A guide to treatment planning in complex older adults

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for oral care in older adults: a focus group study

BACKGROUND

An increase in the aging population underscores the need for oral healthcare practice guidelines. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) includes multidimensional evaluation and integrates oral health into overall healthcare. However, a framework for CGA in dental setting has not been clearly structured. This study aimed to identify the components of CGA essential for proper oral care in older adults based on the perspective of multidisciplinary experts.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted to provide insights into CGAs that are mentioned in treatment plan models for oral healthcare (Protocol registration number 10.17605/OSF.IO/EZRDV). The findings were used as basic information for focus group discussion among the multiple healthcare professions. The first focus group included 6 medical experts of 6 disciplines, and the second focus group included 6 dental experts. Focus group discussion aimed to provide a rationale for selecting CGA components and assessment tools that were essential. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize expert perspectives and build an agreement on the application of CGAs in dental practice.

RESULTS

The scoping review revealed four dental treatment planning models, including the OSCAR model, rational treatment model, the Seattle Care Pathway, and the risk of oral health deterioration (ROHD). These models suggested the key CGA components, including systemic conditions for any risks of comorbidities, oral health conditions, socioeconomic status, dependency, cognitive and mental health, communication, and life expectancy. Data from both focus groups consistently agreed that dentists should evaluate complex oral problems of older adults in multiple dimensions. In addition, they also emphasized the importance of swallowing problems, nutrition, and fall risk. Nonetheless, the selection of assessment tools such as The Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living, water swallow screening test, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Mini-Cog, Patient Health Questionnaire, and three key questions for fall risk assessment should depend on the purposes and team expertise. The development of dental treatment plans must be individualized based on evaluation results of CGA. The rationale for different treatment levels, including comprehensive, limited, urgency care and no treatment, was discussed. The focus groups emphasized that dependency level, social support and systemic factors were important for selecting a level of care.

CONCLUSIONS

CGA provides rationale for oral health problem analysis, treatment planning, and oral healthcare. The expert opinions underscore the importance of comprehensive and individualized care plans suggested in the oral treatment plan model. The multiple dimensions of CGAs include systemic and oral health, socioeconomic factors, dependency, cognitive and mental health, swallowing problem, nutrition, and fall risk. The selection of assessment tools should be optimized based on the purposes and team expertise. The multidisciplinary team has a crucial contribution in comprehensive evaluation of patient problems when formulating treatment plans for special-needed patients.

Safety and Satisfaction Analysis of Intravenous and Inhalational Conscious Sedation in a Geriatric Population Undergoing Oral Surgery

Aim: The objective of this research was to compare two methods of conscious sedation (midazolam vs. sevoflurane) used for performing oral surgical procedures in the older adult population by analyzing dental treatment-related anxiety levels, the quality of sedation, and potential hemodynamic changes during the interventions, as well as post-recovery symptoms and patient satisfaction levels. Methods: A total of 104 patients underwent oral surgery with intravenous (age: 84.00 ± 8.410; 17 men and 36 women) and inhalation conscious sedation (age: 82.73 ± 8.809; 18 men and 33 women). Anxiety levels were recorded using the Modified Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS). During the intervention, the heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, episodes of hypoxia (<90%SpO2), sedation duration, and Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) values were monitored. Upon completion of their treatment, all patients completed three questionnaires which evaluated their recall of the intervention, postoperative symptoms, and recommendation of the sedation method used. Results: Anxiety levels were slightly higher in the midazolam group (MDAS score: 9.60 ± 5.849; HARS score: 27.19 ± 6.802) compared to the sevoflurane group (MDAS score: 8.37 ± 5.063; HARS score: 24.92 ± 5.199), with no statistical significance (MDAS, p = 0.453/HARS, p = 0.065). No significant differences in the analyzed hemodynamic parameters were observed between the two groups. However, SAS values were significantly higher in the sevoflurane group (p = 0.006), while the sedation duration was longer in the midazolam group (p = 0.000). Postoperative symptoms, particularly gastrointestinal disturbances and dry mouth, were significantly more prevalent in the midazolam group, while there were no differences in neurological symptoms between the two groups. The majority of patients expressed a preference for either of these sedation methods. Conclusions: Sedation with agents such as midazolam and sevoflurane appears to be quite safe, given the absence of relevant hemodynamic changes. Midazolam has been shown to be effective for a longer duration, as well as to have a lower risk of developing greater digestive problems during the postoperative period. On the contrary, sevoflurane produced a greater sensation of dry mouth. Both sedative agents are perceived by the older adult population as satisfactory, recommending their use.

