A multicenter phase II study of the combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Safety and efficacy of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) regimen with or without targeted drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Five-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) regimen is used as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The use of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine pro-drug, is feasible and safe; hence, it provides an interesting alternative to 5-fluorouracil in the abovementioned regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) regimen use with or without targeted drugs in Chinese patients with mCRC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with mCRC who received XELOXIRI regimen with or without targeted drugs (bevacizumab or cetuximab) every 2 weeks between January 2017 and November 2019 at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College. Treatment efficacy was assessed by investigators by evaluating the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. The adverse events were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one consecutive patients were examined and followed up for survival. As of November 8, 2021, the median follow-up time was 35.4 months. Disease progression and death occurred in 50 (82%) and 38 (62%) patients, respectively. The median treatment duration of XELOXIRI with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab was 10 cycles (range, 1-12 cycles). The median OS and PFS were 32.2 months (95%CI [24.8-39.6]) and 9.3 months (95% CI [8.1-10.5]), respectively. The ORR of 48 patients with measurable lesions was 70.8%, and the DCR was 89.6%. RAS/BRAF wild-type (HR 0.39; 95% CI [0.16-0.96], p = 0.04) and metastatic organs > 2 (HR 3.25; 95% CI [1.34-7.87], p = 0.009) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The incidence of any grade of adverse events (AEs) was 96.7% (59/61). Grade ≥ 3 AEs included neutropenia (19.7%), leukopenia (9.8%), diarrhea (3.3%), vomiting (3.3%), febrile neutropenia (1.6%), and thrombocytopenia (1.6%). No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION

The use of the XELOXIRI regimen with or without a targeted drug was effective, with a manageable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with mCRC.

Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review

Simple Summary

Fatigue in older patients has multiple etiologies, as this symptom may be cancer-related, treatment-related, age-related, or part of frailty syndrome. Physicians need to identify this symptom and understand its risk factors but also evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of cancer treatments considering the risk of impairing the patient’s quality of life. This scoping review was aimed to present the level of information currently available on any-grade fatigue and grade 3 or more fatigue for each cancer treatment regimen, either in general or in older populations, for the most prevalent tumors.

Abstract

Fatigue is a highly prevalent symptom in both cancer patients and the older population, and it contributes to quality-of-life impairment. Cancer treatment-related fatigue should thus be included in the risk/benefit assessment when introducing any treatment, but tools are lacking to a priori estimate such risk. This scoping review was designed to report the current evidence regarding the frequency of fatigue for the different treatment regimens proposed for the main cancer indications, with a specific focus on age-specific data, for the following tumors: breast, ovary, prostate, urothelium, colon, lung and lymphoma. Fatigue was most frequently reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) versions 3 to 5. A total of 324 regimens were analyzed; data on fatigue were available for 217 (67%) of them, and data specific to older patients were available for 35 (11%) of them; recent pivotal trials have generally reported more fatigue grades than older studies, illustrating increasing concern over time. This scoping review presents an easy-to-understand summary that is expected to provide helpful information for shared decisions with patients regarding the anticipation and prevention of fatigue during each cancer treatment.

Effectiveness of Herbal Medicine for Leukopenia/Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Adults with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) on leukopenia/neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in adults with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods:

Eight electronic databases were searched from their inception to June 2020. Randomized controlled trials with clarified sequence generation were qualified. Two reviewers independently conducted the screening and data extraction. Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4 was applied to the meta-analysis.

Results:

Twenty-seven studies involving 1867 participants were qualified, of which 26 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis showed that CHM significantly reduced the incidence of leukopenia induced by chemotherapy (RR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.82), as well as the grade 3/4 leukopenia (RR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.55-0.90). Meanwhile,CHM decreased the occurrence of neutropenia (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77), especially for the grades 3/4 neutropenia (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.64). Twenty-six of the included studies focused on the adverse events related to CHM.

Conclusion:

CHM may relieve neutropenia/leukopenia induced by chemotherapy in adults with colorectal cancer.

A Phase I Study of Neoadjuvant Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (XELOXIRI) in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the recommended dose (RD) of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHOD

Patients received irinotecan and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) on day 1, and capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 orally twice daily) on days 1-7 of a biweekly schedule. Three dose levels, ranging from 100 to 150 mg/m2, were explored for irinotecan in sequential cohorts of 6 patients. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first cycle to determine the RD.

