminophen, or intravenous morphine. Pain scores were assessed using the visual analog scale at baseline and 5, 15, 30, and 60 min after drug administration. The primary outcome measure was the pain score reduction after one hour.

RESULTS

Out of 388 trauma patients screened, 158 were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in age or sex distribution among the three groups. The pain scores decreased significantly in all groups after 5 min, with the morphine group showing the lowest pain score at 15 min. The maximum effect of ibuprofen was observed after 30 min, while the ibuprofen-acetaminophen combination maintained its effect after 60 min. One hour after injection, pain score reduction in the ibuprofen-acetaminophen group was significantly more than in the other two groups, and pain score reduction in the ibuprofen group was significantly more than in the morphine group.

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that ibuprofen and its combination with acetaminophen have similar or better analgesic effects compared to morphine in patients with closed extremity fractures. Although morphine initially provided the greatest pain relief, its effect diminished over time. In contrast, ibuprofen and the ibuprofen-acetaminophen combination maintained their analgesic effects for a longer duration. The combination therapy demonstrated the most sustained pain reduction. The study highlights the potential of non-opioid analgesics in fracture pain management and emphasizes the importance of initiation of these medications as first line analgesic for patients with fractures. These findings support the growing trend of exploring non-opioid analgesics in pain management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05630222 (Tue, Nov 29, 2022). The manuscript adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

Dentists' perception of third molar surgery in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A cross sectional pilot study

Background/purpose

Concerns about the indications for the surgical removal of third molars have not yet reached a decisive agreement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the perception and practice of Saudi' dentists when encountering third molars clinical situations including diagnosis, treatment, and postsurgical care.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted and approved by the ethics research committee at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz (PSAU). The survey comprised of four sets of questions with multiple-choice answers including the participants' details and type of practice (private or government), clinical awareness and attitude regarding lower third molars surgery, and the confidence level of dentists when performing third molars extraction. The survey was published online with a timeframe of three months to respond.

Results

196 participants responded to the designated survey (55 dental interns and 141 general dental practitioners (GPs)). Most responses (80.1%) were from Riyadh province (central region). There was a significant difference between GPs and interns in terms of impacted third molars with associated cystic lesions, bony impactions, and diffuse pain (P < 0.05). Male dentists tend to prescribe antibiotics more than female dentists (P = 0.001) and GPs more than interns (P = 0.027). The results also indicated that male dentists were more confident than females when performing third molar extraction. Generally, female dentists preferred to have further training on such surgery (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Continuing professional development programs both during dental internship and general practice are recommended to improve the required skills of third molar extraction.

Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption in Septorhinoplasty After Administration of Single-Dose Preemptive Paracetamol and Ibuprofen: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction  Septorhinoplasty operates on the nose's bone and cartilage and is ensued by severe postoperative pain. Objective  The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of preoperative administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol and ibuprofen on postoperative pain scores in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. Methods  A total of 150 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty were randomly assigned into 3 groups with 50 patients in each group. The control group (group A) was administered 100 ml saline solution; the paracetamol group (group B) was administered 1,000 mg of IV paracetamol in 100 ml of saline solution; and the ibuprofen group (group C) was administered 800 mg of IV ibuprofen in 100 ml of saline solution before surgery. Opioid analgesics were employed to achieve postoperative analgesia. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Postoperative opioid consumption and adverse effects were also recorded for each patient. Results  In comparison with group A, the score in the VAS of groups B and C was statistically lower in all the time intervals ( p  < 0.05). In the 1 st and 6 th hours postoperatively, group C's score in the VAS in was lower than that of group B ( p  < 0.05). In the control group, total opioid consumption was highest in all time intervals ( p  < 0.05). In group C, total opioid consumption was significantly lower than in group B in the 0 to 6 and 6 to 12 hours intervals. ( p  < 0.05). Conclusion  The single-dose preemptive administration of ibuprofen has a more profound postoperative analgesic effect than paracetamol in the first 6 hours after septorhinoplasty. After the first 6 hours postsurgery, there is no difference between ibuprofen and paracetamol in terms of analgesic effect.