Implementation of a 4Ms approach in age-friendly oral health care at an Academic Specialty Care Dental Clinic

BACKGROUND

Implementing the Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) framework into dental care provides a significant opportunity to link oral health to healthy aging. This project aimed to implement the AFHS 4Ms (what matters, medications, mentation, and mobility) in the provision of oral health care. This article describes the planning, integration, training development, and outcome measurements supporting a 4Ms approach at an academic dental clinic.

METHODS

The Eastman Institute for Oral Health (EIOH) implemented screening instruments based on the 4Ms framework recommended for ambulatory care clinics by the Institute for Health Care Improvement (IHI). These ambulatory instruments were integrated into the workflows of a Specialty Care Clinic through the development of a plan-do-study-act cycle, utilization of available clinic resources, and creation of interdisciplinary collaborations.

RESULTS

This project demonstrated the feasibility of implementing an AFHS checklist and tracking forms in dental practice by integrating available resources and prioritizing the 4Ms elements. This effort necessitated interdisciplinary collaborations between dental, medical, and social service professionals. It also created a new age-friendly focused education and training curriculum for dental residents and faculty.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot project is the first to establish dental standards for AFHS implementation, adapting the 4Ms assessment and metrics to oral health. This AFHS underscores key oral health processes, including assessment, planning, and personalized oral health care, adapted to the unique needs of the older adult population, especially those with cognitive impairment.

Dental decision-making for persons with dementia: A systematic narrative review

Dental decision-making represents the establishment of a common understanding between the dental professional and the recipient of the intervention, which determines oral healthcare and dental treatment policies. Dental decision-making for persons with dementia can be challenging, and there have been no systematic reviews on this topic. Therefore, this systematic narrative review aimed to identify the current state of dental decision-making in persons with dementia. Literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases. Through the process of research selection, 7 articles with a high risk of bias were included in this study. This review clarified that there is limited information on the dental decision-making processes for persons with dementia. In conclusion, although this may be difficult due to different medical and socioeconomic conditions, the dilemma between the need to establish evidence for dental decision-making and medical ethics that prioritize a patient-centered position should be discussed globally in the future.

Prevention of oral diseases for the older person (Part 1)

Older adults often experience poorer levels of oral health than younger adults, especially if they have become dependent on a third party to support their daily oral care routine. However, the deterioration of oral health does not need to be a part of the ageing process. Most oral diseases are largely preventable with the daily removal of dental plaque that forms on teeth and dentures, using a fluoride toothpaste, eating a healthy diet and reducing any tobacco consumption. The dental team have a duty of care to ensure that older people receive evidence-based oral health preventative advice tailored to the individual, taking into account individual risk factors that can increase with age. This can include the clinical application of topical fluoride and minimally invasive dentistry. Older people at an increased risk of poor oral health include those with cognitive conditions, physical impairments and certain medical conditions. Care home residents face particular barriers to attaining a satisfactory standard of oral care which are discussed herein. Good oral health preventative routines must be established early after the diagnosis of progressive chronic conditions and will help to prevent the need for dental intervention later in life when treatment can be more difficult to tolerate. Inclusion of oral health prevention within health policy and legislation is necessary to improve the oral health for older people living in all health and care settings.

Putting guidelines into practice: Using co-design to develop a complex intervention based on NG48 to enable care staff to provide daily oral care to older people living in care homes

OBJECTIVES

(1) Explore the challenges of providing daily oral care in care homes; (2) understand oral care practices provided by care home staff; (3) co-design practical resources supporting care home staff in these activities.