RESULTS

Six patients were enrolled. The DLT was grade 3 febrile neutropenia, which was observed in 2 of the 6 patients at dose level 1. The RD of irinotecan was defined as 150 mg/m2. Toxicity was manageable: the most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (2 patients), anemia (1 patient), and anorexia (1 patient). Nodal downstaging (cN+ to ypN0) was detected in 2 patients and the T stage was downstaged in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

XELOXIRI is a feasible and active regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Febrile neutropenia was the DLT, and the RD of irinotecan is 150 mg/m2.

A Phase I Study of Irinotecan, Capecitabine (Xeloda), and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present phase I study was to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin given in combination (IXO regimen) to patients with previously untreated, unresectable advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received oxaliplatin followed by irinotecan as intravenous infusions on day 1, with oral capecitabine taken twice daily (BID) on days 2 to 15 of a 3-week cycle. The dose ranges were explored as follows: oxaliplatin, 75 to 120 mg/m²; irinotecan, 160 to 230 mg/m²; capecitabine, 750 to 1000 mg/m² BID. Dose escalation was performed individually for each drug at each dose level according to the type and severity of toxicity encountered in the previous cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients were enrolled at 7 dose levels and the MTD. The recommended doses for phase II evaluation were oxaliplatin 100 mg/m², irinotecan 160 mg/m², and capecitabine 950 mg/m² BID. Diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were DLTs. Of the 39 enrolled patients, 26 (67%) had confirmed objective responses. The median progression-free survival was 11 months, and the median overall survival was 25 months. The survival rate at 5 years was 23%.

CONCLUSION

The IXO regimen has a manageable toxicity profile with promising antitumor activity as first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic CRC.

A triplet combination with capecitabine/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (XELOXIRI) plus cetuximab as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a dose escalation study

PURPOSE

The addition of cetuximab to triplet chemotherapy can increase treatment efficacy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We explored the dose-limiting toxicity and feasibility of a triweekly capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, plus cetuximab (XELOXIRI plus cetuximab) regimen in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC.

METHODS

Patients received oxaliplatin (100 mg/m², day 1), capecitabine (1700 mg/m² per day from day 2 to 15), irinotecan (100, 120, and 150 mg/m² for dose levels 1, 2, 3, respectively, on day 1), and cetuximab (400 mg/m², day 1 and, thereafter, 250 mg/m² every week), repeated every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first 2 treatment cycles to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD).

RESULTS

Twelve patients received a median of 7 cycles of therapy (range 2-10). The DLT was grade 4 neutropenia, observed in 1 of 6 patients at dose level 2. The MTD was not reached at dose level 3. Therefore, the RD of irinotecan was defined as 150 mg/m². Most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neutropenia (50%), diarrhea (17%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). The response rate was 83% (complete and partial response: 1 and 9 patient(s), respectively), including 4 conversion cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of XELOXIRI and cetuximab is feasible and has an acceptable toxicity profile; neutropenia was the DLT. The RD of irinotecan is 150 mg/m². The observed response rate was promising and warrants further investigation.

Colorectal Choriocarcinoma in a Patient with Probable Lynch Syndrome

Background

Personalized therapy of colorectal cancer is influenced by morphological, molecular, and host-related factors. Here, we report the comprehensive clinicopathological and molecular analysis of an extra-gestational colorectal choriocarcinoma in a patient with probable Lynch syndrome.

Case presentation

A 61-year-old female with history of gastric cancer at age 36 presented with a transmurally invasive tumor of the right hemicolon and liver metastasis. A right hemicolectomy was performed. Histopathological analysis showed a mixed trophoblastic and syncytiotrophoblastic differentiation, consistent with choriocarcinoma. Disease progression was rapid under oxaliplatin, capecitabine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Molecular phenotyping identified loss of mismatch-repair protein immunostaining for PMS2, microsatellite instability, a lack of MLH1 promoter methylation, and lack of BRAF mutation suggestive of Lynch syndrome. Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed an ataxia telangiectasia mutated (p.P604S) missense mutation. A bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin treatment protocol targeting germ cell neoplasia lead to disease remission and prolonged survival of 34 months.

Conclusion

Comprehensive immunohistochemical and genetic testing is essential to identify uncommon cancers possibly related to Lynch syndrome. For rare tumors, personalized therapeutic approaches should take both molecular and morphological information into account.

A dose-finding study for oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and S-1 (OIS) in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastrointestinal cancer

PURPOSES

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), and activity of combined oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and S-1 chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.