Analgesic benefit of metamizole and ibuprofen vs. either medication alone: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain relief remains a key problem after surgery. Multimodal pain therapy has proven beneficial in alleviating pain to a certain extent. However, when combining non-opioids, the focus has been on NSAIDs and paracetamol, but effects of combined use are only moderate. Metamizole could be a potent adjunct, due to its preclusion in several countries, data on its combined use are sparse, despite its common use in many countries. The aim of this study was to examine whether the combination of metamizole and ibuprofen is superior in relieving postoperative pain to either drug alone.

METHODS

For this randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 35 patients undergoing bilateral lower third molar extraction were randomized. Each patient received three applications of 1000mg metamizole + 400mg ibuprofen for surgery on one side and either 1000mg metamizole + placebo or 400mg ibuprofen + placebo on the other side. Pain ratings, rescue-medication (tramadol), and sleep were assessed for 18 hours.

RESULTS

The combined treatment of metamizole and ibuprofen showed lower mean pain scores over 12 hours than ibuprofen (2.4±1.3 vs 3.8±1.6; P=0.005)). Further, combined treatment showed lower mean pain scores over 6 hours than ibuprofen (2.0±1.2 vs. 3.1±1.6; P=0.022) or metamizole alone (2.0±1.2 vs. 3.3±1.7; P=0.015). Consumption of rescue medication was lowest in the combination-group (25% vs. 46%-metamizole; 50%-ibuprofen). The trial was stopped prematurely as the COVID-pandemic halted elective surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use enables superior pain control compared to ibuprofen after molar extraction and tends to be superior to metamizole alone. The premature study-termination may overestimate this effect.

The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study (OARS)-a comparison of opioid vs. non-opioid combination analgesics for management of post-surgical pain: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Everyday people die unnecessarily from opioid overdose-related addiction. Dentists are among the leading prescribers of opioid analgesics. Opioid-seeking behaviors have been linked to receipt of initial opioid prescriptions following the common dental procedure of third molar extraction. With each opioid prescription, a patient's risk for opioid misuse or abuse increases. With an estimated 56 million tablets of 5 mg hydrocodone annually prescribed after third molar extractions in the USA, 3.5 million young adults may be unnecessarily exposed to opioids by dentists who are inadvertently increasing their patient's risk for addiction.

METHODS

A double-blind, stratified randomized, multi-center clinical trial has been designed to evaluate whether a combination of over-the-counter non-opioid-containing analgesics is not inferior to the most prescribed opioid analgesic. The impacted 3rd molar extraction model is being used due to the predictable severity of the post-operative pain and generalizability of results. Within each site/clinic and gender type (male/female), patients are randomized to receive either OPIOID (hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/300 mg) or NON-OPIOID (ibuprofen/acetaminophen 400/500 mg). Outcome data include pain levels, adverse events, overall patient satisfaction, ability to sleep, and ability to perform daily functions. To develop clinical guidelines and a clinical decision-making tool, pain management, extraction difficulty, and the number of tablets taken are being collected, enabling an experimental decision-making tool to be developed.

DISCUSSION

The proposed methods address the shortcomings of other analgesic studies. Although prior studies have tested short-term effects of single doses of pain medications, patients and their dentists are interested in managing pain for the entire post-operative period, not just the first 12 h. After surgery, patients expect to be able to perform normal daily functions without feeling nauseous or dizzy and they desire a restful sleep at night. Parents of young people are concerned with the risks of opioid use and misuse, related either to treatments received or to subsequent use of leftover pills. Upon successful completion of this clinical trial, dentists, patients, and their families will be better able to make informed decisions regarding post-operative pain management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04452344 . Registered on June 20, 2020.

