The quality of dental casts used in crown and bridgework.
Br Dent J 2004;
197:261-4; discussion 249. [PMID:
15359325 DOI:
10.1038/sj.bdj.4811621]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2003] [Accepted: 10/08/2003] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the quality of dental casts used in crown and bridge construction.
DESIGN
Observational cross-sectional study of dental casts.
SETTING
Commercial dental laboratories and a university dental hospital laboratory in the UK.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A sample (n = 150) of working and opposing casts used for crown and bridgework prescribed by general dental practices and a dental hospital were sampled from two commercial dental laboratories and an 'on-site' university dental hospital laboratory respectively. A simple '3 point' assessment scale of quality (good, fair and poor) was used to categorise the casts depending on the clarity of reproduction of soft and hard tissues.
RESULTS
The quality of opposing casts used for articulation purposes was significantly better (P<0.001) than that of the working casts. In addition it was found that for working casts the quality in the preparation area(s) was significantly better (p<0.001) than that in areas remote from preparation(s) in the same arch. In general, the quality of casts in the incisal or occlusal surfaces was better than the buccal and lingual surfaces.
CONCLUSIONS
This study has demonstrated that variation exists in the quality of casts used in crown and bridgework, specifically those used in the construction of indirect restorations and also those used for articulation purposes. This study highlights the need for clinicians to exercise continued vigilance with crown and bridge impressions, and casts, particularly in areas away from the prepared teeth.
Collapse