Triplet chemotherapy with vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

Carotid artery inflammation associated with gemcitabine-based therapy: a special report

Vasculitis is an inflammation that can present as acute or chronic in nature, which causes changes in the walls of blood vessels, including thickening, weakening, narrowing and scarring. Gemcitabine, an antimetabolite chemotherapeutic agent, is generally well tolerated with a favorable side effect profile. However, there is increasing evidence that it is associated with vasculitis, which can affect small and large vessels. In this case report, we report a patient who has experienced fever with severe tenderness over right carotid artery, which occurred on the fifth day after the administration of gemcitabine. The exact mechanism of gemcitabine-induced vasculitis is unknown but cessation of gemcitabine and initiation of anti-inflammatory treatment appears to aid in the resolution of the clinical syndrome.

Biweekly triplet chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine for advanced chemotherapy naïve non-small cell lung cancer

Aims and background

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of biweekly scheduled triplet chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods and study design

Patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer and performance status of 0–2 were eligible. Patients who had brain metastasis and of an older age were also enrolled in the study. The triplet combination chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine at the doses of 1000 mg/m2, 25 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, were administered on day 1 and 14, every 28 days, up to 6 cycles.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. Median age was 60 years (range, 42–74). Most of the patients (83%) had metastatic disease and 7 patients (23%) had brain metastasis. In assessing 24 patients for response evaluation, none had complete response. Partial responses were achieved in 18 (60%) patients. Four patients (13%) had stable disease and 2 (7%) progressed. Thirteen percent and 20% of the patients developed severe (grade 3–4) neutropenia and anemia, respectively. Febrile neutropenia, severe thrombocytopenia, hepatic and renal toxicity were not seen. Overall and progression-free survival were 8.15 and 7.15 months, respectively. Patients who had no brain metastasis (P = 0.069), who had more than 3 courses of chemotherapy (P <0.001), and who had chemotherapy applied without dose reduction (P = 0.018) had better survivals.

Conclusions

The biweekly schedule of the triplet chemotherapy combination including gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine was effective in advanced, mostly metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with acceptable and manageable side effects.

An open phase II trial of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and vinorelbine combination as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

The purpose of this multicentric Phase II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/vinorelbine combination as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Patients followed a fortnightly drug schedule, receiving on day 1, vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) (20-min infusion); gemcitabine 700 mg/m(2) (70-min infusion, fixed 10mg/m(2)/min); and on day 2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) (2-h infusion). Thirty-nine patients with a median age of 58 years received a total of 306 cycles (median 8 cycles); 67% were males. Most had adenocarcinoma (51%), large-cell (23%) and squamous cell carcinoma (21%); 15% had stage IIIB and 85% stage IV. There was one complete response (3%; 95% CI: 0.1-13%), 15 partial responses (PR) (38%; 95% CI: 23-55%), and 13 patients with stable disease (33%; 95% CI: 19-50%) of at least 2 months duration, for an overall non-progression rate of 74%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.1-8.7) and overall survival was 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.7-19.4). No treatment-related deaths occurred and very few grade 3-4 events were observed. Overall, the regimen was well tolerated and the planned recommended dose intensity was safely delivered to more than 95% of patients. This triple combination therapy study yielded favourable efficacy and toxicity results, which merit further evaluation in prospective randomised trials.

A randomized phase II study of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine with/without cisplatin against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated

Phase II studies have suggested that vinorelbine (V) plus gemcitabine (G) treatment has a similar response rate and better toxicity profile than cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our aim was to evaluate whether or not the addition of cisplatin (P) to a VG regimen increases the efficacy or toxicities in chemo-naive inoperable NSCLC patients. From April 2002 to October 2003, 86 patients were enrolled. The treatment dose was V 20 mg/m2 plus G 800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion (i.v.) on days 1, 8 and 15, with/without P 60 mg/m2 i.v. on day 15, every 4 weeks. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatment were recorded. In all, 125 cycles of VG and 178 cycles of VGP were given to the patients in the VG and VGP arms, respectively (P = 0.001). The median cycle of treatment was three in the VG arm and five in the VGP arm. There were 10 partial responses (overall 23.3%) in the VG arm and 1 complete response and 19 partial responses (overall 46.5%) in the VGP arm (P = 0.022). Neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the VGP arm (P = 0.023, 0.002, 0.025, 0.001, respectively). The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale showed no difference between the VG and VGP arms after two cycles of treatment or when the patient went off study. We concluded that the addition of P to VG treatment did increase both the tumor response rate and the toxicities. However, the toxicities were tolerable.

Gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicity

Gemcitabine is a relatively new deoxycytidine analog (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) with structural similarities to cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). Activity of gemcitabine is demonstrated in the treatment of many solid tumors, like pancreas, ovarian and nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although gemcitabine is considered as a drug with a good safety profile, cases of gemcitabine-induced severe pulmonary toxicity (GISPT) were reported as for Ara-C. We performed a systematic review of reported cases on the GISPT. Twenty-nine clinical trials especially interesting NSCLC patients (21) and 21 reported cases recording 40 patients were analyzed. The incidence of the GISPT varies from 0 to 5%. The clinical presentation is a subacute clinical syndrome and is frequently nonspecific. The predominant radiographic pattern on chest X-ray are reticulo-nodular interstitial infiltrates. It was postulated that the physio-pathological mechanism of the GISPT was an inflammatory reaction of the alveolar capillary wall cytokine-mediated, which created an abnormal permeability of its membrane. After the differential diagnosis were ruled out, the discontinuation of the drug and the early initiation of steroids and diuretics are the most frequently performed treatments. Under these conditions, the outcome was favorable in a delay of few days generally for a majority of patients but 20% of patients died. Some risk factors, as a previous pulmonary disease or a previous thoracic irradiation, for the occurrence of the GISPT were proposed. GISPT is rare but sometimes fatal. Its a necessity to increase awareness about it to enhanced an early and suitable management of patients developing such a toxicity after gemcitabine administration.