NSAIDs and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been discouraged for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, fearing that they could increase the risk of infection or the severity of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

Original studies providing information on exposure to NSAIDs and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes were retrieved and were included in a descriptive analysis and a meta-analysis with Cochrane Revue Manager (REVMAN 5.4), using inverse variance odds ratio (OR) with random- or fixed-effects models.

Results

Of 92,853 papers mentioning COVID-19, 266 mentioned NSAIDs and 61 mentioned ibuprofen; 19 papers had analysable data. Three papers described NSAID exposure and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, five papers described the risk of hospital admission in positive patients, 10 papers described death, and six papers described severe composite outcomes. Five papers studied exposure to ibuprofen and death. Using random-effects models, there was no excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 positivity (OR 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–1.05). In SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, exposure to NSAIDs was not associated with excess risk of hospital admission (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80–1.17), death (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80–0.98), or severe outcomes (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.90–1.44). With ibuprofen, there was no increased risk of death (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78–1.13). Using a fixed-effect model did not modify the results, nor did the sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

The theoretical risks of NSAIDs or ibuprofen in SARS-CoV-2 infection are not confirmed by observational data.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01089-5.

Postoperative oral drug regimen to control the inflammatory complications in mandibular third molar surgery: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This network meta-analysis aims to rank the best postoperative drug regimen to control inflammatory complications related to mandibular third molar surgery.

INTRODUCTION

Many studies of oral drugs have been proposed to control postoperative inflammatory complications after third molar surgeries with inconclusive results. A systematic review with network meta-analysis in this field may clarify the best therapeutic protocol for practice in dentistry.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider randomized clinical trials that included healthy adult patients or those who had treated and controlled systemic diseases; asymptomatic patients who were free of acute infection or inflammation at the surgical site immediately before third molar surgery; and patients submitted to surgical removal of one lower third molar at a time in which they have received oral anti-inflammatory and/or analgesics in the postoperative moment. The outcomes are pain, edema, trismus, and adverse effects.

METHODS

Sources of published studies, unpublished studies, and gray literature will be searched without time or language restrictions. Titles and abstracts of all search results will be screened by two independent reviewers. The full text of potentially relevant studies will be assessed. Methodological quality of the included studies will be performed using the JBI checklist for experimental studies. Data related to specific details about the population, study methods, interventions, and outcomes will be extracted from the included studies. The findings will be presented in a narrative form and polled in network meta-analysis, when possible.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020196692.

Effectiveness of pre-operative oral corticosteroids in reducing pain, trismus and oedema following lower third molar extractions: a systematic review

Aim To determine if a single pre-operative dose of oral corticosteroids would be effective in reducing pain, trismus and oedema following lower third molar surgical extraction. Secondary outcomes of interest were post-operative complications such as infections.Methods Searching was conducted using Embase, Medline, DOSS, CINAHL and CENTRAL for randomised controlled trials. Four studies which compared pre-operative oral corticosteroids to placebo before lower third molar surgical extractions were eligible for inclusion.Results All studies were judged to be at unclear risk of bias. All studies tested the efficacy of 8 mg dexamethasone 60-90 minutes before surgical extractions. While three studies showed improvement in pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in the dexamethasone groups, two were not statistically significant. One study found no improvement in pain scores on VAS. One study found no difference in either trismus or oedema. One study reported one occurrence of post-operative alveolar infection in the dexamethasone group and one occurrence of alveolar osteitis in the placebo group.Conclusion While there seems to be an improvement in pain scores on VAS, these results are not clinically significant. Post-operative analgesia plays a more important role clinically.

The efficacy of etodolac and ibuprofen, regarding gender, on pain, edema and trismus after impacted lower third molar surgery: A randomized prospective clinical split-mouth study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to conduct a randomized prospective study about the efficacy of etodolac and ibuprofen on trismus, pain and edema regarding gender of patients submitted to impacted lower third molar teeth extraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty patients aging between 16 and 35 year-old were submitted to the exodontia of impacted lower third molars. During the postoperative period, patients received nine ibuprofen (600 mg) or etodolac (300 mg) pills via oral administration immediately after surgery and repeated doses every eight hours during three days. Patients were evaluated regarding pain, trismus and edema.