METHODS

Three Sheffield care homes were identified via the "ENRICH Research Ready Care Home Network," and three to six staff per site were recruited as co-design partners. Design researchers led three co-design workshops exploring care home staff's experiences of providing daily oral care, including challenges, coping strategies and the role of current guidelines. New resources were prototyped to support the use of guidelines in practice. The design researchers developed final resources to enable the use of these guidelines in-practice-in-context.

FINDINGS

Care home staff operate under time and resource constraints. The proportion of residents with dementia and other neurodegenerative conditions is rapidly increasing. Care home staff face challenges when residents adopt "refusal behaviours" and balancing daily oral care needs with resident and carer safety becomes complex. Care home staff have developed many coping strategies to navigate "refusal behaviours." Supporting resources need to "fit" within the complexities of practice-in-context.

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of daily oral care practices in care homes is complex and challenging. The co-design process revealed care home staff have a "library" of context-specific practical knowledge and coping strategies. This study offers insights into the process of making guidelines usable for professionals in their contexts of practice, exploring the agenda of implementing evidence-based guidelines.

Prevention of Oral Functional Decline

OBJECTIVES

The oral cavity functions in eating, speaking, socializing, and serving as a natural barrier to external pathogens. In the prevention of oral function decline in older people, oral health conditions should be maintained through public health actions.

METHODS

This article discusses public health actions to prevent oral functional decline through addressing three major issues among older people: tooth loss, hyposalivation, and oral cancer. Negative impacts of tooth loss, hyposalivation, and oral cancer will be described, followed by describing public health approaches to prevent these problems RESULTS: Tooth loss, commonly caused by dental caries and periodontal diseases, affects one's ability to eat, speak, and socialize freely. Prevention of tooth loss can be done in clinical settings, community settings, and through national policies. Saliva plays an important role in eating, swallowing, and protecting oral mucosa from pathogens. The major causes of dry mouth are polypharmacy and the use of anticholinergic medications among older people. Public health actions to promote collaboration between dentists and doctors in the adjustment of drug prescriptions are warranted. Oral cancer can affect oral function largely both from the disease itself and from cancer treatments due to the destruction of oral structures and salivary gland function. Tobacco use and alcohol consumption are major risk factors for oral cancer; they also contribute to various systemic diseases and cancers of other organs.

CONCLUSIONS

Public health policies and interventions using the common risk factor approaches to tackle tobacco and alcohol consumption should be encouraged. Rather than focusing on older people, the prevention of oral function decline should be planned through a life-course perspective.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the University of British Columbia Geriatric Dentistry Program: Clinical education and service

Background and Objective

In Canada, the COVID‐19 pandemic was associated with significant morbidity and mortality in older adults, particularly those in long‐term care (LTC). Access to oral health services was limited during the pandemic due to public health restrictions. The aim of this paper was to describe the impact of the pandemic on the clinical education and service of the University of British Columbia (UBC) Geriatric Dentistry Program (GDP), which provides care to LTC residents.

Methods

Data were collected from UBC GDP AxiUm dental software records, including number of dental appointments in 2019 and 2020. Data on revenue in 2019 and 2020 based on clinical production were collected through financial summary reports. Data on the number of educational rotations were collected from summary reports from scheduling software.

Results

In 2020, significant reductions in clinical service, revenue, and productivity were observed in the UBC GDP relative to 2019. The number of GDP appointments for June‐December 2020 was lower by 68%. The clinical productivity reduced by 67% for the same period. Expenses were slightly reduced. The overall number of LTC clinical rotations for students were only slightly lower for undergraduate students in 2020 than in 2019, and it increased for graduate students.

Conclusion

The COVID‐19 pandemic and associated public health restrictions had a negative impact on the clinical service and productivity of the UBC GDP in 2020 relative to 2019. However, clinical educational rotations to LTC were slightly increased in 2020 relative to 2019. Dental care for LTC residents can be provided if rigorous administrative controls, engineering controls and personal protective equipment are employed.

GIS mapping of healthcare practices: do older adults have equitable access to dental and medical care in the UK?

