An update on the causes, assessment and management of third division sensory trigeminal neuropathies

Does the addition of cone-beam CT to panoral imaging reduce inferior dental nerve injuries resulting from third molar surgery? A systematic review

Objective

This systematic review aims to examine whether cone-beam CT (CBCT) assessment influences the incidence of nerve injury following high-risk mandibular third molar (MTM) surgery.

Study Design

Randomised controlled trials comparing two and three-dimensional imaging for assessing high-risk MTMs were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and the Dentistry and Oral Science Source (DOSS) were systematically searched along with extensive grey literature searches, hand searching of web sites, and detailed citation searching up to 3 September 2022. Risk of bias was assessed against the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0). Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results

Two authors independently screened 402 abstracts prior to full text screening of 27 articles, which culminated in seven RCTs for inclusion. Two studies were assessed as high risk of bias overall. The other five raised some concerns largely due to unblinded patients and lack of prior trial registration. Just one study reported significantly less nerve injuries following CBCT. The remaining six articles found no significant difference.

Conclusion

The seven RCTs included in this systematic review offered moderate quality evidence that CBCT does not routinely translate to reduced incidence of nerve injury in MTM removal. A single study provided low quality evidence for a consequent change in the surgical approach. Low quality evidence from 3 studies suggested CBCT does not influence the duration of third molar surgery.

Retrospective evaluation of sensory neuropathies after extraction of mandibular third molars with confirmed "high-risk" features on cone beam computed topography scans

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury after extraction of mandibular third molars with confirmed "high-risk" features on cone beam computed topography scans and establish any risk factors that significantly increase the chances of sustaining an IAN injury.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a retrospective analysis of outcomes after surgical extraction of 500 mandibular third molars over a 5-year period. All teeth showed signs of contact with or compression of the IAN on cone beam computed topography scans.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of IAN injury was 6.6%, with permanent neuropathies accounting for 1.8% within this high-risk cohort. Statistically significant factors shown to increase the risk of nerve injury included increasing age (P = .002), compression of the nerve evident on cone beam computed topography scan (P = .005), and buccal or interradicular position of the nerve (P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate a low incidence of IAN injury, particularly given the high-risk nature of all teeth that were extracted. It highlights the benefits of cone beam computed topography scans in surgical planning. These data are an important contribution to the existing literature and valuable in the consent procedure for patients undergoing surgical removal of mandibular third molars in contact with the IAN.