RESULTS

Sixteen men and fourteen women participated of the study. No statistical difference was established regarding gender according to the evaluated parameters. However, etodolac use showed better results regarding pain, trismus and edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain, edema and trismus after impacted third molars extraction were not influenced by gender.

Assessing the Effectiveness of Combined Analgesics for Bilateral Ramus Osteotomies

Pain management is important for alleviating patients' suffering and early recovery. Although analgesic combinations are known to be effective, a comparison of the effectiveness of different combinations has never been performed specifically for ramus osteotomy procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this observational retrospective cohort study was to identify an effective combination for pain management throughout the intraoperative and immediate postoperative period for patients undergoing bilateral ramus osteotomy procedures. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who had undergone bilateral mandibular ramus osteotomies over a 2-year period. The analyzed predictor variables included patient gender, age, body weight, operation, anesthetic method, duration of operation, intraoperative use of fentanyl, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intravenous acetaminophen administered in the operating room at the end of the surgery. The outcome variable was the necessity for additional rescue analgesics (yes/no) in the recovery room. Bivariate statistics and multivariate analysis were computed with a p-value of <0.05. The study sample was comprised of 78 patients requiring bilateral mandibular ramus osteotomies. From the multivariate analysis, the combination of NSAIDs-acetaminophen-fentanyl was an independent factor for no additional rescue analgesics during the first 1 hour after bilateral ramus osteotomies, indicating that the combination is significantly effective for bilateral ramus osteotomies compared with the other combinations. Considering that this study consisted of a small sample size, the results of this study suggest that some of the combinations, particularly NSAIDs-acetaminophen-fentanyl, are more effective than NSAIDs alone for postoperative pain control immediately following bilateral ramus osteotomy procedures.

Pharmacological management of pain after periodontal surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the pharmacological effect of different drugs on pain relief after periodontal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five databases were searched up to September 2019. The eligible studies comprised randomized clinical trials, involving only adult individuals that received any periodontal surgery and presenting two distinct groups of therapeutic regimens to control postoperative pain. Placebo groups could be included. The risk of bias was assessed with the RoB 2 Cochrane tool and the GRADE system. Meta-analyses were performed using different follow-up and drug comparisons.

RESULTS

Overall, 2398 studies were identified, of which 35 were included. Low risk of bias was determined for the majority of the studies. The meta-analyses showed that the comparison of dexamethasone or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) versus placebo favored the use of both interventions in a follow-up of 1 to 8 h for open flap procedures (OFP). However, no statistical difference was found for the comparison between NSAID and dexamethasone for OFP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients may benefit from several pharmacological schemes for pain relief after periodontal surgeries. However, due to the high heterogeneity among studies, no fixed pharmacological protocol could be proposed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There is not enough evidence to recommend one therapeutic scheme. However, untreated pain is harmful to the patients and it is not advisable.

Local Ketamine Improves Postoperative Analgesia After Third Molar Surgery

PURPOSE

Evidence exists to support the peripheral analgesic effect of local administration of ketamine (LAK) after third molar surgery. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of LAK in the control of pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study design was a systematic review with a meta-analysis of the effect of LAK after third molar surgery. A search in electronic databases was performed from September 2017 to February 2019. Only prospective clinical trials and randomized controlled trials that had evaluated LAK after third molar surgery were included. The meta-analysis was based on the random effects model. The outcome measures evaluated were postoperative acute pain, swelling, and trismus. The estimated overall effect size was a standardized mean difference (SMD).

