Factors influencing nerve damage during lower third molar surgery

Relationship between Impacted Mandibular Third Molars and the Mandibular Canal on CBCT Scans

This study aimed to assess the relationship of impacted mandibular third molars with the mandibular canal on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. This cross-sectional study was conducted on CBCT scans of 137 patients with 204 impacted mandibular third molars. The relation of age, gender, class of impaction, anatomical position of canal relative to tooth (buccal, lingual, inferior, inter-radicular), tooth angulation (mesioangular, vertical, distoangular, horizontal), relationship of tooth with the mandibular canal (no contact, in contact, relation), relationship of tooth with the mandibular cortex, anatomical site of contact of tooth with the mandibular cortex (buccal, lingual, inferior), and the impression of canal (grooving, no effect) on impacted teeth were evaluated. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Class B of impaction (78.9%), inferior position of canal relative to the impacted tooth (53.9%) and mesioangular angulation (53.4%) had the highest frequency, respectively. The relationship of tooth with the mandibular canal was "relation" in most cases (53.4%) followed by no contact (26.9%) and in contact (19.6%). Significant associations were noted between depth of impaction (P < 0.001), tooth angulation (P = 0.024), anatomical position of canal relative to tooth (P < 0.001), relationship of tooth with the mandibular cortex (P = 0.032) and anatomical site of contact of tooth with the mandibular cortex (P = 0.013) with the impacted tooth-mandibular canal relationship. CBCT provides accurate information about the relationship of impacted third molars with the mandibular canal and can decrease the risk of traumatization of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) during their surgical extraction.

Neurosensory Deficits of the Mandibular Nerve Following Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molars-A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Neurosensory deficits are one of the major complications after impacted lower third molar extraction leading to an impaired patient's quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of neurosensory deficits after lower third molar extraction and compare it radiologically to the corresponding position of the inferior alveolar nerve.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, all patients who underwent impacted lower third molar extraction between January and December 2019 were compiled. Therefore, clinical data as well as preoperative radiological imaging were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 418 patients who underwent lower third molar extractions (n = 555) were included in this study. Of these, 33 (5.9%) had short-term (i.e., within the initial 7 postoperative days) and 12 (1.3%) long-term (i.e., persisting after 12 months) neurosensory deficits documented. The inferior alveolar nerve position in relation to the tooth roots showed apical position in 27%, buccal position in 30.8%, lingual position in 35.4%, and interradicular position in 6.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically significant increased incidence of neurosensory deficits occurs when the inferior alveolar nerve is directly positioned lingually to the tooth roots (p = 0.01).

Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons

BACKGROUND

Surgical extraction of third molars is one of the most common oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures performed and may have a number of associated complications. One of these complications is inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) dysaesthesia or impairment of sensory perception (including paraesthesia and/or anaesthesia). Previous studies assume that most clinicians use various combinations of nine radiologic criteria on panoramic radiographs as indicators of the relationship and, therefore, predictors of the risk of postoperative dysaesthesia. Our study assessed both the current radiologic modalities and assessment criteria used by Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons when determining the proximity of mandibular canal to third molars.

METHODS

A survey of all surgeon members of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (ANZOMS) practising in Australia was undertaken.

RESULTS

Of the 105 questionnaires sent to surgeons, 72 responses (68 per cent) were returned. All surgeons reported using the panoramic radiograph but only 25 per cent considered it sufficiently accurate in determining the relationship between the mandibular canal (MC) and the third molar root, while 61 per cent of surgeons use CT for this purpose but the average frequency of use was very low (five per cent). This study also revealed that the nine radiologic criteria on a panoramic radiograph are used to varying extents by Australian surgeons. Nearly all surgeons use 'change in MC direction' and 'MC narrowing' to determine and close relationship. Thirty-one per cent used superimposition of the MC and the root of the third molar alone and 24 per cent used appearance of contact of the root with the MC alone in the absence of any other radiologic criteria to indicate close or intimate relationship.

CONCLUSION

Further research is required to determine the accuracy and observer agreement or reliability of using the nine panoramic characteristics, to determine this relationship and whether the presurgical determination of proximity and position (buccal or lingual) of the canal utilizing CT has any usefulness in determining the surgical protocol or affect on postoperative morbidity.