METHODS

Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered intravenously on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally on days 1-7, every 2 weeks. This phase I study used the following dose levels for oxaliplatin/irinotecan/S-1: level 1, 85/120/60 mg/m²; level 2, 85/120/80 mg/m²; level 3, 85/120/100 mg/m²; level 4, 85/150/100 mg/m²; and level 5, 85/180/100 mg/m². Treatment was repeated for a maximum of 12 cycles, until disease progression, or until unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled between October 2012 and February 2014 (median age 59 years). During the first cycle, one of the six patients in levels 1, 3, and 4 developed a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 febrile neutropenia), and none of the three patients in level 5 developed a dose-limiting toxicity. As the planned maximum dose did not reach the MTD, the level 5 dose was defined as the RD. Twenty-one patients were evaluated for response, which included 2 cases of complete response and 8 cases of partial response, with an overall response rate of 47.6 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and S-1 provided an acceptable toxicity profile and modest clinical benefits in patients with advanced GI cancer. The RD was 85 mg/m² of oxaliplatin, 180 mg/m² of irinotecan, and 100 mg/m² of S-1 every 2 weeks.

Capecitabine in the routine first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer--results from a non-interventional observation study

Background

The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate feasibility, efficacy results and toxicity observations of capecitabine in routine first line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, with particular regard of elderly patients (>75 years of age).

Methods

Patients with colorectal cancer receiving capecitabine as part of their first-line treatment were recorded until detection of disease progression or up to a maximum of 12 cycles on standardized evaluation forms. Additional information on long-term outcomes, progression-free survival, and overall survival were retrieved at two follow-up time points. Obtained data were analyzed with regard to age up to 75 and >75 years of age. There were no specific requirements for patient selection and conduct of therapy, corresponding to the non-interventional nature of the study.

Results

In total, 1249 evaluable patients were enrolled in Germany. The median age of the study population was 74 years (range: 21–99). Capecitabine-based combination was administered in 56 % of patients in the overall population. The median treatment duration was about 5 months. Severe toxicities occurred rarely without any difference regarding age groups. The most common hematological toxicity was anemia. Gastrointestinal side effects and hand-food-syndrome (HFS) were the most frequent non-hematologic toxicities. Overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the patient group <=75 years compared to patients >75 years of age (38 vs. 32 %, p=0.019). Median progression free survival (PFS 9.7 vs. 8.2 months, p=0.00021) and overall survival (OS 31.0 vs. 22.6 months, p<0.0001) was decreased in elderly patients.

Conclusion

Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine treatment either as single drug or in various combination regimens, as proven in randomized studies, could be confirmed in a clinical routine setting. Patients older than 75 years may derive a relevant benefit by first line capecitabine-based treatment with good tolerability.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2113-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy of FOLFOXIRI versus XELOXIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy with capecitabine combined with leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (XELOXIRI-Bev) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (FOLFOXIRI-Bev), is recently introduced as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The comparison between the two strategies above in clinical efficacy has not been assessed.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 138 patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer to receive either FOLFOXIR-Bev (group 1) or XELOXIRI-Bev (group 2). Up to 12 cycles of treatment were administered, followed by fluorouracil plus bevacizumab until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival.

RESULTS

The mean progression-free survival was 13.5 months in the group 1, as compared with 10.4 months in the group 2 (hazard ratio for progression, 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.83; P = 0.032). The objective response rate was 71% in the group 1 and 52.2% in the group 2 (P = 0.006). Overall survival was not found significant difference between the two groups (group 1 vs. 2; 31.3 vs. 24.6 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.15; P = 0.115). The incidences of grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity, stomatitis, diarrhea, and neutropenia were significantly higher in the group 1.

CONCLUSION

FOLFOXIR-Bev, as compared with XELOXIRI-Bev, improved the outcomes in patients with mCRC, but increased the incidence of some adverse events.

Phase I/II trial of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab in first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Phase III studies have demonstrated the efficacy of FOLFOXIRI regimens (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) with/without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine that may be used instead of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. We evaluated a triple-chemotherapy regimen of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, plus bevacizumab in 53 patients with mCRC. A Phase I study identified the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan as 150 mg/m². Median follow-up in a subsequent Phase II study using this dose was 28 months (74% progressed). For all patients, a complete response was achieved in 4% and a partial response in 60%; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months and median overall survival (OS) was 28 months. Median PFS was longer for patients with an early treatment response (28 vs. 9 months for others; P = 0.024), or early tumor shrinkage (25 vs. 9 months for others; P = 0.006), or for patients suitable for surgical removal of metastases with curative intent (median not reached vs. 9 months for others; P = 0.001). Median OS was longer for patients with early tumor shrinkage (median not reached vs. 22 months for others; P = 0.006) or surgery (median not reached vs. 22 months for others, P = 0.002). K-ras mutations status did not influence PFS (P = 0.88) or OS (P = 0.82). Considerable Grade 3/4 toxicity was encountered (36% for diarrhea, 21% for vomiting and 17% for fatigue). In conclusion, the 3-weekly triple-chemotherapy regimen of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, plus bevacizumab, was active in the first-line treatment of mCRC, although at the expense of a high level of toxicity.