RESULTS

A total of 110 study subjects (men and women aged 18 to 50 years) were evaluated for the analgesic effect. The SMD showed a significant analgesic effect (postoperative pain control) favoring LAK (SMD, -1.7403; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.45 to -1.04). Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory effect of LAK included 105 study subjects and resulted in significantly less swelling in the first postoperative day (SMD, -0.6169; 95% CI, -1.1654 to -0.0683). However, LAK did not reduce the incidence of trismus after third molar surgery (SMD, -0.7241; 95% CI, -2.2765 to 0.8284).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LAK can reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative pain after third molar surgery and had an anti-inflammatory effect, although only in the first postoperative day. However, LAK had no effect on trismus reduction after third molar surgery.

Essential pharmacologic options for acute pain management in the emergency setting

Pain is the root cause for the overwhelming majority of emergency department (ED) visits worldwide. However, pain is often undertreated due to inappropriate analgesic dosing and ineffective utilization of available analgesics. It is essential for emergency providers to understand the analgesic armamentarium at their disposal and how it can be used safely and effectively to treat pain of every proportion within the emergency setting. A 'balanced analgesia' regimen may be used to treat pain while reducing the overall pharmacologic side effect profile of the combined analgesics. Channels-Enzymes-Receptors Targeted Analgesia (CERTA) is a multimodal analgesic strategy incorporating balanced analgesia by shifting from a system-based to a mechanistic-based approach to pain management that targets the physiologic pathways involved in pain signaling transmission. Targeting individual pain pathways allows for a variety of reduced-dose pharmacologic options - both opioid and non-opioid - to be used in a stepwise progression of analgesic strength as pain advances up the severity scale. By developing a familiarity with the various analgesic options at their disposal, emergency providers may formulate safe, effective, balanced analgesic combinations unique to each emergency pain presentation.

The comparison of single-dose preemptive intravenous ibuprofen and paracetamol on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption after open septorhinoplasty: a randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

Septorhinoplasty is performed in combination with septoplasty and rhinoplasty operations and is characterized by severe postoperative pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate preemptive effects of intravenous (IV) ibuprofen and IV paracetamol on opioid consumption and pain scores after open septorhinoplasty.

METHODS

The study included 150 patients who had undergone elective open septorhinoplasty. Patients were randomly assigned into three groups; Group Control (Group C, n = 50) received 100 ml saline solution, Group Paracetamol (Group P, n = 50) received 1000 mg IV paracetamol in 100 ml solution, and Group Ibuprofen (Group I, n = 50) received 800 mg IV ibuprofen in 100 ml saline before surgery. Postoperative analgesia was achieved by opioid administration via patient-controlled analgesia. Visual analog scores (VASs), postoperative opioid consumption, additional analgesic requirements, and side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with Group C, VASs in Group P and Group I were statistically lower at all time points (p < 0.05). VAS was lower in Group I than in Group P at postoperative, 1st and 6th hours (p < 0.05). Opioid consumption in Group C was highest in all groups at all time periods (p < 0.05). At the 0-6 and 6-12 time intervals, total opioid consumption was significantly lower in Group I compared to Group P (p < 0.05). Total opioid consumption was highest in Group C (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has indicated that ibuprofen has more analgesic effect than paracetamol during first 12 h, but there is a non-inferiority between ibuprofen and paracetamol after first 12 h.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Third Molar Impaction Surgery: INNOVATE Study

The analgesic efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in third molar extraction was evaluated in this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects undergoing bilateral third molar extraction. Subjects were randomized 2 : 1 to infiltration with LB (133 mg/10 mL) or placebo, and received opioid rescue medication as needed. Primary efficacy measure was cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) pain severity scores through 48 hours (AUC of NRS_0-48) postsurgery. Other measures included AUC of NRS_0-24, AUC of NRS_0-72, and AUC of NRS_0-96, and incidence of adverse events. There were 150 subjects in the primary efficacy population (n = 99 LB, n = 51 placebo) and 89 in the per-protocol population (n = 59 LB, n = 30 placebo). Least-squares mean for AUC of NRS_0-48 was 172.3 LB versus 194.7 placebo (P = .227) in the primary efficacy population and 120.8 LB versus 183.3 placebo (P = .023) in the per-protocol population. At all time points, between-group differences in AUC of NRS scores were significant in the per-protocol population (LB lower than placebo, P < .05) but not in the primary efficacy population. The adverse event profile was similar between groups. LB produced significantly lower cumulative pain scores versus placebo at all time points in the per-protocol analysis but not in the primary efficacy analysis because of protocol violations. This study indicates significant improvement in pain scores in the third molar model, but because of extensive protocol violations additional studies are warranted to demonstrate effectiveness.