Introduction Considering an ageing population with increasing comorbidities, access to oral and general healthcare is a growing concern. This study aimed to identify and compare access to dental and general practices. This study further aimed to ascertain if there exists a socioeconomic distribution of dental and general practices among older adults.Materials and methods A total of 13,007 dental practices and 13,759 general practices were mapped using geographic information system software, and overlaid with the UK older adult population and deprivation data by health areas. Data analysis was carried out by creating a geographical distribution map and by using descriptive statistics, Gini coefficients and Lorenz curves.Results NHS Central London Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) held the highest dental practice-to-population ratio of 958 practices per 100,000 older adults, while NHS Manchester CCG held the highest general practice-to-population ratio of 264.4 general practices per 100,000 older adults. England had the highest Gini coefficients for general and dental practice at 0.214 and 0.195, respectively. Both dental and general practices were socioeconomically distributed among older adults in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, but not in Scotland.Conclusions An increasing proportion of older adults need access to healthcare that is based on clinical need, not the ability to pay; a founding principle of the NHS. This nation-wide study captures inequities in the spatial accessibility for older adults in the UK.

Effective mouth care for older people living in nursing homes

Oral health for older people living in nursing homes has long been an area of interest and concern, with suboptimal oral health often having significant effects on their general health, well-being and quality of life. This article outlines the reasons why oral health can deteriorate in nursing home residents and the potential effects of this, and provides information about relevant national guidance. The article also details practical recommendations for nursing home staff on improving residents' oral hygiene, including undertaking oral health assessments, delivering mouth care and accessing dental services.

The Impact of Dementia on Oral Health and Dental Care, Part 1: Setting the Scene for Dental Care Provision

There are over 850,000 people living with dementia in the UK and this figure is expected to rise to over a million by 2021. Increasingly, oral healthcare professionals in primary care will see more patients affected by dementia at varying stages of the disease, and it is therefore crucial that they have a basic understanding of the disease and how these patients can be managed in a primary care environment. The first article in this series of two provides a definition of dementia and describes the symptoms of the disease along with the key issues related to oral health, such as oral pain. Oral pain can have far reaching consequences, but identifying it can be problematic, particularly in the latter stages of the disease. This article will therefore cover how to diagnose pain in patients with dementia. Information is also provided about how to make dental surgeries more 'dementia friendly'.

The Impact of Dementia on Oral Health and Dental Care, Part 2: Approaching and Planning Treatment

Dementia has been described as the biggest health and social care challenge of this century; its impact on dental care cannot be ignored. Dementia affects cognitive ability and decision making, so it is important that oral healthcare professionals are conversant with current mental capacity legislation and issues that may be raised when treatment planning for patients living with the condition. This second article in the series considers the impact of dementia on dental care provision and covers a range of issues which are relevant to both general and specialist practice. These include assessment of capacity, use of different treatment modalities, such as sedation and general anaesthesia, and the factors that may be relevant when deciding to offer treatment or to refer to a secondary care setting for dental treatment. Advanced care planning is detailed to support general dental practitioners considering the longer-term wishes of their patients with an early diagnosis of dementia.

Oral health care for patients with Alzheimer's disease: An update

Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) are among the age-associated chronic conditions that are most challenging to health care systems around the globe, as patients with dementia require full-time, intensive care for multiple years. Oral health care is negatively impacted by cognitive decline, and consequently poor oral health is common among people with ADRD. Poor oral health status is linked with many undesirable consequences for the well-being of people with ADRD, from excruciating local pain to life-threatening conditions, as aspiration pneumonia. In this paper, the authors provide an update on the most current concepts about Alzheimer's disease epidemiology, etiology, and management, current oral health care for patients with Alzheimer's disease, oral health promotion strategies for this population, as well as current research and future direction for improving oral health care for patients with Alzheimer's disease. It concludes that oral health care should be included in the patient's routine health care as early as possible in the progression of Alzheimer's disease for preventing rapid oral health deterioration. Establishing oral hygiene routines and providing dental treatment that is customized to the patients' individual needs and disease stage are important to achieve good oral health outcomes and prevent quality of life decline.