A dose-escalation study of oxaliplatin/capecitabine/irinotecan (XELOXIRI) and bevacizumab as a first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the recommended dose (RD) of a triweekly capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab (XELOXIRI/bevacizumab) regimen that was easier to administer than FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab, using capecitabine instead of 5-fuorouracil (5-FU), in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Patients received oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2), day 1), capecitabine (1,700 mg/m(2) per day from day 2 to 15), irinotecan (100, 120, 150 mg/m(2) for dose levels 1, 2, 3, day 1), and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg, day 1), repeated every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first two cycles to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

RESULTS

Twelve patients received a median of 6.5 cycles of therapy (range 2-12). The DLT was grade 4 neutropenia, observed in one of six patients at dose level 2. The MTD was not reached at dose level 3. Therefore, the RD of irinotecan was defined as 150 mg/m(2). The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (41 %), anemia (17 %), diarrhea (8 %), and febrile neutropenia (8 %). The response rate and median progression-free survival were 83 % and 15 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

XELOXIRI/bevacizumab is a feasible regimen for patients with mCRC, neutropenia was the DLT, and the RD of irinotecan is 150 mg/m(2). The response rate observed is very promising and warrants further investigation.

Efficacy of triplet combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine (OCX) in metastatic colorectal cancer in relation to RAS/RAF mutation status: results of a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The triplet combination of fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer improves efficacy at the cost of increased toxicity. Preliminary reports indicate that triplet combination regimens might improve outcome in the RAS/RAF-mutated subgroup.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 25 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who received treatment with OCX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, capecitabine). The regimen consisted of oxaliplatin 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, irinotecan 100 mg/m2 on days 8 and 22, and capecitabine 1,400 mg/m2 on days 1-29 every 5 weeks. KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations were determined by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

23 patients received at least 1 cycle and were evaluable for efficacy. In 10 patients, a KRAS or BRAF mutation was detected. Partial remission rate was 61%, median progression-free survival 9.8 months, and median overall survival 32.9 months for all evaluable patients. No difference in efficacy was detected between the RAS/RAF wild-type and the mutant group. OCX was well tolerated with no grade 3/4 haematological events. Diarrhoea was the major non-haematological toxicity (24% grade 3).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, triplet chemotherapy with OCX was well tolerated and achieved encouraging efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer irrespective of RAS/RAF mutation status.

S-1 plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective phase II study and pharmacogenetic analysis

BACKGROUND

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine that mimics infusional 5-fluorouracil. The aim of this phase II trial was to explore the clinical efficacy of the triplet regimen TIROX, which consists of S-1, irinotecan and oxaliplatin.

METHODS

Forty-two chemo-naive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were planned to be enrolled and be treated with irinotecan 150 mg m(-2) followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2) on day 1 and S-1 80 mg m(-2) per day from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Polymorphisms in the UGT1A1, UGT1A6, UGT1A7 and CYP2A6 genes were analysed.

RESULTS

Between July 2007 and February 2008, 43 patients were enrolled. An objective response was noted in 29 patients (67.4%, 95% confidence interval: 53.4-81.4), of which 2 achieved durable complete responses. The median progression-free survival was 10.0 months and the median overall survival was 19.2 months. Significant grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (45.2%), febrile neutropenia (9.5%), diarrhoea (7.1%) and vomiting (9.5%). Increased gastrointestinal toxicities were associated with the presence of UGT1A6*2 or UGT1A7*3 and an improved tumour response was noted in those without variant alleles of CYP2A6 or UGT1A1*60.

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1, irinotecan and oxaliplatin showed favourable efficacy and tolerability in untreated patients with mCRC.

Histopathologic evaluation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer in patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

The FOLFOXIRI regimen produces a high rate of radiological and histopathological responses. Bevacizumab added to chemotherapy showed an improvement in pathological response and necrosis of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab produced promising early clinical results and is under investigation in several randomised trials, although no data are currently available on its effects on response of CLMs and on liver toxicities.