Clinical update on benefit versus risks of oral paracetamol alone or with codeine: still a good option?

BACKGROUND

After decades of worldwide use of paracetamol/acetaminophen as a popular and apparently safe prescription and over-the-counter medicine, the future role of this poorly understood analgesic has been seriously questioned by recent concerns about prenatal, cardiovascular (CV) and hepatic safety, and also about its analgesic efficacy. At the same time the usefulness of codeine in combination products has come under debate.

METHODS

Based on a PubMed database literature search on the terms efficacy, safety, paracetamol, acetaminophen, codeine and their combinations up to and including June 2016, this clinical update reviews the current evidence of the benefit and risks of oral paracetamol alone and with codeine for mild-to-moderate pain in adults, and compares the respective efficacy and safety profiles with those of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

RESULTS

Whereas there is a clear strong association of NSAID use and gastrointestinal (GI) and CV morbidity and mortality, evidence for paracetamol with and without codeine supports the recommended use even in most vulnerable individuals, such as the elderly, pregnant women, alcoholics, and compromised GI and CV patients. The controversies and widespread misconceptions about the complex hepatic metabolism and potential hepatotoxicity have been corrected by recent reviews, and paracetamol remains the first-line nonopioid analgesic in patients with liver diseases if notes of caution are applied.

CONCLUSION

Due to its safety and tolerability profile paracetamol remained a first-line treatment in many international guidelines. Alone and with codeine it is a safe and effective option in adults, whilst NSAIDs are obviously less safe as alternatives, given the risk of potentially fatal GI and CV adverse effects.

Experimental protocol of dental procedures In patients with hereditary angioedema: the role of anxiety and the use of nitrogen oxide

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease, little known to the medical and dental community, but with a growing rate of hospitalization over the years. HAE is due to a deficit/dysfunction of C1 esterase inhibitor which leads to an increase in vascular permeability and the appearance of edemas widespread in all body areas. The airways are the most affected and laryngeal swelling, which can occur, it is dangerous for the patient's life, is also a sensitive spot in our daily practice, therefore, it is also important to be aware of all the signs of this disease. Episodes of HAE have no obvious cause, but it can be triggered by anxiety, invasive procedures and trauma. So this disease is a major problem in oral and maxillofacial surgery, ENT, endoscopy, emergency medicine and anesthesia because even simple procedures can cause laryngeal edema. The recommendations on the management of HAE include long- and short-term prophylaxis and treatment for acute attacks, however, the importance of anxiety control during the operating phases is undervalued. The present work suggests an experimental protocol for the surgery management of HAE patients with the help of nitrous oxide, with a brief review of the literature on this topic.

Reporting of Postoperative Pain Management Protocols in Randomized Clinical Trials of Mandibular Fracture Repair: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

The control of pain associated with mandibular fractures is an important treatment outcome that affects function, adherence to treatment regimens, and patient comfort and satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the pain management protocols reported in studies of mandibular fractures, including the reporting of quality-of-life measures.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published from 1970 to July 2014. We followed PRISMA reporting standards to assess study eligibility and extract data. Studies of patients older than 16 years who underwent operative mandibular fracture management were included. The primary data collected included the type of analgesic prescribed, associated adverse effects of the analgesic, method of pain assessment, and use of quality-of-life measures. A pain attentiveness score was assigned to studies based on the comprehensiveness of the information reported. Several variables were reviewed to determine the factors that predict reporting of pain-related data. Assessments of risk for bias were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's domain-based evaluation method.

