Steroid-induced psychosis complicating orthognathic surgery: A case report

More Harm Than Benefit of Perioperative Dexamethasone on Recovery Following Reconstructive Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

Prospective studies on the effect of dexamethasone after microvascular reconstructive head and neck surgery are sparse despite the widespread use of dexamethasone in this setting. The aim of this study was to clarify whether perioperative use of dexamethasone would improve the quality and speed of recovery. The authors hypothesized that dexamethasone would enhance recovery and diminish pain and nausea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-three patients with oropharyngeal cancer and microvascular reconstruction were included in this prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients in the study group (n = 51) received dexamethasone 60 mg over 3 perioperative days; 42 patients did not receive dexamethasone and served as controls. Patient rehabilitation, postoperative opioid and insulin consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte, and lactate levels were recorded.

RESULTS

There was significantly less pain in the study group (P = .030) and the total oxycodone dose for 5 days postoperatively was lower (P = .040). Dexamethasone did not significantly lessen PONV for 5 days postoperatively (P > .05). There were no differences between groups in intensive care unit or hospital stay or in other clinical measures of recovery. Patients receiving dexamethasone required significantly more insulin compared with patients in the control group (P < .001). Lactate and leukocyte levels were significantly higher (P < .001) and CRP levels were significantly lower in the study group.

CONCLUSION

The only benefit of perioperative dexamethasone use was lower total oxycodone dose; however, the disadvantages were greater. Because dexamethasone can have adverse effects on the postoperative course, routine use of dexamethasone as a pain or nausea medication during reconstructive head and neck cancer surgery is not recommended.

Steroid-Induced Psychosis in the Pediatric Population: A New Case and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

Iatrogenic steroid-induced psychosis is a rare but serious adverse side effect seen largely in the adult population that less commonly affects children and adolescents. Given the significant distress steroid-induced psychosis may cause, recommendations are needed for effective management. Here we conducted a systematic review of the literature and report a new case of steroid-induced psychosis in a 12-year-old patient.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and PsychInfo. Key terms included ("steroid induced" or "corticosteroid induced" or "glucocorticoid induced") and ("psychosis" or "hallucinations" or "delusions") and ("child" or "adolescent" or "pediatric"). A total of 15 articles of steroid-induced psychosis in children and adolescents were found in the scientific literature. This report includes those articles and a novel case of steroid-induced psychosis.

RESULTS

Children with asthma, autoimmune diseases, and cancer have been reported to experience steroid-induced psychosis. The mean age of children with steroid-induced psychosis was 12 ± 3.6 years. Our team presents a report of steroid-induced psychosis in a 12-year-old patient with discoid-type lupus erythematosus. Within days of treatment with 40 mg prednisone daily, this patient began to drool, became mute, and was responding to internal stimuli. Treatment was difficult secondary to the acute exacerbation of lupus, requiring ongoing therapy. It was initially unclear whether the acute psychosis was a manifestation of lupus, a side effect of medication, or a combination of the two risk factors. Neurology consultation ruled out lupus cerebritis. Psychosis was treated with haloperidol 5 mg. Psychosis did not resolve until the steroid taper was complete and the patient was no longer taking any prednisone.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the common use of glucocorticoid therapy in children, it is important that physicians and parents recognize the signs of steroid-induced psychosis and are aware of the data on treating this complication.

The influence of dexamethasone on postoperative swelling and neurosensory disturbances after orthognathic surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Orthognathic surgery is associated with considerable swelling and neurosensory disturbances. Serious swelling can lead to great physical and psychological strain. A randomized, prospective, controlled clinical trial was realized in order to evaluate the effect of a preoperative intravenous dexamethasone injection of 40 mg on postoperative swelling and neurosensory disturbances after orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients (27 male and 11 female) patients, all with the indication for an orthognathic surgery, were enrolled in this study (mean age: 27.63 years, range: 16-61 years) and randomly divided into two groups (study group/ control group). Both groups underwent either maxillary and/or mandibular osteotomies, resulting in three subgroups according to surgical technique (A: LeFort I osteotomy, B: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO), C: bimaxillary osteotomy). The study group received a single preoperative intravenous injection of 40 mg dexamethasone. Facial edema was measured by 3D surface scans on the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 14th and 90th postoperative day. Furthermore, neurosensory disturbances on the 2nd, 5th, 14th and 90th postoperative day were investigated by thermal stimulation.

RESULTS

Facial edema after LeFort I osteotomy, BSSO and bimaxillary osteotomy showed a significant decrease in the study group compared to the control group (P = 0.048, P = 0.045, P < 0.001). The influence of dexamethasone on neurosensory disturbances was not significant for the inferior alveolar nerve (P = 0.746) or the infraorbital nerve (P = 0.465).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing orthognathic surgery should receive a preoperative injection of dexamethasone in order to control and reduce edema. However, there was no influence of dexamethasone on reduction of neurosensory disturbances.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00009033 .