METHODS

Starting from 499 patients enrolled in first-line phase II/III trials, we selected on the basis of tissue sample availability 18 patients treated with FOLFOXIRI/XELOXIRI and 24 patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab who underwent secondary resection of CLMs. The 28 untreated patients who underwent primary resection of CLMs were included as control group. Responses of CLMs and chemotherapy-induced toxicities were assessed.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 63% of those treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, as compared with 28% of those treated with only FOLFOXIRI/XELOXIRI, showed a histopathological response (P=0.033). In the two groups, 52% and 12.5%, respectively, showed necrosis ≥50% (P=0.017). The incidence of liver toxicities was not significantly increased in patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOXIRI produces high rates of pathologic responses and necrosis of CLM without increasing liver toxicity.

ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common tumour type in both sexes combined in Western countries. Although screening programmes including the implementation of faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy might be able to reduce mortality by removing precursor lesions and by making diagnosis at an earlier stage, the burden of disease and mortality is still high. Improvement of diagnostic and treatment options increased staging accuracy, functional outcome for early stages as well as survival. Although high quality surgery is still the mainstay of curative treatment, the management of CRC must be a multi-modal approach performed by an experienced multi-disciplinary expert team. Optimal choice of the individual treatment modality according to disease localization and extent, tumour biology and patient factors is able to maintain quality of life, enables long-term survival and even cure in selected patients by a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. Treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence, which has been the basis for this consensus conference-based guideline delivering a clear proposal for diagnostic and treatment measures in each stage of rectal and colon cancer and the individual clinical situations. This ESMO guideline is recommended to be used as the basis for treatment and management decisions.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: current treatment and future options for improved survival. Medical approach--present status

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures. The development seen using medical treatments are reviewed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic approach to the literature-based evidence of effects from palliative chemotherapy and targeted drugs was aimed at.

RESULTS

The continuous improvements during the past 20-25 years have been documented in several large conclusive trials. At the end of the 1980s, the evidence that chemotherapy should be used at all was very limited, whereas presently most patients can be offered three lines of chemotherapy with or without a targeted drug based upon good scientific evidence. Median survival in trials has gradually improved from about 6 months to above 24 months in the most recent trials. Survival in the populations has, however, not improved to the same extent. Several important issues remain to be solved, such as the best sequence of treatments, what regimens to use in various situations, when to start and when to stop if a response is seen, whether cure may be possible in a small subset of patients, and socioeconomic issues. Integration of surgery and other local methods have further improved outcome for some individuals, but must be fine-tuned.

CONCLUSIONS

Progress has been rapid in advanced colorectal cancer. This is likely a result of well-designed trials in collaboration between academy and industry, showing a great interest in the disease. A multi-professional approach and future collaborations may hopefully introduce new treatment concepts, further improving outcome.

Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: how to best complement medical treatment with surgical approaches

Colorectal liver metastases (CLM) represent a major challenge for oncologists and surgeons. In fact, in this setting, the optimal treatment of patients can achieve a long-term survival and sometimes a definitive cure of disease. In recent years, improvements in both medical therapies and surgical approaches have led to an increased rate of patients considered amenable for surgery on CLM. New perspectives in the management of CLM underline the need for a comprehensive assessment of patient and tumor characteristics, to integrate technical and prognostic issues into an individualized therapeutic strategy in different patient subgroups. The multidisciplinary evaluation from the onset and during treatment remains the key element to maximizing the benefit of more intensive treatment modalities.

Safety and efficacy of weekly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/oxaliplatin/irinotecan in the first-line treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer (GC) consists of two-drug, usually fluoropyrimidine-based, combinations, with or without the addition of biological agents. Studies of triple-drug regimens combining 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) with both oxaliplatin and irinotecan have shown promising efficacy in studies of patients with mCRC or GC. However, improved efficacy has often been achieved at the expense of high rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicities such as neutropenia and diarrhoea, occasionally even resulting in toxic deaths.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS

We performed a phase II study of previously untreated patients with mCRC or GC to assess the safety and efficacy of our 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FUFOXIRI) regimen with weekly administration of irinotecan 70 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2), FA 500 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, repeated from day 36.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were enrolled, 11 each with mCRC and GC receiving a median of four cycles per patient. The FUFOXIRI regimen was generally well tolerated with no toxic deaths, neutropenic fever or grade 4 toxicities. Most common grade 3 side effects were diarrhoea and neutropenia each affecting 24% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity were performed in 48% of all and 60% of patients having received at least two cycles of FUFOXIRI. The overall response rate was 46% (all partial responses), 55% and 36% for patients with mCRC and GC, respectively. Median progression-free survival for all patients, mCRC and GC patients was 9.5, 10.0 and 8.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival for all patients was 16.5, 18.0 and 15.0 months for patients with mCRC and GC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data show excellent tolerance and efficacy of the FUFOXIRI regimen in both mCRC and GC. Therefore, FUFOXIRI is a promising backbone for future studies incorporating biologic 'targeted' agents for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

Palliative treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have rapidly increased in the past years, but 50 - 70% of mCRC patients are still unlikely to undergo radical resection of metastases and are candidates for palliative therapy only.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Oxaliplatin and irinotecan have widened the chemotherapy alternatives available in this setting and effective targeted agents against vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor have further improved treatment efficacy. This review covers the main areas of debate in the optimal treatment of unresectable mCRC patients, focusing on the implications for everyday clinical practice and future research of the most relevant clinical trials and molecular investigations published from 1999 to 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Insights into treatment individualization strategies are provided in the review.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

'One size fits all' can not longer be considered an adequate approach to unresectable mCRC, and treatment with both chemotherapy and biologic agents should be guided by prognostic and predictive factors in order to maximize the benefit while reducing futile toxicities.

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a dose-finding study and pharmacogenomic analysis

Background:

A dose-finding study was performed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of escalating the doses of capecitabine and fixed doses of irinotecan and oxaliplatin on a biweekly schedule for metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC). A pharmacogenomic analysis was performed to investigate the association between SNPs and treatment outcome.

Methods:

Eighty-seven chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients were recruited through a two-step study design; 27 were included in the dose-finding study and 60 in the pharmacogenomic analysis. Oxaliplatin (85 mg m^-2) and CPT-11 (150 mg m^-2), both on day 1, and capecitabine doses ranging from 850 to 1500 mg m^-2 bid on days 1–7 were explored. Peripheral blood samples were used to genotype 13 SNPs in 10 genes related to drug metabolism or efficacy. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis was performed to examine associations between SNPs, ORR and PFS.

Results:

The capecitabine RD was 1000 mg m⁻² bid. Diarrhoea and neutropenia were the DLTs. After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, the median PFS and OS were 12 (95% CI; 10.6–13.4) and 27 months (95% CI; 17.2–36.8), respectively.

The GSTP1-G genotype, the Köhne low-risk category and use of a consolidation approach strongly correlated with decreased risk of progression. Patients with all favourable variables showed a median PFS of 42 months vs 3.4 months in the group with all adverse factors. A superior clinical response was obtained in patients with one GSTP1-G allele as compared with GSTP1-AA carriers (P=0.004).

Conclusion:

First-line therapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine is efficient and well-tolerated. The GSTP1 polymorphism A>G status was significantly associated with ORR and PFS in mCRC treated with this triplet therapy.

A dose escalation study of docetaxel plus capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES

Capecitabine (CAP), Oxaliplatin (OX) and Docetaxel (DOC) have shown considerable activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled. The patient's median age was 68 years, 15 were male, and 12 were chemo-naïve. DOC was administered on day 1 as an 1-hour (iv) infusion at a standard dose of 50 mg/m(2). OX was administered on day 1 as a 2-hour (iv) infusion at escalating doses ranging from 70-80 mg/m(2). CAP was administered orally on days 1 to 7 at escalating doses ranging from 2,000-2,750 mg/m(2) given as two daily divided doses. Treatment was repeated every two weeks.

RESULTS

Six different dose-levels were examined. At dose-level VI, two of three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient diarrhea and asthenia grade 3 and another grade 3 diarrhea), and thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies is CAP 2,750 mg/m(2) , DOC 50 mg/m(2) and OX 75 mg/m(2). A total of 121 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in six (5%) treatment cycles and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one (1%). There was no febrile episode. Grade 3 asthenia was observed in three (14%) patients, grade 3 diarrhea in four (19%), grade 3 neuropathy in one (5%), and grade 1/2 hand-foot syndrome in three (14%). Other toxicities were uncommon. There was no treatment related death. Four (29%) PRs and seven (50%) SD were observed among 14 evaluable patients. Responses were seen in patients with renal (n = 1), gastric (n = 2) and pancreatic (n = 1) cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that CAP, DOC and OX can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and this regimen merits further evaluation.