FINDINGS

The initial search identified 111 articles, of which 38 met inclusion criteria. Among the 38 reviewed articles, there were 38 trials and 1808 unique patients represented. Among the 38 articles, the procedures reported included maxillomandibular fixation only in 6 (16%), open reduction with internal fixation only in 20 (53%), and both in 12 (32%). Specific analgesics prescribed were reported in only 5 of the 38 studies (13%), and 3 of these used a combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen (paracetamol). Thirteen studies (34%) reported pain assessments and 5 (13%) included quality-of-life measures. Geographic region was the only variable that predicted pain attentiveness, with studies from Europe (3 of 11 studies [27%]) and Asia (6 of 16 studies [38%]) most likely to have a high pain attentiveness score. A low rating was least common in the United States (2 of 5 studies [40%]) (P = .047, Fisher exact test). Most of the studies had unclear (n = 27) or high (n = 6) risks for bias in the key domains assessed.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pain management is a neglected outcome in randomized clinical trials of mandibular trauma; most studies did not describe the specific analgesics used. Many randomized clinical trials (13 [34%]) assessed pain levels among patients without providing information about the agents prescribed. The incorporation of validated pain measures and quality-of-life scores in future studies of mandibular trauma would focus attention on this key outcome measure.

The Efficacy and Clinical Safety of Various Analgesic Combinations for Post-Operative Pain after Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To run a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials aiming to answer the clinical question "which analgesic combination and dosage is potentially the most effective and safe for acute post-operative pain control after third molar surgery?".

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of computer databases and journals was performed. The search and the evaluations of articles were performed by 2 independent reviewers in 3 rounds. Randomized clinical trials related to analgesic combinations for acute post-operative pain control after lower third molar surgery that matched the selection criteria were evaluated to enter in the final review.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 3521 subjects, with 10 groups (17 dosages) of analgesic combinations were included in the final review. The analgesic efficacy were presented by the objective pain measurements including sum of pain intensity at 6 hours (SPID6) and total pain relief at 6 hours (TOTPAR6). The SPID6 scores and TOTPAR6 scores of the reported analgesic combinations were ranged from 1.46 to 6.44 and 3.24 - 10.3, respectively. Ibuprofen 400mg with oxycodone HCL 5mg had superior efficacy (SPID6: 6.44, TOTPAR6: 9.31). Nausea was the most common adverse effect, with prevalence ranging from 0-55%. Ibuprofen 200mg with caffeine 100mg or 200mg had a reasonable analgesic effect with fewer side effects.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis may help clinicians in their choices of prescribing an analgesic combination for acute post-operative pain control after lower third molar surgery. It was found in this systematic review Ibuprofen 400mg combined with oxycodone HCL 5mg has superior analgesic efficacy when compared to the other analgesic combinations included in this study.

Acetaminophen: old drug, new issues

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this review was to discuss new issues related to safety, labeling, dosing, and a better understanding of the analgesic effect of acetaminophen.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched. Additionally, the bibliography of all relevant articles and textbooks were manually searched. Two reviewers independently selected the relevant articles.

RESULTS

Concerns about acetaminophen overdose and related liver failure have led the US Food and Drug Administration to mandate new labeling on acetaminophen packaging. In addition, large-scale epidemiologic studies increasingly report evidence for second-generation adverse effects of acetaminophen. Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen is associated with neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders. Recent studies also suggest that acetaminophen is a hormone disrupter (ie, it interferes with sex and thyroid hormone function essential for normal brain development) and thus may not be considered a safe drug during pregnancy. Finally, emerging evidence suggests that although the predominant mechanism by which acetaminophen exerts its therapeutic effect is by inhibition of cyclooxygenase, multiple other mechanisms also contribute to its analgesic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that indiscriminate usage of this drug is not warranted. and its administration to a pregnant patient should be considered with great caution.