Psychiatric adverse effects of pediatric corticosteroid use

Corticosteroids, highly effective drugs for myriad disease states, have considerable neuropsychiatric adverse effects that can manifest in cognitive disorders, behavioral changes, and frank psychiatric disease. Recent reviews have summarized these effects in adults, but a comprehensive review on corticosteroid effects in children has not been published since 2005. Here, we systematically review articles published since then that, we find, naturally divide into 3 main areas: (1) chronic effects of acute prenatal and neonatal exposure associated with prematurity and congenital conditions; (2) immediate behavioral effects of acute exposure via oncological protocols; and (3) acute behavioral effects of sporadic use in children and adolescents with other conditions. PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were queried to identify articles reporting psychiatric adverse effects of corticosteroids in pediatric patients. Search terms included corticosteroids, adrenal cortex hormones, steroid psychosis, substance-induced psychoses, glucocorticoids, dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, prednisone, adverse effects, mood disorders, mental disorders, psychosis, psychotic, psychoses, side effect, chemically induced, emotions, affective symptoms, toxicity, behavior, behavioral symptoms, infant, child, adolescent, pediatric, paediatric, neonatal, children, teen, and teenager. Following guidelines for systematic reviews from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis, we have found it difficult to draw specific conclusions that are more than general impressions owing to the quality of the available studies. We find a mixed picture with neonates exposed to dexamethasone, with some articles reporting eventual deficits in neuropsychiatric functioning and others reporting no effect. In pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, corticosteroid use appears to correlate with negative psychiatric and behavioral effects. In children treated with corticosteroids for noncancer conditions, adverse effects have been observed both during treatment and after cessation, although the data from article to article are not consistent enough to establish dose relationships. By and large, inhaled corticosteroids are considered safe and free of severe neuropsychiatric effects. Although both antipsychotic medications and benzodiazepines have been used to treat corticosteroid-induced mania and psychosis, no unified management strategy has emerged. Large-scale standardized investigations are needed to clarify the psychiatric effect of corticosteroids on children in all these conditions. Meanwhile, there is general agreement that patients as well as caregivers should be warned of the potential for behavioral adverse effects when patients receive these drugs.

Psychiatric complications of treatment with corticosteroids: review with case report

Corticosteroids are widely used in modern medicine but can result in troubling psychiatric side-effects. Physicians and other medical professionals should be aware of the potential for these side-effects, possible means of prevention, and efficacious treatments. Herein, we review adult case report data published during the past quarter-century on adverse corticosteroid-induced psychiatric effects, and present a case of corticosteroid-induced psychotic depression. PubMed and PsychLit databases were searched using the terms 'corticosteroids', 'steroids', and the generic names of corticosteroid medications with terms for psychiatric symptoms or syndromes, including psychosis, mania, hypomania, depression, apathy, anxiety, panic, depersonalization, delirium, confusion, hallucinations, delusions, paranoia, cognitive impairment and dementia. Fifty-five cases and a number of clinical trials investigating the incidence and treatment of these psychiatric symptoms and syndromes were identified. Data on incidence, drug dose, risk factors, course of illness and treatment (when present) were tabulated. We conclude that the cumulative data indicate that psychiatric complications of corticosteroid treatment are not rare and range from clinically significant anxiety and insomnia, to severe mood and psychotic disorders, delirium and dementia. While tapering or discontinuation of the corticosteroid treatment may remedy these adverse side-effects, psychotropic medications are often required because of the medical necessity of the corticosteroid or the severity of the psychiatric symptom. Further studies are needed to better understand the deleterious psychiatric effects associated with corticosteroids.

The emotional consequences of corticosteroid use in hematology: preliminary findings

This article presents the findings from a pilot study conducted as a first step in understanding the myriad psychological and psychiatric sequelae stemming from the use of steroids for hematology patients. Descriptions of the side effects experienced by 10 hematology patients undergoing steroid treatment are documented and discussed. Steroid usage can have a range of physical and emotional side effects on patients, including hematology patients. The insights are a serious reminder to all who care for hematology patients that the psychological and psychiatric side effects of steroids need to be taken seriously.

Corticosteroid administration in oral and orthognathic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the effect of corticosteroid (CS) administration on edema, analgesia, and neuroregeneration in conjunction with surgical dental extraction, orthognathic surgery, and the risk of developing side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was made. The primary predictor variable was CS administration and the outcome variables were edema, pain, and infection. A meta-analysis was performed. The risk of other side effects was evaluated through a simple review.

RESULTS

In oral surgery, most clinical trials showed a significant decrease in edema (P < .0001) after CS, and local injection of methylprednisolone > or =25 mg was expected to result in a significant decrease in edema. Regarding the analgesic effect, several clinical trials showed a decrease in pain after CS (P < .0001). Further, CS administration resulted in a slightly higher risk of infection (relative risk, 1.0041), but with a P value of .89. CS could be administered with no increased risk of infection. In orthognathic surgery, methylprednisolone > or =85 mg administered intravenously seemed sufficient to produce a significant decrease in edema, and several trials pointed toward a neuroregeneration effect, but no statistical analysis could be performed. Regarding the risk of other side effects, in oral surgery, a minimal risk of chronic adrenal suppression was seen; in orthognathic surgery, an elevated risk of avascular osteonecrosis, steroid-induced psychosis, and adrenal suppression was seen. There were no reports of decreased healing.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the administration of CS in oral surgery decreases edema and pain significantly, with no higher risk of infection and with a minimum risk of other side effects.

Visual hallucinations on eye closure after orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia

A 61-year-old woman suffering from rheumatoid arthritis without a contributory neurological, mental, or psychological history experienced visual hallucinations solely on eye closure after total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. The visual hallucinations first appeared when she arose from sleep early on postoperative day 1, approximately 12 h after the end of surgery. Only on closing her eyes, she had a clear view of colored clothes, lace curtains, handbags, hats, and sofas, all of which were vivid, realistic, complex, of natural size, and in normal perspective without distortion and appeared independently and randomly in succession. The hallucinations disappeared when she opened her eyes even in the dark. The visual hallucinations gradually decreased as the days elapsed and they had entirely subsided on postoperative day 4. The level and content of her consciousness seemed entirely normal throughout her hospital course. Although postoperative visual hallucinations are not uncommon, they do not always show the closed-eye variation. The causes and underlying mechanisms of this type of visual hallucination remain to be elucidated.