Biological agents: what they are, how they affect oral health and how they can modulate oral healthcare

Challenges and improvements in multi-layer mucosa-adhesive films for oral diseases treatment and prognosis

Due to the complexity of oral physiology and pathology, the treatment of oral diseases faces multiple and complex clinical requirements. Mucosa-adhesive films (MAFs) with a single layer have demonstrated considerable potential in delivering therapeutic bioactive ingredients directly to the site of oral diseases. However, their functions are often hindered by certain factors such as limited loading capacity, poor site specificity, and sensitivity to mechanical stimuli. To overcome these limitations, the development of multi-layer MAFs has become a focal point for recent research. This involves the improvement of construction methods for multi-layer MAFs to minimize potential health risks from residual solvents, and conducting comprehensive in vivo studies to evaluate their safety and therapeutic efficacy more accurately, thus paving the way for their commercialization. Additionally, the exploration of multi-layer MAFs as personalized drug delivery systems could further broaden their application prospect. Precisely, multi-layer MAFs compensate for the shortcomings of current therapeutic strategies for oral diseases to a great extent, indicating a promising future in the market.

Recent Advances in Apical Periodontitis Treatment: A Narrative Review

Apical periodontitis is an inflammatory response caused by pulp infection. It induces bone resorption in the apical and periapical regions of the tooth. The most conservative approach to treat this condition is nonsurgical endodontic treatment. However, clinical failure has been reported with this approach; thus, alternative procedures are required. This review highlights recent literature regarding advanced approaches for the treatment of apical periodontitis. Various therapies, including biological medications, antioxidants, specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators, and stem cell therapy, have been tested to increase the success rate of treatment for apical periodontitis. Some of these approaches remain in the in vivo phase of research, while others have just entered the translational research phase to validate clinical application. However, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that occur during development of the immunoinflammatory reaction in apical periodontitis remains unclear. The aim of this review was to summarize advanced approaches for the treatment of apical periodontitis. Further research can confirm the potential of these alternative nonsurgical endodontic treatment approaches.

A retrospective, single-center cohort study on complications after dental extractions in patients taking biologic agents

BACKGROUND

Although biologic agents represent a growing class of therapeutics, little is known about how these agents affect the provision of dental treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study analyzed patients undergoing dental extraction treated with biologic agents from 2017 through 2020. Complications within 30 days postextraction were recorded.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty-one patients were treated during 147 encounters. Fifteen patients experienced complications during 16 encounters. Notable or excessive pain was most common (14/16; 88%). Patients who experienced complications were treated with 7 biologic agents: dulaglutide, belimumab, adalimumab, aflibercept, tofacitinib, ranibizumab, and ixekizumab. Complication after extraction-specifically, pain-was elevated for patients receiving aflibercept and ranibizumab. When grouped by class, complications were more common with vascular endothelial growth factor antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of biologics on the provision of and recovery after dental treatment remains unknown. Pain was most commonly reported. Patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor antagonists experienced an elevated rate of complications.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study provides preliminary data on how patients taking biologic agents heal after dental extraction. It is limited by small sample sizes. Further work will build on this data to determine appropriate management of patients taking biologics in the dental setting.

Electrospun patch delivery of anti-TNFα F(ab) for the treatment of inflammatory oral mucosal disease

Chronic ulcerative oral mucosal inflammatory diseases, including oral lichen planus and recurrent aphthous stomatitis, are painful and highly prevalent, yet lack effective clinical management. In recent years, systemic biologic therapies, including monoclonal antibodies that block the activity of cytokines, have been increasingly used to treat a range of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. The ability to deliver similar therapeutic agents locally to the oral epithelium could radically alter treatment options for oral mucosal inflammatory diseases, where pro-inflammatory cytokines, in particular tumour-necrosis factor-α (TNFα), are major drivers of pathogenesis. To address this, an electrospun dual-layer mucoadhesive patch comprising medical-grade polymers was investigated for the delivery of F(ab) biologics to the oral mucosa. A fluorescent-labelled F(ab) was incorporated into mucoadhesive membranes using electrospinning with 97% v/v ethanol as a solvent. The F(ab) was detected within the fibres in aggregates when visualised by confocal microscopy. Biotinylated F(ab) was rapidly eluted from the patch (97 ± 5% released within 3 h) without loss of antigen-binding activity. Patches applied to oral epithelium models successfully delivered the F(ab), with fluorescent F(ab) observed within the tissue and 5.1 ± 1.5% cumulative transepithelial permeation reached after 9 h. Neutralising anti-TNFα F(ab) fragments were generated from whole IgG by papain cleavage, as confirmed by SDS-PAGE, then incorporated into patches. F(ab)-containing patches had TNFα neutralising activity, as shown by the suppression of TNFα-mediated CXCL8 release from oral keratinocytes cultured as monolayers. Patches were applied to lipopolysaccharide-stimulated immune-competent oral mucosal ulcer equivalents that contained primary macrophages. Anti-TNFα patch treatment led to reduced levels of active TNFα along with a reduction in the levels of disease-implicated T-cell chemokines (CCL3, CCL5, and CXCL10) to baseline concentrations. This is the first report of an effective device for the delivery of antibody-based biologics to the oral mucosa, enabling the future development of new therapeutic strategies to treat painful conditions.

Targeted cancer therapies: Oral health care implications

BACKGROUND

Targeted treatments have been incorporated into oncology protocols, often with more traditional therapies, and are not totally free of adverse reactions, some of which affect the orofacial region.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the US Food and Drug Administration Approved Drug Products database to identify reported adverse effects of targeted agents in the orofacial region as well as other implications in oral health care. Their principal focus was the relatively newer category of molecularly targeted drugs which are called small molecules (SMs).

RESULTS

The authors identified several categories of SMs and biological agents (for example, monoclonal antibodies) with adverse effects in the orofacial region. The oral and perioral regions are also fields for which there are therapeutic applications for targeted therapies, particularly to treat malignant neoplasms such as head and neck cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

SMs are the most rapidly growing group of targeted cancer treatments. Patients receiving SMs and other targeted antineoplastic agents may require oral medicine advice and special-care dentistry.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

In this narrative review, the authors focus mainly on the orofacial adverse effects of targeted cancer therapies and outline many of the agents that are in use so the dentally focused reader can familiarize themselves with these adverse effects and agents.

Oral lichenoid reactions may possibly be associated with abatacept: A case report and literature update

Oral lichenoid reactions (OLRs) comprise a group of conditions with a common clinical appearance and histopathologic pattern that may be induced by several conditions or medications. This report describes an OLR possibly induced by a biologic agent. A 69-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis presented with a chief complaint of oral pain. The patient retroactively reported of skin lesions as well. Clinically, she had mixed red-white mucosal lesions and ulcers suggestive of an OLR. This diagnosis was supported by histopathologic findings. Withholding the putative etiologic agent, abatacept, resulted in immediate alleviation of both oral and skin lesions. Abatacept and other biologics are thought to help treat inflammation and are becoming more commonly prescribed to treat rheumatoid arthritis. However, the clinicians should explore these medications as a causative factor for OLR.